Prenatal cocaine exposure
Prenatal cocaine exposure (PCE), theorized in the 1970s, occurs when a pregnant woman uses cocaine and thereby exposes her fetus to the drug. Babies whose mothers used cocaine while pregnant supposedly have increased risk of several different health issues during growth and development.[1]
"Crack baby" was a term coined to describe children who were exposed to
No specific disorders or conditions have been found to result for people whose mothers used cocaine while pregnant.[5] Studies focusing on children of six years and younger have not shown any direct, long-term effects of PCE on language, growth, or development as measured by test scores.[6] PCE also appears to have little effect on infant growth.[7] However, PCE is associated with premature birth, birth defects, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and other conditions. The effects of cocaine on a fetus are thought to be similar to those of tobacco, and are less severe than those of alcohol.[8] No scientific evidence has shown a difference in harm to a fetus between crack and powder cocaine.[9]
PCE is very difficult to study because it very rarely occurs in isolation; usually it coexists with a variety of other factors, which may confound a study's results.[6] Thus, studies have failed to clearly show that PCE has negative cognitive effects, partly because such effects may be due to concurrent factors.[10] Pregnant mothers who use cocaine, often use other drugs in addition, or they may be malnourished and lacking in medical care. Children in households where cocaine is abused are at risk of violence and neglect, and those in foster care may experience problems due to unstable family situations. Factors such as poverty that are frequently associated with PCE have a much stronger influence on children's intellectual and academic abilities than does exposure to cocaine in isolation.[11] Thus, researchers have had difficulty in determining which effects result from PCE and which result from other factors in the children's histories.
Historical context
During 1980s and 1990s, a surge occurred in use of crack
Media reports commonly emphasized that babies who had been exposed to crack in utero would never develop normally.[14][18] The children were reported to be inevitably destined to be physically and mentally disabled for their whole lives.[2] Babies exposed to crack in utero were written off as doomed to be severely disabled, and many were abandoned in hospitals.[19] They were expected to be unable to form normal social bonds.[14] Experts foresaw the development of a "biological underclass" of born criminals who would prey on the rest of the population.[17][19][20] Crime rates were predicted to rise when the generation of crack-exposed infants grew up (instead, they dropped).[19] The children were predicted to be difficult to console, irritable, and hyperactive, putting a strain on the school system.[7] Charles Krauthammer, a columnist for The Washington Post wrote in 1989, "[t]heirs will be a life of certain suffering, of probable deviance, of permanent inferiority."[17][19] The president of Boston University at the time, John Silber, said, "crack babies ... won't ever achieve the intellectual development to have consciousness of God."[19][20] These claims of biological inferiority played easily into existing class and racial biases. Reporting was often sensational, favoring the direst predictions and shutting out skeptics.[20]
Reporting on the effects of PCE may have been affected by publication bias, a disproportionate publication of studies indicating more severe outcomes as the crack epidemic emerged.[21] Scientific studies that reported PCE to have significant effects were more likely to be published than those that did not.[22] Between 1980 and 1989, 57% of studies showing cocaine has effects on a fetus were accepted by the Society for Pediatric Research, compared with only 11% of studies showing no effects.[23] Findings that other factors such as prematurity were behind symptoms that cocaine-exposed babies showed did not "fit within the narrative of what had become a national scare" and were given less attention.[24] Ideas about severe effects of PCE may have been more readily embraced because they "fit in with cultural stereotypes".[24]
At the time, the proposed mechanism by which cocaine harmed fetuses was as a stimulant— cocaine was predicted to disrupt normal development of parts of the brain that dealt with stimulation, resulting in problems such as
After the early studies that reported that PCE children would be severely disabled came studies that purported to show that cocaine exposure in utero has no important effects.[19] Almost every prenatal complication originally thought to be due directly to PCE was found to result from confounding factors such as poor maternal nutrition, use of other drugs, depression, and lack of prenatal care.[25] More recently, the scientific community has begun to reach an understanding that PCE does have some important effects, but that they are not severe as was predicted in the early studies.[19] The effects of PCE are subtle but they exist.[21][26][27] Most people who were exposed to cocaine in utero are normal or close to it.[14]
Pathophysiology
Cocaine, a small molecule, is able to cross the placenta into the bloodstream of the fetus.[28][29] In fact, it may be present in a higher concentration in the amniotic fluid than it is in the mother's bloodstream.[30] The skin of the fetus is able to absorb the chemical directly from the amniotic fluid until the 24th week of pregnancy.[30] Cocaine can also show up in breast milk and affect the nursing baby.[30][31] The severity of effects depends on how much of the drug is used, how often, and the stage in the development of the fetus.[32]
Cocaine prevents the
Use of cocaine during pregnancy can negatively affect both the mother and the fetus,[23] but the ways in which it affects the fetus are poorly understood.[25] Three main mechanisms of cocaine exposure can harm a fetus, by altering brain chemistry, altering the expression of certain genes, and the constriction of blood vessels.[1] The neurotransmitters affected by cocaine are involved in the development of the fetus's brain,[32] so the drug may affect fetal development directly by altering the development of the brain's monoaminergic system.[34] The most important way cocaine affects fetal development is by binding to dopamine receptors.[14]
Another possible mechanism by which cocaine harms the fetus may be in part by interfering with blood supply to the uterus.
