Pontius Pilate
Pontius Pilate | |
---|---|
Pontius Pilatus | |
Prefect of Judaea | |
In office c. 26 AD – 36 AD | |
Appointed by | Tiberius |
Preceded by | Valerius Gratus |
Succeeded by | Marcellus |
Personal details | |
Nationality | Roman |
Spouse | Unknown[a] |
Known for | Pilate's court |
Pontius Pilate
Although Pilate is the best-attested governor of Judaea, few sources regarding his rule have survived. Nothing is known about his life before he became governor of Judaea, and nothing is known about the circumstances that led to his appointment to the governorship.[9] Coins that he minted have survived from Pilate's governorship, as well as a single inscription, the so-called Pilate stone. The Jewish historian Josephus, the philosopher Philo of Alexandria, and the Gospel of Luke all mention incidents of tension and violence between the Jewish population and Pilate's administration. Many of these incidents involve Pilate acting in ways that offended the religious sensibilities of the Jews. The Christian gospels record that Pilate ordered the crucifixion of Jesus at some point during his time in office; Josephus and the Roman historian Tacitus also record this information.
According to Josephus, Pilate was removed from office because he violently suppressed an armed Samaritan movement at Mount Gerizim. He was sent back to Rome by the legate of Syria to answer for this incident before Tiberius, but the emperor died before Pilate arrived in Rome. Nothing is known about what happened to him after this event. On the basis of events which were documented by the second-century pagan philosopher Celsus and the Christian apologist Origen, most modern historians believe that Pilate simply retired after his dismissal.[10] Modern historians have differing assessments of Pilate as an effective ruler: while some believe that he was a particularly brutal and ineffective governor, others believe that his long time in office implies reasonable competence. According to one prominent post-World War II theory, Pilate's treatment of the Jews was motivated by antisemitism, but most contemporary historians do not accept this theory.[11]
In
Pilate has frequently been a subject of artistic representation.
Life and political career
Sources
Sources on Pontius Pilate are limited, although modern scholars know more about him than about other Roman governors of Judaea.[12] The most important sources are the Embassy to Gaius (after the year 41) by contemporary Jewish writer Philo of Alexandria,[13] the Jewish Wars (c. 74) and Antiquities of the Jews (c. 94) by the Jewish historian Josephus, as well as the four canonical Christian gospels, Mark (composed between 66 and 70), Luke (composed between 85 and 90), Matthew (composed between 85 and 90), and John (composed between 90 and 110);[12] he is also mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles (composed between 85 and 90) and in the First Epistle to Timothy (written in the second half of the 1st century).
Ignatius of Antioch mentions him in his epistles to the Trallians, Magnesians, and Smyrnaeans[14] (composed between 105 and 110).[15] He is also briefly mentioned in Annals of the Roman historian Tacitus (early 2nd century), who simply says that he put Jesus to death.[12] Two additional chapters of Tacitus's Annals that might have mentioned Pilate have been lost.[16] The written sources provide only limited information, and each has its own biases, with the gospels in particular providing a theological rather than historical perspective on Pilate.[17] Besides these texts, dated coins in the name of emperor Tiberius minted during Pilate's governorship have survived, as well as a fragmentary short inscription that names Pilate, known as the Pilate Stone, the only inscription about a Roman governor of Judaea predating the Jewish–Roman wars to survive.[18][19][20]
Early life
The sources give no indication of Pilate's life prior to his becoming governor of Judaea.
Pilate was likely educated, somewhat wealthy, and well-connected politically and socially.[28] He was probably married, but the only extant reference to his wife, in which she tells him not to interact with Jesus after she has had a disturbing dream (Matthew 27:19), is generally dismissed as legendary.[29] According to the cursus honorum established by Augustus for office holders of equestrian rank, Pilate would have had a military command before becoming prefect of Judaea; historian Alexander Demandt speculates that this could have been with a legion stationed at the Rhine or Danube.[30] Although it is therefore likely Pilate served in the military, it is nevertheless not certain.[31]
Role as governor of Judea
Pilate was the fifth governor of the Roman province of Judaea, during the reign of the emperor
Pilate's title of prefect[c] implies that his duties were primarily military;[41] however, Pilate's troops were meant more as a police than a military force, and Pilate's duties extended beyond military matters.[42] As Roman governor, he was head of the judicial system. He had the power to inflict capital punishment, and was responsible for collecting tributes and taxes, and for disbursing funds, including the minting of coins.[42] Because the Romans allowed a certain degree of local control, Pilate shared a limited amount of civil and religious power with the Jewish Sanhedrin.[43]
Pilate was subordinate to the legate of Syria; however, for the first six years in which he held office, Syria's legate Lucius Aelius Lamia was absent from the region, something which Helen Bond believes may have presented difficulties to Pilate.[44] He seems to have been free to govern the province as he wished, with intervention by the legate of Syria only coming at the end of his tenure, after the appointment of Lucius Vitellius to the post in 35.[32] Like other Roman governors of Judaea, Pilate made his primary residence in Caesarea, going to Jerusalem mainly for major feasts to maintain order.[45] He also would have toured around the province in order to hear cases and administer justice.[46]
As governor, Pilate had the right to appoint the Jewish High Priest and also officially controlled the vestments of the High Priest in the Antonia Fortress.[47] Unlike his predecessor, Valerius Gratus, Pilate retained the same high priest, Joseph ben Caiaphas, for his entire tenure. Caiaphas would be removed following Pilate's own removal from the governorship.[48] This indicates that Caiaphas and the priests of the Sadducee sect were reliable allies to Pilate.[49] Moreover, Maier argues that Pilate could not have used the temple treasury to construct an aqueduct, as recorded by Josephus, without the cooperation of the priests.[50] Similarly, Helen Bond argues that Pilate is depicted working closely with the Jewish authorities in the execution of Jesus.[51] Jean-Pierre Lémonon argues that official cooperation with Pilate was limited to the Sadducees, noting that the Pharisees are absent from the gospel accounts of Jesus's arrest and trial.[52]
Daniel Schwartz takes the note in the
Incidents with the Jews
Various disturbances during Pilate's governorship are recorded in the sources. In some cases, it is unclear if they may be referring to the same event,
