Quantum mechanics
Part of a series of articles about |
Quantum mechanics |
---|
Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory in physics that describes the behavior of nature at and below the scale of atoms.[2]: 1.1 It is the foundation of all quantum physics, which includes quantum chemistry, quantum field theory, quantum technology, and quantum information science.
Quantum mechanics can describe many systems that
Quantum systems have bound states that are quantized to discrete values of energy, momentum, angular momentum, and other quantities, in contrast to classical systems where these quantities can be measured continuously. Measurements of quantum systems show characteristics of both particles and waves (wave–particle duality), and there are limits to how accurately the value of a physical quantity can be predicted prior to its measurement, given a complete set of initial conditions (the uncertainty principle).
Quantum mechanics
Overview and fundamental concepts
Quantum mechanics allows the calculation of properties and behaviour of physical systems. It is typically applied to microscopic systems: molecules, atoms and sub-atomic particles. It has been demonstrated to hold for complex molecules with thousands of atoms,
A fundamental feature of the theory is that it usually cannot predict with certainty what will happen, but only give probabilities. Mathematically, a probability is found by taking the square of the absolute value of a complex number, known as a probability amplitude. This is known as the Born rule, named after physicist Max Born. For example, a quantum particle like an electron can be described by a wave function, which associates to each point in space a probability amplitude. Applying the Born rule to these amplitudes gives a probability density function for the position that the electron will be found to have when an experiment is performed to measure it. This is the best the theory can do; it cannot say for certain where the electron will be found. The Schrödinger equation relates the collection of probability amplitudes that pertain to one moment of time to the collection of probability amplitudes that pertain to another.[7]: 67–87
One consequence of the mathematical rules of quantum mechanics is a tradeoff in predictability between different measurable quantities. The most famous form of this uncertainty principle says that no matter how a quantum particle is prepared or how carefully experiments upon it are arranged, it is impossible to have a precise prediction for a measurement of its position and also at the same time for a measurement of its momentum.[7]: 427–435
Another consequence of the mathematical rules of quantum mechanics is the phenomenon of
Another non-classical phenomenon predicted by quantum mechanics is
When quantum systems interact, the result can be the creation of quantum entanglement: their properties become so intertwined that a description of the whole solely in terms of the individual parts is no longer possible. Erwin Schrödinger called entanglement "...the characteristic trait of quantum mechanics, the one that enforces its entire departure from classical lines of thought".[13] Quantum entanglement enables quantum computing and is part of quantum communication protocols, such as quantum key distribution and superdense coding.[14] Contrary to popular misconception, entanglement does not allow sending signals faster than light, as demonstrated by the no-communication theorem.[14]
Another possibility opened by entanglement is testing for "
It is not possible to present these concepts in more than a superficial way without introducing the actual mathematics involved; understanding quantum mechanics requires not only manipulating complex numbers, but also linear algebra, differential equations, group theory, and other more advanced subjects.[17][18] Accordingly, this article will present a mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics and survey its application to some useful and oft-studied examples.
