Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
"PFAS" redirects here. For other uses, see PFAS (disambiguation).

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS

Teflon or Gore-Tex
.

Only since the start of the 21st century has the environmental impact and toxicity to human and mammalian life been studied in depth. Many PFAS such as

antibody response, reduced infant and fetal growth, and higher rates of kidney cancer.[12]

Health concerns related to PFASs have resulted in numerous litigations (see Timeline of events related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). PFAS producers such as 3M, Chemours, DuPont and Corteva have reached billion dollar agreements to settle claims against them. The use of PFAS is regulated in several parts of the world, with some plans to phase them out entirely from products.

Definition

Skeletal structure of PFOS, an effective, persistent and bioaccumulative fluorosurfactant
Space filling model of PFOS

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances are defined as a group of synthetic

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) expanded its terminology, stating that "PFASs are defined as fluorinated substances that contain at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom (without any H/Cl/Br/I atom attached to it), i.e., with a few noted exceptions, any chemical with at least a perfluorinated methyl group (–CF3) or a perfluorinated methylene group (–CF2–) is a PFAS."[2][15]

According to the OECD, at least 4,730 distinct PFASs that contain at least three perfluorinated carbon atoms are known.[16] The United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) toxicity database, DSSTox, lists 14,735 unique PFAS chemical compounds,[17] while PubChem lists more than 6 million.[3]

Fluorosurfactants

A shiny spherical drop of water on blue cloth
Fluorine-containing durable water repellent makes a fabric water-resistant.

The fluorinated surfactants or fluorosurfactants subgroup has a fluorinated "tail" and a

perfluorocarboxylic acids like perfluorooctanoic acid
(PFOA).

Fluorosurfactants are

surfactants containing fluorocarbon chains such as those in PFASs. Their hydrophobic nature can reduce the surface tension of water below what is attainable by using hydrocarbon surfactants,[18] so fluorosurfactants tend to concentrate at the liquid-air interface.[19] Fluorocarbons are both lipophobic and hydrophobic, which allows them to repel both oil and water. Their lipophobicity results from the relative lack of London dispersion forces when compared to hydrocarbons, a consequence of fluorine's large electronegativity and small bond length, which reduce the polarizability of the surfactants' fluorinated molecular surface. Fluorosurfactants are more stable and fit for harsher conditions than hydrocarbon surfactants because of the stability of the carbon–fluorine bond. Perfluorinated surfactants persist in the environment for the same reason.[6]

Economic role

PFASs play a key economic role for companies such as DuPont, 3M, and W. L. Gore & Associates because they are used in emulsion polymerization to produce fluoropolymers. They have two main markets: a $1 billion annual market for use in stain repellents, and a $100 million annual market for use in polishes, paints, and coatings.[20] In 2022, 3M announced that it would end PFAS production by 2025.[21][22] Over the past two decades, production of certain PFASs has increasingly moved to Asia, where there is less regulatory scrutiny.[23]

Health and environmental effects

Part of a series on
Pollution
Air pollution from a factory
Air
Biological
Digital
Electromagnetic
Natural
Noise
Radiation
Soil
Solid waste
Space
Thermal
Visual
War
Water
Topics
Misc
Lists
Categories

On their introduction in the 1940s, PFASs were considered inert.[24][25] Early occupational studies revealed elevated levels of fluorochemicals, including perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA, C8), in the blood of exposed industrial workers, but cited no ill health effects.[26][27] These results were consistent with the measured serum concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in 3M plant workers ranging from 0.04 to 10.06 ppm and 0.01 to 12.70 ppm, respectively, well below toxic and carcinogenic levels cited in animal studies.[27] Given, however, the "forever chemical" property of PFASs (serum elimination half-life of 4–5 years) and widespread environmental contamination, molecules have been shown to accumulate in humans to such a degree that adverse health outcomes have resulted.[24]

Effects of exposure to PFASs on human health[28][29][30]

Hormone-disrupting chemicals, including PFASs, are linked with rapid declines in human fertility.[31] In a meta-analysis for associations between PFASs and human clinical biomarkers for liver injury, authors considered both PFAS effects on liver biomarkers and histological data from rodent experimental studies and concluded that evidence exists showing that PFOA, perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) are hepatotoxic to humans.[32]

Many comprehensive epidemiological studies linking adverse human health effects to PFASs, particularly PFOA, come from the C8 Science Panel.

preeclampsia.[35][36][37][38][39]

Pregnancy

Exposure to PFAS is a risk factor for various hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, including

high blood pressure. It is not clear whether PFAS exposure is associated with wider cardiovascular disorders during pregnancy.[40] Human breast milk has the capability to harbor PFASs as well as be transferred from mother to infant through breastfeeding.[41]

Cancer

As of November 2023, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified PFOA as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) based on “sufficient” evidence for cancer in animals and “strong” mechanistic evidence in exposed humans. IARC also classified PFOS as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2b) based on “strong” mechanistic evidence.[11] There is a lack of high-quality epidemiological data on the associations between many specific PFAS chemicals and specific cancer types, and research is ongoing.[42]

Prevalence in rainwater

In 2022, it was found that levels of at least four perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in

planetary boundary for chemical pollution being exceeded".[43] There are some moves to restrict and replace their use.[44]

Estimated contemporary costs

Chemical corporations that produce PFAS generate approximately US$4 billion in annual profits from the production of this chemical, but it is estimated that they impose much larger costs on taxpayers and the health of the planet's population (i.e. as

NGO that works with industry and policymakers to limit the use of toxic chemicals.[46]

Costs by region

In a report by the Nordic Council of Ministers, the total annual health-related costs associated with human exposure to PFASs were estimated to be at least €52–84 billion in the European Economic Area (EEA) countries.[47] Aggregated annual costs covering environmental screening, monitoring where contamination is found, water treatment, soil remediation and health assessment total €821 million – 170 billion in the EEA plus Switzerland.[47]

In the United States, estimated PFAS-attributable disease costs amount to 6–62 billion US$.[48] Studies have estimated the annual healthcare costs in the United States of each of some of the major diseases attributed to PFAS.[49]

Proposed mechanisms of PFAS-related adverse health outcomes

Hypercholesterolemia

A response is observed in humans where elevated PFOS levels were significantly associated with elevated total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, highlighting significantly reduced PPAR expression and alluding to PPAR independent pathways predominating over lipid metabolism in humans compared to rodents.[50]

Ulcerative colitis

PFOA and PFOS have been shown to significantly alter immune and inflammatory responses in human and animal species. In particular,

sulfate-reducing bacteria to flourish. Elevated levels of hydrogen sulfide result, which reduce beta-oxidation and nutrient production, leading to a breakdown of the colonic epithelial barrier.[52]

Thyroid disease

Hypothyroidism is the most common thyroid abnormality associated with PFAS exposure.[53] PFASs have been shown to decrease thyroid peroxidase, resulting in decreased production and activation of thyroid hormones in vivo.[54] Other proposed mechanisms include alterations in thyroid hormone signaling, metabolism and excretion as well as function of nuclear hormone receptor.[53]

Washington Post 2018 op-ed

Fluorosurfactants such as PFOS, PFOA, and PFNA have caught the attention of regulatory agencies because of their persistence, toxicity, and widespread occurrence in the blood of general populations

Washington Post.[59] The nickname was derived by combining the two dominant attributes of this class of chemicals: PFAS chemicals are characterized by a carbon-fluorine backbone (the "F-C" in "forever chemicals"), and the carbon-fluorine bond is one of the strongest bonds in organic chemistry, which gives these chemicals an extremely long environmental half-life. The term forever chemicals is commonly used in media outlets in addition to the more technical name of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances.[60][61][62] Their production has been regulated or phased out by manufacturers, such as 3M, DuPont, Daikin, and Miteni in the U.S., Japan, and Europe. In 2006 3M replaced PFOS and PFOA with short-chain PFASs,[20] such as perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS). Shorter fluorosurfactants may be less prone to accumulating in mammals;[20] there is still some concern that they may be harmful to both humans[63][64][65] and the environment,[66] though the EPA states, "...research is still ongoing to determine how different levels of exposure to different PFAS can lead to a variety of health effects."[67] Many PFASs are either not covered by European legislation or are excluded from registration obligations under the EU REACH chemical regulation.[68] Several PFASs have been detected in drinking water,[69] municipal wastewater,[70] and landfill leachates[71]
worldwide.

