New Perspective on Paul
The "New Perspective on Paul" is a movement within the field of biblical studies concerned with the understanding of the writings of the Apostle Paul. The "new perspective" was started with scholar E. P. Sanders' 1977 work Paul and Palestinian Judaism.[1][2] The old
According to Sanders, Paul's letters do not address general good works, but instead question observances such as circumcision, dietary laws, and Sabbath laws, which were the "boundary markers"[4] that set the Jews apart from the other ethnic groups. According to Sanders, first-century Palestinian Judaism was not a "legalistic community," nor was it oriented to "salvation by works." As God's chosen people, they were under his covenant. Contrary to Protestant belief, following the Law was not a way of entering the covenant, but of staying within it.[4]
Development
Since the
In 1963 Krister Stendahl, who is considered by modern scholarship to have been as influential as E. P. Sanders in the development of the "new perspective on Paul",[5]: 63 published a paper arguing that the typical Lutheran view of Paul's theology did not align with statements in Paul's writings, and in fact was based on mistaken assumptions about Paul's beliefs rather than careful interpretation of his writings.[6] Stendahl warned against imposing modern Western ideas on the Bible, and especially on the works of Paul.[6] In 1977 E. P. Sanders, a liberal theologian and scholar, published Paul and Palestinian Judaism.[7] In this work he studies Jewish literature and Paul's writings, arguing that the traditional Protestant understanding of the theology of Judaism and Paul was fundamentally incorrect.
Sanders continued to publish books and articles in this field, and was soon joined by the
The "new-perspective" movement is closely connected with a surge of recent scholarly interest in studying the Bible in the context of other ancient texts, and the use of social-scientific methods to understand ancient culture. Scholars affiliated with The Context Group[12][13][14] have called for various reinterpretations of biblical texts based on studies of the ancient world.
Main ideas
It is often noted that the singular title "the new perspective" gives an unjustified impression of unity.[
Works of the Law
Paul's letters contain a substantial amount of criticism regarding the "works of the Law".[16][17] The radical difference in these two interpretations of what Paul meant by "works of the Law" is the most consistent distinguishing feature between the two perspectives. The historic Protestant perspectives interpret this phrase as referring to human effort to do good works in order to meet God's standards (Works Righteousness).[citation needed] In this view, Paul is arguing against the idea that humans can merit salvation from God by their good works alone (note that the "new" perspective agrees that we cannot merit salvation; the issue is what exactly Paul is addressing).
By contrast, new-perspective scholars see Paul as talking about "badges of covenant membership" or criticizing Gentile believers who had begun to rely on the Torah to reckon Jewish kinship.
Human effort and good works
Due to their interpretation of the phrase "works of the law," theologians of the historic Protestant perspectives see Paul's rhetoric as being against human effort to earn righteousness. This is often cited by Protestant and Reformed theologians as a central feature of the Christian religion, and the concepts of grace alone and faith alone are of great importance within the creeds of these denominations.[citation needed]
"New-perspective" interpretations of Paul tend to result in Paul having nothing negative to say about the idea of human effort or good works, and saying many positive things about both. New-perspective scholars point to the many statements in Paul's writings that specify the criteria of
Final Judgment According to Works... was quite clear for Paul (as indeed for Jesus). Paul, in company with mainstream second-Temple Judaism, affirms that God's final judgment will be in accordance with the entirety of a life led – in accordance, in other words, with works.
