Podgorica Assembly
The Great People's Assembly of the Serb People in Montenegro (
The manner in which the Podgorica Assembly was elected and its resolutions on unification and the removal of King Nikola from the throne were criticized as unlawful and illegitimate by the king, his government-in-exile situated in France at the time, and opponents of the unconditional union in the country known as the Greens. The Greens, earning that moniker after the color of paper used to print Podgorica Assembly candidate lists containing pro-independence candidates, supported either full independence of Montenegro or a federation or a confederation with Serbia and other South Slavs where Montenegro would be an equal partner.
Following the resolutions on the unification and the deposition of the king, the Greens resorted to insurrection to fight pro-unionist
Background
Montenegrin independence and alliances
The
Following the Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and the subsequent July Crisis and Austro-Hungarian declaration of war against Serbia, Montenegro witnessed widespread popular support for Serbia. In response, Montenegro entered into a military treaty with Serbia on 4 August 1914, just two days before declaring war on Austria-Hungary. According to the treaty, the Montenegrin Army fell under the command of the Royal Serbian Army's High Command, with King Nikola retaining a nominal position as supreme commander. The treaty mandated that two-thirds of Montenegro's forces be stationed in Pljevlja in the north to support a Serbian offensive aimed at capturing Sarajevo, while the remainder defended the country's borders. Additionally, Serbia was to receive and distribute aid from the allied Entente powers.[5] Serbia outlined its war aims in the Niš Declaration, emphasizing the post-war unification of the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, which marginalized Montenegro in the proposed state-building process.[6] In 1915, Montenegro sought support from the Russian Empire for its aspirations to expand along the Adriatic Sea and its hinterland between the Mat and Neretva rivers, encompassing Herzegovina, southern Dalmatia, and the city of Shkodër, but these efforts were unsuccessful.[7] The Entente pressured Montenegro to align its war aims with those of Serbia and abandon any separate ambitions.[6]
Military defeat
From the outset of the war, Montenegro faced shortages of equipment and food.[8] The first clash of interests between Montenegro and Serbia occurred in June 1915 when King Nikola ordered the army to capture Shkodër. Although the Serbian government disapproved of this move, it refrained from confronting King Nikola to avoid potentially increasing support for him among the Montenegrin population. After Serbia's military defeat in the 1915 Serbian campaign, the Royal Serbian Army suffered significant losses, reducing its size to a level comparable to that of the Montenegrin forces. To prevent the Montenegrin allies from becoming the senior Entente-allied fighting force in the area, Serbia sought to weaken the Montenegrin army similarly. Consequently, the bulk of the Montenegrin forces were ordered by the Royal Serbian Army's High Command to move to the north of Montenegro, concentrating around the Sandžak region. This left the southern border, including the Lovćen Mountain between the Austro-Hungarian Bay of Kotor and the Montenegrin capital, thinly defended.[9]
In November–December 1915, while the Montenegrin forces shielded the Royal Serbian Army during its Great Retreat from Serbia through Montenegro and Albania to Greece, Austro-Hungarian forces advanced across Lovćen in the Montenegrin campaign. Towards the end of December, anticipating the imminent loss of the city, the king, government officials, members of parliament, representatives of the Serbian High Command, and foreign embassies were evacuated from the nation's capital of Cetinje to Podgorica.[8] On 19 January, the king and most of the government left the country.[10] Acting against the king's instructions, the remaining government ministers declared themselves the new government and surrendered to Austria-Hungary. They later attributed the surrender to the king's departure.[11] Accusations regarding the surrender were exchanged between members of the government-in-exile and the king. Prime Minister Lazar Mijušković resigned from his post after one such dispute, expressing support for union with Serbia over the preservation of Montenegrin independence. Andrija Radović was appointed by the king to succeed him.[12]
Throughout the war, most Entente powers did not completely trust Montenegro as an ally due to persistent rumours of covert diplomatic arrangements.[13] These rumours were encouraged by Serbia, which even used a forged agreement alleged to have been concluded by Montenegro and Austria-Hungary.[14] Instead of confronting King Nikola for fear of pushing Montenegro to the opposing camp, the Central Powers chose to work to channel their support through Serbia.[13] The Kingdom of Italy, despite being part of the Entente, supported Montenegrin independence, viewing the prospective unified South Slavic state as a threat to its interests in the Balkans and the Adriatic. Italy exploited the so-called Montenegrin question to extract concessions from Serbia.[15] The United States did not proactively engage in the issue of Montenegrin independence before the Paris Peace Conference of 1919,[16] failing to obtain international support for the restoration of Montenegro's independence. By 1918, King Nikola shifted his approach to Yugoslavism, advocating first for a Yugoslav federation and then a confederation as the common South Slavic state, with Montenegro as one of its constitutive elements.[17] In an interview in the final days of the war, the king expressed hope that U.S. President Woodrow Wilson would ensure Montenegro's independent political future.[18]
Montenegrin Committee
In August 1916, Radović drafted a memorandum to the king proposing the unification of Montenegro and Serbia, arguing that independent Montenegro could not sustain itself after an Entente victory.