It had been thought that PFAAs would eventually end up in the oceans, where they would be diluted over decades, but a field study published in 2021 by researchers at Stockholm University found that they are significantly transferred from water to air when waves break on land, and are a significant source of air pollution, and eventually get into the rain. The researchers concluded that pollution "may impact large areas of inland Europe and other continents, in addition to coastal areas".[72][73]

Bioaccumulation and biomagnification

Bioaccumulation of PFAS: PFASs from sediments and water can accumulate in marine organisms. Animals higher up the food chain accumulate more PFAS because they absorb PFAS in prey they consume.
In marine species of the food web

Bioaccumulation controls internal concentrations of pollutants, including PFAS, in individual organisms. When bioaccumulation is looked at in the perspective of the entire food web, it is called biomagnification, which is incredibly important to track because lower concentrations of pollutants in environmental matrices such as seawater or sediments, can very quickly grow to harmful concentrations in organisms at higher trophic levels, including humans. Notably, concentrations in biota can even by >5000 times those present in water for PFOS and C10-C14

PFCAs.[74] PFAS can enter an organism by ingestion of sediment, through the water, or directly via their diet. It accumulates namely in areas with high protein content, in the blood and liver, but its also found to a lesser extent in tissues.[75]

Biomagnification can be described using the estimation of the trophic magnification factor (TMF), this describes the relationship between the contamination levels in a species and their trophic level in the food web. TMFs are determined by graphing the log transformed concentrations of PFAS against the assigned trophic level, and taking the antilog of the regression slope (10slope).[6]

In a study done on a macrotidal estuary in Gironde, SW France, TMFs were >1 for nearly all 19 PFAS compounds considered in the study and were particularly high for PFOA and PFNA (6.0 and 3.1 respectively).[6] A TMF> 1 means that accumulation in the organism is greater than that of the medium, in this case the medium being sea water.

PFOS, a long chain sulfonic acid, was found at the highest concentrations relative to other PFASs measured in fish and birds in Northern seas such as the Barents Sea and the Canadian Arctic.[76] A study and an interactive map by the EWG using its results showed freshwater fish in the U.S.[globalize] ubiquitously contain high levels of harmful PFAS, with a single serving typically significantly increasing the blood PFOS level.[77][78]

Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of PFASs in marine species throughout the food web, particularly frequently consumed fish and shellfish, can have important impacts on human populations.[79] PFASs have been frequently documented in both fish and shellfish that are commonly consumed by human populations,[80] which poses health risks to humans and studies on the bioaccumulation in certain species are important to determine daily tolerable limits for human consumption, and where those limits may be exceeded causing potential health risks.[81] This has particular implications for populations that consume larger numbers of wild fish and shellfish species.[80] In addition to health risks, populations may be impacted by advisories, limits of fishing closures for certain species that are put in place to help mitigate health risks from potential consumption of species with higher levels of accumulated PFASs, but result in a loss of food sources and important subsistence species depended on by local communities. There is research being done in this area, including into spatial patterns of PFAS bioaccumulation in fish and crustaceans.[82]

Corporate and federal government suppression of information

Since the 1970s, forty years before the public health community, DuPont and 3M were aware that PFAS was “highly toxic when inhaled and moderately toxic when ingested.”[83] Producers used several strategies to influence science and regulation – most notably, suppressing unfavorable research and distorting public discourse.[83]

In 2018

EPA pressured the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry to suppress a study that showed PFASs to be even more dangerous than previously thought.[84][85]

Concerns, litigation and regulations in specific countries and regions

Australia

In 2017, the ABC's current affairs program Four Corners reported that the storage and use of firefighting foams containing perfluorinated surfactants at Australian Defence Force facilities around Australia had contaminated nearby water resources.[86] In 2019, remediation efforts at RAAF Base Tindal and the adjacent town of Katherine were ongoing.[87] In the 2022 Australian federal budget $428 million was allocated for works at HMAS Albatross, RAAF Base Amberley, RAAF Base Pearce and RAAF Base Richmond including funding to remediate PFAS contamination.[88]

Canada

Although PFASs are not manufactured in Canada, they may be present in imported goods and products. In 2008, Canada prohibited the import, sale, or use of PFOS or PFOS-containing products, with some exceptions for products used in firefighting, the military, and some forms of ink and photo media.[89]

Health Canada has published drinking water guidelines for maximum concentrations of PFOS and PFOA to protect the health of Canadians, including children, over a lifetime's exposure to these substances. The maximum allowable concentration for PFOS under the guidelines is 0.0002 milligrams per litre. The maximum allowable concentration for PFOA is 0.0006 milligrams per litre.[90]

New Zealand

The New Zealand Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has banned the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in cosmetic products starting from 31 December 2026. This will make the country one of the first in the world to take this step on PFAS to protect people and the environment.[91]

United Kingdom

The environmental consequences of PFAS, especially from firefighting activities, has been recognized since the mid-1990s and came to prominence after the

Buncefield explosion on 11 December 2005. In recent years the Environment Agency has undertaken a series of projects to understand the scale and nature of PFAS in the environment. The Drinking Water Inspectorate requires water companies to report concentrations of 47 PFAS.[92]

European Union

In 2019, the

Plant Protection Products Regulation
, Medicinal Products Regulation) that have an explicit authorization procedure that focuses on risk for health and the environment.

The proposal was submitted on 13 January 2023 and published by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) on 7 February. From 22 March to 21 September, citizens, companies and other organizations can comment on the proposal during a public consultation.[95] Based on the information in the restriction proposal and the consultation, two committees from ECHA formulate an opinion on the risk and socio-economic aspects of the proposed restriction. Within a year of publication, the opinions are sent to the European Commission, which makes a final proposal that is submitted to the EU Member States for discussion and decision.[96] Eighteen months after the publication of the restriction decision (which may differ from the original proposal), it will enter the ban.[95]

Italy

Over 350,000 residents in the

European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) has reduced by more than four times the maximum tolerable limit of PSAS that can be taken through the diet, the region has not carried out new assessments or implemented concrete actions to protect the population and the agri-food and livestock sectors. Some limits were added to monitoring the geographical area, which does not include the orange zone and other areas affected by contamination, as well as the insufficiency of analysis on important productions widespread in the areas concerned: eggs (up to 37,100 ng/kg), fish (18,600 ng/kg) spinach and radicchio (only one sampling carried out), kiwis, melons, watermelons, cereals (only one sample was analyzed), soy, wines and apples.[97]

Sweden

Highly contaminated drinking water has been detected at several locations in Sweden. Such locations include Arvidsjaur, Lulnäset, Uppsala and Visby.[98][99] In 2013, PFAS were detected at high concentrations in one of the two municipality drinking water treatment plants in the town of Ronneby, in southern Sweden. Concentrations of PFHxS and PFOS were found at 1700 ng/L and 8000 ng/L, respectively.[100] The source of contamination was later found to be a military fire-fighting exercise site in which PFAS containing fire-fighting foam had been used since the mid-1980s.[101]