According to Josephus in his The Jewish War (2.9.2) and Antiquities of the Jews (18.3.1), Pilate offended the Jews by moving imperial standards with the image of Caesar into Jerusalem. This resulted in a crowd of Jews surrounding Pilate's house in Caesarea for five days. Pilate then summoned them to an arena, where the Roman soldiers drew their swords. But the Jews showed so little fear of death, that Pilate relented and removed the standards.[58] Bond argues that the fact that Josephus says that Pilate brought in the standards by night, shows that he knew that the images of the emperor would be offensive.[59] She dates this incident to early in Pilate's tenure as governor.[60] Daniel Schwartz and Alexander Demandt both suggest that this incident is in fact identical with "the incident with the shields" reported in Philo's Embassy to Gaius, an identification first made by the early church historian Eusebius.[61][55] Lémonon, however, argues against this identification.[62]
According to Philo's Embassy to Gaius (Embassy to Gaius 38), Pilate offended against Jewish law by bringing golden shields into Jerusalem, and placing them on Herod's Palace. The sons of Herod the Great petitioned him to remove the shields, but Pilate refused. Herod's sons then threatened to petition the emperor, an action which Pilate feared would expose the crimes he had committed in office. He did not prevent their petition. Tiberius received the petition and angrily reprimanded Pilate, ordering him to remove the shields.[63] Helen Bond, Daniel Schwartz, and Warren Carter argue that Philo's portrayal is largely stereotyped and rhetorical, portraying Pilate with the same words as other opponents of Jewish law, while portraying Tiberius as just and supportive of Jewish law.[64] It is unclear why the shields offended against Jewish law: it is likely that they contained an inscription referring to Tiberius as divi Augusti filius (son of divine Augustus).[65][66] Bond dates the incident to 31, sometime after Sejanus's death in 17 October.[67]
In another incident recorded in both the Jewish Wars (2.9.4) and the Antiquities of the Jews (18.3.2), Josephus relates that Pilate offended the Jews by using up the temple treasury (korbanos) to pay for a new aqueduct to Jerusalem. When a mob formed while Pilate was visiting Jerusalem, Pilate ordered his troops to beat them with clubs; many perished from the blows or from being trampled by horses, and the mob was dispersed.[68] The dating of the incident is unknown, but Bond argues that it must have occurred between 26 and 30 or 33, based on Josephus's chronology.[51]
The Gospel of Luke mentions in passing Galileans "whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices" (Luke 13:1). This reference has been variously interpreted as referring to one of the incidents recorded by Josephus, or to an entirely unknown incident.[69] Bond argues that the number of Galileans killed does not seem to have been particularly high. In Bond's view, the reference to "sacrifices" likely means that this incident occurred at Passover at some unknown date.[70] She argues that "[i]t is not only possible but quite likely that Pilate's governorship contained many such brief outbreaks of trouble about which we know nothing. The insurrection in which Barabbas was caught up, if historical, may well be another example."[71]
Trial and execution of Jesus
At the Passover of most likely 30 or 33, Pontius Pilate condemned Jesus of Nazareth to death by crucifixion in Jerusalem.[7] The main sources on the crucifixion are the four canonical Christian Gospels, the accounts of which vary.[73] Helen Bond argues that
the evangelists' portrayals of Pilate have been shaped to a great extent by their own particular theological and apologetic concerns. [...] Legendary or theological additions have also been made to the narrative [...] Despite extensive differences, however, there is a certain agreement amongst the evangelists regarding the basic facts, an agreement which may well go beyond literary dependency and reflect actual historical events.[74]
Pilate's role in condemning Jesus to death is also attested by the Roman historian
Bond argues that Jesus's arrest was made with Pilate's prior knowledge and involvement, based on the presence of a 500-strong Roman cohort among the party that arrests Jesus in John 18:3.[78] Demandt dismisses the notion that Pilate was involved.[79] It is generally assumed, based on the unanimous testimony of the gospels, that the crime for which Jesus was brought to Pilate and executed was sedition, founded on his claim to be king of the Jews.[80] Pilate may have judged Jesus according to the cognitio extra ordinem, a form of trial for capital punishment used in the Roman provinces and applied to non-Roman citizens that provided the prefect with greater flexibility in handling the case.[81][82] All four gospels also mention that Pilate had the custom of releasing one captive in honor of the Passover festival; this custom is not attested in any other source. Historians disagree on whether or not such a custom is a fictional element of the gospels, reflects historical reality, or perhaps represents a single amnesty in the year of Jesus's crucifixion.[83]
The Gospels' portrayal of Pilate is "widely assumed" to diverge greatly from that found in Josephus and Philo,
Others have tried to explain Pilate's behavior in the Gospels as motivated by a change of circumstances from that shown in Josephus and Philo, usually presupposing a connection between Pilate's caution and the death of Sejanus.[84] Yet other scholars, such as Brian McGing and Bond, have argued that there is no real discrepancy between Pilate's behavior in Josephus and Philo and that in the Gospels.[7][90] Warren Carter argues that Pilate is portrayed as skillful, competent, and manipulative of the crowd in Mark, Matthew, and John, only finding Jesus innocent and executing him under pressure in Luke.[91] N. T. Wright and Craig A. Evans argue that Pilate's hesitation was due to the fear of causing a revolt during Passover, when large numbers of pilgrims were in Jerusalem.[92]
Removal and later life
According to Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews (18.4.1–2), Pilate's removal as governor occurred after Pilate slaughtered a group of armed
Following Tiberius's death, Pilate's hearing would have been handled by the new emperor Caligula: it is unclear whether any hearing took place, as new emperors often dismissed outstanding legal matters from previous reigns.[96] The only sure outcome of Pilate's return to Rome is that he was not reinstated as governor of Judaea, either because the hearing went badly, or because Pilate did not wish to return.[97] J. P. Lémonon argues that the fact that Pilate was not reinstated by Caligula does not mean that his trial went badly, but may simply have been because after ten years in the position it was time for him to take a new posting.[98] Joan Taylor, on the other hand, argues that Pilate seems to have ended his career in disgrace, using his unflattering portrayal in Philo, written only a few years after his dismissal, as proof.[99]
