Poverty in Poland

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Poverty Headcount (% of population) living at below $4 (purchasing power adjusted) per day in Central and Eastern Europe, 1992-2009 (missing years were linearly interpolated). Poland is represented by the yellow line.

Poverty in Poland has been relatively stable in the past decades, affecting (depending on measure) about 6.5% of the society. In the last decade there has been a lowering trend, as in general Polish society is becoming wealthier and the economy is enjoying one of the highest growth rates in Europe. There have been noticeable increases in poverty around the turns of the decades, offset by decreases in poverty in the years following those periods.

History and trends

GDP per capita estimates for Western and Eastern Europe for 1937, as percent of UK GDP per capita.[1]
Food distribution to poor people in Galicia (Sanok)
Distribution of loaves to the poor at Christmas Time in Poland (2015)

Before WWII

See also: Poverty in Austrian Galicia

During the Second Polish Republic, deep poverty characterized the country's farmers, who made up 70% of the population, a feature that worsened with the Great Depression.[2][3] Per capita GNP in 1929 was lower than that of the neighboring Baltic states,[2] although, in 1937, higher than in Portugal or Greece.[1] While farm productivity was high in western Poland, it was much lower in southern and eastern areas, due to high population levels and relatively small farm size. In the country's central, southern and eastern regions, 6.5 million people were unable to satisfy their basic food needs by 1934–1935. In 1930–1931, farm laborers earned 54% of their low wages of two years earlier, with one noting his family's diet consisted of unseasoned potatoes, that the unaffordable price of soap meant they were covered in lice, and that a slice of bread was only for special occasions. An observer described the south as "a nightmare of degradation and poverty". By late 1934, rural Poles had an estimated purchasing capacity at 43% of the 1928 level. Urban consumers were aided by falling food prices, but jobs became scarcer, with industrial production in 1932 at 58% of the pre-depression level, and unemployment above 40% in 1932–1934.[2]

Poverty was acute among

zlotys a year.[10]

Communist era

Under the

communist regime state labour policy, income equalizing policies and subsidies to energy, food and housing helped to relieve poverty and made it less visible.[11] Rural workers' incomes were consistently lower than that of their urban counterparts, and poverty affected larger families living in the countryside with high numbers of children; but it also touched town dwellers: unskilled workers, pensioners, single and disabled people, single-parent families, families tied to alcoholism and crime, and young intelligentsia couples just starting independent lives. Family dysfunctions such as serious illness, elderly loneliness, abuse and alcoholism were correlated with poverty, as well as dramatic incidents in people's lives. Those living in poverty tended to have substandard housing, an inability to seek help from institutions, low education levels; they sometimes turned to crime and excessive drinking.[12]

The most common site of poverty was among retirees and those receiving disability payments; one 1979 estimate indicates that 40-50% of pensioners and disabled families lived at or below the social minimum. Next came workers in the lowest income categories (agricultural and unskilled workers, as well as labourers). In 1974, 48% of workers were in low income groups, while in 1979, 10% of people in workers' families were below the social minimum level. A dissenting view is that poverty did not affect employed individuals and their families, as full employment guaranteed subsistence, if at a modest standard. Families with several children came next; in 1974, 60% of children lived in families below the social minimum.[12]

Poverty was sometimes very deep, close to the subsistence minimum; this was the case for single, old and disabled pensioners; other times, it was partial, not affecting people's entire lives. For instance, a lack of adequate accommodation could impact a family's finances. The most common response to money troubles was to take on additional jobs, whether formal or informal, legal or illegal. One innovation was to wait in a queue on behalf of someone else, for a fee. Such practices meant that serious time shortages often came with poverty. As people started doing more at home to save or earn cash (producing food and clothing, repairing, painting apartments), time pressure damaged family life, so that lack of leisure time was a very widespread phenomenon among poor families.[13]

Concurrently, the state tended to neglect the problem: a 1983 work claims that social assistance fulfilled 14% of poor people's needs. Institutions were not proactively interested in bettering people's lives, while the poor had little awareness of their rights. Official ideology saw poverty as a marginal phenomenon caused by unusual life events and pathology, rather than being a usual part of life. In the 1980s, as economic depression and the shortage economy took hold, poverty changed from afflicting the marginalized and the maladapted, to include those willing and able to work.[14]