Additionally, low-level contaminated drinking water has also been shown to be a significant exposure source of PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS and PFOS for Swedish adolescents (ages 10–21). Even though the median concentrations in the municipality drinking water were below <1 ng individual PFAS/L, positive associations were found between adolescent serum PFAS concentrations and PFAS concentrations in drinking water.[102]

United States

An estimated 26,000 U.S. sites are contaminated with PFASs. At least six million Americans are estimated to have drinking water containing PFASs above the safe limit published prior to 2022 by the

PFOS levels) exceeds the 1 ppt (part per trillion) limit set in 2022 by the EPA.[105]

Between 2016 and 2021 the

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) tested tap water from 716 locations across the United States, and reported in 2023 that the PFAS levels exceeded the EPA advisories in approximately 75% of the samples from urban areas and in approximately 25% of the rural area samples.[106]

Industry

Certain PFASs are no longer manufactured in the United States as a result of phase-outs including the PFOA Stewardship Program (2010-2015), in which eight major chemical manufacturers agreed to eliminate the use of PFOA and PFOA-related chemicals in their products and emissions from their facilities.[107] Although PFOA and PFOS are no longer manufactured in the United States, they are still produced internationally and are imported into the U.S. in consumer goods such as carpet, leather and apparel, textiles, paper and packaging, coatings, rubber, and plastics.[108]

In 2020, manufacturers and the Food and Drug Administration announced an agreement to phase out some types of PFAS that are used in food packaging by 2024.[109]

PFASs are also used by major companies of the

tear ducts, and such products on lips are often unwittingly ingested. Manufacturers often fail to label their products as containing PFASs, which makes it difficult for cosmetics consumers to avoid products containing PFASs.[112] In response, Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut proposed the No PFAS in Cosmetics Act in the United States Senate.[113] It was also introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Michigan Representative Debbie Dingell,[114] but the U.S. chemical industry lobby has killed efforts to regulate this.[115]

Military bases

The water in and around at least 126 U.S. military bases has been contaminated by high levels of PFASs because of their use of firefighting foams since the 1970s, according to a study by the

U.S. Department of Defense. Of these, 90 bases reported PFAS contamination that had spread to drinking water or groundwater off the base.[116][117] A 2022 Pentagon report acknowledged that approximately 175,000 U.S. military personnel at two dozen American military facilities drank water contaminated by PFAS that exceeded the U.S. EPA limit. However, according to an analysis of the Pentagon report by the non-partisan Environmental Working Group, the Pentagon report downplayed the number of people exposed to PFAS, which was much higher, probably in excess of 640,000 at 116 military facilities, than the number advanced by the Pentagon report. The EWG found that the Pentagon also omitted from its report some types of diseases that are likely to be caused by PFAS exposure, such as testicular cancer, kidney disease, and fetal abnormalities.[118]

Environmental Protection Agency actions

EPA published non-enforceable drinking water health advisories for PFOA and PFOS in 2016.[119][120] In March 2021 EPA announced that it would develop national drinking water standards for PFOA and PFOS.[121] On December 27, 2021, EPA published a regulation requiring drinking water utilities to conduct monitoring for 29 compounds. The data are to be collected during 2023 to 2025. EPA will pay for the monitoring costs for small drinking water systems (those serving a population of 10,000 or fewer). The agency may use the monitoring data to develop additional regulations.[122][123]

In mid-2021 EPA announced plans to revise federal wastewater regulations (effluent guidelines) for several industries that manufacture PFASs or use PFASs in fabricating various products.[124][125]

In October 2021 EPA announced the PFAS Strategic Roadmap. It is a "whole-of-EPA" strategy and considers the full lifecycle of PFAS—including drinking water monitoring and risk assessment for PFOA and PFOS in biosolids (processed wastewater sludge used as fertilizer).[126][127]

The EPA issued health advisories for four specific PFASs in June 2022, significantly lowering their safe threshold levels for drinking water. PFOA was reduced from 70 ppt to 0.004 ppt, while PFOS was reduced from 70 ppt to 0.02 ppt.

PFBS were set to 2000 ppt. While not enforceable, these health advisories are intended to be acted on by states in setting their own drinking water standards.[128]

A formal EPA rule to add PFOA and PFAS as hazardous chemicals was first issued for comment in August 2022, which would require anyone discharging waste to monitor and restrict the release of these PFAS to set levels, and report when the wastewater exceeds it. It would also make grounds affected by high levels of PFIA or PFAS to be considered Superfund cleanup sites.[129] The EPA formally established rules for establishing these two chemicals as hazardous chemicals in April 2024.[130]

EPA has listed recommended steps that consumers may take to reduce possible exposure to PFAS chemicals.[131]

USGS map showing the number of PFAS detections in tap water samples from select sites across the US.

On 14 March 2023, EPA announced the proposed National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR). This proposal includes new maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) in drinking water for six well-known PFAS: PFOA, PFOS, GenX, PFBS, PFNA, and PFHxS. While the proposal does not require any actions until its finalization, the EPA believes it will be implemented by late 2023. If these new restrictions are put into place, the EPA expects that they will prevent thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of PFAS-attributable illnesses. Along with legally enforceable MCLs, the EPA proposal will also require public water systems to actively monitor for the 6 PFAS, notify the public about the level of PFAS in the water supply, and take measures to reduce the level of PFAS in drinking water if they exceed the MCLs.[132] In April 2024, the EPA issued its final ruling, requireing that within 3 years, these six PFAS must be removed to near-zero levels in drinking water supplies. States would be given up to $1 billion in aid to help with the initial testing and treatment of water for this purpose.[133]

The EPA has stated that while some companies have reached certain conclusions related to PFASs, the EPA research is still ongoing and as of 2023, remains inconclusive as it relates to the certainty of detrimental effects on humans, according to the EPA:

Current scientific research suggests that exposure to certain PFAS may lead to adverse health outcomes. However, research is still ongoing to determine how different levels of exposure to different PFAS can lead to a variety of health effects. Research is also underway to better understand the health effects associated with low levels of exposure to PFAS over long periods of time, especially in children.[67]

Legal actions

In February 2017, DuPont and Chemours (a DuPont spin-off) agreed to pay $671 million to settle lawsuits arising from 3,550 personal injury claims related to releasing of PFASs from their Parkersburg, West Virginia, plant into the drinking water of several thousand residents.[134] This was after a court-created independent scientific panel—the C8 Science Panel—found a "probable link" between C8 exposure and six illnesses: kidney and testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, pregnancy-induced hypertension and high cholesterol.[33][135]

In October 2018, a

class action suit was filed by an Ohio firefighter against several producers of fluorosurfactants, including the 3M and DuPont corporations, on behalf of all U.S. residents who may have adverse health effects from exposure to PFASs.[136] The story is told in the film Dark Waters.[137]

In 2023, the American multinational 3M reached a US$10.3 billion settlement with a host of US public water systems to resolve water pollution claims tied to PFAS.[138] Three other major chemicals companies – Chemours, DuPont and Corteva – have reached an agreement in principle for US$1.19 bn to settle claims they contaminated US public water systems with PFAS.[138]

In December, 2023, as part of a four-year legal battle,[139] the EPA banned Inhance—a Houston, Texas-based manufacturer that produces an estimated 200m containers annually with a process that creates, among other chemicals, PFOA—from using the manufacturing process.[140] In March, 2024, the Fifth Circuit federal appeals court overturned the ban. While the court did not deny the containers’ health risks, it said that the EPA could not regulate the manufactured containers under the statute it used.