The church historian Eusebius (Church History 2.7.1), writing in the early fourth century, claims that "tradition relates that" Pilate committed suicide after he was recalled to Rome due to the disgrace he was in.[100] Eusebius dates this to 39.[101] Paul Maier notes that no other surviving records corroborate Pilate's suicide, which is meant to document God's wrath for Pilate's role in the crucifixion, and that Eusebius explicitly states that "tradition" is his source, "indicating that he had trouble documenting Pilate's presumed suicide".[100] Daniel Schwartz, however, argues that Eusebius's claims "should not lightly be dismissed."[53] More information on the potential fate of Pontius Pilate can be gleaned from other sources. The second-century pagan philosopher Celsus polemically asked why, if Jesus was God, God had not punished Pilate, indicating that he did not believe that Pilate shamefully committed suicide. Responding to Celsus, the Christian apologist Origen, writing c. 248 AD, argued that nothing bad happened to Pilate, because the Jews and not Pilate were responsible for Jesus' death; he therefore also assumed that Pilate did not die a shameful death.[102][103] Pilate's supposed suicide is also left unmentioned in Josephus, Philo, and Tacitus.[102] Maier argues that "[i]n all probability, then, the fate of Pontius Pilate lay clearly in the direction of a retired government official, a pensioned Roman ex-magistrate, than in anything more disastrous."[104] Taylor notes that Philo discusses Pilate as though he were already dead in the Embassy to Gaius, although he is writing only a few years after Pilate's tenure as governor.[105]
Archaeology
Caesarea inscription
A single inscription by Pilate has survived in Caesarea, on the "
- S TIBERIÉVM
- PONTIVS PILATVS
- PRAEFECTVS IVDAEAE
Vardaman "freely" translates it as follows: "Tiberium [?of the Caesareans?] Pontius Pilate, Prefect of Judea [ ... has given?]".[106] The fragmentary nature of the inscription has led to some disagreement about the correct reconstruction, so that "apart from Pilate's name and title the inscription is unclear."[107] Originally, the inscription would have included an abbreviated letter for Pilate's praenomen (e.g., T. for Titus or M. for Marcus).[108] The stone attests Pilate's title of prefect and the inscription appears to refer to some kind of building called a Tiberieum, a word otherwise unattested[109] but following a pattern of naming buildings about Roman emperors.[110] Bond argues that we cannot be sure what kind of building this referred to.[111] G. Alföldy argued that it was some sort of secular building, namely a lighthouse, while Joan Taylor and Jerry Vardaman argue that it was a temple dedicated to Tiberius.[112][113]
Ameria inscription
A second inscription, which has since been lost,[114] has historically been associated with Pontius Pilate. It was a fragmentary, undated inscription on a large piece of marble recorded in Ameria, a village in Umbria, Italy.[115] The inscription read as follows:
- PILATVS
- IIII VIR
- QVINQ
The only clear items of text are the names "Pilate" and the title
Coins
As governor, Pilate was responsible for minting coins in the province: he appears to have struck them in 29/30, 30/31, and 31/32, thus the fourth, fifth, and sixth years of his governorship.[118] The coins belong to a type called a "perutah", measured between 13.5 and 17mm, were minted in Jerusalem,[119] and are fairly crudely made.[120] Earlier coins read ΙΟΥΛΙΑ ΚΑΙΣΑΡΟΣ on the obverse and ΤΙΒΕΡΙΟΥ ΚΑΙΣΑΡΟΣ on the reverse, referring to the emperor Tiberius and his mother Livia (Julia Augusta). Following Livia's death, the coins only read ΤΙΒΕΡΙΟΥ ΚΑΙΣΑΡΟΣ.[121] As was typical of Roman coins struck in Judaea, they did not have a portrait of the emperor, though they included some pagan designs.[118]
E. Stauffer and E. M. Smallwood argued that the coins' use of pagan symbols was deliberately meant to offend the Jews and connected changes in their design to the fall of the powerful Praetorian prefect Sejanus in 31.[122] This theory was rejected by Helen Bond, who argued that there was nothing particularly offensive about the designs.[123] Joan Taylor has argued that the symbolism on the coins show how Pilate attempted to promote the Roman imperial cult in Judaea, in spite of local Jewish and Samaritan religious sensitivities.[124]
Aqueduct
Attempts to identify the
Inscribed ring
In 2018, an inscription on a thin copper-alloy sealing ring that had been discovered at Herodium was uncovered using modern scanning techniques. The inscription reads ΠΙΛΑΤΟ(Υ) (Pilato(u)), meaning "of Pilate".[129] The name Pilatus is rare, so the ring could be associated with Pontius Pilate; however, given the cheap material, it is unlikely that he would have owned it. It is possible that the ring belonged to another individual named Pilate,[130] or that it belonged to someone who worked for Pontius Pilate.[131]
Apocryphal texts and legends
Due to his role in Jesus' trial, Pilate became an important figure in both pagan and Christian propaganda in late antiquity. Perhaps the earliest apocryphal texts attributed to Pilate are denunciations of Christianity and of Jesus that claim to be Pilate's report on the crucifixion. According to
Positive traditions about Pilate are frequent in Eastern Christianity, particularly in Egypt and Ethiopia, whereas negative traditions predominate in Western and Byzantine Christianity.
New Testament Apocrypha
Beginning in the fourth century, a large body of Christian apocryphal texts developed concerning Pilate, making up one of the largest groups of surviving
The fragmentary third-century
In the most common version of the passion narrative in the apocryphal
In the so-called
Pilate's death in the apocrypha
Seven of the Pilate texts mention Pilate's fate after the crucifixion: in three, he becomes a very positive figure, while in four he is presented as diabolically evil.
In addition to the report on Pilate's suicide in Eusebius, Grüll notes three Western apocryphal traditions about Pilate's suicide. In the
Later legends
Beginning in the eleventh century, more extensive legendary biographies of Pilate were written in Western Europe, adding details to information provided by the bible and apocrypha.[169] The legend exists in many different versions and was extremely widespread in both Latin and the vernacular, and each version contains significant variation, often relating to local traditions.[170]
Early "biographies"
The earliest extant legendary biography is the De Pilato of c. 1050, with three further Latin versions appearing in the mid-twelfth century, followed by many vernacular translations.[171] Howard Martin summarizes the general content of these legendary biographies as follows: a king who was skilled in astrology and named Atus lived in Mainz. The king reads in the stars that he will bear a son who will rule over many lands, so he has a miller's daughter named Pila brought to him whom he impregnates; Pilate's name thus results from the combination of the names Pila with Atus.
