Rice-fish system
A rice-fish system is a polyculture practice that integrates rice agriculture with aquaculture, most commonly with freshwater fish. It is based on a mutually beneficial relationship between rice and fish in the same agroecosystem.
The benefits of rice-fish systems include increased rice yield, the production of an additional (fish) crop on the same land, diversification of farm production, increased food security, and reduced need for inputs of fertilizer and pesticide. Because fish eat insects and snails, the systems may reduce mosquito-borne diseases such as malaria and dengue fever, and snail-born parasites such as the trematodes which cause schistosomiasis. The reduction in chemical inputs may reduce environmental harms caused by their release into the environment. The increased biodiversity may reduce methane emissions from rice fields.
History
The simultaneous cultivation of rice and fish is thought to be over 2,000 years old. Ancient clay models of
Common carp were probably among the first fish used in rice-fish systems.
It is possible that the practice developed independently from China in other Asian countries. It appears to have spread from India to neighbouring Asian countries over 1500 years ago.[2]
The practice slowly gained popularity among farmers, and by the mid-1900s, over 28 countries on all continents except Antarctica used rice-fish systems.[2] Historically, the common carp was the most commonly used fish, with the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) in second place.[2] As the practice spread throughout the world, new species were adopted. For example, Malaysia introduced the snakeskin gourami (Trichogaster pectoralis) and Egypt used the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).[2]
An early study, in
Rice-fish systems were traditionally low maintenance, growing additional animal
Principle
Rice-fish systems are
Before creating the rice field, the field is treated with 4.5–5.25 tonnes per hectare (2.0–2.3 short ton/acre) of organic
Unwanted fish or invasive species can threaten the mutualistic relationship between rice and fish, and therefore reduce the food production. For example, in the integrated Rice-Swamp Loach Aquaculture Model, catfish, snakeheads (Channa argus) and paddy eels (Monopterus albus) are considered as unwanted species.[3] Predatory birds can be considered a threat: adding nets to the rice fields can prevent these birds from eating the wanted fish.[3]
Rice-fish systems are the most common type of integrated rice-field system. However, some 19 other models exist, including rice-crayfish, rice-crab and rice-turtle.[3]
Rice-fish mutualism
Rice and fish form a mutualistic relationship: they both benefit from growing together. The rice provides the fish with shelter and shade and a reduced water temperature, along with herbivorous insects and other small animals that feed on the rice.[7] Rice benefits from nitrogenous waste from the fish, while the fish reduce insect pests such as brown planthoppers, diseases such as sheath blight of rice, and weeds.[7] By controlling weeds, competition for nutrients is decreased. CO2 released by the fish may be used in photosynthesis by the rice.[5]
The constant fish movements allow for the loosening of the surface soil which can:
- Improve oxygen levels by increasing the amount of dissolved oxygen.[8] Consequently, the activity of microorganisms is increased and they generate more usable nutrients, which will allow an increased nutrient uptake for the rice.[8]
- Increase mineralization of the organic matter.[5]
- Optimization of nutrient release in the soil.
- Promote fertilizer decomposition and therefore fertilizer effectiveness.[5]
- Better root development of the rice.[5]
Soil fertility is improved by the integration of fish, whose manure is a fertilizer recycling organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.[5] The inclusion of fish in rice-fields helps to maintain soil health, biodiversity, and productivity.[7]
The aquatic diversity in rice-fish systems includes
Benefits
Economic
Net gains vary between and within countries. Overall, integrated rice-fish fields have a positive impact on net returns. In Bangladesh, net returns are over 50% greater than in rice monocultures.[6] In China, the net return by region is between 45 and 270% greater.[6] A case of loss in net returns was found in Thailand with only 80% of the profitability of rice monocultures.[9] This might be caused by the initial investment needed when starting the system.[9][10] The use of rice-fish systems has resulted in an increase in rice yields and productivity from 6.7 tons to 7.5 tons of rice per hectare and simultaneously also from 0.75 tons to 2.25 tons of fish per hectare.[11] The landscapes created by rice-fish systems form a possible tourist attraction, as it creates a distinctive landscape.[10]
The addition of fish diversifies the farm's production, increases food security, and generates income; Halwart and Gupta comment that if it also increases rice yield and cuts the need for fertilizer and pesticide inputs, these are "added bonus[es]".[12]
Rice-fish farming was one of the first systems to be considered as a "Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System" according to the FAO's Global Environment Facility.[3]
Public health
In 1981, the Health Commission of China recognised integrated rice fields as a possible measure to decrease the population of
Environmental
As fish control pests and weeds, fewer chemicals (such as pesticides and herbicides) are used, reducing the release of these agricultural chemicals into the environment.[10] In addition, farmers often choose not to use pesticides, to avoid harming the fish.[16] In turn, biodiversity is increased. Rice-fish systems can reduce methane emissions compared to rice monoculture.[17]
Applications
Developing countries
Rice-fish systems are being exported to less developed countries with the
Climate change
Climate change threatens global food production as it creates numerous changes to regional weather, such as higher temperatures, heavy rainfall, and storms. These changes may cause outbreaks of pests with, for example, an increase in the number of plant hoppers and stem borers.[18] Rice-fish systems should be beneficial in future climates because they have higher reliability and stability than rice monoculture.[18]
See also
References
- ^ ISBN 0889367760. Retrieved 12 October 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g Halwart & Gupta 2004, 2. History, pp. 3–4.
- ^ .
- ^ a b "Rice-fish systems". IRRI Rice Knowledge Bank. Retrieved 25 March 2024.
- ^ S2CID 90610992.
- ^ a b c Halwart & Gupta 2004, 7.2 Rice Yields, pp. 34–39.
- ^ PMID 22084110.
- ^ .
- ^ a b Halwart & Gupta 2004, 9.1 Economics of Production, pp. 48–49.
- ^ ISBN 978-4-431-55329-8.
- ^ a b c d Scaling Up Rice-Fish Systems (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization (Report). United Nations. 2019. CA3625EN/1/03.19. Retrieved 12 October 2023.
- ^ Halwart & Gupta 2004, 7.1.4 Polyculture, p. 34.
- ^ Halwart & Gupta 2004, 8.3.1 Management of insect pests, p. 42.
- ^ Halwart & Gupta 2004, 8.3.2 Management of snails, pp=44–45.
- .
- ^ Halwart & Gupta 2004, 8.1 Managing Pests with Fish Present, pp. 40–41.
- ^ Velasquez-Manoff, Moises (1 April 2020). "The Fishy Fix to a Methane-Spewing Crop". Wired. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ^ PMID 30283100.
Sources
- Halwart, Matthias; Gupta, Modadugu Vijay (2004). Culture of fish in rice fields. ISBN 983-2346-33-9.