State actions

In 2021, Maine became the first U.S. state to ban these compounds in all products by 2030, except for instances deemed "currently unavoidable".[141][142]

As of October 2020, the states of California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, and Wisconsin had enforceable drinking water standards for between two and six types of PFAS. The six chemicals (termed by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection as PFAS6) are measured either individually or summed as a group depending on the standard; they are:[143]

California

In 2021 California banned PFASs for use in food packaging and from infant and children's products and also required PFAS cookware in the state to carry a warning label.[144]

Maine

A program licensed and promoted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection that provided free municipal wastewater sludge (biosolids) to farmers as fertilizer has resulted in PFAS contamination of local drinking water and farm-grown produce.[145][146]

Michigan

The Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART) was launched in 2017 and is the first multi-agency action team of its kind in the nation. Agencies representing health, environment, and other branches of state government have joined together to investigate sources and locations of PFAS contamination in the state, take action to protect people's drinking water, and keep the public informed.[147]

Groundwater is tested at locations throughout the state by various parties to ensure safety, compliance with regulations, and proactively detect and remedy potential problems. In 2010, the

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) discovered levels of PFASs in groundwater monitoring wells at the former Wurtsmith Air Force Base. As additional information became available from other national testing, Michigan expanded its investigations into other locations where PFAS compounds were potentially used.[147]

In 2018, the MDEQ's Remediation and Redevelopment Division (RRD) established cleanup criteria for groundwater used as drinking water of 70 ppt of PFOA and PFOS, individually or combined. The RRD staff are responsible for implementing these criteria as part of their ongoing efforts to clean up sites of environmental contamination. The RRD staff are the lead investigators at most of the PFAS sites on the MPART website and also conduct interim response activities, such as coordinating bottled water or filter installations with local health departments at sites under investigation or with known PFAS concerns. Most of the groundwater sampling at PFAS sites under RRD's lead is conducted by contractors familiar with PFAS sampling techniques. The RRD also has a Geologic Services Unit, with staff who install monitoring wells and are also well versed with PFAS sampling techniques.[147]

The MDEQ has been conducting environmental clean-up of regulated contaminants for decades. Due to the evolving nature of PFAS regulations as new science becomes available, the RRD is evaluating the need for regular PFAS sampling at Superfund sites and is including an evaluation of PFAS sampling needs as part of a Baseline Environmental Assessment review.[147]

Earlier in 2018, the RRD purchased lab equipment that will allow the MDEQ Environmental Lab to conduct analyses of certain PFAS samples. (Currently, most samples are shipped to one of the few labs in the country that conduct PFAS analysis, in California, although private labs in other parts of the country, including Michigan, are starting to offer these services.) As of August 2018, RRD has hired additional staff to work on developing the methodology and conducting PFAS analyses.[147]

In 2020 Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filed a lawsuit against 17 companies, including 3M, Chemours, and DuPont, for hiding known health and environmental risks from the state and its residents. Nessel's complaint identifies 37 sites with known contamination.[148] The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy introduced some of the strictest drinking water standards in the country for PFAS, setting maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for PFOA and PFOS to 8 and 16 ppt respectively (down from previous existing groundwater cleanup standards of 70 ppt for both), and introducing MCLs for 5 other previously unregulated PFAS compounds, limiting PFNA to 6 ppt, PFHxA to 400,000 ppt, PFHxS to 51 ppt, PFBS to 420 ppt and HFPO-DA to 370 ppt.[149] The change adds 38 additional sites to the state's list of known PFAS contaminated areas, bringing the total number of known sites to 137. About half of these sites are landfills and 13 are former plating facilities.[150]

In 2022 PFOS was found in beef produced at a Michigan farm: the cattle had been fed crops fertilized with contaminated biosolids. State agencies issued a consumption advisory, but did not order a recall, because there currently is no PFOS contamination in beef government standards.[151]

Minnesota

In February 2018, 3M settled a lawsuit for $850 million related to contaminated drinking water in Minnesota.[152]

New Jersey

In 2018 the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) published a drinking water standard for PFNA. Public water systems in New Jersey are required to meet an MCL standard of 13 ppt.[153][154] In 2020 the state set a PFOA standard at 14 ppt and a PFOS standard at 13 ppt.[155]

In 2019 NJDEP filed lawsuits against the owners of two plants that had manufactured PFASs, and two plants that were cited for water pollution from other chemicals. The companies cited are DuPont, Chemours and 3M.[156] NJDEP also declared five companies to be financially responsible for statewide remediation of the chemicals. Among the companies accused were Arkema and Solvay regarding a West Deptford Facility in Gloucester County, where Arkema manufactured PFASs, but Solvay claims to have never manufactured but only handled PFASs.[157] The companies denied liability and contested the directive.[158] In June 2020, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection published a paper reporting that a unique family of PFAS used by Solvay, chloroperfluoropolyether carboxylates (ClPFPECAs), were contaminating the soils of New Jersey as far from the Solvay facility as 150 km.[159] and the ClPFPECAs were found in water as well.[160]

Later in 2020, the New Jersey state attorney general filed suit in the New Jersey Superior Court against Solvay regarding PFAS contamination of the state's environment.[161] In May 2021, Solvay issued a press release that the company is "discontinuing the use of fluorosurfactants in the U.S.".[162]

New York

In 2016, New York, along with Vermont and New Hampshire, acknowledged PFOA contamination by requesting the EPA to release water quality guidance measures. Contamination has been observed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in Hoosick Falls, Newburgh, Petersburgh, Poestenkill, Mahopac, and Armonk.[163]

The village of Hoosick Falls has received a $65.25 million dollar settlement from Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, Honeywell, 3M, and DuPont companies through a class action lawsuit in 2021, due to the disposal of PFAS chemicals into the groundwater of the local water treatment plant.[164]

Washington

Five military installations in Washington State have been identified by the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works as having PFAS contamination. Toward environmental and consumer protections, the Washington State Department of Ecology published a Chemical Action Plan in November 2021, and in June 2022 the governor tasked the Washington State Department of Ecology with phasing out manufacture and import of products containing PFASs. Initial steps taken by the Washington State Department of Health to protect the public from exposure through drinking water have included setting State Action Levels for five PFASs (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, and PFBS), which were implemented in November 2021.[165][166][167]

United Nations

PFOS, its salts and

Stockholm Convention.[168] The long-chain (C9–C21) PFCAs are currently under review for listing.[169]

Occupational exposure

Occupational exposure to PFASs occurs in numerous industries due to the widespread use of the chemicals in products and as an element of industrial process streams.[170] PFASs are used in more than 200 different ways in industries as diverse as electronics and equipment manufacturing, plastic and rubber production, food and textile production, and building and construction.[171] Occupational exposure to PFASs can occur at fluorochemical facilities that produce them and other manufacturing facilities that use them for industrial processing like the chrome plating industry.[170] Workers who handle PFAS-containing products can also be exposed during their work, such as people who install PFAS-containing carpets and leather furniture with PFAS coatings, professional ski-waxers using PFAS-based waxes, and fire-fighters using PFAS-containing foam and wear flame-resistant protective gear made with PFASs.[170][172][173]

Exposure pathways

People who are exposed to PFASs through their jobs typically have higher levels of PFASs in their blood than the general population.[170][174][175] While the general population is exposed to PFASs through ingested food and water, occupational exposure includes accidental ingestion, inhalation exposure, and skin contact in settings where PFAS become volatile.[176][13] The severity of PFAS-associated health effects can vary based on the length of exposure, level of exposure, and health status.[170]

Professional ski wax technicians

Compared to the general public exposed to contaminated drinking water, professional ski wax technicians are more strongly exposed to PFASs (PFOA, PFNA, PFDA, PFHpA, PFDoDA) from the glide wax used to coat the bottom of skis to reduce the friction between the skis and snow.[177] During the coating process, the wax is heated, which releases fumes and airborne particles.[177] Compared to all other reported occupational and residential exposures, ski waxing had the highest total PFAS air concentrations.[178]

