Polysporangiophyte
Polysporangiophyte Temporal range:
| |
---|---|
Reconstruction of Aglaophyton, illustrating bifurcating axes with terminal sporangia, and rhizoids. | |
Modern polysporangiophyte, monarch fern is a vascular plant .
| |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | Plantae |
Clade: | Embryophytes |
Clade: | Polysporangiophytes Kenrick & Crane (1997) |
Subgroups | |
|
Polysporangiophytes, also called polysporangiates or formally Polysporangiophyta, are plants in which the spore-bearing generation (sporophyte) has branching stems (axes) that bear sporangia. The name literally means 'many sporangia plant'. The clade includes all land plants (embryophytes) except for the bryophytes (liverworts, mosses and hornworts) whose sporophytes are normally unbranched, even if a few exceptional cases occur.[1] While the definition is independent of the presence of vascular tissue, all living polysporangiophytes also have vascular tissue, i.e., are vascular plants or tracheophytes. Extinct polysporangiophytes are known that have no vascular tissue and so are not tracheophytes.
Early polysporangiophytes
History of discovery
Paleobotanists distinguish between micro- and megafossils. Microfossils are primarily spores, either single or in groups. Megafossils are preserved parts of plants large enough to show structure, such as stem cross-sections or branching patterns.[2]
From 1917 onwards, Robert Kidston and William H. Lang published a series of papers describing fossil plants from the Rhynie chert – a fine-grained sedimentary rock found near the village of Rhynie, Aberdeenshire, now dated to the Pragian of the Lower Devonian (around 411 to 408 million years ago). The fossils were better-preserved than Dawson's, and showed clearly that these early land plants did indeed consist of generally naked vertical stems arising from similar horizontal structures. The vertical stems were dichotomously branched with some branches ending in sporangia.[3]
Since these discoveries, similar megafossils have been discovered in rocks of Silurian to mid-Devonian age throughout the world, including Arctic Canada, the eastern US, Wales, the Rhineland of Germany, Kazakhstan, Xinjiang and Yunnan in China, and Australia.[4]
As of 2019[update],
Taxonomy
The concept of the polysporangiophytes, more formally called Polysporangiophyta, was first published in 1997 by Kenrick and Crane.
Prior to that, most of the early polysporangiophytes had been placed in a single
As additional fossils were discovered and described, it became apparent that the Psilophyta were not a homogeneous group of plants. In 1975, Banks expanded on his earlier 1968 proposal that split it into three groups at the rank of subdivision.[12][13] These groups have since been treated at the ranks of division,[14] class[15] and order.[16] A variety of names have been used, which the table below summarizes.
Division | Subdivision | Class | Order | Informal |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhyniophyta | Rhyniophytina | Rhyniopsida (Rhyniophytopsida)[17] | Rhyniales | rhyniophyte |
Zosterophyllophyta | Zosterophyllophytina | Zosterophyllopsida | Zosterophyllales | zosterophyll (zosterophyllophyte) |
Trimerophyta (Trimerophytophyta)[18] | Trimerophytina (Trimerophytophytina) | Trimeropsida (Trimerophytopsida) | Trimerophytales | trimerophyte |
For Banks,
Research by Kenrick and Crane that established the polysporangiophytes concluded that none of Banks' three groups were
Many researchers have urged caution in the classification of early polysporangiophytes. Taylor et al. note that basal groups of early land plants are inherently difficult to characterize since they share many characters with all later-evolving groups (i.e., have multiple
As of February 2011[update], there appears to be no complete Linnean (i.e., rank-based) classification for early polysporangiophytes that is consistent with Kenrick and Crane's cladistic analysis and subsequent research, though Cantino et al. have published a
Phylogeny
A major cladistic study of land plants was published in 1997 by Kenrick and Crane; this both established the concept of the polysporangiophytes and presented a view of their phylogeny.[9] Since 1997 there have been continual advances in understanding plant evolution, using RNA and DNA genome sequences and chemical analyses of fossils (e.g., Taylor et al. 2006[24]), resulting in revisions to this phylogeny.