The king ultimately declined to endorse the memorandum in January 1917, leading to Radović's resignation. He then emerged as a prominent advocate for unification. Radović expressed his determination to sway Montenegrins against King Nikola to Serbia's ambassador to Paris, Milenko Radomar Vesnić. Subsequently, Radović collaborated with Serbia to establish the Montenegrin Committee for Unification. Its inaugural proclamation was submitted for approval to Serbia's prime minister, Nikola Pašić, who advised Radović to avoid mentioning Yugoslavia as the new state and instead suggested using the term "other Serbian lands."[19] Initially, the committee comprised former government ministers Pero Vučković, Danilo Gatalo, and Janko Spasojević, along with district court member Miloš Ivanović.[21]
Adriatic Troops
In September 1918, the Entente powers initiated their northward advance at the
The Royal Serbian Army contingent assigned Colonel Dragutin Milutinović the task of gaining control of Montenegro. Milutinović's force, initially known as the Scutari Troops (Skadarske Trupe), later adopted the name Adriatic Troops (Jadranske Trupe), named after the city of Shkodër.[22] The Adriatic Troops were composed of soldiers from the Yugoslav Division (recruited from Austro-Hungarian lands) and Serbian paramilitaries from the Kosovo region, under the leadership of Kosta Pećanac.[24] Milutinović, instructed by Prince Regent Aleksandar, was tasked with preventing the return of King Nikola to Montenegro by any means necessary. Accompanied by Spasojević, a member of the Montenegrin Committee, and Svetozar Tomić, head of the Montenegrin section of the Serbian Foreign Ministry, Milutinović established the Central Executive Committee for the Unification of Serbia and Montenegro in Berane on October 28. This committee, comprising Spasojević, Tomić, and Berane mayor Milosav Raičević, was responsible for organizing a popular assembly and establishing the rules for the election of assembly delegates.[22]
In the latter part of October, while the Adriatic Troops were stationed in Berane, Montenegrin insurgents (komite) under the leadership of Jovan Radović gained control of much of the countryside. The Adriatic Troops advanced towards Podgorica, defeating an Austro-Hungarian force on the city outskirts on October 30–31. Two days later, Radović's insurgents seized Nikšić. Austro-Hungarian forces abandoned the Montenegrin capital and withdrew from the country on November 4, two days before the Adriatic Troops reached Cetinje. After securing Cetinje, they proceeded to Nikšić, Kolašin, and Bar. The tense atmosphere at political rallies promoting unification prompted Milutinović to request reinforcements to maintain order during the election.[25] Milutinović ordered the disbanding of the insurgents on November 12.[26]
Election
Rules
The legality and legitimacy of the election rules drafted by Tomić, as well as the election itself, have been at the forefront of debate between unionists and independentists in Montenegro. The latter argue that the rules were unlawful because they were not formulated by any Montenegrin legislative body and because they contradicted existing laws and the
The election rules, adopted in Berane on 7 November 1918, outlined the process for selecting the popular assembly's delegates. It was stipulated that the elected delegates would convene in Podgorica a week later to deliberate on Montenegro's constitutional and legal status and appoint an executive body to enforce the assembly's decisions. Eligible delegates had to be over 25 years old and have no criminal record. The election process involved selecting a slate of electors in each province, municipality, and town. Each slate of electors then chose a predetermined number of assembly delegates. Larger towns with over five thousand inhabitants elected twice as many electors and delegates as smaller towns.[31] In total, 165 delegates were to be elected.[32] Podgorica was chosen as the assembly venue because committee members believed that the capital, Cetinje, was a stronghold of King Nikola loyalists beyond their control.[33]
Number of Podgorica Assembly electors and delegates per constituency type[31] | |||
---|---|---|---|
Constituency type | Electors | Delegates | Notes |