Manufacturing workers

People who work at fluorochemical production plants and in manufacturing industries that use PFASs in the industrial process can be exposed to PFASs in the workplace. Much of what we know about PFASs exposure and health effects began with medical surveillance studies of workers exposed to PFASs at fluorochemical production facilities. These studies began in the 1940s and were conducted primarily at U.S. and European manufacturing sites. Between the 1940s and 2000s, thousands of workers exposed to PFASs participated in research studies that advanced scientific understanding of exposure pathways,

toxicokinetic properties, and adverse health effects associated with exposure.[26][179][180]

The first research study to report elevated organic fluorine levels in the blood of fluorochemical workers was published in 1980.[26] It established inhalation as a potential route of occupational PFAS exposure by reporting measurable levels of organic fluorine in air samples at the facility.[26] Workers at fluorochemical production facilities have higher levels of PFOA and PFOS in their blood than the general population. Serum PFOA levels in fluorochemical workers are generally below 20,000 ng/mL but have been reported as high as 100,000 ng/mL, whereas the mean PFOA concentration among non-occupationally exposed cohorts in the same time frame was 4.9 ng/mL.[181][27] Among fluorochemical workers, those with direct contact with PFASs have higher PFAS concentrations in their blood than those with intermittent contact or no direct PFAS contact.[179][181] Blood PFAS levels have been shown to decline when direct contact ceases.[181][182] PFOA and PFOS levels have declined in U.S. and European fluorochemical workers due to improved facilities, increased usage of personal protective equipment, and the discontinuation of these chemicals from production.[179][183] Occupational exposure to PFASs in manufacturing continues to be an active area of study in China with numerous investigations linking worker exposure to various PFASs.[184][185][186]

Firefighters

Firefighters using aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)

PFASs are commonly used in Class B firefighting foams due to their hydrophobic and lipophobic properties, as well as the stability of the chemicals when exposed to high heat.[187]

Research into occupational exposure for firefighters is emergent, though frequently limited by underpowered study designs. A 2011 cross-sectional analysis of the C8 Health Studies found higher levels of PFHxS in firefighters compared to the sample group of the region, with other PFASs at elevated levels, without reaching statistical significance.

test of significance was not conducted. A 2015 cross-sectional study conducted in Australia found that PFOS and PFHxS accumulation was positively associated with years of occupational AFFF exposure through firefighting.[174]

Due to their use in training and testing, recent studies indicate occupational risk for military members and firefighters, as higher levels of PFASs in exposure were indicated in military members and firefighters when compared to the general population.[189] PFAS exposure is prevalent among firefighters not only due to its use in emergencies, but also because it is used in personal protective equipment. In support of these findings, states like Washington and Colorado have moved to restrict and penalize the use of Class B firefighting foam for firefighter training and testing.[190][191]

Exposure after World Trade Center terrorist attacks

The 11 September 2001 collapse of the World Trade Center buildings in New York City resulted in the release of chemicals from the destruction of construction and electrical material and long-term chemical fires. This collapse caused the release of several toxic chemicals, including fluorinated surfactants used as soil- and stain-resistant coatings on various materials.[192] First responders to this incident were exposed to PFOA, PFNA, and PFHxS through inhalation of dust and smoke released during and after the collapse of the World Trade Center.[192]

Fire responders who were working at or near ground zero were assessed for respiratory and other health effects from exposure to emissions at the World Trade Center. Early clinical testing showed a high prevalence of respiratory health effects. Early symptoms of exposure often presented with persistent coughing and wheezing. PFOA and PFHxS levels were present in both smoke and dust exposure, but first responders exposed to smoke had higher concentrations of PFOA and PFHxS than those exposed to dust.[192]

Mitigation measures

Several strategies have been proposed as a way to protect those who are at greatest risk of occupational exposure to PFAS, including exposure monitoring, regular blood testing, and the use of PFAS-free alternatives. For example, fluorine-free firefighting foam and plant-based ski wax contain no PFAS and greatly reduce the occupational hazards associated with certain professions.[193]

Remediation

Main article: Remediation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances

Water treatment

Several technologies are currently available for remediating PFASs in liquids. These technologies can be applied to drinking water supplies, groundwater, industrial wastewater, surface water, and other applications such as landfill leachate. Influent concentrations of PFASs can vary by orders of magnitude for specific media or applications. These influent values, along with other general water quality parameters (for example, pH) can influence the performance and operating costs of the treatment technologies. The technologies are:

Private and public sector applications of one or more of these methodologies above are being applied to remediation sites throughout the United States and other international locations.[197] Most solutions involve on-site treatment systems, while others are leveraging off-site infrastructure and facilities, such as a centralized waste treatment facility, to treat and dispose of the PFAS pool of compounds.

The US based Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC)[198] has undertaken extensive evaluation of ex situ and in situ treatment technologies for PFAS impacted liquid matrices. These technologies are divided into field implemented technologies, limited application technologies and developing technologies and typically fit into one of three technology types:

  • Separation,
  • Concentration, and
  • Destruction

The type of PFAS remediation technology selected is often a reflection of the PFAS contamination levels and the PFAS signature (i.e. the combination of short and long chain PFAS substances present) in conjunction with the site specific water chemistry and cross contaminants present in the liquid stream. More complex waters such as landfill leachates and WWTP waters require more robust treatment solutions which are less vulnerable to blockage.

Stripping and Enrichment

Foam Fractionation utilises the air/water interface of a rising air bubble to collect and harvest PFAS molecules. The hydrophobic tail of many long chain criteria PFAS compounds adhere to this interface and rise to the water surface with the air bubble where they present as a foam for harvesting and further concentration. The foam fractionation technique is a derivation of traditional absorptive bubble separation techniques used by industries for decades to extract amphiphilic contaminants. The absence of a solid absorptive surface reduces consumables and waste byproducts and produces a liquid hyper-concentrate which can be fed into one of the various PFAS destruction technologies. Across various full scale trials and field applications, this technique provides a simplistic and low operational cost alternative for complex PFAS impacted waters.[199]

Destruction

Most recently, a 2022 study published in the Journal of Environmental Engineering found that a heat-and pressure-based technique known as supercritical water oxidation destroyed 99% of the PFASs present in a water sample. During this process, oxidizing substances are added to PFAS-contaminated water and then the liquid is heated above its critical temperature of 374 degrees Celsius at a pressure of more than 220 bars. The water becomes supercritical, and, in this state, water-repellent substances such as PFASs dissolve much more readily.[196]

Theoretical and early-stage solutions

A possible solution for PFAS-contaminated wastewater treatment has been developed by the Michigan State University-Fraunhofer team. Boron-doped diamond electrodes are used for the electrochemical oxidation system where it is capable of breaking PFAS molecular bonds which essentially eliminates the contaminates, leaving fresh water.[200] Cory Rusinek, an electrochemist at MSU-Fraunhofer stated:

"EO, or electrochemical oxidation, is a simple, clean, and effective method for destruction of PFASs and other co-contaminants as a complementary procedure to other wastewater treatment processes. If we can remove it from wastewater, we can reduce its occurrence in surface waters.[200]

unsaturated bonds are easier to break down: the commercial dechlorination culture KB1 (contains Dehalococcoides) is capable of breaking down such substances, but not saturated PFAS. When alternative, easier-to-digest substrates are present, microbes may prefer them over PFAS.[202]

Chemical treatment

A study published in

metal-organic frameworks (MOFs).[205]

