Religious vows

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
consecration of virgins
in the Benedictine priory of Marienrode in Germany, 2006

Religious vows are the public

vows
made by the members of religious communities pertaining to their conduct, practices, and views.

In the Buddhist tradition, in particular within the Mahayana and Vajrayana traditions, many different kinds of religious vows are taken by the lay community as well as by the monastic community, as they progress along the path of their practice. In the monastic tradition of all schools of Buddhism, the Vinaya expounds the vows of the fully ordained Nuns and Monks.

In the

hierarchy.[2]

Christianity

In the Western Churches

Since the 6th century,

profession of obedience (placing oneself under the direction of the abbot/abbess or prior/prioress), stability (committing oneself to a particular monastery), and "conversion of manners" (which includes celibate chastity and forgoing private ownership).[3]

During the 12th and 13th centuries

counsels of perfection), confirmed by vow or other sacred bond, are a requirement according to Church Law.[4]

The "clerks regular" of the 16th century and after, such as the

St. Teresa of Calcutta
centuries later (1940s) take a fourth vow of special service to "the poorest of the poor".

In the Catholic Church

In the

Code of Canon Law. These are public vows, meaning vows accepted by a superior in the name of the Church,[5] and they are usually of two durations: temporary, and, after a few years, final vows (permanent or "perpetual"). Depending on the order, temporary vows may be renewed a number of times before permission to take final vows is given. There are exceptions: the Jesuits' first vows are perpetual, for instance, and the Sisters of Charity
take only temporary but renewable vows.

Religious vows are of two varieties:

solemn vows. The highest level of commitment is exemplified by those who have taken their solemn, perpetual vows. There once were significant technical differences between them in canon law; but these differences were suppressed by the current Code of Canon Law
in 1983, although the nominal distinction is maintained. Only a limited number of religious congregations may invite their members to solemn vows; most religious congregations are only authorized to take simple vows. Even in congregations with solemn vows, some members with perpetual vows may have taken them simply rather than solemnly.

A perpetual vow can be superseded by the pope, when he decides that a man under perpetual vows should become a bishop of the Church. In these cases, the ties to the order the new bishop had are dissolved as if the bishop had never been a member; hence, such a person as Pope Francis, for example, has had no formal ties to his old order for years. However, if the bishop was a member in good standing, he will be regarded, informally, as "one of us", and he will always be welcome in any of the order's houses.

There are other forms of

societies of apostolic life
. Diocesan hermits individually profess the three evangelical counsels in the hands of their local ordinary. Consecrated virgins living in the world do not make religious vows, but express by a public so-called sanctum propositum ("holy purpose")[6] to follow Christ more closely. The prayer of consecration that constitutes such virgins "sacred persons" inserts them into the Ordo Virginum and likewise places them in the consecrated life in the Catholic Church.

In the Lutheran Church

In the Anglican Communion

In the Eastern Orthodox Church

Although the taking of vows was not a part of the earliest monastic foundations (the wearing of a particular monastic habit is the earliest recorded manifestation of those who had left the world), vows did come to be accepted as a normal part of the tonsure service in the Christian East. Previously, one would simply find a spiritual father and live under his direction. Once one put on the monastic habit, it was understood that one had made a lifetime commitment to God and would remain steadfast in it to the end. Over time, however, the formal Tonsure and taking of vows was adopted to impress upon the monastic the seriousness of the commitment to the ascetic life he or she was adopting.

The vows taken by Orthodox monks are: Chastity, poverty, obedience, and stability. The vows are administered by the

Great Schema; i.e., the full monastic habit). The one administering the tonsure must be an ordained priest, and must be a monk of at least the rank he is tonsuring the candidate into. However, a Bishop
(who, in the Orthodox Church, must always be a monk) may tonsure a monk or nun into any degree regardless of his own monastic rank.

Jain ethics and five vows

Nishidhi stone, depicting the vow of sallekhana, 14th century, Karnataka

Jainism teaches five ethical duties, which it calls five vows. These are called anuvratas (small vows) for Jain laypersons, and mahavratas (great vows) for Jain mendicants.[7] For both, its moral precepts preface that the Jain has access to a guru (teacher, counsellor), deva (Jina, god), doctrine, and that the individual is free from five offences: doubts about the faith, indecisiveness about the truths of Jainism, sincere desire for Jain teachings, recognition of fellow Jains, and admiration for their spiritual pursuits.[8] Such a person undertakes the following Five vows of Jainism:

  1. Ahiṃsā, "intentional non-violence" or "noninjury":[8] The first major vow taken by Jains is to cause no harm to other human beings, as well as all living beings (particularly animals).[8] This is the highest ethical duty in Jainism, and it applies not only to one's actions, but demands that one be non-violent in one's speech and thoughts.[9][10]
  2. Satya, "truth": This vow is to always speak the truth. Neither lie, nor speak what is not true, and do not encourage others or approve anyone who speaks an untruth.[9][7]
  3. Asteya, "not stealing": A Jain layperson should not take anything that is not willingly given.[8][11] Additionally, a Jain mendicant should ask for permission to take it if something is being given.[12]
  4. Brahmacharya, "celibacy": Abstinence from sex and sensual pleasures is prescribed for Jain monks and nuns. For laypersons, the vow means chastity, faithfulness to one's partner.[9][7]
  5. Aparigraha, "non-possessiveness": This includes non-attachment to material and psychological possessions, avoiding craving and greed.[7] Jain monks and nuns completely renounce property and social relations, own nothing and are attached to no one.[13][14]

Jainism also prescribes seven supplementary vows, including three guņa vratas (merit vows) and four śikşā vratas.[15][16] The Sallekhana (or Santhara) vow is a "religious death" ritual vow observed at the end of life, historically by Jain monks and nuns, but rare in the modern age.[17] In this vow, there is voluntary and gradual reduction of food and liquid intake to end one's life by choice and with dispassion,[18][19] In Jainism this is believed to reduce negative karma that affects a soul's future rebirths.[20]

References

Citations

  1. ^ "Code of Canon Law: text - IntraText CT". www.intratext.com. Retrieved Apr 23, 2023.
  2. ^ Chart showing the place of those making religious vows among the People of God
  3. ^ Rule of St Benedict, ch. 58:17.
  4. ^ In the Roman Catholic Church, see canons 573, 603 and 654 of the Code of Canon Law 1983; only the Benedictines continue to make the equivalent Benedictine vow.
  5. ^ "Code of Canon Law: Table of Contents". www.vatican.va. Retrieved Apr 23, 2023.
  6. ^ CIC, Can. 604 Hisce formis vitae consecratae accedit ordo virginum, quae sanctum propositum emittentes Christum pressius sequendi, ab Episcopo diocesano iuxta probatum ritum liturgicum Deo consecrantur, Christo Dei Filio mystice desponsantur et Ecclesiae servitio dedicantur.
  7. ^ a b c d von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 228–231.
  8. ^ a b c d von Glasenapp 1925, p. 228.
  9. ^ a b c Shah, Pravin K (2011), Five Great Vows (Maha-vratas) of Jainism, Harvard University Literature Center, archived from the original on 31 December 2014, retrieved 7 May 2017
  10. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 33.
  11. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 68.
  12. ^ von Glasenapp 1925, p. 231.
  13. ^ Natubhai Shah 2004, p. 112.
  14. ^ Long 2009, p. 109.
  15. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 87–88.
  16. ^ Tukol 1976, p. 5.
  17. ^ Dundas 2002, pp. 179–180.
  18. ^ Jaini 2000, p. 16.
  19. ^ Tukol 1976, p. 7.
  20. ^ Williams 1991, pp. 166–167.

Sources

External links