Mathematical formulation
In the mathematically rigorous formulation of quantum mechanics, the state of a quantum mechanical system is a vector belonging to a (separable) complex Hilbert space . This vector is postulated to be normalized under the Hilbert space inner product, that is, it obeys , and it is well-defined up to a complex number of modulus 1 (the global phase), that is, and represent the same physical system. In other words, the possible states are points in the
Physical quantities of interest – position, momentum, energy, spin – are represented by observables, which are
After the measurement, if result was obtained, the quantum state is postulated to
Time evolution of a quantum state
The time evolution of a quantum state is described by the Schrödinger equation:
Here denotes the
The solution of this differential equation is given by
The operator is known as the time-evolution operator, and has the crucial property that it is unitary. This time evolution is deterministic in the sense that – given an initial quantum state – it makes a definite prediction of what the quantum state will be at any later time.[20]
Some wave functions produce probability distributions that are independent of time, such as
Analytic solutions of the Schrödinger equation are known for very few relatively simple model Hamiltonians including the quantum harmonic oscillator, the particle in a box, the dihydrogen cation, and the hydrogen atom. Even the helium atom – which contains just two electrons – has defied all attempts at a fully analytic treatment, admitting no solution in closed form.[21][22][23]
However, there are techniques for finding approximate solutions. One method, called perturbation theory, uses the analytic result for a simple quantum mechanical model to create a result for a related but more complicated model by (for example) the addition of a weak potential energy.[7]: 793 Another approximation method applies to systems for which quantum mechanics produces only small deviations from classical behavior. These deviations can then be computed based on the classical motion.[7]: 849
Uncertainty principle
One consequence of the basic quantum formalism is the uncertainty principle. In its most familiar form, this states that no preparation of a quantum particle can imply simultaneously precise predictions both for a measurement of its position and for a measurement of its momentum.[24][25] Both position and momentum are observables, meaning that they are represented by Hermitian operators. The position operator and momentum operator do not commute, but rather satisfy the canonical commutation relation:
Given a quantum state, the Born rule lets us compute expectation values for both and , and moreover for powers of them. Defining the uncertainty for an observable by a standard deviation, we have
and likewise for the momentum:
The uncertainty principle states that
Either standard deviation can in principle be made arbitrarily small, but not both simultaneously.[26] This inequality generalizes to arbitrary pairs of self-adjoint operators and . The commutator of these two operators is
and this provides the lower bound on the product of standard deviations:
Another consequence of the canonical commutation relation is that the position and momentum operators are Fourier transforms of each other, so that a description of an object according to its momentum is the Fourier transform of its description according to its position. The fact that dependence in momentum is the Fourier transform of the dependence in position means that the momentum operator is equivalent (up to an factor) to taking the derivative according to the position, since in Fourier analysis differentiation corresponds to multiplication in the dual space. This is why in quantum equations in position space, the momentum is replaced by , and in particular in the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in position space the momentum-squared term is replaced with a Laplacian times .[24]
Composite systems and entanglement
When two different quantum systems are considered together, the Hilbert space of the combined system is the tensor product of the Hilbert spaces of the two components. For example, let A and B be two quantum systems, with Hilbert spaces and , respectively. The Hilbert space of the composite system is then
If the state for the first system is the vector and the state for the second system is , then the state of the composite system is
Not all states in the joint Hilbert space can be written in this form, however, because the superposition principle implies that linear combinations of these "separable" or "product states" are also valid. For example, if and are both possible states for system , and likewise and are both possible states for system , then
is a valid joint state that is not separable. States that are not separable are called entangled.[27][28]
If the state for a composite system is entangled, it is impossible to describe either component system A or system B by a state vector. One can instead define
As described above, entanglement is a key feature of models of measurement processes in which an apparatus becomes entangled with the system being measured. Systems interacting with the environment in which they reside generally become entangled with that environment, a phenomenon known as quantum decoherence. This can explain why, in practice, quantum effects are difficult to observe in systems larger than microscopic.[30]
Equivalence between formulations
There are many mathematically equivalent formulations of quantum mechanics. One of the oldest and most common is the "
Symmetries and conservation laws
The Hamiltonian is known as the generator of time evolution, since it defines a unitary time-evolution operator for each value of . From this relation between and , it follows that any observable that commutes with will be conserved: its expectation value will not change over time.[7]: 471 This statement generalizes, as mathematically, any Hermitian operator can generate a family of unitary operators parameterized by a variable . Under the evolution generated by , any observable that commutes with will be conserved. Moreover, if is conserved by evolution under , then is conserved under the evolution generated by . This implies a quantum version of the result proven by Emmy Noether in classical (Lagrangian) mechanics: for every differentiable symmetry of a Hamiltonian, there exists a corresponding conservation law.
Examples
Free particle
The simplest example of a quantum system with a position degree of freedom is a free particle in a single spatial dimension. A free particle is one which is not subject to external influences, so that its Hamiltonian consists only of its kinetic energy:
The general solution of the Schrödinger equation is given by
which is a superposition of all possible plane waves , which are eigenstates of the momentum operator with momentum . The coefficients of the superposition are , which is the Fourier transform of the initial quantum state .