Diagnosis
Cocaine use during pregnancy can be discovered by asking the mother, but sometimes women will not admit to having used drugs.
Effects and prognosis
Studies have returned widely varying reports of the effects of PCE; some claim the physical disabilities are severe and generalized, others find specific effects, others none all.[1] The timing of the dose of the drug is an important determinant of outcome, in addition to how much is used, for how long, and what kind of care is rendered after birth.[1] Drug use in the first trimester is the most harmful to the fetus in terms of neurological and developmental outcome.[40] The effects of PCE later in a child's life are poorly understood; little information is available about the effects of in utero cocaine exposure on children over the age of five.[6] Some studies have found PCE-related differences in height and weight, while others have not; these differences are generally either small or are gone by the time children are of school age.[6] Much is still not known about what factors may exist to aid children who were exposed to cocaine in utero.[25] Whether the effects of PCE are increased once children reach adolescence is unknown, as is whether the neural rewiring that occurs during this developmental period attenuates the effects.[22] A review of 27 studies performed between 2006 and 2012 found that cognitive development was mildly to moderately affected in PCE adolescents, but how important these effects were in practical terms was unclear.[22]
Unlike
Pregnancy and birth
Studies have found after controlling for other factors that some effects are present in pregnancies involving cocaine:
While newborns who were exposed prenatally to drugs such as
Mental, emotional, and behavioral outcomes
Studies have shown small deficits in behavioral, cognitive, attention, emotional, and language function in PCE infants, children, and adolescents,[22] but other studies attribute findings of negative effects on cognitive development to confounding factors.[10] Studies suggest that the environment in which a child grows up makes a more important contribution to outcome in cognitive, behavioral, and other outcomes than does the cocaine exposure itself.[11] School performance is mildly affected in older children.[29] In IQ studies, cocaine-exposed children do not appear to score lower than others.[1] Although PCE is correlated with low IQ scores, scientists generally believe that PCE alone does not cause this effect; rather, it is more likely due to associated factors.[11] In school-aged and younger children, PCE does not appear in studies to predispose children to poorer intellectual performance.[6] Poor performance on IQ tests could actually be due to trouble with sustaining attention if the tests fail to account for this factor separately.[10]
Cocaine causes impaired growth of the fetus's brain, an effect that is most pronounced with high levels of cocaine and prolonged duration of exposure throughout all three trimesters of pregnancy.[43] Prenatal cocaine exposure has been found to affect the cognitive performance of individuals and affect speech and language development, behavior, physical and cognitive growth, and function. The more of the substance the fetus is exposed to the more of an effect it can have on the overall development as well as running the risk of being fatal to the fetus during the prenatal stage(s) of pregnancy. The effects of cocaine uses can cause for there to be an increased chance of the baby being born premature, affecting the body weight, height and the growth of the organs and brain due to the premature state of the baby as well as the impact of the harmful substances the baby was exposed to. This can have effects on other areas such as brain development, being exposed to a stimulant such as cocaine can cause damage and issues in development over time. In behavior, cognition, memory, grasping of information, and attention are areas that are common struggles for children that were exposed to cocaine in the womb. These effects are seen in individuals reaching the age of 10 and older. Long-term studies have shown that there are alterations made in the structure and function of the brain occur when exposed to these drugs with cause change in the behaviors of the individual over time and they develop and grow. All of the effects physically and cognitively all vary for each individual based on their level of exposure to the drug, the gestational timing of the infant as it develops, determine some physical effect that might have occurred and the care they receive after being born.