A few years later, Pilate is brought to his father's court where he kills his half-brother. As a result, he is sent as a hostage to Rome, where he kills another hostage. As punishment he is sent to the island of Pontius, whose inhabitants he subjugates, thus acquiring the name Pontius Pilate. King Herod hears of this accomplishment and asks him to come to Palestine to aid his rule there; Pilate comes but soon usurps Herod's power.[172]
The trial and judgment of Jesus then happens as in the gospels. The emperor in Rome is suffering from a terrible disease at this time, and hearing of Christ's healing powers, sends for him only to learn from Saint Veronica that Christ has been crucified, but she possesses a cloth with the image of his face. Pilate is taken as a prisoner with her to Rome to be judged, but every time the emperor sees Pilate to condemn him, his anger dissipates. This is revealed to be because Pilate is wearing Jesus's coat; when the coat is removed, the Emperor condemns him to death, but Pilate commits suicide first. The body is first thrown in the Tiber, but because it causes storms it is then moved to Vienne, and then thrown in a lake in the high Alps.[173]
One important version of the Pilate legend is found in the
Western Europe
Several places in Western Europe have traditions associated with Pilate. The cities of
The town of Tarragona in modern Spain possesses a first-century Roman tower, which, since the eighteenth-century, has been called the "Torre del Pilatos," in which Pilate is claimed to have spent his last years.[168] The tradition may go back to a misread Latin inscription on the tower.[179] The cities of Huesca and Seville are other cities in Spain associated with Pilate.[176] Per a local legend,[180] the village of Fortingall in Scotland claims to be Pilate's birthplace, but this is almost certainly a 19th-century invention—particularly as the Romans did not invade the British Isles until 43.[181]
Eastern Christianity
Pilate was also the subject of legends in Eastern Christianity. The Byzantine chronicler
Art, literature, and film
Visual art
Late antique and early medieval art
Pilate is one of the most important figures in early Christian art; he is often given greater prominence than Jesus himself.[185] He is, however, entirely absent from the earliest Christian art; all images postdate the emperor Constantine and can be classified as early Byzantine art.[186] Pilate first appears in art on a Christian sarcophagus in 330 CE; in the earliest depictions he is shown washing his hands without Jesus being present.[187] In later images he is typically shown washing his hands of guilt in Jesus' presence.[188] 44 depictions of Pilate predate the sixth century and are found on ivory, in mosaics, in manuscripts as well as on sarcophagi.[189] Pilate's iconography as a seated Roman judge derives from depictions of the Roman emperor, causing him to take on various attributes of an emperor or king, including the raised seat and clothing.[190]
The older Byzantine model of depicting Pilate washing his hands continues to appear on artwork into the tenth century;
The eleventh century sees Pilate iconography spread from France and Germany to Great Britain and further into the eastern Mediterranean.[192] Images of Pilate are found on new materials such as metal, while he appeared less frequently on ivory, and continues to be a frequent subject of gospel and psalter manuscript illuminations.[192] Depictions continue to be greatly influenced by the Acts of Pilate, and the number of situations in which Pilate is depicted also increases.[192] From the eleventh century onward, Pilate is frequently represented as a Jewish king, wearing a beard and a Jewish hat.[197] In many depictions he is no longer depicted washing his hands, or is depicted washing his hands but not in the presence of Jesus, or else he is depicted in passion scenes in which the Bible does not mention him.[198]
Despite being venerated as a saint by the
High and late medieval and renaissance art
In the thirteenth century, depictions of the events of Christ's passion came to dominate all visual art forms—these depictions of the "Passion cycle" do not always include Pilate, but they often do so; when he is included, he is often given stereotyped Jewish features.[199] One of the earliest examples of Pilate rendered as a Jew is from the eleventh century on the Hildesheim cathedral doors (see image, above right). This is the first known usage of the motif of Pilate being influenced and corrupted by the Devil in Medieval Art. Pilate is typically represented in fourteen different scenes from his life;[200] however, more than half of all thirteenth-century representations of Pilate show the trial of Jesus.[201] Pilate also comes to be frequently depicted as present at the crucifixion, by the fifteenth century being a standard element of crucifixion artwork.[202] While many images still draw from the Acts of Pilate, the Golden Legend of Jacobus de Voragine is the primary source for depictions of Pilate from the second half of the thirteenth century onward.[203] Pilate now frequently appears in illuminations for books of hours,[204] as well as in the richly illuminated Bibles moralisées, which include many biographical scenes adopted from the legendary material, although Pilate's washing of hands remains the most frequently depicted scene.[205] In the Bible moralisée, Pilate is generally depicted as a Jew.[206] In many other images, however, he is depicted as a king or with a mixture of attributes of a Jew and a king.[207]
The fourteenth and fifteenth centuries see fewer depictions of Pilate, although he generally appears in cycles of artwork on the passion. He is sometimes replaced by Herod, Annas, and Caiaphas in the trial scene.[208] Depictions of Pilate in this period are mostly found in private devotional settings such as on ivory or in books; he is also a major subject in a number of panel-paintings, mostly German, and frescoes, mostly Scandinavian.[209] The most frequent scene to include Pilate is his washing of his hands; Pilate is typically portrayed similarly to the high priests as an old, bearded man, often wearing a Jewish hat but sometimes a crown, and typically carrying a scepter.[210] Images of Pilate were especially popular in Italy, where, however, he was almost always portrayed as a Roman,[211] and often appears in the new medium of large-scale church paintings.[212] Pilate continued to be represented in various manuscript picture bibles and devotional works as well, often with innovative iconography, sometimes depicting scenes from the Pilate legends.[213] Many, mostly German, engravings and woodcuts of Pilate were created in the fifteenth century.[214] Images of Pilate were printed in the Biblia pauperum ("Bibles of the Poor"), picture bibles focusing on the life of Christ, as well as the Speculum Humanae Salvationis ("Mirror of Human Salvation"), which continued to be printed into the sixteenth century.[215]
Post-medieval art
In the
Following this longer period in which few depictions of Pilate were made, the increased religiosity of the mid-nineteenth century caused a slew of new depictions of Pontius Pilate to be created, now depicted as a Roman.
Medieval plays
Pilate plays a major role in the medieval
In the passion plays from the continental Western Europe, Pilate's characterization varies from good to evil, but he is mostly a benign figure.[231] The earliest surviving passion play, the thirteenth-century Ludus de Passione from Klosterneuburg, portrays Pilate as a weak administrator who succumbs to the whims of the Jews in having Christ crucified.[232] Pilate goes on to play an important role in the increasingly long and elaborate passion plays performed in the German-speaking countries and in France.[233] In Arnoul Gréban's fifteenth-century Passion, Pilate instructs the flagellators on how best to whip Jesus.[234] The 1517 Alsfelder Passionsspiel portrays Pilate as condemning Christ to death out of fear of losing Herod's friendship and to earn the Jews' good will, despite his long dialogues with the Jews in which he professes Christ's innocence. He eventually becomes a Christian himself.[235] In the 1493 Frankfurter Passionsspiel, on the other hand, Pilate himself accuses Christ.[236] The fifteenth-century German Benediktbeuern passion play depicts Pilate as a good friend of Herod's, kissing him in a reminiscence of the kiss of Judas.[206] Colum Hourihane argues that all of these plays supported antisemitic tropes and were written at times when persecution of Jews on the continent were high.[237]
The fifteenth-century Roman Passione depicts Pilate as trying to save Jesus against the wishes of the Jews.[230] In the Italian passion plays, Pilate never identifies himself as a Jew, condemning them in the fifteenth-century Resurrezione and stressing the Jews' fear of the "new law" of Christ.[238]
Hourihane argues that in England, where the Jews had been expelled in 1290 CE, Pilate's characterization may have been used primarily to satyrize corrupt officials and judges rather than to stoke antisemitism.