It is not possible for the solution to be a single momentum eigenstate, or a single position eigenstate, as these are not normalizable quantum states.[note 1] Instead, we can consider a Gaussian wave packet:
which has Fourier transform, and therefore momentum distribution
We see that as we make smaller the spread in position gets smaller, but the spread in momentum gets larger. Conversely, by making larger we make the spread in momentum smaller, but the spread in position gets larger. This illustrates the uncertainty principle.
As we let the Gaussian wave packet evolve in time, we see that its center moves through space at a constant velocity (like a classical particle with no forces acting on it). However, the wave packet will also spread out as time progresses, which means that the position becomes more and more uncertain. The uncertainty in momentum, however, stays constant.[33]
Particle in a box
The particle in a one-dimensional potential energy box is the most mathematically simple example where restraints lead to the quantization of energy levels. The box is defined as having zero potential energy everywhere inside a certain region, and therefore infinite potential energy everywhere outside that region.[24]: 77–78 For the one-dimensional case in the direction, the time-independent Schrödinger equation may be written
With the differential operator defined by
the previous equation is evocative of the classic kinetic energy analogue,
with state in this case having energy coincident with the kinetic energy of the particle.
The general solutions of the Schrödinger equation for the particle in a box are
or, from Euler's formula,
The infinite potential walls of the box determine the values of and at and where must be zero. Thus, at ,
and . At ,
in which cannot be zero as this would conflict with the postulate that has norm 1. Therefore, since , must be an integer multiple of ,
This constraint on implies a constraint on the energy levels, yielding
A
Harmonic oscillator
As in the classical case, the potential for the quantum harmonic oscillator is given by[7]: 234
This problem can either be treated by directly solving the Schrödinger equation, which is not trivial, or by using the more elegant "ladder method" first proposed by Paul Dirac. The
where Hn are the Hermite polynomials
and the corresponding energy levels are
This is another example illustrating the discretization of energy for bound states.
Mach–Zehnder interferometer
The
We can model a photon going through the interferometer by considering that at each point it can be in a superposition of only two paths: the "lower" path which starts from the left, goes straight through both beam splitters, and ends at the top, and the "upper" path which starts from the bottom, goes straight through both beam splitters, and ends at the right. The quantum state of the photon is therefore a vector that is a superposition of the "lower" path and the "upper" path , that is, for complex . In order to respect the postulate that we require that .
Both beam splitters are modelled as the unitary matrix , which means that when a photon meets the beam splitter it will either stay on the same path with a probability amplitude of , or be reflected to the other path with a probability amplitude of . The phase shifter on the upper arm is modelled as the unitary matrix , which means that if the photon is on the "upper" path it will gain a relative phase of , and it will stay unchanged if it is in the lower path.
A photon that enters the interferometer from the left will then be acted upon with a beam splitter , a phase shifter , and another beam splitter , and so end up in the state
and the probabilities that it will be detected at the right or at the top are given respectively by
One can therefore use the Mach–Zehnder interferometer to estimate the phase shift by estimating these probabilities.
It is interesting to consider what would happen if the photon were definitely in either the "lower" or "upper" paths between the beam splitters. This can be accomplished by blocking one of the paths, or equivalently by removing the first beam splitter (and feeding the photon from the left or the bottom, as desired). In both cases, there will be no interference between the paths anymore, and the probabilities are given by , independently of the phase . From this we can conclude that the photon does not take one path or another after the first beam splitter, but rather that it is in a genuine quantum superposition of the two paths.[36]
Applications
Quantum mechanics has had enormous success in explaining many of the features of our universe, with regard to small-scale and discrete quantities and interactions which cannot be explained by classical methods.[note 2] Quantum mechanics is often the only theory that can reveal the individual behaviors of the subatomic particles that make up all forms of matter (electrons, protons, neutrons, photons, and others). Solid-state physics and materials science are dependent upon quantum mechanics.[37]
In many aspects, modern technology operates at a scale where quantum effects are significant. Important applications of quantum theory include quantum chemistry, quantum optics, quantum computing, superconducting magnets, light-emitting diodes, the optical amplifier and the laser, the transistor and semiconductors such as the microprocessor, medical and research imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging and electron microscopy.[38] Explanations for many biological and physical phenomena are rooted in the nature of the chemical bond, most notably the macro-molecule DNA.