— N. T. Wright[21]
Wright, however, does not hold the view that good works contribute to one's salvation, but rather that the final judgment is something Christians can look forward to as a future vindication of God's present declaration of their righteousness. In other words, one's works are a product of one's salvation and future judgment will reflect that.[22] Others tend to place a higher value on the importance of good works than the historic Protestant perspectives do, taking the view that they causally contribute to the salvation of the individual.[citation needed]
Advocates of the historic Protestant perspectives often see this as being "salvation by works", and as a bad thing, contradicting fundamental tenets of Christianity. New-perspective scholars often respond that their views are not so different. For in the perspective of Luther and Calvin, God graciously empowers the individual to the faith which leads to salvation and also to good works, while in the "new" perspective God graciously empowers individuals to the faith (demonstrated in good works), which leads to salvation.[citation needed]
See also
Pistis Christou – 'faith in', or 'faithfulness of'
An ongoing debate related to the "new" perspective has been over Paul's use of the Greek word pistis (πίστις, meaning "trust", "belief", "faith", or "faithfulness"). Writers with a more historic Protestant perspective have typically interpreted this word as meaning a belief in God and Christ, and trust in Christ for salvation with faith that he will save you.[citation needed] This interpretation is based on several passages from the Bible, notably the epistle to the Ephesians: "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not as a result of works, so that no one may boast" (Eph. 2:9). E. P. Sanders has conceded that Ephesians 2:9 teaches the traditional perspective.[23]
By contrast, many recent studies of the Greek word pistis have concluded that its primary and most common meaning was faithfulness, meaning firm commitment in an interpersonal relationship.[24][25][26][27] As such, the word could be almost synonymous with "obedience" when the people in the relationship held different status levels (e.g. a slave being faithful to his master). Far from being equivalent to "lack of human effort", the word seems to imply and require human effort. The interpretation of Paul's writings that we need "faithfully" to obey God's commands is quite different from one which sees him saying that we need to have "faith" that he will do everything for us. This is also argued to explain why James was adamant that "faith without works is dead" and that "a man is justified by works, and not by faith alone" (Js. 2:24), while also saying that merely to believe places one on the same level as the demons (see James 2). The "new" perspective argues that James was concerned with those who were trying to reduce faith to an intellectual subscription without any intent to follow God or Jesus, and that Paul always intended "faith" to mean a full submission to God.
Another related issue is the pistis Christou ("faith of Christ") debate. Paul several times uses this phrase at key points in his writings and it is linguistically ambiguous as to whether it refers to faith in Christ ("objective genitive"), or Christ's own faithfulness to God ("subjective genitive"), or even Christians' faithfulness to God like that of Christ ("adjectival genitive"). There is wide disagreement within the academic community over which of these is the best rendering.
Grace, or favor
Writers with a more historic Protestant perspective have generally translated the Greek word charis as "grace" and understood it to refer to the idea that there is a lack of human effort in salvation because God is the controlling factor. Proponents of the New Perspective argue that "favor" is a better translation, as the word refers normally to "doing a favor". In ancient societies there was the expectation that such favors be repaid, and this semi-formal system of favors acted like loans.[30] Gift giving corresponded with the expectation of reciprocity.[31] Therefore, it is argued that when Paul speaks of how God did us a "favor" by sending Jesus, he is saying that God took the initiative, but is not implying a lack of human effort in salvation, and is in fact implying that Christians have an obligation to repay the favor God has done for them. Some argue that this view then undermines the initial "favor"—of sending Jesus—by saying that, despite his life, death and resurrection, Christians still have, as before, to earn their way to heaven. However, others note this is the horns of a false dilemma (all grace versus all works). Many new-perspective proponents that see "charis" as "favor" do not teach that Christians earn their way to heaven outside of the death of Christ. Forgiveness of sins through the blood of Christ is still necessary to salvation. But, that forgiveness demands effort on the part of the individual (cf. Paul in Phil. 3:12–16).[32]
The Atonement
To writers of the historic Protestant perspectives the penal substitution atonement theory and the belief in the "finished work" of Christ have been central. New-perspective writers have regularly questioned whether this view is really of such central importance in Paul's writings. Generally new-perspective writers have argued that other theories of the atonement are more central to Paul's thinking, but there has been minimal agreement among them as to what Paul's real view of the atonement might be.
