Queer coding

Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. Please help improve this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be challenged and removed. (July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Queer coding involves attributing stereotypically queer traits without explicitly stating gender and sexual identity.^[1] Though such a character's sexual identity may not be explicitly confirmed within their respective work, a character might be coded as queer through the use of traits and stereotypes recognizable to the audience. Queer coding is a concept both in the discussion of media portrayal of LGBT people and academic research involving queer theory or gender studies.

History

The idea of non-explicit queer coding likely stems from the strict regulations of how queer characters were able to be portrayed in the early days of film-making. In 1930, the

Time Squad, which aired from 2001 to 2003 on Cartoon Network, had the character Larry 3000, who was interpreted as gay by many viewers. In 2012, the voice actor of Larry 3000, Mark Hamill, implied that Larry could easily have been interpreted as gay,^[9] due to his femininity and presentation as the "gay best friend" to Cleopatra in "Shop like an Egyptian", even though Larry has stated on multiple occasions he dislikes humans in general. However, the show never directly stated his sexuality. Even so, Hamill described Larry 3000 as fierce and flamboyant.^[10]

Late in 2021, Kevin Williamson told The Independent he believed that "the Scream movies are coded in gay survival."^[11] In the same interview, prior to him saying the previous statement, Williamson talked about how much of himself he unintentionally projected onto the main character of the first movie, Sidney Prescott. "As a gay kid, I related to the final girl and to her struggle because it’s what one has to do to survive as a young gay kid, too."^[11]

^{Sidney is not the only queer coded character in the original 1996 Scream film, however.}

Because of the Hays Code, positive portrayals of homosexual characters were barred, and the only characters in fiction that could be perceived as homosexuals had evil roles and were punished throughout the work.^[15] Thus, villains became noted in particular to have effeminate characteristics, behaviors or gestures that could be perceived as LGBTQ.^[16][17] Disney characters have attracted attention because their films are popular among children.^[18][19][20] Examples include:

• Governor Ratcliffe in Pocahontas, who is the only male character with makeup, braided hair and bows, and wears pink.
• Ursula in The Little Mermaid was inspired by the drag queen Divine.
• Scar in The Lion King, who has mannered^{[clarification needed]} gestures.
• Captain Hook in Peter Pan.
• Hector Barbossa in the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise.
• The
  anti-hero
  .

While many examples can be pulled from Disney, the trend of queer coding villains in prominent media and film extends beyond the corporation. Some examples include:

• The character 'HIM' in The Powerpuff Girls, who dresses in a tutu and heels.
• The primary antagonist Rumpelstiltskin in Shrek Forever After.
• The lethal duo of Billy Loomis and Stu Macher in Scream, who are based on murderers Nathan Freudenthal Leopold Jr. and Richard Albert Loeb according to the screenwriter of Scream, Kevin Williamson.^[21]
• The androgynous Overwatch hero Moira, who is an agent of the terrorist organisation Talon.

Impact

Queer coding is similar to

This queer coding had its disadvantages, with networks not wanting to show overt representation. Animator Rebecca Sugar argued that it is "really heavy" for a kid to only exist "as a villain or a joke" in an animated series.^[7] In 2011, Deja told news.com.au Disney would have a "family that has two dads or two mums" if they find the "right kind of story with that kind of concept."^[27] However, other critics criticized such queer-coded villains as contributing to "homophobic discourse" and equating queerness with evil itself.^[28][29] Other critics have claimed that this attribution can lead to a negative association between queerness and immoral, licentious behavior.^[30][19]

In February 2021, producer Ralph Farquhar said that in The Proud Family, which aired on the Disney Channel from 2001 to 2005, they had to use "code to talk about if Michael was gay, to talk about sexuality" and to be "sort of underhanded about it." He said this changed with The Proud Family: Louder and Prouder with the biggest changes to the show are "gender identity, obviously racial identity and quote-unquote wokeness,” and said that sexuality can be "sort of in your face with it a lot more," manifesting itself in the storytelling.^[31]

See also

• Media portrayal of LGBT people
• He never married
• Medieval singlewomen

References