Relation to other scientific theories
Modern physics |
---|
|
Classical mechanics
The rules of quantum mechanics assert that the state space of a system is a
When quantum mechanics was originally formulated, it was applied to models whose correspondence limit was non-relativistic classical mechanics. For instance, the well-known model of the quantum harmonic oscillator uses an explicitly non-relativistic expression for the kinetic energy of the oscillator, and is thus a quantum version of the classical harmonic oscillator.[7]: 234
Complications arise with chaotic systems, which do not have good quantum numbers, and quantum chaos studies the relationship between classical and quantum descriptions in these systems.[40]: 353
Many macroscopic properties of a classical system are a direct consequence of the quantum behavior of its parts. For example, the stability of bulk matter (consisting of atoms and molecules which would quickly collapse under electric forces alone), the rigidity of solids, and the mechanical, thermal, chemical, optical and magnetic properties of matter are all results of the interaction of electric charges under the rules of quantum mechanics.[42]
Special relativity and electrodynamics
Early attempts to merge quantum mechanics with special relativity involved the replacement of the Schrödinger equation with a covariant equation such as the Klein–Gordon equation or the Dirac equation. While these theories were successful in explaining many experimental results, they had certain unsatisfactory qualities stemming from their neglect of the relativistic creation and annihilation of particles. A fully relativistic quantum theory required the development of quantum field theory, which applies quantization to a field (rather than a fixed set of particles). The first complete quantum field theory, quantum electrodynamics, provides a fully quantum description of the electromagnetic interaction. Quantum electrodynamics is, along with general relativity, one of the most accurate physical theories ever devised.[43][44]
The full apparatus of quantum field theory is often unnecessary for describing electrodynamic systems. A simpler approach, one that has been used since the inception of quantum mechanics, is to treat charged particles as quantum mechanical objects being acted on by a classical electromagnetic field. For example, the elementary quantum model of the hydrogen atom describes the electric field of the hydrogen atom using a classical Coulomb potential.[7]: 285 Likewise, in a Stern–Gerlach experiment, a charged particle is modeled as a quantum system, while the background magnetic field is described classically.[40]: 26 This "semi-classical" approach fails if quantum fluctuations in the electromagnetic field play an important role, such as in the emission of photons by charged particles.
Relation to general relativity
Even though the predictions of both quantum theory and general relativity have been supported by rigorous and repeated empirical evidence, their abstract formalisms contradict each other and they have proven extremely difficult to incorporate into one consistent, cohesive model. Gravity is negligible in many areas of particle physics, so that unification between general relativity and quantum mechanics is not an urgent issue in those particular applications. However, the lack of a correct theory of quantum gravity is an important issue in physical cosmology and the search by physicists for an elegant "Theory of Everything" (TOE). Consequently, resolving the inconsistencies between both theories has been a major goal of 20th- and 21st-century physics. This TOE would combine not only the models of subatomic physics but also derive the four fundamental forces of nature from a single force or phenomenon.[46]
One proposal for doing so is
Another popular theory is
Philosophical implications
Is there a preferred interpretation of quantum mechanics? How does the quantum description of reality, which includes elements such as the "superposition of states" and "wave function collapse", give rise to the reality we perceive?