There are various estimates of poverty's extent in Communist Poland. Using the social minimum level as a measure, the following figures are cited: 20% at the end of the 1960s; 28%, mostly employees, in 1975 (a secret official estimate); about 30% at the end of the 1980s; 14.2% in 1981, 27.2% in 1983, 25.3% in 1987 and 16.3% in 1989, according to the World Bank. One researcher found that the number of the poor increased from 3.3 million in 1978 to 8.6 million in 1987. By a stricter definition of poverty, figures for the end of the 1980s include 5-7%, 6% and 5-10%.[15]

Polish sociologists began analysing poverty almost as soon as sociology was established there. Early research institutions, such as the

Warsaw School of Economics, analysed poverty, unemployment and the interwar economic migrations. Aside from census data and family budget inquiries, poverty was documented by independent investigations and autobiographical materials. The advent of communism interrupted this research tradition; poverty became a political issue, a social, political and ideological taboo. It was dismissed as a remnant of the previous regime or a byproduct of transitional difficulties; poverty and the poor were labeled with euphemisms such as "sphere of deficiency" or "low-income groups". Book or report titles prior to 1989 never used the term "poverty", while the neglect it received can also be seen in the lack of policies or related legislation. Scientific investigations were limited, with the most important research taking place in periods of relative openness: the time after the Polish October, the early 1970s, and 1980–81. A number of important studies were published in spite of the prevailing ideology, but their publication was either seriously restricted or banned.[11]

Early post-communist era

It has been estimated that Poland began its transformation from communist to capitalist economy with about 20% of its population in poverty.

Central Statistical Office (GUS) estimate) 18.1% in 2005, and dropping to 10.6% in 2008; an alternate measure suggests that in the period 2005-2008 absolute poverty fell from 12.3% to 5.6%.[18] Brzeziński (2011) notes that any rise in poverty in the period 1998-2005 was outdone by the drop in poverty in the years 2005–2008.[18]

absolute poverty
threshold chosen, poverty in Poland increased from 1992 to 1998, stayed constant until 2006 and then dropped from 2006 to 2009.

According to the Polish

poverty line in Poland has been decreasing in the last few years, down to about 6.5% in 2011.[19] The report notes, however, that this is mostly due to the fact that the nominal value of the poverty line in Poland has not changed since 2006, thus ignoring inflation.[19] If the poverty line were indexed to inflation, the report estimated that 11.4% of Polish households would be below it.[19] The poverty threshold was estimated at 16.7%.[19] Percent of population receiving less than the living wage was estimated at 6.7%.[19] Poverty has decreased as compared to a 2005 report, which had reported both poverty line and poverty threshold at 18.1%, and the percentage of population receiving less than the living wage at 12.3%.[20] In 2003, about 23% of households believed they lived below the poverty line (declaring that they saw their income as insufficient for basic needs).[20]

Overall, the levels of poverty in Poland have been reported as stable[19][21] or on the decrease in the past years, but it is still a significant concern.[18][22] The reduction in poverty slowed down or was partially reversed again in early 2010s, although as of early 2013 the datasets are still mostly preliminary and usually cover the period only up to 2011.[19][23][24]

Modern era since government shift in 2015

The Law and Justice party won the 2015 parliamentary election, first ever time with an outright majority—something no Polish party had done since the fall of communism, and with the emphasis on lowering income inequality in Poland. The party was founded in 2001 as a centrist and Christian democratic party. Initially the party was broadly pro-market.[25] It has adopted the social market economy rhetoric similar to that of western European Christian democratic parties.[26][25] However, one of the major themes in the PiS party is balanced social structure and fighting the income inequality. Shortly after assuming power it is launched successful 500+ programme giving monthly monetary benefit of 500zł per child to all families with two or more children. While this is not a social welfare program since it has no conditions like income level nor "any other strings attached", it has most benefited low income families for whom this monetary transfer is significant boost to their disposable income and as such represents transfer of wealth between social groups in the society.