The fifteenth century also sees Pilate as a character in plays based on legendary material: one, La Vengeance de Nostre-Seigneur, exists in two dramatic treatments focusing on the horrible fates that befell Christ's tormenters: it portrays Pilate being tied to a pillar, covered with oil and honey, and then slowly dismembered over 21 days; he is carefully tended to so that he does not die until the end.[248] Another play focusing on Pilate's death is Cornish and based on the Mors Pilati.[249] The Mystère de la Passion d'Angers by Jean Michel includes legendary scenes of Pilate's life before the passion.[231]
Modern literature
Pontius Pilate appears as a character in a large number of literary works, typically as a character in the judgment of Christ.[224] One of the earliest literary works in which he plays a large role is French writer Anatole France's 1892 short story "Le Procurateur de Judée" ("The Procurator of Judaea"), which portrays an elderly Pilate who has been banished to Sicily. There he lives happily as a farmer and is looked after by his daughter, but suffers from gout and obesity and broods over his time as governor of Judaea.[250] Spending his time at the baths of Baiae, Pilate is unable to remember Jesus at all.[251]
John Masefield's play in verse, Good Friday was written in 1916. Pilate is the protagonist.[252]
Pilate makes a brief appearance in the preface to George Bernard Shaw's 1933 play On the Rocks where he argues against Jesus about the dangers of revolution and of new ideas.[253] Shortly afterwards, French writer Roger Caillois wrote a novel Pontius Pilate (1936), in which Pilate acquits Jesus.[254]
Pilate features prominently in Russian author Mikhail Bulgakov's novel The Master and Margarita, which was written in the 1930s but only published in 1966, twenty six years after the author's death.[255] Henry I. MacAdam describes it as "the 'cult classic' of Pilate-related fiction."[254] The work features a novel within the novel about Pontius Pilate and his encounter with Jesus (Yeshu Ha-Notsri) by an author only called the Master. Because of this subject matter, the Master has been attacked for "Pilatism" by the Soviet literary establishment. Five chapters of the novel are featured as chapters of The Master and Margarita. In them, Pilate is portrayed as wishing to save Jesus, being affected by his charisma, but as too cowardly to do so. Russian critics in the 1960s interpreted this Pilate as "a model of the spineless provincial bureaucrats of Stalinist Russia."[256] Pilate becomes obsessed with his guilt for having killed Jesus.[257] Because he betrayed his desire to follow his morality and free Jesus, Pilate must suffer for eternity.[258] Pilate's burden of guilt is finally lifted by the Master when he encounters him at the end of Bulgakov's novel.[259]
The majority of literary texts about Pilate come from the time after the Second World War, a fact which Alexander Demandt suggests shows a cultural dissatisfaction with Pilate having washed his hands of guilt.[251] One of Swiss writer Friedrich Dürrenmatt's earliest stories ("Pilatus," 1949) portrays Pilate as aware that he is torturing God in the trial of Jesus.[260] Swiss playwright Max Frisch's comedy Die chinesische Mauer portrays Pilate as a skeptical intellectual who refuses to take responsibility for the suffering he has caused.[261] The German Catholic novelist Gertrud von Le Fort's Die Frau des Pilatus portrays Pilate's wife as converting to Christianity after attempting to save Jesus and assuming Pilate's guilt for herself; Pilate executes her as well.[260]
In 1986, Soviet-Kyrgiz writer
Film
Pilate has been depicted in a number of films, being included in portrayals of Christ's passion already in some of the earliest films produced.[263] In the 1927 silent film The King of Kings, Pilate is played by Hungarian-American actor Victor Varconi, who is introduced seated under an enormous 37 feet high Roman eagle, which Christopher McDonough argues symbolizes "not power that he possesses but power that possesses him".[264] During the Ecce homo scene, the eagle stands in the background between Jesus and Pilate, with a wing above each figure; after hesitantly condemning Jesus, Pilate passes back to the eagle, which is now framed beside him, showing his isolation in his decision and, McDonough suggests, causing the audience to question how well he has served the emperor.[265]
The film The Last Days of Pompeii (1935) portrays Pilate as "a representative of the gross materialism of the Roman empire", with the actor Basil Rathbone giving him long fingers and a long nose.[266] Following the Second World War, Pilate and the Romans often take on a villainous role in American film.[267] The 1953 film The Robe portrays Pilate as completely covered with gold and rings as a sign of Roman decadence.[268] The 1959 film Ben-Hur shows Pilate (the Australian actor, Frank Thring Jr.) presiding over a chariot race, in a scene that Ann Wroe says "seemed closely modeled on the Hitler footage of the 1936 Olympics," with Pilate bored and sneering.[269] Martin Winkler, however, argues that Ben-Hur provides a more nuanced and less condemnatory portrayal of Pilate and the Roman Empire than most American films of the period.[270]
Only one film has been made entirely in Pilate's perspective, the 1962 French-Italian
Mel Gibson's 2004 film The Passion of the Christ portrays Pilate, played by Hristo Shopov, as a sympathetic, noble-minded character,[275] fearful that the Jewish priest Caiaphas will start an uprising if he does not give in to his demands. He expresses disgust at the Jewish authorities' treatment of Jesus when Jesus is brought before him and offers Jesus a drink of water.[275] McDonough argues that "Shopov gives us a very subtle Pilate, one who manages to appear alarmed though not panicked before the crowd, but who betrays far greater misgivings in private conversation with his wife."[276]
Legacy
Pontius Pilate is mentioned as having been involved in the crucifixion in both the
He is venerated as a saint by the
Pilate's washing his hands of responsibility for Jesus's death in Matthew 27:24 is a commonly encountered image in the popular imagination,[75] and is the origin of the English phrase "to wash one's hands of (the matter)", meaning to refuse further involvement with or responsibility for something.[285] Parts of the dialogue attributed to Pilate in the Gospel of John have become particularly famous sayings, especially quoted in the Latin version of the Vulgate.[286] These include John 18:35 (numquid ego Iudaeus sum? "Am I a Jew?"), John 18:38 (Quid est veritas?; "What is truth?"), John 19:5 (Ecce homo, "Behold the man!"), John 19:14 (Ecce rex vester, "Behold your king!"), and John 19:22 (Quod scripsi, scripsi, "What I have written, I have written").[286]
The Gospels' deflection of responsibility for Jesus's crucifixion from Pilate to the Jews has been blamed for fomenting antisemitism from the Middle Ages through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.[287]
Scholarly assessments
The main ancient sources on Pilate offer very different views on his governorship and personality. Philo is hostile, Josephus mostly neutral, and the Gospels "comparatively friendly."[288] This, combined with the general lack of information on Pilate's long time in office, has resulted in a wide range of assessments by modern scholars.[17]
On the basis of the many offenses that Pilate caused to the Judaean populace, some scholars find Pilate to have been a particularly bad governor. M. P. Charlesworth argues that Pilate was "a man whose character and capacity fell below those of the ordinary provincial official [...] in ten years he had piled blunder on blunder in his scorn for and misunderstanding of the people he was sent to rule."[289] However, Paul Maier argues that Pilate's long term as governor of Judaea indicates he must have been a reasonably competent administrator,[290] while Henry MacAdam argues that "[a]mong the Judaean governors prior to the Jewish War, Pilate must be ranked as more capable than most."[291] Other scholars have argued that Pilate was simply culturally insensitive in his interactions with the Jews and in this way a typical Roman official.[292]
Beginning with E. Stauffer in 1948, some scholars have argued, on the basis of his possible appointment by
See also
Notes
- ^ /ˈpɒnʃəs ˈpaɪlət, -tiəs/ PON-shəs PY-lət, -tee-əs[4][5][6]
- procurator in Tacitus, and with the Greek equivalent epitropos (ἐπίτροπος) in Josephus and Philo.[39] The title prefect was later changed to "procurator" under the emperor Claudius, explaining why later sources give Pilate this title.[40] The New Testament uses the generic Greek term hegemon (ἡγεμών), a term also applied to Pilate in Josephus.[39]
Citations
- ^ Demandt 1999, p. 162.