Since its inception, the many counter-intuitive aspects and results of quantum mechanics have provoked strong
The views of Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg and other physicists are often grouped together as the "Copenhagen interpretation".[52][53] According to these views, the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics is not a temporary feature which will eventually be replaced by a deterministic theory, but is instead a final renunciation of the classical idea of "causality". Bohr in particular emphasized that any well-defined application of the quantum mechanical formalism must always make reference to the experimental arrangement, due to the complementary nature of evidence obtained under different experimental situations. Copenhagen-type interpretations were adopted by Nobel laureates in quantum physics, including Bohr,[54] Heisenberg,[55] Schrödinger,[56] Feynman,[2] and Zeilinger[57] as well as 21st-century researchers in quantum foundations.[58]
Everett's many-worlds interpretation, formulated in 1956, holds that all the possibilities described by quantum theory simultaneously occur in a multiverse composed of mostly independent parallel universes.[65] This is a consequence of removing the axiom of the collapse of the wave packet. All possible states of the measured system and the measuring apparatus, together with the observer, are present in a real physical quantum superposition. While the multiverse is deterministic, we perceive non-deterministic behavior governed by probabilities, because we do not observe the multiverse as a whole, but only one parallel universe at a time. Exactly how this is supposed to work has been the subject of much debate. Several attempts have been made to make sense of this and derive the Born rule,[66][67] with no consensus on whether they have been successful.[68][69][70]
History
Quantum mechanics was developed in the early decades of the 20th century, driven by the need to explain phenomena that, in some cases, had been observed in earlier times. Scientific inquiry into the wave nature of light began in the 17th and 18th centuries, when scientists such as
During the early 19th century,
The
- ,
where h is
This phase is known as the
In the mid-1920s quantum mechanics was developed to become the standard formulation for atomic physics. In 1923, the French physicist
By 1930 quantum mechanics had been further unified and formalized by
See also
- Bra–ket notation
- Einstein's thought experiments
- List of textbooks on classical and quantum mechanics
- Macroscopic quantum phenomena
- Phase-space formulation
- Regularization (physics)
- Two-state quantum system
Explanatory notes
- ^ A momentum eigenstate would be a perfectly monochromatic wave of infinite extent, which is not square-integrable. Likewise, a position eigenstate would be a Dirac delta distribution, not square-integrable and technically not a function at all. Consequently, neither can belong to the particle's Hilbert space. Physicists sometimes introduce fictitious "bases" for a Hilbert space comprising elements outside that space. These are invented for calculational convenience and do not represent physical states.[24]: 100–105
- ^ See, for example, the Feynman Lectures on Physics for some of the technological applications which use quantum mechanics, e.g., transistors (vol III, pp. 14–11 ff), integrated circuits, which are follow-on technology in solid-state physics (vol II, pp. 8–6), and lasers (vol III, pp. 9–13).
- ^ see macroscopic quantum phenomena, Bose–Einstein condensate, and Quantum machine
- ^ The published form of the EPR argument was due to Podolsky, and Einstein himself was not satisfied with it. In his own publications and correspondence, Einstein used a different argument to insist that quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory.[59][60][61][62]
References
- S2CID 119896026.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-201-50064-6. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
- .
- S2CID 203638258.
- S2CID 18463042.
- PMID 36867820.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-262-04613-8.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-61614-281-0.
- ISBN 978-981-256-691-1.
- ISBN 978-1-4614-4517-3.
- ISBN 0-13-124405-1.
- PMID 24039543.
- ^ Bub, Jeffrey (2019). "Quantum entanglement". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-943580-04-0.
- ^ PMID 26503054.
- ^ a b Wolchover, Natalie (7 February 2017). "Experiment Reaffirms Quantum Weirdness". Quanta Magazine. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
- ^ Baez, John C. (20 March 2020). "How to Learn Math and Physics". University of California, Riverside. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
there's no way to understand the interpretation of quantum mechanics without also being able to solve quantum mechanics problems – to understand the theory, you need to be able to use it (and vice versa)
- ISBN 0-345-40946-9.
"For most physics students, (the "mathematical underpinning" of quantum mechanics) might occupy them from, say, third grade to early graduate school – roughly 15 years. [...] The job of the popularizer of science, trying to get across some idea of quantum mechanics to a general audience that has not gone through these initiation rites, is daunting. Indeed, there are no successful popularizations of quantum mechanics in my opinion – partly for this reason.
- ISBN 978-0-7637-2470-2. Archived from the originalon 2023-01-02.
- ISBN 978-1-4070-6396-6.
- PMID 9908895.
- ISSN 2542-4653.
- ISBN 978-3-030-73892-1.
- ^ ISBN 0-471-16433-X.
- OCLC 2284121.
- ISBN 0-521-49730-2
- ^ OCLC 844974180.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-262-01506-6.