The 500+ program enjoys broad support in the society and in 2019 PiS has both extended the eligibility and added more programs aimed at lowering poverty. This has attracted significant criticism especially from the main opposition liberal party Platforma Obywatelska, and some international media, as the way to buy votes and as populist, anti-liberal agenda.[27][28][29][30] PiS supports state provided universal health care, which is free to all citizens, however it is supplemented by growing private medical care with lower queues.[31]

Structural breakdown

Poverty in Poland has been described as "shallow", referring to the fact that few poor live significantly below the

poverty line (as defined by World Bank); the at risk of poverty gap in Poland is estimated at 21%.[32]

In terms of geography, poverty was more likely to affect households in small towns and rural areas, as well as households in the east and north, with the highest poverty reported in

Lubelskie Voivodeship and Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship (see also: Poland A and B).[19]

Poverty was most prevalent for households suffering from unemployment, disability, and with multiple children.[19] The young are more likely to be affected by the poverty than the old, who are relatively well off due to generous pension system.[16][19][33] As such, poverty in Poland is relatively similar, in terms of structure, to that found in most other European countries.[16] Beblo et al. (2002) note that poverty in Poland is primarily caused by unemployment, insufficient aid to families with multiple children or from marginalized groups, and poor earnings in agricultural sector.[16] Brzeziński (2011) notes that the rise in poverty in late 1990s and early 2000s can be attributed to stagnant wages and pensions, and growing unemployment, and its subsequent decline, to economic growth and welfare policies.[18]

Poverty in Poland - international ranking

Main article: List of countries by percentage of population living in poverty
Population living under 1.90 and
3.20 dollar (PPP) a day (%)
(International poverty line) 		Population living below national
poverty line
(%)
Country < $1.90[34] < $3.20[34] Year
 Poland 0.02 0.03 2017
Country World
Bank[35] 		Year CIA[36] Year Other Year
 Poland 10.6 2008 17 2003 est. — —

Income inequality

Gini Index.[37]

Since

family allowance and unemployment benefits being most important in reducing inequality.[33]

There is a widespread perception of widening

wealth gap in Poland, although Rutkowski (1998) argues that it has more to do with social structure changes than actual gap in income distribution.[33]

Income inequality in Poland - international ranking

Main article: List of countries by income equality

Key:
R/P 10%: The ratio of the average income of the richest 10% to the poorest 10%
R/P 20%: The ratio of average income of the richest 20% to the poorest 20%
Gini:

Gini index, a quantified representation of a nation's Lorenz curve

UN: Data from the United Nations Development Programme.
CIA: Data from the Central Intelligence Agency's The World Factbook.
GPI: Data from the Global Peace Index.











Country UN R/P
10%[38] 		UN R/P
20%[39] 		World Bank
Gini (%)[40] 		WB Gini
(year) 		CIA R/P
10%[41] 		Year CIA Gini
(%)[42] 		CIA Gini
(year) 		GPI Gini
(%)[43]
 Poland 8.8 5.6 34.1 2009 8.7 2002 34.2 2008

