Richard Ottley
Richard Ottley | |
---|---|
Deputy Lieutenant of Shropshire | |
In office 3 September 1660 – 1670 | |
Member of Parliament for Shropshire | |
In office 1661–1670 | |
Monarch | Charles II |
Personal details | |
Born | 5 August 1626 Pitchford Hall, Shropshire |
Died | 10 August 1670 |
Spouse | Lettice Ridgeway |
Children | 7, including Adam |
Parents |
|
Relatives |
|
Profession | Politician, soldier |
Sir Richard Ottley (5 August 1626 – 10 August 1670) was an English
Background, early life and education
Richard Ottley was the eldest son of
- Sir Francis Ottley of Pitchford, Shropshire, who was military governor of Shrewsbury for part of the English Civil War
- Lucy Edwards, daughter of Thomas Edwards of the College, Shrewsbury. She was the widow of Thomas Pope, another Shrewsbury resident.
The Ottley family were part of the landed gentry of Shropshire and claimed descent from the more ancient Ottleys of Oteley, near Ellesmere, Shropshire.[1][2] However, Thomas Ottley, the ancestor who bought Pitchford Hall in 1473, was a Merchant of the Staple[3] with a house in Calais[4] as well as in Shrewsbury. The Ottleys of Pitchford owed their status to wealth made as merchants of the thriving county town, with its monopoly in the finishing of Welsh cloth.[5]
Richard Ottley was born on 5 August 1626 and christened on 15 September.[6] He had a brother, Adam, who was born in 1628 and a sister, Mary, who was born in 1630. He was admitted to Shrewsbury School on 9 April 1638, the same day as his brother Adam.[7] but his education beyond that stage was interrupted by the outbreak of the Civil War in 1642.
The Civil War and Commonwealth
Francis Ottley was quick to act to disrupt Parliamentary mobilization in Shropshire as Civil War threatened in the summer of 1642
Richard was present at the siege of Bridgnorth in 1646 and was covered by the surrender agreement negotiated by his father, which allowed the Royalist garrison to choose between peace and exile. The agreement explicitly granted permission to Lady Ottley and her children to live at Pitchford.[10] The estates of both Sir Francis and Lady Ottley had been sequestrated by Parliament. Lady Ottley used the good offices of a friend and relative, Elinor Davenport, in contacting the sequestrators over furnishings and clothing.[11] and employed Thomas Lee, a relative of Sir Francis and a Lincoln's Inn lawyer, to negotiate recovery of her own estates.[12] On 16 June 1646 Richard was given a pass to travel to Shrewsbury to speak to Parliament's County Committee,[13] probably in connection with his father's request to compound for delinquency, which was made on that date. A decision on the allowance for Lady Ottley and the children was soon made: a fifth of Sir Francis's estates was handed over to them for their maintenance by an order of 5 September 1646.[14] However, the outstanding issues took three years to resolve.
Richard Ottley spent a considerable part of this time in London with his father, often having to attend Goldsmiths' Hall, where the Committee for Compounding with Delinquents was housed. On 12 January he wrote to his mother from Gray's Inn to report that his father had obtained permission to live at home and that his personal property had been secured while he compounded. He thanked her for a pie.[15] Richard was admitted to Gray's Inn for legal training on 1 March 1647.[16] In April Lady Ottley wrote to him to report that Sir Francis had not actually gone home as there was a possibility he would be prosecuted by Humphrey Mackworth,[17] who, although reckoned a cousin, was the Parliamentarian governor of Shrewsbury. Later in the year, on 2 August, Richard's younger brother Adam was also admitted to Gray's Inn.[18]
Adam wrote to Lady Ottley in September 1648 in anticipation of Richard's engagement to Lady Lettice Ridgeway,[19] "soe good a sister in ye place of yt deare one w'ch I soe lately lost." The marriage probably took place in January 1649:[3] their first child was born on October.[20] On 24 March Sir Francis, with his last extant letter, sent Lettice a copy of Eikon Basilike,[21] purportedly a collection of Charles I's final meditations and apologia: the same book had recently been sent by Adam Ottley to his mother.[22] The Ottleys were clearly finding resources to sustain their royalist faith.
On 13 April 1649 Sir Francis asked for Richard to be included in his composition.