- S2CID 2515538.
- S2CID 208006050.
- Acta Physica Polonica B. 19 (8): 683–695. Retrieved 13 June 2016.
- ISBN 978-0-486-47722-0.
- ISBN 978-0-07-096510-2.
- S2CID 13963928.
- S2CID 119261326.
- OCLC 442351498.
- PMID 19113681. Retrieved 31 March 2012.
- ^ Matson, John. "What Is Quantum Mechanics Good for?". Scientific American. Retrieved 18 May 2016.
- ISBN 978-0-7167-7550-8.
- ^ ISBN 0-7923-2549-4.
- ^ Baez, John C. (2019-02-26). "The Math That Takes Newton Into the Quantum World". Nautilus Quarterly. Retrieved 2024-03-23.
- ^ "Atomic Properties". Academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu. Retrieved 18 August 2012.
- ISBN 978-1-4008-3474-7.
- ^
Tatsumi Aoyama; Masashi Hayakawa; Toichiro Kinoshita; Makiko Nio (2012). "Tenth-Order QED Contribution to the Electron g-2 and an Improved Value of the Fine Structure Constant". S2CID 14712017.
- ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979". Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 16 December 2020.
- ^ Overbye, Dennis (10 October 2022). "Black Holes May Hide a Mind-Bending Secret About Our Universe – Take gravity, add quantum mechanics, stir. What do you get? Just maybe, a holographic cosmos". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 October 2022.
- ISBN 978-0-521-86069-7.
- ISBN 978-0-521-88032-9.
- ISBN 978-1-316-14811-2.
- ISBN 0-262-56003-8.
- S2CID 119273840.
- S2CID 9454552.
- S2CID 57559199.
- doi:10.1038/121580a0.
- OCLC 743037461.
- S2CID 22433857.
- S2CID 34901303.
- S2CID 55537196.
- S2CID 32755624.
- .
- ISSN 1355-2198.
- ^ Einstein, Albert (1949). "Autobiographical Notes". In Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Open Court Publishing Company.
- .
- ^ Goldstein, Sheldon (2017). "Bohmian Mechanics". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
- ^ Barrett, Jeffrey (2018). "Everett's Relative-State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
- ISBN 0-691-08131-X.
- S2CID 1921913.
- S2CID 121747282.
- ISBN 978-3-540-70622-9.
The conclusion seems to be that no generally accepted derivation of the Born rule has been given to date, but this does not imply that such a derivation is impossible in principle.
- Bibcode:2009arXiv0905.0624K.
- S2CID 17217776.
- ^ Healey, Richard (2016). "Quantum-Bayesian and Pragmatist Views of Quantum Theory". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
- OCLC 1151058062.
- ISSN 0031-921X.
- ISBN 978-0-201-50064-6. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
- ISBN 978-0-08-057733-3,
Evidence for the existence of "cathode-rays" was first found by Plücker and Hittorf ...
- ISBN 978-0-7503-0453-5.
- ISBN 978-0-387-90642-3.
- ^ "Quantum – Definition and More". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Archived from the original on Oct 26, 2012. Retrieved 18 August 2012.
- ISBN 978-0-19-502383-1.
- ^ Kragh, Helge (1 December 2000). "Max Planck: the reluctant revolutionary". Physics World. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
- ISBN 978-1-4020-9106-3.
- doi:10.1002/andp.19053220607. Reprinted in Stachel, John, ed. (1989). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein (in German). Vol. 2. Princeton University Press. pp. 149–166. See also "Einstein's early work on the quantum hypothesis", ibid. pp. 134–148.
- ISBN 978-0-08-012102-4.
- ^ Ball, Philip (2017-08-31). "A century ago Einstein sparked the notion of the laser". Physics World. Retrieved 2024-03-23.
- ^ LCCN 66-29628.
- ^ Bokulich, Alisa; Bokulich, Peter (2020-08-13). "Bohr's Correspondence Principle". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- ^ "Semi-classical approximation". Encyclopedia of Mathematics. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
- OCLC 929609283.
- ISBN 0-19-851791-2.
