Purpureocillium lilacinum

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Divergent phialides and long, tangled chains of elliptical conidia borne from more complex fruiting structures characteristic of Purpureocillium lilacinum; magnification 460X.
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Ascomycota
Class: Sordariomycetes
Order: Hypocreales
Family: Ophiocordycipitaceae
Genus: Purpureocillium
Species:
P. lilacinum
Binomial name
Purpureocillium lilacinum
(Thom) Luangsa-ard, Hou- braken, Hywel-Jones & Samson (2011)
Synonyms[2]

Paecillium Luangsa-ard, Hywel-Jones & Samson nom. prov. (2007)[1]
Penicillium lilacinum Thom (1910)
Penicillium amethystinum Wehmer (1923)
Spicaria rubidopurpurea Aoki (1941) Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson (1974)

Purpureocillium lilacinum is a species of filamentous

root-knot nematodes
.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

The species was originally described by American mycologist

monophyletic,[7] and that close relatives were Paecilomyces nostocoides, Isaria takamizusanensis and Nomuraea atypicola.[8] The new genus Purpureocillium was created to hold the taxon. The generic name refers to the purple conidia produced by the fungus.[9]

Description

Purpureocillium lilacinum forms a dense

phialides from the ends of which spores are formed in long chains. Spores germinate when suitable moisture and nutrients are available. Colonies on malt agar grow rather fast, attaining a diameter of 5–7 cm within 14 days at 25 °C (77 °F), consisting of a basal felt with a floccose overgrowth of aerial mycelium; at first white, but when sporulating changing to various shades of vinaceous. The reverse side is sometimes uncolored but usually in vinaceous shades. The vegetative hyphae are smooth-walled, hyaline, and 2.5–4.0 µm wide. Conidiophores arising from submerged hyphae, 400–600 µm in length, or arising from aerial hyphae and half as long. Phialides consisting of a swollen basal part, tapering into a thin distinct neck. Conidia are in divergent chains, ellipsoid to fusiform in shape, and smooth walled to slightly roughened. Chlamydospores are absent.[4]

Life cycles

Purpureocillium lilacinum is highly adaptable in its life strategy: depending on the availability of nutrients in the surrounding microenvironments it may be

.

Human pathogenicity

Purpureocillium lilacinum is an infrequent cause of human disease.[15][16] Most reported cases involve patients with compromised immune systems, indwelling foreign devices, or intraocular lens implants.[17][18] Research of the last decade suggests it may be an emerging pathogen of both immunocompromised[19] as well as immunocompetent adults.[20] It is one of the most common species causing hyalohyphomycosis along with Paecilomyces variotii.[9]

Biocontrol agent

P. lilacinum is used as a biocontrol agent for several nematode species, such as Meloidogyne incognita, shown here.

Plant-parasitic nematodes cause significant economic losses to a wide variety of crops. Chemical control is a widely used option for plant-parasitic nematode management. However, chemical nematicides are now being reappraised in respect of environmental hazard, high costs, limited availability in many developing countries or their diminished effectiveness following repeated applications.

Control of plant-parasitic nematodes

Purpureocillium lilacinum was first observed in association with nematode eggs in 1966[21] and the fungus was subsequently found parasitising the eggs of Meloidogyne incognita in Peru.[22] It has now been isolated from many cyst and root-knot nematodes and from soil in many locations.[23][24] Several successful field trials using P. lilacinum against pest nematodes were conducted in Peru.[22] The Peruvian isolate was then sent to nematologists in 46 countries for testing, as part of the International Meloidogyne project, resulting in many more field trials on a range of crops in many soil types and climates.[25] Field trials, glasshouse trials and in vitro testing of P. lilacinum continues and more isolates have been collected from soil, nematodes and occasionally from insects. Isolates vary in their pathogenicity to plant-parasitic nematodes. Some isolates are aggressive parasites while others, though morphologically indistinguishable, are less or non-pathogenic. Sometimes isolates that looked promising in vitro or in glasshouse trials have failed to provide control in the field.[26]

Enzymes

Many

Meloidogyne hapla eggs has been identified.[27] One strain of P. lilacinum has been shown to produce proteases and a chitinase, enzymes that could weaken a nematode egg shell so as to enable a narrow infection peg to push through.[28]

Egg infection

Before infecting a nematode egg, P. lilacinum flattens against the egg surface and becomes closely

conidiophores
and to grow towards adjacent eggs.

Mycotoxins

Paecilotoxin is a mycotoxin isolated from the fungus.[30] Its significance is unknown. Khan et al. (2003) tested one strain of P. lilacinum for the production of paecilotoxin and were unable to show toxin production in that strain, suggesting that toxin synthesis may vary among isolates.[31][32]

References

  1. .
  2. ^ a b "Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson 1974". MycoBank. International Mycological Association. Retrieved 2011-07-17.
  3. PMID 26734546
    .
  4. ^ a b c Samson RA. (1974). "Paecilomyces and some allied hyphomycetes". Studies in Mycology. 6: 58.
  5. .
  6. ^ Thom C. (1910). Bulletin of the Bureau of Animal Industry US Department of Agriculture. 118: 73. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  7. .
  8. .
  9. ^ .
  10. .
  11. .
  12. .
  13. S2CID 20548355. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2012-04-25. Retrieved 2018-07-23.
  14. .
  15. .
  16. .
  17. .
  18. .
  19. .
  20. ^ Carey J, D’Amico R, Sutton DA, Rinaldi MG. Paecilomyces lilacinus vaginitis in an immunocompetent patient. Emerg Infect Dis [serial online] 2003 Sep
  21. ^ Lysek H. (1996). "Study of biology of geohelminths. II. The importance of some soil microorganisms for the viability of geohelminth eggs in the soil". Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. 40: 83–90.
  22. ^ a b Jatala P, Kaltenbach R, Bocangel M (1979). "Biological control of Meloidogyne incognita acrita and Globodera pallida on potatoes". Journal of Nematology. 11: 303.
  23. ^ Stirling, GR (1991). Biological Control of Plant Parasitic Nematodes. UK: CABI Publishing. p. 282.
  24. S2CID 34778287
    .
  25. .
  26. ^ Gomes Carniero RMD, Cayrol J (1991). "Relationship between inoculum density of the nematophagous fungus Paecilomyces lilacinus and control of Meloidogyne arenaria on tomato". Revue de Nématologie. 14 (4): 629–34.
  27. PMID 7773385
    .
  28. .
  29. ^ Money NP. (1998). "Mechanics of invasive fungal growth and the significance of turgor in plant infection". Molecular genetics of host-specific toxins in plant disease. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 261–71.
  30. S2CID 681219
    .
  31. .
  32. .

External links