[1] Studies that use neuroimaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and FMRI have shown differences in brain structure of PCE children, for example in the cerebral cortex and limbic system.[1] Those PCE children who had slowed brain growth as fetuses are at higher risk for impaired brain growth and motor, language and attention problems after they are born.[43] Studies have found that children exposed to cocaine during fetal development experience problems with language, behavior, development, and attention. Mild deficits in language have been found in older PCE children.[29] Language development is impaired, possibly into late adolescence, but adolescents up to age 17 may improve their receptive language skills.[1]
Evidence suggests that in utero cocaine exposure leads to problems with behavior and sustained attention, possibly by affecting parts of the brain that are vulnerable to toxins during fetal development.[6] School-age PCE children have been found to have trouble regulating their behavior and sustaining their attention.[10] Children who had been exposed to high levels of cocaine in utero show poorer behavioral inhibition than those with lower levels of exposure or unexposed children.[11] The changes in behavior and attention caused by PCE are measurable by standardized scales;[43] however these behavioral effects seem to be mild.[15] Children exposed to cocaine in the first trimester are less sociable, more withdrawn, and show more anxious and depressed behaviors.[1] Those exposed to higher doses of cocaine have been reported to show aggressive and disruptive behaviors.[1] PCE girls are seven times more likely to have delinquent behavioral problems, but PCE boys are no more likely than other boys.[45] Studies from the 2000s and 2010s are conflicted on whether PCE adolescents are at greater risk for use of drugs such as cocaine, alcohol, and marijuana.[22] A 2010 study found that PCE adolescent girls were have anxiety than their non-exposed peers.[22]
Physical outcomes
Slowed growth is well documented in fetuses, but it is not as clear whether older children remain smaller or catch up to their peers.
A review of the literature reported that cocaine use causes
Epidemiology
Of all cocaine users, women of childbearing age comprise 15–17%.[29] An estimated 0.6 to 3% of pregnant women in the developed world use cocaine.[5][14] A 1995 survey in the US found that between 30,000 and 160,000 cases of prenatal exposure to cocaine occur each year.[49] By one estimate, in the US 100,000 babies are born each year after having been exposed to crack cocaine in utero.[35] An estimated 7.5 million PCE children are living in the US.[14] Pregnant women in urban parts of the US and who are of a low socioeconomic status use cocaine more often.[34] However, the real prevalence of cocaine use by pregnant women is unknown.[25][11]
Legal and ethical issues
The harm to a child from PCE has implications for public policy and law. Some US states have pressed charges against pregnant women who use drugs, including
From 1989 to 1994, in the midst of public outcry about cocaine babies, the Medical University of South Carolina tested pregnant women for cocaine, reporting those who tested positive to the police.[51] The US Supreme Court found the policy to be unacceptable on constitutional grounds in 2001.[51] Some advocates argue that punishment for crack-using pregnant women as a means to treat their addiction is a violation of their right to privacy.[40] According to studies, fear of prosecution and having children taken away is associated with a refusal to seek prenatal care or medical treatment.[15]
Some nonprofit organizations aim to prevent PCE with
Social stigma
Children who were exposed to crack prenatally faced social stigma as babies and school-aged children; some experts say that the "crack baby" stigma was more harmful than the PCE.[17] Teachers were affected by these cultural stereotypes; such biases may have negatively affected the educational experiences of children thus stigmatized.[53] Teachers who knew that specific children had been exposed to crack in utero may have expected these children to be disruptive and developmentally delayed.[42] Children who were exposed to cocaine might be teased by others who knew of the exposure, and problems these children had might be misdiagnosed by doctors or others as resulting from PCE when they may really have been due to factors like illness or abuse.[13]