- ^ a b Grüll 2010, p. 168.
- ^ a b Hourihane 2009, p. 415.
- ^ Olausson & Sangster 2006.
- ^ Milinovich 2010.
- ^ Jones 2006.
- ^ a b c Bond 1998, p. 201.
- ^ Carter 2003, p. 11; Grüll 2010, p. 167; Luisier 1996, p. 411.
- ^ Schwartz 1992, p. 398; Lémonon 2007, p. 121.
- ^ Maier 1971, p. 371; Demandt 2012, pp. 92–93.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 22; Carter 2003.
- ^ a b c d Carter 2003, p. 12.
- ^ Demandt 2012, p. 34. "Nach dem Tod des Caligula, unter Claudius, schrieb Philo seine 'Legatio'."
- ^ a b Bayes 2010, p. 79.
- ^ Trebilco 2007, p. 631.
- ^ Wroe 1999, p. xii.
- ^ a b Carter 2003, pp. 12–19.
- ^ Carter 2003, pp. 12–13.
- ^ MacAdam 2001, p. 75.
- ^ The Pilate Stone at the Inscriptions of Israel-Palestine project: https://library.brown.edu/iip/viewinscr/caes0043/ (2019)
- ^ a b Lémonon 2007, p. 121.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, p. 16.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 47–48.
- ^ Wroe 1999, p. 16.
- ^ Ollivier 1896, p. 252.
- ^ a b Demandt 2012, pp. 46–47.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 9.
- ^ Carter 2003, p. 15.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 197; Demandt 2012, pp. 76–77; Lémonon 2007, p. 167.
- ^ Demandt 2012, p. 48.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, pp. 121–122.
- ^ a b c Schwartz 1992, p. 398.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 8.
- ^ Maier 1968, pp. 8–9.
- ^ McGing 1991, p. 427; Carter 2003, p. 4; Schwartz 1992, p. 398.
- ^ Schwartz 1992, pp. 396–397.
- ^ Lönnqvist 2000, p. 67.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, p. 122.
- ^ a b Schwartz 1992, p. 397.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 11–12.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 11.
- ^ a b Schwartz 1992, p. 197.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, p. 70.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 5, 14–15.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 7–8.
- ^ Carter 2003, p. 46.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, pp. 86–88.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 19.
- ^ Carter 2003, p. 48.
- ^ Maier 1971, p. 364.
- ^ a b Bond 1998, p. 89.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, p. 172.
- ^ a b Schwartz 1992, p. 400.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 60–61.
- ^ a b c Schwartz 1992, p. 399.
- ^ MacAdam 2001, p. 78.
- ^ Taylor 2006.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 57.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 79.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 53–55.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, p. 206.
- ^ Yonge 1855, pp. 165–166.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 36–37; Carter 2003, pp. 15–16; Schwartz 1992, p. 399.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 39.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 51–52.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 46.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 53.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 194–195.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 195–196.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 196.
- ^ "Christus bij Pilatus". lib.ugent.be. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 22–23.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 196–167.
- ^ a b Bond 1998, p. xi.
- ISBN 978-0-06-061662-5.
That he was crucified is as sure as anything historical can ever be, since both Josephus and Tacitus ... agree with the Christian accounts on at least that basic fact.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 44–45.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 197.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 70–71.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 197–198; Lémonon 2007, p. 172; Demandt 2012, p. 74.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 198.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, pp. 172–173.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 199; Lémonon 2007, pp. 173–176; Demandt 2012, pp. 75–76.
- ^ a b McGing 1991, p. 417.
- ^ Meier 1990, p. 95.
- ^ McGing 1991, pp. 417–418.
- ^ Winter 1974, pp. 85–86.
- ^ Ehrman 2003, pp. 20–21.
- ISBN 978-0-300-14009-5.
- ^ McGing 1991, pp. 435–436.
- ^ Carter 2003, pp. 153–154.
- ISBN 978-0-664-23359-4.
- ^ Demandt 2012, p. 63.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 67.
- ^ Karen Cokayne, Experiencing Old Age in Ancient Rome, p.100
- ^ Maier 1971, pp. 366–367.
- ^ Maier 1971, p. 367.
- ^ Bond 1998, pp. 92–93.
- ^ Taylor 2006, p. 577.
- ^ a b Maier 1971, p. 369.
- ^ Demandt 2012, p. 92.
- ^ a b Maier 1971, p. 370.
- ^ Grüll 2010, pp. 154–155.
- ^ Maier 1971, p. 371.
- ^ Taylor 2006, p. 578.
- ^ a b Vardaman 1962, p. 70.
- ^ Taylor 2006, pp. 565–566.
- ^ Demandt 2012, p. 40.
- ^ Taylor 2006, p. 566.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 41–42.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 12.
- ^ Taylor 2006, pp. 566–567.
- ^ Vardaman 1962.
- ^ a b MacAdam 2017, p. 134.
- ^ a b Bormann 1901, p. 647.
- ^ a b c MacAdam 2001, p. 73.
- ^ Demandt 1999, p. 82.
- ^ a b Bond 1998, pp. 20–21.
- ^ Taylor 2006, pp. 556–557.
- ^ Bond 1996, p. 243.
- ^ Bond 1996, p. 250.
- ^ Bond 1996, p. 241.
- ^ Bond 1996, pp. 241–242.
- ^ Taylor 2006, pp. 562–563.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, p. 155.
- ^ Lönnqvist 2000, p. 64.
- ^ Lönnqvist 2000, p. 473.
- ^ Hasson, Nir (19 December 2021). "Notorious Pontius Pilate Is the One Who Built Jerusalem Aqueduct, Study Finds". Haaretz. Retrieved 23 June 2022.
- ^ Amora-Stark 2018, p. 212.
