Pinaceae

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Pinaceae
Temporal range: Jurassic–Recent
Larix (golden), Abies (central foreground) and Pinus (right foreground)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Gymnospermae
Division: Pinophyta
Class: Pinopsida
Order: Pinales
Family: Pinaceae
Lindley 1836
Genera
Synonyms
  • Abietaceae von Berchtold & Presl 1820
  • Cedraceae Vest 1818
  • Compsostrobaceae Delevoryas & Hope 1973
  • †Kranneraceae Corda 1866
  • Piceaceae Goroschankin 1904

The Pinaceae (/pɪˈnsˌ, -siˌ/), or pine family, are conifer trees or shrubs, including many of the well-known conifers of commercial importance such as cedars, firs, hemlocks, piñons,

southwest China, Mexico, central Japan, and California
.

Description

Cultivated pine forest in Vagamon, southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India

Members of the family Pinaceae are

monoecious, with subopposite or whorled branches, and spirally arranged, linear (needle-like) leaves.[2] The embryos of Pinaceae have three to 24 cotyledons
.

The female cones are large and usually woody, 2–60 centimetres (1–24 inches) long, with numerous spirally arranged scales, and two winged seeds on each scale. The male cones are small, 0.5–6 cm (142+14 in) long, and fall soon after pollination; pollen dispersal is by wind. Seed dispersal is mostly by wind, but some species have large seeds with reduced wings, and are dispersed by birds. Analysis of Pinaceae cones reveals how selective pressure has shaped the evolution of variable cone size and function throughout the family. Variation in cone size in the family has likely resulted from the variation of seed dispersal mechanisms available in their environments over time. All Pinaceae with seeds weighing less than 90 milligrams are seemingly adapted for wind dispersal. Pines having seeds larger than 100 mg are more likely to have benefited from adaptations that promote animal dispersal, particularly by birds.[4] Pinaceae that persist in areas where tree squirrels are abundant do not seem to have evolved adaptations for bird dispersal.

Boreal conifers have many adaptions for winter. The narrow conical shape of northern conifers, and their downward-drooping limbs help them shed snow, and many of them seasonally alter their biochemistry to make them more resistant to freezing, called "hardening".

Classification

European black pine
(Pinus nigra) with the light brown umbo visible on the green cone scales
Norway spruce
(Picea abies) with no umbo

Classification of the subfamilies and genera of Pinaceae has been subject to debate in the past. Pinaceae ecology, morphology, and history have all been used as the basis for methods of analyses of the family. An 1891 publication divided the family into two subfamilies, using the number and position of resin canals in the primary vascular region of the young taproot as the primary consideration. In a 1910 publication, the family was divided into two tribes based on the occurrence and type of long–short shoot dimorphism.

A more recent classification divided the subfamilies and genera based on the consideration of features of ovulate cone anatomy among extant and fossil members of the family. Below is an example of how the morphology has been used to classify Pinaceae. The 11 genera are grouped into four subfamilies, based on the microscopical anatomy and the morphology of the cones, pollen, wood, seeds, and leaves:[5]

Phylogeny

A revised 2018 phylogeny places Cathaya as sister to the pines rather than in the Laricoidae subfamily with Larix and Pseudotsuga.

Ran et al. 2018[6] & Leslie et al. 2018[7][8] Stull et al. 2021[9][10]
Abietoideae
Cedreae

Cedrus (cedars 4 sp.)

Pseudolariceae

Pseudolarix (golden larch 1 sp.)

Nothotsuga (1 sp.)

Tsuga (hemlock 9 sp.)

Abieteae

Keteleeria (3 sp.)

Abies
(firs c.50 sp.)

Pinoideae
Lariceae

Pseudotsuga (Douglas-firs 5 sp.)

Larix
(larches 14 sp.)

Pineae

Picea
(spruces c 35 sp.)

Cathaya (1 sp.)

Pinus
(pines c.115 sp.)