The following is a broad sample of different views advocated by various scholars:
- E. P. Sanders argued that Paul's central idea was that we mystically spiritually participate in the risen Christ and that all Paul's judicial language was subordinate to the participatory language.[7]
- N. T. Wright has argued that Paul sees Israel as representative of humanity and taking onto itself the sinfulness of humanity through history. Jesus, in turn, as Messiah is representative of Israel and so focuses the sins of Israel on himself on the cross. Wright's view is thus a "historicized" form of Penal Substitution.[33]
- Chris VanLandingham has argued that Paul sees Christ as having defeated the Devil and as teaching humans how God wants them to live and setting them an example.[34]
- David Brondos has argued that Paul sees Jesus as just a part in a wider narrative in which the Church is working to transform lives of individuals and the world, and that Paul's participatory language should be understood in an ethical sense (humans living Christ-like lives) rather than mystically as Sanders thought.[35]
- Pilch and Malina take the view that Paul holds to the Satisfaction theory of atonement.[36]
- Stephen Finlan holds that Paul uses numerous different metaphors to describe the atonement; "justified by his blood" (Rom 5:9) means that a cultic substance has a judicial effect. Paul also taught the transformation of believers into the image of God through Christ (Theosis).[37]
Criticism
The "new" perspective has been an extremely controversial subject and has drawn strong arguments and recriminations from both sides of the debate.[38]
In 2003 Steve Chalke, after being influenced by new-perspective writers, published a book targeted at a popular audience which made comments that were interpreted as being highly critical of the penal substitution theory of the atonement.[39] This caused an extensive and ongoing controversy among Evangelicals in Britain, with a strong backlash from laypeople and advocates of the historic Protestant traditions.[40] Chalke's views drew much support as well as criticism, with numerous articles, blogs and books being written on both sides of the debate.
The continuing controversy led to the
Both sides of the debate have attempted to claim the higher, and more accurate, view of scripture. New-perspective advocates claim that supporters of the historic Protestant views are too committed to historic
The "new" perspective has been heavily criticized by many scholars in the Reformed and Protestant tradition, arguing that it undermines the classical, individualistic, Augustinian interpretation of election and does not faithfully reflect the teachings of the Scriptures. It has been the subject of fierce debate among Evangelicals in recent years, mainly due to N. T. Wright's increasing popularity in evangelical circles.
Its most outspoken critics include,
Barry D. Smith has claimed that the New Perspective's challenge to the traditional view of Jewish faith practice as legalistic is misplaced.[56] Biblical passages which do describe the Jewish people as struggling with legalism and the concept of earning salvation by good works include Jesus' parable of the Pharisee and the Publican, and more importantly, Paul's own words in passages like Romans 4:4-5: "to the one who works his wages are not a gift but what is owed, but to the one who does not work but trusts in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness." Paul also alludes to Deuteronomy 9:4, in which God warned the Jewish people not to think that he chose them because they were better than other people and deserved it, when he contrasts the righteousness of the law and the righteousness of faith in Romans 10:5-8.
In 2015
Catholic and Orthodox reactions
The "new" perspective has, by and large, been an internal debate among Protestant scholars. Many
The increased importance new-perspective writers have given to good works in salvation has created strong common ground with many within the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches. Historic
See also
- Pauline Christianity
- Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification
- Paula Fredriksen
- Daniel Boyarin
References
- ISBN 978-0-8006-1899-5.
- ISBN 0-664-25095-5.
- ^ Yoon Jr., Paul (2006). In Defense of Sola Fide: A Refutation of N.T. Wright's view of Justification. Master's Seminary.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-8028-4562-7.
- ISSN 0167-9732.
- ^ S2CID 170331485.
- ^ a b Sanders, EP (1977), Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion, Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
- ISBN 978-0-281-06090-0
- ISBN 978-0-80286619-6
- .
- Wright, NT(1997), What Saint Paul Really Said, Eerdmans, chapter 4 (pp 63-75).
- ^ Esler, Philip F. Conflict and Identity in Romans: The Social Setting of Paul's Letter. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003.
- Malina, Bruce J.& Neyrey, Jerome H., Portraits of Paul: An Archaeology of Ancient Personality, Louisville: John Knox Press, 1996.
- ^ Neyrey, Jerome H., Paul, in Other Words: A Cultural Reading of His Letters. Louisville: John Knox Press, 1990.
- ^ N. T. Wright, New Perspectives.
- ^ JSTOR 3267745.
- ^ JSTOR 24735868.
- JSTOR 3268465. Retrieved 2008-10-26.
- ^ Dunn, James D. 'The New Perspective on Paul', 104, 2005.
- ISBN 978-90-04-44401-0.
- ^ Wright, N. T (August 2003), New Perspectives on Paul, 10th Edinburgh Dogmatics Conference.
- ^ Wright, NT, New perspective (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-08-29, retrieved 2011-08-25.
- ^ Waters, Guy Prentiss, Justification and the New Perspectives on Paul, p. 167,
Sanders has conceded to me that Ephesians 2:9 teaches the traditional view.
- ^ Douglas A. Campbell, "The Quest For Paul's Gospel: A Suggested Strategy", 2005, pp. 178–207
- JSTOR 3267114.