The social stigma of the drug also complicated studies of PCE; researchers labored under the awareness that their findings would have political implications.[13] In addition, the perceived hopelessness of 'crack babies' may have caused researchers to ignore possibilities for early intervention that could have helped them.[7] The social stigma may turn out to be a self-fulfilling prophecy.[54]
Research
Confounding factors
A number of the effects that had been thought after early studies to be attributable to prenatal exposure to cocaine are actually due partially or wholly to other factors, such as exposure to other substances (including
PCE is very difficult to study because of a variety of factors that may confound the results: pre- and postnatal care may be poor; the pregnant mother and child may be
Addiction to any substance, including crack, may be a risk factor for child abuse or neglect.[42] Crack addiction, like other addictions, distracts parents from the child and leads to inattentive parenting.[18] Mothers who continue to use drugs once their babies are born have trouble forming the normal parental bonds, more often interacting with their babies with a detached, unenthusiastic, flat demeanor.[55] Conversely, low-stress environments and responsive caregiving may provide a protective effect on the child's brain, potentially compensating for negative effects of PCE.[22] Many drug users do not get prenatal care, for a variety of reasons including that they may not know they are pregnant.[40] Many crack addicts get no medical care at all and have extremely poor diets, and children who live around crack smoking are at risk of inhaling secondary smoke.[18] Cocaine using mothers also have a higher rate of sexually transmitted infections such as HIV and hepatitis.[21]
In some cases, it is not clear whether direct results of PCE lead to behavioral problems, or whether environmental factors are at fault.[6] For example, children who have caregiver instability may have more behavioral problems as a result, or it may be that behavioral problems manifested by PCE children lead to greater turnover in caregivers.[6] Other factors that make studying PCE difficult include unwillingness of mothers to tell the truth about drug history, uncertainty of dosages of street drugs[37] and high rates of attrition (loss of participants) from studies.[34]
Animal models
One way to address problems with uncertainty about cocaine's effects due to confounding factors is to use animal models; these allow experimenters to study the effects at specific doses and times.[56] Studies have used mice, other rodents, rabbits, and primates.[14] However, differences between species' physiology and
References
- ^ PMID 24938210.
- ^ a b c d e
Martin, M (May 3, 2010). "Crack babies: Twenty years later". npr.org. National Public Radio. Retrieved December 1, 2015.
- ^ "Crack Babies, Moral Panic, and the Criminalization of Behavior During Pregnancy (From New War on Drugs: Symbolic Politics and Criminal Justice Policy, P 107-121, 1998, Eric L. Jensen and Jurg Gerber, eds. -- See NCJ-170568) | Office of Justice Programs". www.ojp.gov. Retrieved 2022-04-23.
- ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-04-23.
- ^ PMID 20159194.
- ^ PMID 20142293.
- ^ a b c d Goldberg 2009, p. 228.
- ^ Okie S (February 7, 2009). "Encouraging new on babies born to cocaine-abusing mothers". The New York Times. Retrieved December 1, 2015.
- ^ Lavoie D (December 25, 2007). "Crack-vs.-powder disparity is questioned". usatoday.com. USA Today. Retrieved August 12, 2010.
- ^ PMID 26604776.
- ^ PMID 22791278.
- ^ Reed, Todd; Hoye, Sarah (March 10, 2015). "Former crack baby: 'It's another stigma, another box to put me in'". Al Jazeera America.
- ^ a b c Okie S (January 26, 2009). "Crack babies: The epidemic that wasn't". The New York Times. Retrieved December 1, 2015.
- ^ PMID 24968785.
- ^ PMID 19277053.
- ^ Doweiko 2008, p. 239.
- ^ Discover Magazine. Retrieved December 1, 2015.
- ^ a b c d e f g Mercer 2009, pp. 62–64.
- ^ a b c d e f g Vargas, Theresa (April 18, 2010). "Once written off, 'crack babies' have grown into success stories". The Washington Post.
- ^ a b c Greider, K (August 1995). "Crackpot ideas". Mother Jones.
- ^ PMID 16143741.
- ^ PMID 23713107.
- ^ a b c d Volpe 2008, p.1025
- ^ a b "Crack Babies: A Tale From the Drug Wars". The New York Times. 15 August 2013.
- ^ a b c d e f Doweiko 2008, p. 240.
- S2CID 8002039.
- PMID 18822371.
- ^ a b Chandler & Lane 2014, p. 23.
- ^ a b c d e f Miller et al. 2013, p. 197.
- ^ a b c d e f Doweiko 2008, p. 241.
- ^ Yaffe, Briggs & Freeman 2008, p. 417.
- ^ a b c Chandler & Lane 2014, p. 24.
- ^ PMID 15685202.
- ^ PMID 11960537.
- ^ a b c d e Aronson 2008, pp. 512–14
- ^ Chandler & Lane 2014, pp. 24–25.
