Principality

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A principality (or sometimes princedom) can either be a

feudatory or a sovereign state, ruled or reigned over by a regnant-monarch with the title of prince and/or princess
, or by a monarch with another title considered to fall under the generic meaning of the term prince.

Terminology

Most of these states have historically been a polity, but in some occasions were rather territories in respect of which a princely title is held. The prince's estate and wealth may be located mainly or wholly outside the geographical confines of the principality.

Generally recognised surviving sovereign principalities are

Laws in Wales Act 1535 which legally incorporated Wales within England removed the distinction between those areas and the March of Wales.[1]

The Principality of Catalonia was a state located in the north-eastern area of the Iberian Peninsula and southern France between the late 12th and early 18th centuries, as the term for the political entity ruled by the Catalan Courts (the parliament) as a member of the composite monarchy of the Crown of Aragon, until the defeat of the Habsburgs in the War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714), when these institutions were abolished by the Bourbons due to their support for the Habsburg pretender. "Principality of Asturias" is the official name of autonomous community of Asturias, however, the term "Principality of Catalonia" or simply "Principality" remains in popular and informal contexts to refer to the autonomous community of Catalonia.

The term "principality" is also sometimes used generically for any small monarchy, especially for small sovereign states ruled by a monarch of a lesser rank than a king, such as a

Margraviate and even Lordship, especially within the Holy Roman Empire
.

While the preceding definition would seem to fit a princely state perfectly, the European historical tradition is to reserve that word for native monarchies in colonial countries, and to apply "principality" to the European monarchies.

European

Development

Though principalities existed in antiquity, even before the height of the

Princes of the Holy Roman Empire
.

During the Late Middle Ages from 1200 to 1500, principalities were often at war with each other as royal houses asserted sovereignty over smaller principalities. These wars caused a great deal of instability and economies were destroyed. Episodes of bubonic plague also reduced the power of principalities to survive independently. Eventually, agricultural progress and development of new trade goods and services boosted commerce between principalities. Many of these states became wealthy, expanded their territories and improved the services provided to their citizens. Princes and dukes developed their lands, established new ports and chartered large thriving cities. Some used their new-found wealth to build palaces and other institutions now associated with sovereign states.

Consolidation

Prince Johann I Josef, last prince of Liechtenstein prior to the end of the Holy Roman Empire

While some principalities prospered in their independence, less successful states were swallowed by stronger royal houses. Europe saw consolidation of small principalities into larger

papacy. They then appointed family members as princes and assured their protection. Prussia
also later expanded by acquiring the territories of many other states.

However, in the 17th to 19th centuries, especially within the Holy Roman Empire, the reverse was also occurring: many new small sovereign states arose as a result of transfers of land for various reasons.

Notable principalities existed until the early 20th century in various regions of Germany and Italy.

Nationalism

Nationalism, the belief that the nation-state is the best vehicle to realise the aspirations of a people, became popular in the late 19th century. A characteristic of nationalism is an identity with a larger region such as an area sharing a common language and culture. With this development, principalities fell out of favour. As a compromise, many principalities united with neighbouring regions and adopted constitutional forms of government, with the monarch acting as a mere figurehead while administration was left in the hands of elected parliaments. The trend in the 19th and 20th centuries was the abolition of various forms of monarchy and the creation of republican governments led by popularly elected presidents.

Ecclesiastical principalities

Several principalities where genealogical inheritance is replaced by succession in a religious office have existed in the

grand master
.

Some of these instances were merely religious offices without sovereign power over any territory, while others, such as

Durham
, shared some of the characteristics of secular princes.

Asia

Prior to the European colonialism,

Sanskrit dialect.[2] This can be seen in the spread of Hinduism and Buddhism. Indian honorifics also influenced the Malay, Thai, Filipino and Indonesian honorifics.[3]

In the colonial context, the term

British Indian and neighbouring or associated (e.g., Arabian) princely states were ruled by monarchs called Princes by the British, regardless of the native styles, which could be equivalent to royal or even imperial rank in the Indigenous
cultures.

Other principalities

Other

Principalities have also existed in ancient and modern civilizations of

]

Micronational principalities

Several

Mosman, internationally considered to be in Australia
.

See also

References

  1. .
  2. ^ Coedes, George (1967). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Australian National University Press.
  3. ^ Krishna Chandra Sagar, 2002, An Era of Peace, Page 52.