Analytical methods

Analytical methods for specific PFASs in environmental matrices and food and food have generally improved in sensitivity and selectivity in recent years, e.g. to meet lower regulatory limit values. However, sensitive and accurate targeted methods using isotope-labeled internal standards still only cover just over 50 PFASs, mostly PFCAs and PFSAs with perfluorinated alkyl chains of four or more carbon atoms.[206][23] Sum parameter methods, such as total organic fluorine assays (e.g., adsorbable organic fluorine, AOF; extractable organic fluorine, EOF), and the total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay, are increasingly being used across matrices to quantify the proportion of PFASs not captured by typical targeted analyses.[23][207][208]

Sample chemicals

Some common per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances include:[209][210]

Name Abbreviation Structural formula
Molecular weight
(g/mol)
CAS No.
Perfluorobutane sulfonamide H-FBSA C4F9SO2NH2 299.12 30334-69-1
Perfluoropentanesulfonamide PFPSA C5F11SO2NH2 349.12 82765-76-2
Perfluorohexanesulfonamide PFHxSA C6F13SO2NH2 399.13 41997-13-1
Perfluoroheptanesulfonamide PFHpSA C7F15SO2NH2 449.14 82765-77-3
Perfluorooctanesulfonamide PFOSA C8F17SO2NH2 499.14 754-91-6
Perfluorobutanesulfonyl fluoride PFBSF C4F9SO2F 302.09 375-72-4
Perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride PFOSF C8F17SO2F 502.12 307-35-7

