Political science

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Political science is the

laws.[1]

Modern political science can generally be divided into the three sub-disciplines: comparative politics, international relations, and political theory.[2]

History

Origin

Political science is a social science dealing with systems of

laws.[3]

As a social science, contemporary political science started to take shape in the latter half of the 19th century and began to separate itself from political philosophy and history.[4] Into the late 19th century, it was still uncommon for political science to be considered a distinct field from history.[4] The term "political science" was not always distinguished from political philosophy, and the modern discipline has a clear set of antecedents including moral philosophy, political economy, political theology, history, and other fields concerned with normative determinations of what ought to be and with deducing the characteristics and functions of the ideal state.[citation needed]

Generally, classical

sociologists (e.g., structure and agency).[6]

The advent of political science as a university discipline was marked by the creation of university departments and chairs with the title of political science arising in the late 19th century. The designation "political scientist" is commonly used to denote someone with a doctorate or master's degree in the field.

positive political science, with each part of the discipline sharing some historical predecessors. The American Political Science Association and the American Political Science Review were founded in 1903 and 1906, respectively, in an effort to distinguish the study of politics from economics and other social phenomena. APSA membership rose from 204 in 1904 to 1,462 in 1915.[4] APSA members played a key role in setting up political science departments that were distinct from history, philosophy, law, sociology, and economics.[4]

A world map distinguishing countries of the world as federations (green) from unitary states (blue), a work of political science

The journal Political Science Quarterly was established in 1886 by the Academy of Political Science. In the inaugural issue of Political Science Quarterly, Munroe Smith defined political science as "the science of the state. Taken in this sense, it includes the organization and functions of the state, and the relation of states one to another."[8]

As part of a UNESCO initiative to promote political science in the late 1940s, the International Political Science Association was founded in 1949, as well as national associations in France in 1949, Britain in 1950, and West Germany in 1951.[4]

Behavioral revolution and new institutionalism

In the 1950s and the 1960s, a behavioral revolution stressing the systematic and rigorously scientific study of individual and group behavior swept the discipline. A focus on studying political behavior, rather than institutions or interpretation of legal texts, characterized early behavioral political science, including work by Robert Dahl, Philip Converse, and in the collaboration between sociologist Paul Lazarsfeld and public opinion scholar Bernard Berelson.[citation needed]

The late 1960s and early 1970s witnessed a takeoff in the use of deductive, game-theoretic formal modelling techniques aimed at generating a more analytical corpus of knowledge in the discipline. This period saw a surge of research that borrowed theory and methods from economics to study political institutions, such as the United States Congress, as well as political behavior, such as voting. William H. Riker and his colleagues and students at the University of Rochester were the main proponents of this shift.[citation needed]

Despite considerable research progress in the discipline based on all types of scholarship discussed above, scholars have noted that progress toward systematic theory has been modest and uneven.[9]

21st century

In 2000, the

Perestroika Movement in political science was introduced as a reaction against what supporters of the movement called the mathematicization of political science. Those who identified with the movement argued for a plurality of methodologies and approaches in political science and for more relevance of the discipline to those outside of it.[10]

Some evolutionary psychology theories argue that humans have evolved a highly developed set of psychological mechanisms for dealing with politics. However, these mechanisms evolved for dealing with the small group politics that characterized the ancestral environment and not the much larger political structures in today's world. This is argued to explain many important features and systematic cognitive biases of current politics.[11]

Overview

normative theses, such as by making specific policy recommendations. The study of politics and policies can be closely connected—for example, in comparative analyses of which types of political institutions tend to produce certain types of policies.[12] Political science provides analysis and predictions about political and governmental issues.[13] Political scientists examine the processes, systems and political dynamics of countries and regions of the world, often to raise public awareness or to influence specific governments.[13]