- ^ Amora-Stark 2018, pp. 216–217.
- ^ Amora-Stark 2018, p. 218.
- ^ Grüll 2010, pp. 156–157.
- ^ Grüll 2010, pp. 170–171.
- ^ Demandt 2012, p. 102.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 37.
- ^ Wroe 1999, p. 329.
- ^ Ehrman 2003, pp. 20–22.
- ^ a b Grüll 2010, p. 166.
- ^ Demandt 2012, p. 94.
- ^ Lémonon 2007, pp. 232–233.
- ^ Izydorczyk 1997, p. 22.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 25.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 93–94.
- ^ Koester 1980, p. 126.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 26.
- ^ Koester 1980, pp. 128–129.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 27.
- ^ Izydorczyk 1997, p. 4.
- ^ Dilley 2010, pp. 592–594.
- ^ Izydorczyk 1997, p. 6.
- ^ Izydorczyk 1997, pp. 9–11, 419–519.
- ^ a b c Izydorczyk 1997, p. 7.
- ^ Carter 2003, pp. 10–11.
- ^ Piovanelli 2003, pp. 427–428.
- ^ Piovanelli 2003, p. 430.
- ^ Piovanelli 2003, pp. 433–434.
- ^ Grüll 2010, pp. 159–160.
- ^ Grüll 2010, pp. 166–167.
- ^ a b c Grüll 2010, p. 167.
- ^ Burke 2018, p. 266.
- ^ a b Grüll 2010, p. 160.
- ^ Gounelle 2011, p. 233.
- ^ a b Grüll 2010, p. 162.
- ^ Gounelle 2011, pp. 243–244.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 36.
- ^ Grüll 2010, pp. 162–163.
- ^ Ehrman & Pleše 2011, p. 559–567.
- ^ a b c Grüll 2010, p. 164.
- ^ Martin 1973, p. 99.
- ^ Martin 1973, p. 102.
- ^ Martin 1973, pp. 102–103, 106.
- ^ Martin 1973, pp. 101–102.
- ^ Martin 1973, pp. 102–103.
- ^ Martin 1973, p. 109.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 234.
- ^ a b Demandt 2012, p. 104.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 104–105.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 105–106.
- ^ Grüll 2010, p. 165.
- ^ Macaskill, Mark (3 January 2010). "Pontius Pilate's Scottish roots 'a joke'". The Times. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
- ^ Campsie, Alison (17 November 2016). "Mystery of the '5,000-year-old' yew of Fortingall". The Scotsman. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 102–103.
- ^ Demandt 2012, p. 106.
- ^ Demandt 1999, pp. 69–70.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 2.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 67.
- ^ Kirschbaum 1971, p. 436.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 52.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 53.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 57–60.
- ^ a b Hourihane 2009, p. 85.
- ^ a b c d Hourihane 2009, p. 144.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 86, 93–95, 111–116.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 98–100.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 86.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 92.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 146–151.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 151–153.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 227–228.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 238.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 255.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 240–243.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 234–235.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 228–232, 238.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 245–249.
- ^ a b Hourihane 2009, p. 252.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 293.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 296–297.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 303.
- ^ a b c Hourihane 2009, p. 297.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 303–304.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 305.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 312–321.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 321–323.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 308–311.
- ^ Kirschbaum 1971, p. 438.
- ^ a b Wroe 1999, p. 38.
- ^ a b Wroe 1999, p. 185.
- ^ Morowitz 2009, pp. 184–186.
- ^ Morowitz 2009, p. 191.
- ^ Wroe 1999, p. 182.
- ^ Wroe 1999, pp. 182–185.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 392.
- ^ a b MacAdam 2001, p. 90.
- ^ MacAdam 2017, pp. 138–139.
- ^ The Catholic Encyclopedia (1907). s.v. "The Way of the Cross" Archived 27 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 363.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 296.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 363–364.
- ^ a b Hourihane 2009, p. 364.
- ^ a b Hourihane 2009, p. 365.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 237.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 365–366.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 283–284.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 366–367.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 367–368.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 368–369.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 364–365.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 265.
- ^ Wroe 1999, pp. 177–178.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 286.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 243.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 297, 328.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, pp. 243–245.
- ^ Wroe 1999, pp. 213–214.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 328.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 352.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 317.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 318.
- ^ Wroe 1999, p. 358.
- ^ a b Demandt 2012, p. 107.
- John Masefield Society: Good Friday: A Play in Verse (1916)
- ^ Wroe 1999, p. 195.
- ^ a b MacAdam 2017, p. 133.
- ^ a b Langenhorst 1995, p. 90.
- ^ Wroe 1999, p. 273.
- ^ Ziolkowski 1992, p. 165.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. xiii.
- ^ Wroe 1999, p. 371.
- ^ a b Demandt 2012, p. 108.
- ^ Demandt 2012, pp. 107–109.
- ^ Ziolkowski 1992, pp. 167–168.
- ^ McDonough 2009, pp. 278–280.
- ^ McDonough 2009, p. 283.
- ^ McDonough 2009, pp. 284–285.
- ^ Wroe 1999, pp. 38–39.
- ^ Winkler 1998, p. 167.
- ^ a b c d Wroe 1999, p. 39.
- ^ Wroe 1999, p. 186.
- ^ Winkler 1998, p. 192.
- ^ a b McDonough 2009, p. 287.
- ^ McDonough 2009, p. 290.
- ^ McDonough 2009, pp. 290–291.
- ^ McDonough 2009, pp. 291–293.
- ^ a b Grace 2004, p. 16.
- ^ McDonough 2009, p. 295.
- ^ "The Apostles' Creed" (PDF). Cardinal Newman Catechist Consultants. 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 March 2019. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
- ^ Nicene Creed in English
- ^ Carter 2003, p. 1.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 391.
- ^ Bayes 2010, p. 78.
- ^ Carter 2003, p. 11.
- ^ Hourihane 2009, p. 4.
- ^ Luisier 1996, p. 411.
- ^ Martin 2019.
- ^ a b MacAdam 2017, p. 139.
- ^ Wroe 1999, pp. 331–332.
- ^ McGing 1991, pp. 415–416.
- ^ Maier 1971, p. 363.
- ^ Maier 1971, p. 365.
- ^ MacAdam 2001, p. 77.
- ^ Carter 2003, pp. 5–6.
- ^ Maier 1968, pp. 9–10.
- ^ Maier 1968, pp. 10–11.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 21.
- ^ Bond 1998, p. 22.
- ^ Carter 2003, p. 4.
References
- Amora-Stark, Shua; et al. (2018). "An Inscribed Copper-Alloy Finger Ring from Herodium Depicting a Krater". Israel Exploration Journal. 68 (2): 208–220.
- Ash, Rhiannon, ed. (2018). Tacitus Annals. Book XV. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-00978-3.