See also

References

  1. ^
    doi:10.1080/09668139408412160
    .
  2. ^
    ISBN 978-0-5214-1608-5
    . Retrieved 5 March 2013.
  3. ISBN 978-0-6740-6816-2
    . Retrieved 5 March 2013.
  4. ISBN 978-9-0279-3239-6
    . Retrieved 5 March 2013.
  5. ^ Joseph Marcus, Social and political history of the Jews in Poland, 1919–1939 (ibidem) page 34
  6. ^ Yehuda Bauer: A History of the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee 1929–1939. Ibidem. Chapter 1. A Time of Crisis: 1929–1932
  7. ^ T. Ron Jasinski-Herbert, Confrontation among neighbors Archived 2009-11-14 at the Wayback Machine, Conference at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, Washington
  8. ^ "Trudności i osiągnięcia gospodarcze i kulturalne Polski okresu międzywojennego. 2). Odbudowa gospodarki". Serwis prawno-historyczny © 2006–2009. Archived from the original on 9 January 2010. Retrieved 13 June 2013.
  9. ^ Joseph Marcus, Social and political history of the Jews in Poland, 1919–1939 (ibidem) page 41
  10. ^ Joseph Marcus , Social and political history of the Jews in Poland, 1919–1939, (ibidem) page 47
  11. ^
    ISBN 978-0-2759-6881-6
    . Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  12. ^
    ISBN 978-0-2759-6881-6
    . Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  13. ISBN 978-0-2759-6881-6
    . Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  14. ISBN 978-0-2759-6881-6
    . Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  15. ISBN 978-0-2759-6881-6
    . Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  16. ^ a b c d e f g Miriam Beblo, Stanisława Golinowska, Charlotte Lauer, Katarzyna Piętka, Agnieszka Sowa, Poverty Dynamics in Poland Selected quantitative analyses, CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw 2002, 2002. P. 30-31, 34-45
  17. ISBN 978-0-8213-4318-0
    . Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  18. ^ a b c d Michał Brzeziński, Accounting for recent trends in absolute poverty in Poland: A decomposition analysis, Working Paper, 2011 "Accounting for recent trends in absolute poverty in Poland: A decomposition analysis" (PDF). www.wne.uw.edu.pl. Retrieved 11 September 2023.
  19. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "GUS - Główny Urząd Statystyczny - Ubóstwo w Polsce w 2011r" (in Polish). Stat.gov.pl. 31 May 2012. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  20. ^ a b "GUS - Główny Urząd Statystyczny - Zasięg ubóstwa materialnego w 2005 r" (in Polish). Stat.gov.pl. 18 July 2006. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  21. ^ "Interpelacja nr 5181 - tekst odpowiedzi". Sejm.gov.pl. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  22. ^ "Poland". Socialwatch.eu. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  23. ^ "Po latach spadków poziom ubóstwa w Polsce znów rośnie | Forsal.pl - Giełda, Waluty, Finanse". Forsal.pl. 20 June 2012. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  24. ^ Kasat Sp. z o.o. (1 June 2012). "Ubóstwo w Polsce 2011 - eGospodarka.pl - Raporty i prognozy". eGospodarka.pl. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  25. ^
    ISBN 978-0-7425-5501-3
    .
  26. ^ Bale, Tim; Szczerbiak, Aleks (December 2006). "Why is there no Christian Democracy in Poland (and why does this matter)?". SEI Working Paper (91). Sussex European Institute. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  27. ISBN 978-1-137-41411-3
    .
  28. ^ Łukasz Warzecha (20 April 2018). "PiS, Czyli Populizm i Socjalizm" [PiS means Populism and Socialism] (in Polish). Retrieved 29 May 2019.
  29. ^ Traub, James (2 November 2016). "The Party That Wants to Make Poland Great Again". The New York Times Magazine.
  30. ^ Adekoya, Remi (25 October 2016). "Xenophobic, authoritarian – and generous on welfare: how Poland's right rules". The Guardian.
  31. ^ "PiS wygrywa: koniec NFZ, system budżetowy i sieć szpitali? - Polityka zdrowotna". www.rynekzdrowia.pl.
  32. ISBN 978-0-8213-4318-0
    . Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  33. ^
    ISBN 978-0-8213-4318-0
    . Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  34. ^ a b "World Development Indicators". World Bank. 9 July 2012. Retrieved 25 July 2012.
  35. ^ "World Databank". Databank.worldbank.org. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  36. CIA
    , accessed on July 25, 2012.
  37. ^ PovCalNet. PovcalNet: the on-line tool for poverty measurement developed by the Development Research Group of the World Bank.
  38. UNDP
    , accessed on July 30, 2011.
  39. UNDP
    , accessed on February 3, 2008.
  40. ^ World Bank GINI index, accessed on November 24, 2011.
  41. CIA
    , updated on January 24, 2008. Note: To calculate the value given in the table for this article, the highest 10% value was divided by the lowest 10% value.
  42. CIA
    , accessed on November 24, 2011.
  43. ^ Global Peace Index calculation incorporates UN Gini scores where available, so countries with a UN Gini calculation are left blank in this column. At "Vision of Humanity". Archived from the original on 30 March 2010. Retrieved 3 March 2013. click on each country to see its Gini coefficient. Year is not given. "There are, nevertheless, some problems with the Gini-coefficient; there is a considerable lag in the publication of statistics for many countries suffers, forcing the Economist Intelligence Unit to estimate the coefficient for a sizeable proportion of the 153 countries in the GPI. These problems of measurement look likely to persist for the foreseeable future, and the use of other measures of income inequality may be more effective."

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Poverty_in_Poland&oldid=1215905551"