Films

See also

References

  1. ^ "Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)". 30 March 2016.
  2. ^ a b OECD (2021). "Reconciling Terminology of the Universe of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Recommendations and Practical Guidance" (PDF). OECD Series on Risk Management. Paris: OECD Publishing. p. 23. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2021.
  3. ^ a b "PubChem Classification Browser – PFAS and Fluorinated Compounds in PubChem Tree". pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. NBCI. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
  4. ^ a b c d e f "Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAS) Factsheet | National Biomonitoring Program | CDC". www.cdc.gov. 3 May 2022. Retrieved 12 April 2024.
  5. PMID 21793199
    .
  6. ^
    PMID 28679050
    .
  7. ^ "Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAS) Factsheet". National Biomonitoring Program. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2 September 2021. Retrieved 10 October 2021.
  8. ^ Elton C (24 February 2023). "'Frightening' scale of Europe's forever chemical pollution revealed". euronews. Retrieved 25 February 2023.
  9. ^ "Emerging chemical risks in Europe — 'PFAS' — European Environment Agency". www.eea.europa.eu. Retrieved 12 April 2024.
  10. ^ a b US EPA, OW (30 March 2016). "PFAS Explained". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 12 April 2024.
  11. ^
    S2CID 265571186
    .
  12. ^ "New Report Calls for Expanded PFAS Testing for People With History of Elevated Exposure, Offers Advice for Clinical Treatment". National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 28 July 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  13. ^
    PMID 21793199
    .
  14. PMID 30235423
    .
  15. S2CID 243861839
    .
  16. ^ Toward a New Comprehensive Global Database of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): Summary Report on Updating the OECD 2007 List of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) (Report). Series on Risk Management No. 39. OECD. Archived from the original on 17 January 2020. Retrieved 9 December 2019.
  17. ^ "PFAS structures in DSSTox (update August 2022)". CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Retrieved 21 October 2022. "List consists of all DTXSID records with a structure assigned, and using a set of substructural filters based on community input."
  18. ^ Salager JL (2002). "Surfactants-Types and Uses" (PDF). FIRP Booklet # 300-A. Universidad de los Andes Laboratory of Formulation, Interfaces Rheology, and Processes. p. 45. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 7 September 2008.
  19. ^ "Fluorosurfactant — Structure / Function". Mason Chemical Company. 2007. Archived from the original on 5 July 2008. Retrieved 1 November 2008.
  20. ^
    PMID 16433328
    .
  21. doi:10.1021/cen-10101-leadcon
    . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
  22. ^ "3M to Exit PFAS Manufacturing by the End of 2025". 3M News Center (Press release). 20 December 2022. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
  23. ^
    ISSN 2328-8930
    .
  24. ^
    S2CID 199655540
    .
  25. ISSN 1609-1914
    .
  26. ^
    PMID 7405826
    .
  27. ^
    S2CID 11648767
    .
  28. ^ "Emerging chemical risks in Europe — 'PFAS'". European Environment Agency. 2019. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020.
  29. ^ "Some Chemicals Used as Solvents and in Polymer Manufacture". IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol. 110. 2016. Archived from the original on 24 March 2020.
  30. PMID 19429407
    .
  31. ^ Swan SH, Colino S (February 2021). Count down: how our modern world is threatening sperm counts, altering male and female reproductive development, and imperiling the future of the human race. New York, USA: Scribner.
    ISBN 978-1-9821-1366-7
    .
  32. PMID 35475652
    .
  33. ^ a b c "C8 Science Panel". www.c8sciencepanel.org. Archived from the original on 18 June 2019. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
  34. PMID 19654917
    .
  35. ^ "Probable Link Evaluation for heart disease (including high blood pressure, high cholesterol, coronary artery disease)" (PDF). C8 Science Panel. 29 October 2012.
  36. ^ "Probable Link Evaluation of Autoimmune Disease" (PDF). C8 Science Panel. 30 July 2012.
  37. ^ "Probable Link Evaluation of Thyroid disease" (PDF). C8 Science Panel. 30 July 2012.
  38. ^ "Probable Link Evaluation of Cancer" (PDF). C8 Science Panel. 15 April 2012.
  39. ^ "Probable Link Evaluation of Pregnancy Induced Hypertension and Preeclampsia" (PDF). C8 Science Panel. 5 December 2011.
  40. PMID 33823190
    .
  41. ^ "PFAS and Breastfeeding | ATSDR". www.atsdr.cdc.gov. 17 January 2024. Retrieved 16 April 2024.
  42. PMID 33385391
    .
  43. PMID 35916421
    .
  44. ^ "Pollution: 'Forever chemicals' in rainwater exceed safe levels". BBC News. 2 August 2022. Retrieved 14 September 2022.
  45. ^ "GDP (current US$)". World Bank Open Data. Retrieved 23 April 2024.
  46. ^ Perkins T (12 May 2023). "Societal cost of 'Forever Chemicals' About $17.5tn Across Global Economy—Report". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 November 2023.
  47. ^ a b "Nordic Council of Ministers (2019). The cost of inaction. A socioeconomic analysis of environmental and health impacts linked to exposure" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2019. Retrieved 1 October 2019.
  48. S2CID 251072281
    .
  49. ^ NYU Langone NewsHub, 26 July 2022, "Daily Exposure to ‘Forever Chemicals’ Costs United States Billions in Health Costs—NYU Langone Researchers Link the Chemicals to Cancer, Thyroid Disease, Childhood Obesity & Other Medical Conditions"
  50. S2CID 96896603
    .
  51. S2CID 35549835
    .
  52. PMID 23735465
    .
  53. ^
    PMID 28443254
    .
  54. PMID 22699773
    .
  55. PMID 18007991
    .
  56. PMID 26922149
    .
  57. PMID 25932614
    .
  58. ^ "Stockholm Convention Clearing". chm.pops.int. Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention. Archived from the original on 10 April 2011. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
  59. ^ "Opinion | These toxic chemicals are everywhere — even in your body. And they won't ever go away". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
  60. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived
    from the original on 8 June 2019. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
  61. ^ Kounang N (3 June 2019). "FDA confirms PFAS chemicals are in the US food supply". CNN. Archived from the original on 8 June 2019. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
  62. ^ "Companies deny responsibility for toxic 'forever chemicals' contamination". The Guardian. 2019. Archived from the original on 11 September 2019.
  63. PMID 25461427
    .
  64. PMID 25932670
    .
  65. S2CID 88276945
    .
  66. S2CID 249995685
    .
  67. ^ a b "Our Current Understanding of the Human Health and Environmental Risks of PFAS". 7 June 2023. Retrieved 21 September 2023.
  68. ^ "The "forever chemicals" that are harming our health: PFAS". Health and Environment Alliance. 4 February 2020. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
  69. S2CID 210167277
    .
  70. PMID 25889547
    .
  71. S2CID 214766390
    .
  72. ^ Perkins T (18 December 2021). "PFAS 'forever chemicals' constantly cycle through ground, air and water, study finds". The Guardian.
  73. PMID 34907779
    .
  74. PMID 28679050
    .
  75. S2CID 58660816
    .
  76. S2CID 12659454
    .
  77. ^ LaMotte S (17 January 2023). "Locally caught fish are full of dangerous chemicals called PFAS, study finds". CNN. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 15 February 2023.
  78. S2CID 255248441
    .
  79. S2CID 211727091
    .
  80. ^
    PMID 30703622
    .
  81. S2CID 232414650
    .
  82. S2CID 47009972
    .
  83. ^
    PMID 37273487
    .
  84. ^ Halpern M (16 May 2018). "Bipartisan Outrage as EPA, White House Try to Cover Up Chemical Health Assessment". Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists. Archived from the original on 5 March 2020. Retrieved 2 May 2020.
  85. ^ Snider A (14 May 2018). "White House, EPA headed off chemical pollution study". Politico. Archived from the original on 16 May 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2020.
  86. ^ "'Shocked and disgusted' Katherine residents demand action on PFAS contamination". ABC News. 10 October 2017. Archived from the original on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 10 October 2017.
  87. ^ McLennan C (5 December 2019). "Tindal's PFAS hot spots record startling results". Katherine Times. Archived from the original on 21 February 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2020.
  88. ^ Curtis K (21 April 2022). "Airbases to get $428 million upgrade as government switches back to national security". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 22 April 2022.
  89. ^ O'Keeffe J. "Keeping Drinking Water Safe: New Guidelines for PFASs in Canada". National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health. Archived from the original on 7 August 2020. Retrieved 22 July 2020.
  90. ^ "Perfluoroalkylated substances in drinking water". canada.ca. Government of Canada. April 2019. Archived from the original on 15 August 2020. Retrieved 22 July 2020.
  91. ^ "EPA bans 'forever chemicals' in cosmetic products". govt.nz. Government of New Zealand. Retrieved 6 February 2024.
  92. ^ Requirements for PFAS monitoring by water companies in England and Wales, DWI Information Letter 05/2021.
  93. ^ "Council Conclusions on Chemicals". European Council.
  94. ^ "PFAS". RIVM.
  95. ^ a b "ECHA publishes PFAS restriction proposal". ECHA. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  96. ^ "Restriction procedure". ECHA. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  97. ^ PFAS negli alimenti dell’area rossa del Veneto, Greenpeace.
  98. PMID 26079316
    .
  99. PMID 36535390
    .
  100. ^ Jakobsson K, Kronholm Diab K, Lindh C, Persson B, Jönsson B (12 June 2014). "Exponering för perfluorerade ämnen (PFAS) i dricksvatten i Ronneby kommun". Retrieved 31 October 2023.
  101. S2CID 248247530
    .
  102. S2CID 261156749
    .
  103. ^ Timmis A (January 2018). "Using Dredged Materials to Improve a Salt Marsh". The Military Engineer. 110 (712): 61. Archived from the original on 7 November 2018. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  104. PMID 27752509
    .
  105. ^ Sneed A (22 January 2021). "Forever Chemicals Are Widespread in U.S. Drinking Water: Experts hope that with the incoming Biden administration, the federal government will finally regulate a class of chemicals known as PFASs". Scientific American. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  106. ^ "Tap water study detects PFAS 'forever chemicals' across the US". Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. 5 July 2023. National News Release.
  107. ^ "Fact Sheet: 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program". Assessing and Managing Chemicals under TSCA. EPA. 9 August 2018. Archived from the original on 8 December 2018.
  108. ^ "Basic Information on PFAS". EPA. 6 December 2018. Archived from the original on 23 December 2018.
  109. ^ Hahn SM (31 July 2020). "FDA Announces Voluntary Agreement with Manufacturers to Phase Out Certain Short-Chain PFAS Used in Food Packaging". FDA. Archived from the original on 2 August 2020. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
  110. ^ a b "Toxic 'forever chemicals' widespread in top makeup brands, study finds". The Guardian. 15 June 2021. Archived from the original on 7 July 2021. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  111. S2CID 236284279
    .