Political scientists may provide the frameworks from which journalists, special interest groups, politicians, and the

electorate
analyze issues. According to Chaturvedy,

Political scientists may serve as advisers to specific politicians, or even run for office as politicians themselves. Political scientists can be found working in governments, in political parties, or as civil servants. They may be involved with

non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or political movements. In a variety of capacities, people educated and trained in political science can add value and expertise to corporations. Private enterprises such as think tanks, research institutes, polling and public relations firms often employ political scientists.[14]

Country-specific studies

Political scientists may study political phenomena within one specific country. For example, they may study just the politics of the United States[15] or just the politics of China.[16]

Political scientists look at a variety of data, including constitutions,

elections, public opinion, and public policy, foreign policy, legislatures, and judiciaries. Political scientists will often focus on the politics of their own country; for example, a political scientist from Indonesia may become an expert in the politics of Indonesia.[17]

Anticipating crises

The theory of political transitions,

correlations in large groups, was proposed for crisis anticipation and may be successfully used in various areas.[22] Its applicability for early diagnosis of political crises was demonstrated by the analysis of the prolonged stress period preceding the 2014 Ukrainian economic and political crisis. There was a simultaneous increase in the total correlation between the 19 major public fears in the Ukrainian society (by about 64%) and in their statistical dispersion (by 29%) during the pre-crisis years.[23] A feature shared by certain major revolutions is that they were not predicted. The theory of apparent inevitability of crises and revolutions was also developed.[24]

The study of major crises, both political crises and external crises that can affect politics, is not limited to attempts to predict regime transitions or major changes in political institutions. Political scientists also study how governments handle unexpected disasters, and how voters in democracies react to their governments' preparations for and responses to crises.[25]

Research methods

Political science is methodologically diverse and appropriates many methods originating in psychology, social research, political philosophy, and many others, in addition to those that developed chiefly within the field of political science.

Political scientists approach the study of politics from a host of different ontological orientations and with a variety of different tools. Because political science is essentially a study of

Lawrence Lowell once said "We are limited by the impossibility of experiment. Politics is an observational, not an experimental science."[19]
Because of this, political scientists have historically observed political elites, institutions, and individual or group behaviour in order to identify patterns, draw generalizations, and build theories of politics.

Like all social sciences, political science faces the difficulty of observing human actors that can only be partially observed and who have the capacity for making conscious choices, unlike other subjects, such as non-human organisms in

geoscience, chemical elements in chemistry, stars in astronomy, or particles in physics. Despite the complexities, contemporary political science has progressed by adopting a variety of methods and theoretical approaches to understanding politics, and methodological
pluralism is a defining feature of contemporary political science.

Empirical political science methods include the use of field experiments,[27] surveys and survey experiments,[28] case studies,[29] process tracing,[30][31] historical and institutional analysis,[32] ethnography,[33] participant observation,[34] and interview research.[35]

Political scientists also use and develop theoretical tools like game theory and agent-based models to study a host of political systems and situations.[36]

Political theorists approach theories of political phenomena with a similar diversity of positions and tools, including feminist political theory, historical analysis associated with the Cambridge school, and Straussian approaches.

Political science may overlap with topics of study that are the traditional focuses of other social sciences—for example, when sociological norms or psychological biases are connected to political phenomena. In these cases, political science may either inherit their methods of study or develop a contrasting approach.[37] For example, Lisa Wedeen has argued that political science's approach to the idea of culture, originating with Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba and exemplified by authors like Samuel P. Huntington, could benefit from aligning more closely with the study of culture in anthropology.[37] In turn, methodologies that are developed within political science may influence how researchers in other fields, like public health, conceive of and approach political processes and policies.[38]

Education

Political science, possibly like the social sciences as a whole, can be described "as a discipline which lives on the fault line between the 'two cultures' in the academy, the

liberal arts.[40] At some universities, especially research universities and in particular those that have a strong cooperation between research, undergraduate, and graduate faculty with a stronger more applied emphasis in public administration, political science would be taught by the university's public policy school
.