Abietoideae
Cedreae

Cedrus

Pseudolariceae
Abieteae

Keteleeria

Abies

Pinoideae
Lariceae

Pseudotsuga

Larix

Pineae

Cathaya

Picea

Pinus

Multiple molecular studies indicate that in contrast to previous classifications placing it outside the conifers, Gnetophyta may in fact be the sister group to the Pinaceae, with both lineages having diverged during the early-mid Carboniferous. This is known as the "gnepine" hypothesis.[11][12]

Evolutionary history

Pinaceae is estimated to have diverged from other conifer groups during the late

stem-group relatives have been reported from as early as the Late Permian (Lopingian) The extinct conifer cone genus Schizolepidopsis likely represent stem-group members of the Pinaceae, the first good records of which are in the Middle-Late Triassic, with abundant records during the Jurassic across Eurasia.[14][15] The oldest crown group (descendant of the last common ancestor of all living species) member of Pinaceae is the cone Eathiestrobus, known from the Upper Jurassic (lower Kimmeridgian, 157.3-154.7 million years ago) of Scotland,[16] which likely belongs to the pinoid grouping of the family.[17][15] Pinaceae rapidly radiated during the Early Cretaceous.[13] Members of the modern genera Pinus (pines), Picea (spruce) and Cedrus (cedar) first appear during the Early Cretaceous.[18][19][20] The extinct Cretaceous genera Pseudoaraucaria and Obirastrobus appear to be members of Abietoideae, while Pityostrobus appears to be non-monophyletic, containing many disparately related members of Pinaceae.[17] While Pinaceae, and indeed all of its subfamilies, substantially predate the break up of the super-continent Pangea, its distribution was limited to the northern Laurasia. During the Cenozoic, Pinaceae had higher rates of species turnover than Southern Hemisphere conifers, thought to be driven by range shifts in response to glacial cycles.[21]

Defense mechanisms

External stresses on plants have the ability to change the structure and composition of forest ecosystems. Common external stress that Pinaceae experience are herbivore and pathogen attack which often leads to tree death.[22] In order to combat these stresses, trees need to adapt or evolve defenses against these stresses. Pinaceae have evolved a myriad of mechanical and chemical defenses, or a combination of the two, in order to protect themselves against antagonists.[23] Pinaceae have the ability to up-regulate a combination of constitutive mechanical and chemical strategies to further their defenses.[24]

Pinaceae defenses are prevalent in the bark of the trees. This part of the tree contributes a complex defensive boundary against external antagonists.[25] Constitutive and induced defenses are both found in the bark.[25][26][27]

Constitutive defenses

Constitutive defenses are typically the first line of defenses used against antagonists and can include sclerified cells, lignified periderm cells, and secondary compounds such as phenolics and resins.[28][25][26] Constitutive defenses are always expressed and offer immediate protection from invaders but could also be defeated by antagonists that have evolved adaptations to these defense mechanisms.[28][25] One of the common secondary compounds used by Pinaceae are phenolics or polyphenols. These secondary compounds are preserved in vacuoles of polyphenolic parenchyma cells (PP) in the secondary phloem.[29][27]

Induced defenses

Induced defense responses need to be activated by certain cues, such as herbivore damage or other biotic signals.[28]

A common induced defense mechanism used by Pinaceae is resins.

conifer defense mechanism against biotic attacks.[31] They are found in secretory tissues in tree stems, roots, and leaves.[31] Oleoresin is also needed in order to classify conifers.[31]

Active research: methyl jasmonate

The topic of defense mechanisms within family Pinaceae is a very active area of study with numerous studies being conducted. Many of these studies use methyl jasmonate (MJ) as an antagonist.[26][27][32] Methyl jasmonate is known to be able to induce defense responses in the stems of multiple Pinaceae species.[26][32] It has been found that MJ stimulated the activation of PP cells and formation of xylem traumatic resin ducts (TD). These are structures that are involved in the release of phenolics and resins, both forms of defense mechanism.[26][27]

  • Close up of bishop pine cones
    Close up of bishop pine cones
  • Knobcone pine cone
    Knobcone pine cone

References

  1. ISSN 1916-2790
    .
  2. ^ .
  3. ^ Earle, Christopher J., ed. (2018). "Pinus merkusii". The Gymnosperm Database. Retrieved March 17, 2015.
  4. JSTOR 3545911
    .
  5. .
  6. .
  7. .
  8. PMID 30157290. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help
    )
  9. .
  10. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14547354.v1. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help
    )
  11. .
  12. .
  13. ^ .
  14. .
  15. ^ .
  16. .
  17. ^ .
  18. .
  19. .
  20. .
  21. .
  22. .
  23. ^ .
  24. .
  25. ^ a b c d Franceschi, V. R., P. Krokene, T. Krekling, and E. Christiansen. 2000. Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distance defense response to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 87:314-326.
  26. ^
    PMID 14704135
    .
  27. ^ .
  28. ^ .
  29. ^ .
  30. ^ .
  31. ^ .
  32. ^ .

External links