Province | 10 | 2 | Located in pre-First Balkan War territory |
Municipality | 15 | 3 | Located in territories won in the First Balkan War |
Towns over 5000 inhabitants | 10 | 2 | |
Towns under 5000 inhabitants | 10 | 1 | Bar, Berane, Bijelo Polje, Kolašin, Ulcinj |
Voting
The election witnessed the emergence of two distinct camps. Unionists advocated for an unconditional and immediate merger with Serbia, while their counterparts, the independents, opposed the proposed union's terms. Instead, they advocated for a partnership where Montenegro would maintain equal status, constituting an integral part of the union state rather than merely a province of Serbia. Unionists framed their call for unconditional unification as a test of patriotism and moral obligation necessary to achieve longstanding state-building goals.[34] Financial support for the unionists came from Serbia.[35] Candidate lists were visually differentiated by being printed on different types of paper: white for the unionists and green for the independents. Consequently, they were commonly referred to as the Whites (bjelaši) and the Greens (zelenaši) respectively.[29] This division built upon existing political rifts within Montenegro, primarily revolving around the People's Party (known as the klubaši) and the True People's Party (known as the pravaši). These groups enjoyed varying levels of support across different regions of the country. While urban populations predominantly backed the Whites, except in Cetinje, the Whites also garnered more support than the Greens among educated individuals, youth, craftsmen, tradesmen, and administrative staff.[36]
The election, held on November 19, resulted in a significant majority for the Whites within the newly elected assembly.[36] There were allegations that the Royal Serbian Army obstructed supporters of independence from returning from abroad, thereby interfering with the electoral process.[27] Similarly, the French authorities prevented King Nikola from returning to Montenegro from his exile in Neuilly-sur-Seine.[23] Notably, voting did not take place in the town of Ulcinj, the nearby village of Vladimir, and the regions of Skadarska Krajina and Mrkojevići.[37]
Assembly resolutions
The Great People's Assembly convened in the hall of the Tobacco Monopoly in Podgorica on 24 November 1918. Initially, Savo Cerović and Lazar Damjanović were elected as its president and vice-president, respectively. The following day, the assembly appointed a twenty-member committee and charged it with preparing a draft resolution for the assembly's consideration and adoption, despite an already prepared draft by Tomić being distributed to the delegates. Concurrently, the assembly articulated the unification of Montenegro and Serbia as its primary objective.[38]
On 26 November, the assembly proceeded to read the proposed resolution, despite some individual complaints about the lack of debate on the resolution. The draft was read aloud, accompanied by occasional cheering and singing of the Serbian national anthem, "
In four additional sessions held by 29 November, the assembly appointed Damjanović along with Vojvoda Stevo Vukotić (brother of Queen Consort Milena), Marko Daković, Spasoje Piletić, and Risto Jojić as the executive committee members. They debated the committee's tasks and appointed a fifteen-member delegation led by Bishop Gavrilo Dožić, tasked with traveling to Belgrade and presenting the resolution to Prince Regent Aleksandar. There was also a discussion on the fate of the property of the king and the Montenegrin Orthodox Church,[39] which was confiscated in the immediate aftermath of the assembly meetings.[40] Finally, the assembly decided to confiscate the king's property and prohibit his family from returning to Montenegro. The assembly reconvened on 29 April 1919 in Podgorica to dismiss the executive committee and transfer its powers to Ivo Pavićević as the Serbian administrator for Montenegro.[39]
Aftermath
Unification
The unification of Serbia and Montenegro, based on the assembly's resolution, strengthened Serbia's political position shortly before the proclamation of the