- ^ a b c d e f g Zuckerman & Frank 2012, p. 127.
- ^ a b Chandler & Lane 2014, p. 20.
- ^ PMID 11241040.
- ^ PMID 12680368.
- ^ Chandler & Lane 2014, p. 25.
- ^ PMID 11268270.
- ^ PMID 15380830.
- PMID 20407981.
- ^ a b Beauchaine & Hinshaw 2015, p. 427.
- ^ a b c d e f Aronson 2008, p. 517
- ^ Aronson 2008, p. 520
- ^ MacDonald & Seshia 2015.
- ^ S2CID 23158459.
- ^ a b Gaines & Kremling 2013, p. 453.
- ^ PMID 11386286.
- ^ "Sterilisation for drug addicts?". BBC News. 10 August 2010.
- ^ Gaines & Kremling 2013, p. 452.
- ^ Connors 2007.
- ^ a b Chandler & Lane 2014, p. 28.
- ^ a b Chandler & Lane 2014, p. 22.
- ^ a b Zuckerman & Frank 2012, p. 125.
Bibliography
- Aronson, JK (2008). "Cocaine". Meyler's Side Effects of Psychiatric Drugs. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. ISBN 978-0-444-53266-4.
- Beauchaine, TP; Hinshaw, SP (29 October 2015). The Oxford Handbook of Externalizing Spectrum Disorders. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. ISBN 978-0-19-932467-5.
- Chandler, LS; Lane, SJ (3 June 2014). Children With Prenatal Drug Exposure. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-82688-0.
- Connors, GJ; Maisto, SA; Galizio, M (2007). Drug Use and Abuse. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-495-09207-0.
- Doweiko, HE (2008). Concepts of Chemical Dependency. Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN 978-0-495-50580-8.
- Gaines, LK; Kremling, J (11 December 2013). Drugs, Crime, and Justice: Contemporary Perspectives, Third Edition. Waveland Press. ISBN 978-1-4786-1318-3.
- Goldberg, R (2009). "Cocaine amphetamines". Drugs Across the Spectrum. Brooks Cole. ISBN 978-0-495-55793-7.
- Lewis, M; Kestler, L (2011). Gender Differences in Prenatal Substance Exposure. American Psychological Society. ISBN 978-1-4338-1033-6.
- MacDonald, MG; Seshia, MM (29 July 2015). "Maternal Drugs and the Developing Fetus". Avery's Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn. Wolters Kluwer Health. ISBN 978-1-4963-1868-8.
- Mercer, J (2009). "Claim 9: "Crack babies" can't be cured and will always have serious problems". Child Development: Myths and Misunderstandings. Sage Publications, Inc. ISBN 978-1-4129-5646-8.
- Miller, PM; Blume, AW; Kavanaugh, DJ; Kampman, KM; Bates, ME; Larimer, ME; Petry, NM; Dewitte, P; Ball, SA (17 May 2013). Principles of Addiction: Comprehensive Addictive Behaviors and Disorders. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-398361-9.
- Soby, JM (2006). Prenatal Exposure to Drugs/Alcohol: Characteristics And Educational Implications of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome And Cocaine/polydrug Effects. Charles C. Thomas Ltd. ISBN 978-0-398-07635-1.
- Wenzel, SL; Kosofsky, BE; Harvey, JA; Iguchi, MY; Steinberg, PS; Watkins, KE; Shaikh R (2001). Prenatal Cocaine Exposure: Scientific Considerations and Policy Implications. RAND Drug Policy Research Center and NY Academy of Sciences. ISBN 978-0-8330-3001-6.
- Volpe, JJ (2008). "Teratogenic effects of drugs and passive addiction". Neurology of the Newborn. Vol. 22. Philadelphia: Saunders. pp. 1–648. )
- Yaffe, SJ; Briggs, GG; Freeman, RA (2008). "Cocaine". Drugs in pregnancy and lactation: A reference guide to fetal and neonatal risk. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 978-0-7817-7876-3.
- Zuckerman, B; Frank, DA (2 December 2012). "Prenatal Cocaine and Marijuana Exposure: Research and Clinical Implications". In Zagon, IS; Slotkin TA (eds.). Maternal Substance Abuse and the Developing Nervous System. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-092667-4.
External links
- Crack Babies: A Tale from the Drug Wars, a documentary from The New York Times