Most United States

academic concentrations within a political science academic major. Master's-level programs in public administration are professional degrees covering public policy along with other applied subjects; they are often seen as more linked to politics than any other discipline, which may be reflected by being housed in that department.[42]

The main national honor society for college and university students of government and politics in the United States is Pi Sigma Alpha, while Pi Alpha Alpha is a national honor society specifically designated for public administration.

Writing

The most common piece of academic writing in generalist political sciences is the research paper, which investigates an original research question.[43][44]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Definition from Lexico powered by Oxford University Press. Retrieved 23 February 2020". Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  2. .
  3. ^ "Definition from Lexico powered by Oxford University Press. Retrieved 23 February 2020". Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  4. ^ .
  5. .
  6. .
  7. ^ Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. "How to Become a Political Scientist". Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  8. from the original on 18 January 2022. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
  9. ^ Kim Quaile Hill, "In Search of General Theory", Journal of Politics 74 (October 2012), 917–31.
  10. from the original on 20 August 2020. Retrieved 24 May 2016.
  11. .
  12. ^ Roller, Edeltraud (2005). The Performance of Democracies: Political Institutions and Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
  13. ^ a b Maddocks, Krysten Godfrey (26 June 2020). "What is Political Science All About?". www.snhu.edu. Archived from the original on 25 September 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  14. from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
  15. .
  16. ^ Oi, Jean C. (1989). State and Peasant in Contemporary China: The Political Economy of Village Government. University of California Press. p. xvi.
  17. ^ "Sekelumit Prof. Dr. Miriam Budiardjo" (in Indonesian). Indonesian Political Science Association. 25 October 2013. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
  18. ^ Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. "A theory of political transitions." Archived 9 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine American Economic Review. 2001 Sep 1:938–63.
  19. ^ a b Lowell, A. Lawrence. 1910. "The Physiology of Politics Archived 9 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine." American Political Science Review 4: 1–15.
  20. ^ McClelland C.A. "The Anticipation of International Crises: Prospects for Theory and Research." Archived 9 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 1, Special Issue on International Crisis: Progress and Prospects for Applied Forecasting and Management (March 1977), pp. 15–38
  21. ^ Scheffer M., Carpenter S.R., Lenton T.M., et al. "Anticipating critical transitions." Archived 4 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine Science. 2012 Oct 19; 338(6105):344–48.
  22. from the original on 3 April 2022. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
  23. from the original on 3 April 2022. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
  24. ^ Kuran T. "Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution." Archived 9 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine Public Choice, Vol. 61, No. 1 (April 1989), pp. 41–74
  25. S2CID 32422707
    .
  26. .
  27. .
  28. ^ "The Progress and Pitfalls of Using Survey Experiments in Political Science". Oxford Research Encyclopedia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. February 2020.
  29. .
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .
  33. .
  34. ^ Cramer, Katherine J. (2016). The Politics of Resentment. University of Chicago Press.
  35. .
  36. .
  37. ^ .
  38. .
  39. ^ Stoner, J.R. (22 February 2008). "Political Science and Political Education". Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA Teaching and Learning Conference (APSA), San Jose Marriott, San Jose, California. Archived from the original on 30 November 2009. Retrieved 19 October 2011. …although one might allege the same for social science as a whole, political scientists receive funding from and play an active role in both the National Science Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities [in the United States].
  40. ^ See, e.g., the department of Political Science Archived 19 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine at Marist College, part of a Division of Humanities before that division became the School of Liberal Arts (c. 2000).
  41. S2CID 255514132
    .
  42. from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 17 June 2015. …existing practices at Harvard University, the University of California at Berkeley, and the University of Michigan.
  43. from the original on 3 April 2022, retrieved 25 September 2021
  44. ^ "Political Science". The Writing Center • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Archived from the original on 25 September 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2021.

Further reading

External links

Professional organizations

Further reading

Library guides