  112. ^ "Toxic 'Forever Chemicals' Widespread in Top Makeup Brands, Study Finds; Researchers Find Signs of PFAS in over Half of 231 Samples of Products Including Lipstick, Mascara and Foundation". The Guardian. UK. 15 June 2021. Archived from the original on 26 June 2021.
  113. ^ Root T (15 June 2021). "Senate bill would ban toxic 'forever chemicals' in makeup, which new study found are often unlabeled". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 16 June 2021. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
  114. ^ LaMotte S (15 June 2021). "Makeup may contain potentially toxic chemicals called PFAS, study finds". CNN. Archived from the original on 29 June 2021. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  115. ISSN 0261-3077
    . Retrieved 15 February 2023.
  116. ^ "DoD: At Least 126 Bases Report Water Contaminants Linked to Cancer, Birth Defects". Military Times. 26 April 2018. Archived from the original on 6 May 2020.
  117. ^ Sullivan M (March 2018). "Addressing Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)" (PDF).
  118. ^ The Guardian (UK), 23 December 2022, "US Military ‘Downplayed’ The Number of Soldiers Exposed to ‘Forever Chemicals’—Analysis of Pentagon Report Reveals that Soldiers Exposed to PFAS Pollution at Much Higher Rate than Military Claims"
  119. ^ "Drinking Water Health Advisories for PFOA and PFOS". EPA. 9 December 2020. Archived from the original on 28 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  120. ^ "Fact Sheet; PFOA & PFOS Drinking Water Health Advisories". November 2016. EPA 800-F-16-003. Archived from the original on 26 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  121. ^ EPA (2021-03-03). "Announcement of Final Regulatory Determinations for Contaminants on the Fourth Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List." Federal Register, 86 FR 12272
  122. ^ EPA (2021-12-27). "Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) for Public Water Systems and Announcement of Public Meetings." Federal Register, 86 FR 73131
  123. ^ "Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule". EPA. 22 February 2022.
  124. ^ "Organic Chemicals, Plastics and Synthetic Fibers Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 13 July 2021.
  125. ^ "Metal Finishing Effluent Guidelines". EPA. 24 September 2021.
  126. ^ "PFAS Strategic Roadmap: EPA's Commitments to Action 2021-2024". EPA. 27 January 2022.
  127. ^ "Risk Assessment of Pollutants in Biosolids". EPA. 3 May 2022.
  128. ^ Maher K (15 June 2022). "EPA Lowers Bar for Toxic Chemicals Contamination". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 15 June 2022.
  129. ^ washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2022/08/26/forever-chemicals-epa-cleanup-rule/
  130. ^ Davenport, Coral (19 April 2024). "E.P.A. Will Make Polluters Pay to Clean Up Two 'Forever Chemicals'". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 April 2024.
  131. ^ "Meaningful and Achievable Steps You Can Take to Reduce Your Risk". PFOA, PFOS and Other PFAS. EPA. 18 August 2022.
  132. ^ "Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)". United States Environmental Protection Agency. 16 November 2021. Retrieved 20 April 2023.
  133. ^ Friedman, Lisa (10 April 2024). "E.P.A. Says 'Forever Chemicals' Must Be Removed From Tap Water". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 April 2024.
  134. ^ "DuPont settles lawsuits over leak of chemical used to make Teflon". Reuters. 13 February 2017. Archived from the original on 8 June 2019. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
  135. ^ "C8 Science Panel Website". www.c8sciencepanel.org. Archived from the original on 14 April 2013. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
  136. ^ Lerner S (6 October 2018). "Nationwide class action lawsuit targets Dupont, Chemours, 3M, and other makers of PFAS chemicals". The Intercept. Archived from the original on 7 October 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  137. ^ Piña C (30 November 2019). "'Dark Waters': 7 of the Film's Stars and Their Real-Life Inspirations". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
  138. ^
    ISSN 0261-3077
    . Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  139. ^ Perkins, Tom (1 June 2023). "Plastic containers still distributed across the US are a potential health disaster". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
  140. ^ Perkins, Tom (30 March 2024). "US appeals court kills ban on plastic containers contaminated with PFAS". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
  141. ^ Perkins T (16 July 2021). "Maine bans toxic 'forever chemicals' under groundbreaking new law". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021.
  142. doi:10.1126/science.abm1382. Archived
    from the original on 31 August 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  143. ^ Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (21 October 2020). "MassDEP's PFAS6 Drinking Water Standard" (PDF).
  144. ^ Duggan T (5 October 2021). "California bans PFAS chemicals from baby products and food packaging". San Francisco Chronicle.
  145. ^ "'I don't know how we'll survive': the farmers facing ruin in America's 'forever chemicals' crisis". The Guardian. Guardian News & Media Limited. 22 March 2022. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  146. ^ "'Complete crisis' as PFAS discovery upends life and livelihood of young Maine farming family". Maine Public. 7 February 2022.
  147. ^ a b c d e "FY 2020 Fast Facts". Michigan PFAS Action Response Team. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy. Archived from the original on 18 December 2018. Retrieved 27 March 2021.
  148. ^ "Dana Nessel sues 3M, DuPont over 'unconscionable' PFAS pollution in Michigan | Bridge Michigan". www.bridgemi.com. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  149. ^ "EGLE - Michigan adopts strict PFAS in drinking water standards". www.michigan.gov. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
  150. ^ Matheny K. "Michigan's drinking water standards for these chemicals now among toughest in nation". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  151. ^ "Toxic 'forever chemicals' found in Michigan farm's beef". abcNEWS. ABC News Internet Ventures. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  152. ^ "3M Settles Minnesota Lawsuit for $850 Million". Bloomberg. 7 June 2019. Archived from the original on 8 June 2019. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
  153. ^ Fallon S (6 September 2018). "New Jersey becomes first state to regulate dangerous chemical PFNA in drinking water". North Jersey Record. Woodland Park, New Jersey. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  154. ^ "Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for Perfluorononanoic Acid and 1,2,3-Trichloropropane; Private Well Testing for Arsenic, Gross Alpha Particle Activity, and Certain Synthetic Organic Compounds". Trenton, New Jersey: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). 4 September 2018. 50 N.J.R. 1939(a). Archived from the original on 6 October 2021. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  155. ^ "Adoption of ground water quality standards and maximum contaminant levels for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)". NJDEP. 1 June 2020. Archived from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  156. ^ "AG Grewal, DEP Commissioner Announce 4 New Environmental Lawsuits Focused on Contamination Allegedly Linked to DuPont, Chemours, 3M". Totowa, New Jersey: New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. 27 March 2019. Press release. Archived from the original on 13 January 2021. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
  157. ^ Norton GP (17 April 2019). "Re: Statewide PFAS Directive, Information Request and Notice to Insurers". Letter to Shawn LaTourette – via Internet Archive.
  158. ^ Warren MS (13 May 2019). "State ordered chemical companies to pay for pollution clean-up. They say, no way!". NJ.com. NJ Advance Media. Archived from the original on 19 October 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2019.
  159. PMID 32499438
    .
  160. PMID 33553465
    .
  161. ^ New Jersey DEP plaintiffs v. Solvay Specialty Chemicals USA and Arkema Inc. defendants. GLO-L-001239-20. Trans ID 20202023975
  162. ^ "Solvay Launches Non-Fluorosurfactant Technologies in the U.S." 5 May 2021.
  163. ^ "Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation". www.dec.ny.gov. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  164. ^ Lyons BJ (21 July 2021). "$65M settlement filed in Hoosick Falls PFOA water contamination". Times Union. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  165. PMID 24262211
    .
  166. PMID 28764109
    .
  167. S2CID 233999063
    .
  168. ^ "Listing of POPs in the Stockholm Convention". pops.int. Retrieved 23 April 2024.
  169. ^ "Chemicals proposed for listing under the Convention". pops.int. Retrieved 23 April 2024.
  170. ^ a b c d e "Toxicological profile for Perfluoroalkyls". Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2018. Archived from the original on 12 May 2021.
  171. PMID 33125022
    .
  172. PMID 20158198
    .
  173. PMID 32100527
    .
  174. ^
    PMID 26001497
    .
  175. PMID 18565792
    .
  176. PMID 19250678
    .
  177. ^
    S2CID 255211077
    .
  178. S2CID 256481718
    .
  179. ^
    S2CID 34813716
    .
  180. S2CID 30289350
    .
  181. ^
    S2CID 20124680
    .
  182. PMID 19059455
    .
  183. S2CID 28440634
    .
  184. PMID 25791573
    .
  185. S2CID 23947500
    .
  186. S2CID 195762433
    .
  187. ^
    PMID 25447453
    .
  188. S2CID 41993931
    .
  189. PMID 31444118
    .
  190. doi:10.2172/10112187. Archived
    from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 2 December 2019.
  191. ^ "Toxics in firefighting". ecology.wa.gov. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  192. ^
    PMID 18522136
    . Retrieved 2 December 2019.
  193. S2CID 235578939
    .
  194. ISSN 1051-5658
    .
  195. ^ "Treatment Technologies". PFAS — Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. Washington, DC: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC). September 2020. Archived from the original on 27 March 2021. Retrieved 27 March 2021.
  196. ^ a b Fischer L (31 January 2022). "How to Destroy 'Forever Chemicals'". Scientific American.
  197. ^ "PFAS Assessment & Mitigation". Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute. Archived from the original on 18 December 2018. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  198. ^ https://pfas-1.itrcweb.org/12-treatment-technologies/
  199. PMID 38071776
    .
  200. ^ a b Cameron L (9 October 2018). "Diamond technology cleans up PFAS-contaminated wastewater". MSU Today. Michigan State University. Archived from the original on 19 December 2018. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  201. ^ Mandelbaum RF (18 September 2019). "A New Jersey Soil Bacteria Is First to Break Down Toxic 'Forever Chemical'". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on 20 September 2019. Retrieved 19 September 2019.
  202. ^ Lim XZ. "Can microbes save us from PFAS?". cen.acs.org.
  203. PMID 35981038
    .
  204. PMID 36545134
    .
  205. S2CID 249956841
    .
  206. PMID 34509025
    .
  207. PMID 37313434
    .
  208. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2023.117351
    .
  209. ^ "Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). Centers for Disease Control. 22 August 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 October 2020. Retrieved 13 August 2019.
  210. ^ "ORD subset of PFAS with ongoing work methods; CompTox Chemicals Dashboard" (PDF). EPA. 11 March 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 July 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2019.

Further reading

External links
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Per-_and_polyfluoroalkyl_substances&oldid=1220470965"