- ^ David Edwards, "The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics", Synthese, Volume 42, Number 1/September, 1979, pp. 1–70.
- ^ D. Edwards, "The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory: Fermions, Gauge Fields, and Super-symmetry, Part I: Lattice Field Theories", International J. of Theor. Phys., Vol. 20, No. 7 (1981).
- ISSN 0002-9505.
- ISBN 0-691-01243-1.
- (PDF) from the original on Jan 20, 2024.
- ^ Feynman, Richard. "The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. III Ch. 21: The Schrödinger Equation in a Classical Context: A Seminar on Superconductivity, 21-4". California Institute of Technology. Archived from the original on 15 Dec 2016. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
...it was long believed that the wave function of the Schrödinger equation would never have a macroscopic representation analogous to the macroscopic representation of the amplitude for photons. On the other hand, it is now realized that the phenomena of superconductivity presents us with just this situation.
- ^ Packard, Richard (2006). "Berkeley Experiments on Superfluid Macroscopic Quantum Effects" (PDF). Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 November 2015. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
Further reading
The following titles, all by working physicists, attempt to communicate quantum theory to lay people, using a minimum of technical apparatus.
- ISBN 0-486-42878-8
- ISBN 978-1-84614-432-5.
- ISBN 0-691-08388-6. Four elementary lectures on quantum electrodynamics and quantum field theory, yet containing many insights for the expert.
- Ghirardi, GianCarlo, 2004. Sneaking a Look at God's Cards, Gerald Malsbary, trans. Princeton Univ. Press. The most technical of the works cited here. Passages using algebra, trigonometry, and bra–ket notation can be passed over on a first reading.
- N. David Mermin, 1990, "Spooky actions at a distance: mysteries of the QT" in his Boojums All the Way Through. Cambridge University Press: 110–76.
- philosophicalconsiderations.
More technical:
- ISBN 978-0-674-03541-6.
- ISBN 978-0-486-65969-5.
- ISBN 978-0-19-968857-9.
- Eisberg, Robert; ISBN 978-0-471-87373-0.
- ISBN 0-691-08131-X
- S2CID 17178479.
- ISBN 978-0-7382-0008-8.
- D. Greenberger, K. Hentschel, F. Weinert, eds., 2009. Compendium of quantum physics, Concepts, experiments, history and philosophy, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. Short articles on many QM topics.
- OCLC 40251748. A standard undergraduate text.
- Max Jammer, 1966. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. McGraw Hill.
- Hagen Kleinert, 2004. Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets, 3rd ed. Singapore: World Scientific. Draft of 4th edition. Archived 2008-06-15 at the Wayback Machine
- ISBN 978-0-08-020940-1. Online copy
- ISBN 978-0-8053-8714-8.
- Gunther Ludwig, 1968. Wave Mechanics. London: Pergamon Press. ISBN 0-08-203204-1
- ISBN 0-486-43517-2.
- ISBN 978-0-471-88702-7.
- Albert Messiah, 1966. Quantum Mechanics (Vol. I), English translation from French by G.M. Temmer. North Holland, John Wiley & Sons. Cf. chpt. IV, section III. online
- OCLC 39849482.
- ISBN 0-19-530573-6
- ISBN 978-0-306-44790-7.
- ISBN 978-0-691-13968-5.
- OCLC 34661512.
- Veltman, Martinus J.G. (2003), Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics.
On Wikibooks
External links
- J. O'Connor and E. F. Robertson: A history of quantum mechanics.
- Introduction to Quantum Theory at Quantiki.
- Quantum Physics Made Relatively Simple: three video lectures by Hans Bethe
- Course material
- Quantum Cook Book and PHYS 201: Fundamentals of Physics II by Ramamurti Shankar, Yale OpenCourseware
- Modern Physics: With waves, thermodynamics, and optics – an online textbook.
- MIT OpenCourseWare: Chemistry and Physics. See 8.04, 8.05 and 8.06
- 5½ Examples in Quantum Mechanics
- Imperial College Quantum Mechanics Course.
- Philosophy
- Ismael, Jenann. "Quantum Mechanics". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Krips, Henry. "Measurement in Quantum Theory". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.