In 2004, Crane et al. published a simplified cladogram for the polysporangiophytes (which they call polysporangiates), based on a number of figures in Kenrick and Crane (1997).[10] Their cladogram is reproduced below (with some branches collapsed into 'basal groups' to reduce the size of the diagram). Their analysis is not accepted by other researchers; for example Rothwell and Nixon say that the broadly defined fern group (moniliforms or monilophytes) is not monophyletic.[25]
polysporangiophytes |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
More recently, Gerrienne and Gonez have suggested a slightly different characterization of the early diverging polysporangiophytes:[26]
Polysporangiophytes |
| ||||||||||||
The paraphyletic protracheophytes, such as Aglaophyton, have water-conducting vessels like those of mosses, i.e., without cells containing thickened cell walls. The paratracheophytes, a name intended to replace Rhyniaceae or Rhyniopsida, have 'S-type' water-conducting cells, i.e., cells whose walls are thickened but in a much simpler fashion than those of true vascular plants, the eutracheophytes.[26]
Evolution
If the cladogram above is correct it has implications for the evolution of land plants. The earliest diverging polysporangiophytes in the cladogram are the Horneophytopsida, a clade at the 'protracheophyte' grade that is sister to all other polysporangiophytes. They had essentially an isomorphic alternation of generations (meaning that the sporophytes and gametophytes were equally free living), which might suggest that both the gametophyte-dominant life style of bryophytes and the sporophyte-dominant life style of vascular plants evolved from this isomorphic condition. They were leafless and did not have true vascular tissues. In particular, they did not have tracheids: elongated cells that help transport water and mineral salts, and that develop a thick lignified wall at maturity that provides mechanical strength. Unlike plants at the bryophyte grade, their sporophytes were branched.[27]
According to the cladogram, the genus Rhynia illustrates two steps in the evolution of modern vascular plants. Plants have vascular tissue, albeit significantly simpler than modern vascular plants. Their gametophytes are distinctly smaller than their sporophytes (but have vascular tissue, unlike almost all modern vascular plants).[28]
The remainder of the polysporangiophytes divide into two lineages, a deep phylogenetic split that occurred in the early to mid Devonian, around 400 million years ago. Both lineages have developed leaves, but of different kinds. The lycophytes, which make up less than 1% of the species of living vascular plants, have small leaves (
Both the cladogram derived from Kenrick and Crane's studies and its implications for the evolution of land plants have been questioned by others. A 2008 review by Gensel notes that recently discovered fossil spores suggest that tracheophytes were present earlier than previously thought; perhaps earlier than supposed
The cladogram above shows the 'protracheophytes' diverging earlier than the lycophytes; however, lycophytes were present in the Ludfordian stage of the Silurian around 430 to 420 million years ago, long before the 'protracheophytes' found in the
Boyce has shown that the sporophytes of some Cooksonia species and allies ('cooksonioids') had stems that were too narrow to have supported sufficient photosynthetic activity for them to be independent of their gametophytes – inconsistent with their position in the cladogram.[32]
Because the
The evolutionary history of plants is far from settled.[citation needed]
Notes and references
- PMID 29254961.
- ^ See, e.g., Edwards, D. & Wellman, C. (2001), "Embryophytes on Land: The Ordovician to Lochkovian (Lower Devonian) Record" in Gensel & Edwards 2001, pp. 3–28
- ^ ISBN 978-0-12-373972-8, p. 225ff
- ISBN 978-0-231-11161-4, chapters 2, 6, 7
- ISBN 978-0-231-11161-4, p. 4
- ^ JSTOR 1219787
- S2CID 7958927
- S2CID 19151297
- ^ a b Kenrick & Crane 1997a, pp. 139–140, 249
- ^ PMID 21652317
- ^ Taylor, Taylor & Krings 2009, p. 226.
- ^ Banks, H.P. (1968), "The early history of land plants", in Drake, E.T. (ed.), Evolution and Environment: A Symposium Presented on the Occasion of the 100th Anniversary of the Foundation of Peabody Museum of Natural History at Yale University, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, pp. 73–107, cited in Banks 1980
- JSTOR 1219491
- ^ a b c Taylor, Taylor & Krings 2009, p. 227
- ^ See, e.g., Berry, C.M. & Fairon-Demaret, M. (2001), "The Middle Devonian Flora Revisited", in Gensel & Edwards 2001, pp. 120–139
- ISBN 978-0-333-14634-7, p. 57
- International Code of Botanical Nomenclature.
- International Code of Botanical Nomenclatureallows the phyton part to be omitted before -ophyta, -ophytina, and -opsida.
- ISBN 978-1-56098-730-7
- S2CID 3866183
- ^ Berry, C. M. & Fairon-Demaret, M. (2001), "The Middle Devonian Flora Revisited", in Gensel & Edwards 2001, p. 127
- JSTOR 25065865
- S2CID 83801635
- S2CID 86172890
- ^ S2CID 29795245
- S2CID 44508826, p. 270
- S2CID 128629425
- PMID 21652310, pp. 1582–3
- , pp. 470–2
- PMID 21665700
- S2CID 36688488
- PMID 22356739.
External links
- Cladogram Archived 2012-12-04 at archive.today from Crane, Herendeen & Friis 2004