- S2CID 170874320.
- ^ Pilch and Malina, "Handbook of Biblical Social Values", 1998, pg 72–75
- ^ [improper synthesis?]See, e.g.: for subjective genitive:
- Howard, G. (1974). "The 'Faith of Christ'". The Expository Times. 85 (7): 212–5. S2CID 170874320.
- Hays, Richard B. (2002). The faith of Jesus Christ: the narrative substructure of Galatians 3:1–4:11. O'Reilly Media. pp. xlviii. ISBN 978-0-596-00281-7.
- Hooker, Morna D. (1989). "Πίστις Χριστοῦ". S2CID 251057973.
[improper synthesis?]For objective genitive:- Hultgren, A. J. (1980). "The Pistis Christou Formulation in Paul". Novum Testamentum. 22 (3): 248–63. JSTOR 1560601.
- Dunn, J. D. G. (1991). "Once More, ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ". Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers: 730–44.
- Howard, G. (1974). "The 'Faith of Christ'". The Expository Times. 85 (7): 212–5.
- ^ E.g., Romans 3:21–22: 'But now apart from the law the righteousness of God (which is attested by the law and the prophets) has been disclosed – namely, the righteousness of God through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ for all who believe. ...' (emphasis added. Also see Gal. 2:20).
- ^ David A.deSilva, Honor, Patronage, Kinship and Purity: Unlocking New Testament Culture, 2000, pg 117
- ^ B. J. Oropeza, "The Expectation of Grace," Bulletin for Biblical Research 24.2 (2014) 207-226
- ^ Wright, N. T. (1995). "Romans and the Theology of Paul" (PDF). Pauline Theology. 3 (3). Minneapolis: Fortress: 30–67. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-22.
- ^ Wright, N.T. (1996). Jesus and the Victory of God. Fortress Press. pp. 379–382.
- ^ Chris VanLandingham, "Judgment and Justification in Early Judaism and the Apostle Paul", Hendrickson 2006[page needed]
- ^ David Brondos, "Paul on the Cross: Reconstructing the Apostle's Story of Redemption", Fortress Press, 2006[page needed]
- ^ Bruce J. Malina and John J. Pilch, "Social-Science Commentary on the Letters of Paul" Augsburg Fortress 2006[page needed]
- ^ Stephen Finlan, Problems with Atonement: The Origins of, and Controversy about, the Atonement Doctrine, Liturgical Press 2005, pp. 58–59, 120–23.
- ^ Gathercole, Simon (10 August 2007). "What Did Paul Really Mean?". Christianity Today.
- ^ Chalke, Steve; Mann, Alan (2003), The Lost Message of Jesus, Zondervan.[page needed]
- ^ Ashworth, Pat. "Atonement row gets personal as Evangelical partnership splits", 'Church Times', 27 April 2007.
- ^ Derek Tidball, David Hilborn, Justin Thacker. the atonement debate. p. 34 to 45.
- ^ "Joint Evangelical Alliance – London School Of Theology Atonement Symposium". Evangelical Alliance. 2005-07-08. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-08-26.
- ^ Stephen, Jonathan (February 2005). "Chalkegate". Evangelical Times. Retrieved 2011-11-25.
- ISBN 978-1-84474-178-6.
- ^ "Pierced for our Transgressions – Rediscovering the Glory of Penal Substitution". Retrieved 2007-08-26.
- ^ Wright, NT (April 2007). "The Cross and the Caricatures – a response to Robert Jenson, Jeffrey John, and a new volume entitled Pierced for Our Transgressions". Fulcrum. Retrieved 2014-08-19.
- ISBN 978-0801027413.
- ^ Thomas R. Schreiner (28 June 2014). "Another Look at the New Perspective". Southern Equip. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
- ^ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: "Wayne Grudem on Justification and the New Perspective on Paul | Systematic Theology, 2nd Edition". YouTube.
- ^ "Justification and the New Perspective on Paul".
- ^ John Piper, Interview with Piper on Wright, October 11, 2007.
- ^ Sinclair Ferguson, What Does Justification Have to do with the Gospel?