- Baudoin, Anne-Catherine (2023). Ponce Pilate: la construction d'une figure dans la littérature patristique et apocryphe. Paris: Institut d'études augustiniennes. ISBN 9782851213075.
- Bayes, Jonathan F. (2010). The Apostles' Creed: Truth with Passion. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 978-1-60899-539-4.
- JSTOR 24660068.
- ISBN 0-521-63114-9.
- Bormann, Eugen, ed. (1901). Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum XI.2.1: Inscriptiones Aemiliae, Etruriae, Umbriae, Latinae. Berlin: G. Reimer.
- Burke, Paul F. (2018). "Saint Pilate and the Conversion of Tiberius". In English, Mary C.; Fratantuono, Lee (eds.). Pushing the boundaries of Historia. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 264–268. ISBN 978-1-138-04632-0.
- ISBN 0-8146-5113-5.
- ISBN 3-412-01799-X.
- ISBN 978-3-406-63362-1.
- Dilley, Paul C. (2010). "The Invention of Christian Tradition: "Apocrypha," Imperial Policy, and Anti-Jewish Propaganda". Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies. 50 (4): 586–615.
- ISBN 978-0-19-518249-1.
- ISBN 978-0-19-973210-4.
- Gounelle, Remi (2011). "Les origines littéraires de la légende de Véronique et de la Sainte Face: la Cura sanitatis Tiberii et la Vindicta Saluatoris". In Castagno, Adele Monaci (ed.). Sacre impronte e oggetti "non fatii da mano d'uomo" nelle religioni : atti del Convegno Internazionale, Torino, 18–20 maggio 2010. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso. pp. 231–251. ISBN 9788862742993.
- Grace, Pamela (2004). "Sacred Savagery: The Passion of the Christ". Cinéaste. 29 (3): 13–17. JSTOR 41690249.
- Grüll, Tibor (2010). "The Legendary Fate of Pontius Pilate". Classica et Mediaevalia. 61: 151–176.
- Hourihane, Colum (2009). Pontius Pilate, Anti-Semitism, and the Passion in Medieval Art. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-13956-2.
- Izydorczyk, Zbigniew, ed. (1997). The Medieval Gospel of Nicodemus: texts, intertexts, and contexts in Western Europe. Tempe, AZ: Medieval & Renaissance Texts and Studies. ISBN 0-86698-198-5.
- Kirschbaum, Engelbert; et al., eds. (1971). "Pilatus". Lexikon der christlichen Ikonographie. Vol. 3. Rome, Freiburg, Basel, Vienna: Herder. pp. 436–439.
- Koester, Helmut (1980). "Apocryphal and Canonical Gospels". The Harvard Theological Review. 73 (1/2): 105–130. S2CID 162904508.
- Langenhorst, Georg (1995). "The Rediscovery of Jesus as a Literary Figure". Literature and Theology. 9 (1): 85–98. JSTOR 23926700.
- Lémonon, Jean-Pierre (2007). Ponce Pilate. Paris: Atelier. ISBN 978-2708239180.
- Lönnqvist, Kenneth (2000). "Pontius Pilate – An Aqueduct Builder? – Recent Findings and New Suggestions". Klio. 82 (2): 52–67. S2CID 193871188.
- Luisier, Philippe (1996). "De Pilate chez les Coptes". Orientalia Christiana Periodica. 62: 411–426.
- MacAdam, Henry I. (2001). "Quid Est Veritas? Pontius Pilate in Fact, Fiction, Film, and Fantasy". Irish Biblical Studies. 23 (1): 66–99.
- MacAdam, Henry I. (2017). "Quod scripsi, scripsi: Pontius Pilatus Redivivus". The Polish Journal of Biblical Research. 17 (1–2): 129–140.
- S2CID 162410612.
- JSTOR 4475698.
- Martin, Gary (2019). "Phrases and Expressions that originated in the Bible". phrases.org.uk. Retrieved 15 August 2019.
- Martin, Howard (1973). "The Legend of Pontius Pilate". Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik. 4 (1): 95–118. .
- McDonough, Christopher M. (2009). "Quid est Veritas? Pontius Pilate, the Passion, and the Pax Romana in Film". Sewanee Theological Review. 52 (2): 276–301.
- McGing, Brian C. (1991). "Pontius Pilate and the Sources". The Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 53 (3): 416–438. JSTOR 43718282.
- JSTOR 43718026.
- Milinovich, Timothy M., ed. (2010). Pronunciation Guide for the Lectionary. Liturgy Training Publications.
- Morowitz, Laura (2009). "A Passion for Business: Wanamaker's, Munkácsy, and the Depiction of Christ". The Art Bulletin. 91 (2): 184–206. S2CID 192152772.
- Olausson, Lena; Sangster, Catherine, eds. (2006). Oxford BBC Guide to Pronunciation. Oxford University Press.
- Ollivier, Marie-Joseph (1896). "Ponce Pilate et les Pontii". Revue Biblique. 5 (2 and 4): 247–254, 594–600. JSTOR 44100212.
- Piovanelli, Pierluigi (2003). "Exploring the Ethiopic "Book of the Cock", An Apocryphal Passion Gospel from Late Antiquity". The Harvard Theological Review. 96 (4): 427–454. S2CID 162634709.
- Jones, Daniel (2006). Roach, Peter; Hartman, James; Setter, Jane (eds.). Cambridge Pronouncing Dictionary. Cambridge University Press.
- ISBN 0-385-19360-2.
- S2CID 170175728.
- Trebilco, Paul (2007). The Early Christians in Ephesus from Paul to Ignatius (Reprint ed.). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8028-0769-4.
- Vardaman, Jerry (1962). "A New Inscription Which Mentions Pilate as "Prefect"". Journal of Biblical Literature. 81 (1): 70–71. JSTOR 3264829.
- Whiston, William (1737). The Genuine Works of Flavius Josephus the Jewish Historian. London.
- Winkler, Martin M. (1998). "The Roman Empire in American Cinema after 1945". The Classical Journal. 93 (2): 167–196. JSTOR 3298137.
- Winter, Paul (1974). On the Trial of Jesus. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-002283-4.
- ISBN 0-375-50305-6.
- Yonge, Charles Duke (1855). The Works of Philo Judaeus, The contemporary of Josephus, translated from the Greek. Vol. 4. London: H. G. Bohn.
- Ziolkowski, Margaret (1992). "Pilate and Pilatism in Recent Russian Literature". In Graham, Sheelagh Duffin (ed.). New Directions in Soviet Literature: Selected Papers from the Fourth World Congress for Soviet and East European Studies, Harrogate, 1990. New York: St. Martin's Press in association with the International Council for Soviet and East European Studies. pp. 164–181. ISBN 0-312-07990-7.