The fate of Montenegro was discussed at the Paris Peace Conference, where the government-in-exile and King Nikola were not involved in decision-making.[43] The conference only invited a representative of the government-in-exile to present their position,[30] at King Nikola's insistence. Although Montenegro was formally granted a seat at the conference, it remained vacant due to disagreement over the selection of its representative. Montenegro's government-in-exile proposals were rejected by Serbia, backed by France.[44] In early 1919, Montenegro was divided into French, British, Italian, US, and Serbian occupation zones. However, by mid-year, the entire territory came under Serbian control, renamed the Yugoslav Occupational Forces in Montenegro.[40] France severed diplomatic ties with Montenegro on 20 December 1920 following the Constitutional Assembly election in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. The United Kingdom and the United States followed suit in January 1921, effectively removing Montenegro from international affairs.[44]
Christmas Uprising
A portion of Montenegro's population became dissatisfied with the political developments following the Podgorica Assembly, leading to an insurrection in January 1919. The ultimately unsuccessful rebellion, known as the Christmas Uprising, was instigated by the Greens and led by Krsto Popović and Jovan Plamenac. According to the British Military Mission to Montenegro, approximately one-fifth of the population supported the rebels.[45] Historian Ivo Banac suggested that the Greens enjoyed support from a larger proportion of the population but were comparably poorly organized, indecisive, and politically divided.[46] While some fought for full independence and the return of King Nikola to the country, others supported union with Serbia, objecting only to Montenegro's unequal status in such a union.[47] Contemporary Western media reported heavy fighting during the uprising.[48] The Entente occupation troops in Montenegro pursued individual national interests and policies, with the French giving Serbia a free hand, while Italian troops supported the rebels.[49] Italy initially supported the Montenegrin government-in-exile during negotiations over borders with the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes as part of the resolution of the Adriatic question. However, after the issue was settled by the 1920 Treaty of Rapallo, Italy agreed to withdraw its support.[50] In 1923, some of the Greens established the Montenegrin Federalist Party led by Sekula Drljević, shifting to political struggle and advocating for Montenegrin statehood within the proposed Yugoslav federation.[51]
Annulment of resolutions
Following the collapse of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in
Following the
See also
References
- ^ Morrison 2008, p. 26.
- ^ a b Pavlović 2008, pp. 52–54.
- ^ Morrison 2008, p. 39.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, pp. 64–68.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, pp. 67–69.
- ^ a b Pavlović 2008, p. 70.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, p. 67.
- ^ a b Pavlović 2008, pp. 75–77.
- ^ Banac 1984, p. 282.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, p. 78.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, p. 80.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, p. 88.
- ^ a b Pavlović 2008, pp. 94–95.
- ^ Banac 1984, p. 281.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, pp. 95–97.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, pp. 109–111.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, pp. 145–147.
- ^ NYT 8 November 1918.
- ^ a b Pavlović 2008, pp. 91–94.
- ^ Banac 1984, p. 283.
- ^ Ružić & Lalović 2016, p. 294.
- ^ a b c Pavlović 2008, pp. 147–149.
- ^ a b Banac 1984, p. 284.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, p. 168.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, pp. 151–154.
- ^ Djukanović 2023, p. 178.
- ^ a b Pavlović 2008, pp. 149–151.
- ^ Littlefield 1922.
- ^ a b Heka 2022, p. 35.
- ^ a b Fuller 1943, pp. 209–210.
- ^ a b Pavlović 2008, pp. 186–187.
- ^ Bojović 1989, p. 291.
- ^ Ramet 2006, p. 38.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, pp. 150–151.
- ^ Pavlović 1999, p. 162.
- ^ a b c Banac 1984, p. 285.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, p. 154.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, pp. 154–156.
- ^ a b c Pavlović 2008, pp. 157–163.