- ^ Was There Legalism in First Century Judaism Or: Was Jesus and Paul Shooting at Phantoms? basketoffigs.org Retrieved 17 April 2023
- ^ Contours of Pauline Theology tomholland.org.uk Retrieved 17 April 2023
- ^ J. Ligon Duncan, The Attractions of the New Perspective(s) on Paul.
- ^ Barry D. Smith, 'The Tension Between God as Righteous Judge and as Merciful in Early Judaism', What Must I Do to Be Saved? Paul Parts Company with His Jewish Heritage.
- ^ Barclay, John M. G. "Paul and the Gift". Eerdmans. Archived from the original on 2016-08-29. Retrieved 2016-08-31.
- ^ "Paul and the Gift: Prologue". What You Think Matters. Retrieved 2016-08-31.
- ^ "John Barclay's Paul and the Gift and the New Perspective on Paul". Themelios. The Gospel Coalition. Retrieved 2016-08-31.
- ISBN 978-3-8306-7705-5
- ^ "Augsburg Confession". Book of Concord. Article XX. Retrieved 8 September 2012.
- ^ Calvin, John. "Commentary on James: Chapter 2: James 2:18–19". Commentary on the Catholic Epistles. Retrieved 8 September 2012.
- ^ "Canons of Dort". First head: Paragraph 3. Archived from the original on 19 September 2012. Retrieved 9 September 2012.
- ^ "Augsburg Confession". Book of Concord. Article XII. Retrieved 8 September 2012.
Further reading
- Badenas, Robert, Christ the End of the Law, Romans 10.4 in Pauline Perspective, 1985. ISBN 0-905774-93-0
- Despotis, Athanasios (2014), Die "New Perspective on Paul" und die griechisch-orthodoxe Paulusinterpretation, VIOTh, St. Ottilien: EOS, ISBN 978-3-8306-7705-5
- ——— (2017), Participation, Justification and Conversion: Eastern Orthodox Interpretation of Paul and the Debate between Old and New Perspectives on Paul, WUNT II, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
- ISBN 0-664-25095-5
- ISBN 0-8028-3991-6
- Gosdeck, David, Nicholas Thomas Wright – New Perspective on St. Paul[permanent dead link], 2013, WLS Essays.
- Irons, Lee, Seyoon Kim's Critique of the New Perspective on Paul, 2007.
- ISBN 0-8006-6285-7
- ——— (2011), A Theological Introduction to Paul's Letters: Exploring a Threefold Theology of Paul, Wipf and Stock Publishers, ISBN 978-1-60899-793-0
- Kok, Jacobus, The New Perspectives on Paul and its implication for ethics and mission, Acta Patristica, vol 21, 2010, pp. 3–17
- ISBN 978-0-393-34791-3.
- Oropeza, B. J. and Scot McKnight, "Paul in Perspective: An Overview of the Landscape More Than Forty Years after Paul and Palestinian Judaism." Pages 1–23 in Perspectives on Paul: Five Views. (Baker Academic Books), 2020 ISBN 978-1-5409-6075-7
- Smith, Barry D., What Must I Do to Be Saved? Paul Parts Company with His Jewish Heritage, 2007.
- Pitre, Brant; Barber, Michael P.; Kincaid, John A., Paul, a New Covenant Jew: Rethinking Pauline Theology. (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing), 2019 ISBN 978-1-4674-5703-3
- Thompson, Michael B., The New Perspective on Paul (Grove Biblical Series), 2002. ISBN 1-85174-518-1.
- Wright, N.T., What St Paul Really Said, 1997.
- ——— (2003), New Perspectives on Paul.
- ——— (2005), Paul: Fresh Perspectives.
- Yinger, Kent L., The New Perspective on Paul: An Introduction, (Cascade Books), 2010 ISBN 978-1608994632
- Young, Brad, Paul the Jewish Theologian, 1998
External links
- The Paul Page—Extensive list of online articles relating to the New Perspective
- Galatians, Paul, the Torah-Law and Legalism
- Theopedia: New Perspective on Paul—Traditional Reformed perspective
- Report on Justification Presented to the 73rd General Assembly (Orthodox Presbyterian Church)
- Mississippi Valley Presbytery Report (Presbyterian Church in America)
- Catholic Perspective on Paul—A Catholic analysis of topics pertaining to the New Perspective on Paul
- WELS Topical Q&A: New Perspective on Paul—A Confessional Lutheran evaluation of the New Perspective