- ^ a b Pavlović 1999, pp. 161–162.
- ^ Pavlović 2008, pp. 162–163.
- ^ NYT 25 December 1918.
- ^ a b Morrison 2008, pp. 42–45.
- ^ a b Rastoder 2003, p. 132.
- ^ Morrison 2008, pp. 43–44.
- ^ Banac 1984, p. 286.
- ^ Morrison 2008, p. 45.
- ^ CT 4 September 1919.
- ^ Rastoder 2003, p. 129.
- ^ Banac 1984, p. 288.
- ^ Banac 1984, pp. 289–290.
- ^ a b Heka 2022, p. 37.
- ^ Heka 2022, p. 41.
Sources
- ISBN 0-8014-1675-2.
- Bojović, Jovan R. (1989). Podgorička skupština 1918: dokumenta [Podgorica Assembly in 1918: Documents] (in Serbian). Gornji Milanovac: ISBN 9788636702093.
- Djukanović, Bojka (2023). Historical Dictionary of Montenegro. Lanham: ISBN 9781538139141.
- Fuller, Joseph V., ed. (1943). "Secretary's Notes of a Conversation Held in M. Pichon's Room at the Quai d'Orsay, Paris, on Wednesday, March 5, 1919, at 3 p.m.". Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919. Vol. IV. Washington: United States Government Printing Office. OCLC 1140993210.
- Heka, László (2022). "Crnogorsko nacionalno pitanje: pravne posljedice odluka Podgoričke skupštine 1918. godine" [The Question of Nationality in Montenegro: Legal Consequences of the Decisions of Podgorica Assembly in 1918]. Politička misao: časopis za politologiju (in Croatian). 59 (1). Zagreb: ISSN 0032-3241.
- Littlefield, Walter (16 April 1922). "Annihilation of a Nation" (PDF). ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
- Morrison, Kenneth (2008). Montenegro, A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-0-85771-487-9.
- JSTOR 40870060.
- ISBN 978-1-55753-465-1.
- ISBN 978-0-253-34656-8.
- ISBN 9783832900724.
- Ružić, Nataša; Lalović, Vladan (2016). "Izvještavanje Glasa Crnogorca o osnivanju Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca" [Reporting in the Voice of the Montenegrin on the Formation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes]. Radovi Zavoda za povijesne znanosti HAZU u Zadru (in Croatian) (58). Zagreb: ISSN 1330-0474.
- "King Nicholas Will Meet Wilson" (PDF). ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 5 December 2023.
- "Montenegro Puts Hope in President Wilson" (PDF). ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
- "Serbs Wipe Out Royalist Party in Montenegro". from the original on 2 March 2010. Retrieved 5 December 2023.
Further reading
- Mrvaljević, Jakov; Dragićević, Branko (1989). Kraj crnogorskog kraljevstva [The End of the Montenegrin Kingdom] (in Serbian). Cetinje: Muzeji Cetinje. OCLC 440306038.
- Vujović, Dimitrije-Dimo (1962). Ujedinjenje Crne Gore i Srbije [Unification of Montenegro and Serbia] (in Serbian). Titograd: Istorijski institut narodne republike Crne Gore. OCLC 11608258.
- Vujović, Dimitrije-Dimo (1987). Prilozi izučavanju crnogorskog nacionalnog pitanja [Contributions to Researching of the Montenegrin National Question] (in Serbian). Nikšić: Univerzitetska riječ. OCLC 23690011.
- Vujović, Dimitrije-Dimo (1989). Podgorička skupština 1918 [Podgorica Assembly 1918] (in Croatian). Zagreb: Školska knjiga. OCLC 23379241.
External links
- Wikisource.
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
[DECISION of the Great People's Assembly of the Serbian People in Montenegro, adopted at the sitting of 13 November in Podgorica] (in Serbian). Podgorica. 26 November 1918 – via - Александар Раковић (ed.). "Podgoricka skupstina" Подгоричка скупштина (in Serbian). Српска земља Црна Гора.
- Facsimile of the decisions of the Podgorica Assembly