The end of the year brought prospects of Ottley's completion of his business with the Commissioners for Compounding. On 20 December he was told that he owed £296 and could discharge this in two equal instalments at fortnightly intervals.[26] However, the sum seems to have been wrongly transcribed, for the next communication from the commissioners, dated 17 January, refers to a debt of £269.[27] Ottley had already promptly paid £134 10s. The commissioners had reviewed his debts and told him that they required only another £35 10s. This he paid immediately and on 24 January 1651 all seizures, sequestrations and penalties on the Ottley estates were discharged.
Ottley seems thereafter to have been mainly quiescent during the rule of Oliver Cromwell. He took no part in the Penruddock uprising of 1655, although he probably alluded to it in a letter of May 1655, sent from his Inn of Court, where he stayed when in London.[28] However, later that year he was faced by a large claim for compensation from a Mary Moloy, widow of Hugh Lewis, a London goldsmith. In a letter to Ottley, Humphrey Mackworth, the son and successor of the earlier governor, alleged that Sir Francis Ottley had confiscated from Lewis jewellery to the value of £600 during the Civil War. When she later sued him, Sir Francis had offered £300. Mackworth recommended that Ottley pay up, as Cromwell was exasperated by royalists because of the recent rising.[29] Apparently Ottley decided to wait on events and Moloy's petition to Cromwell portrayed her as the daughter of a hero of the Nine Years' War in Ireland who had taken refuge in England during the Civil War. Now having four small children to feed, she had in turn sued Sir Francis and asked his heir for recompense.[30] On 13 October Cromwell referred the matter to Mackworth, who was authorised to summon and question Richard Ottley. The matter seems to have been resolved the following month by Ottley paying Moloy the much smaller sum of £60.
Ottley witnessed the funeral of Cromwell in November 1658 and wrote from Gray's Inn to inform his mother, enclosing a printed description.[31] The Protectorate fell apart during the succeeding year. On 25 November 1659, a day after General Monck took overall command of the army, Richard and Adam Ottley were given a pass by Charles Fleetwood allowing them to travel between London and Pitchford without further hindrance:[32] the regime had ceased to wield effective authority and had given up the attempt to control its enemies.
Restoration and repression
After
Ottley contacted Charles II and on 5 March Charles issued a commission from Brussels, appointing Ottley, his friend Richard Scriven and others as commissioners for Shropshire. They were authorised to raise a large militia force for the king's cause, to set up a command structure and to levy contributions for its support.[35] Shrewsbury was still held by the stalwart Parliamentarian Colonel Thomas Hunt, who carried out a review of military resources and preparedness during April and arranged a muster of his forces for 1 May.[36] However events were moving too quickly for Hunt's measures to take effect. The Convention Parliament accepted Charles II as king on 8 May. Ottley set off for Dover[37] to welcome Charles to England in May. Charles entered London on 29 May and Ottley wrote from there to his mother:
- "My most deare and evere honored Mother,
- "I prayse God we are safe come to towne, and his Matie, with his two brotheres, the duke of Yorke and duke of Glouster, are now at Whitehall. I met them at Canterbury, and had the happinesse to be of the life guard since Fryday last; wherein my content over ballanced the paynes I underwent. I most, humbly thanke yor Lap for your py which I shiall enquire after. I beg pardon that I am soe short in wrighting, being weary at p'sent: I humbly crave yor blessing: wth my duty and thanks for yor goodnesse to mine, for whom my hearty prayers to God are : I rest
"Yor Laps most dutiful sonne and servant,
- "May 29, Ric. Ottley."
Shortly after the king's return, Ottley was
On 26 July
Repression of the old Parliamentarians began with claims that some had taken property from High Ercall and other places. Their houses were ransacked, resulting in a petition of protest from Thomas Hunt, an alderman of Shrewsbury, to the House of Commons, alleging he had lost goods to the value of £1377 18s. 9d. Edmund Waring, a former Parliamentarian governor of Shrewsbury, and Vavasor Powell, a Welsh Independent preacher and theologian, were arrested and imprisoned.[37] Ottley released Waring after a short time, as he was not persuaded there were good grounds or valid warrant for his detention. A Fifth Monarchist rising in London on 6 January 1661 panicked the Privy Council. On 8 January Newport was ordered to disarm any disaffected people in the county and to administer to them the Oath of Supremacy.[42][43] On 22 January a further letter stepped up the pressure greatly with a demand that the county authorities arrest "dangerous persons."[44][45] Forwarding the Privy Council's letter to Ottley on 24 January, Newport rebuked him for being too lenient:
- "I send you enclosed a letter from the Councell, and a proclamation for the moderating of your proceedings. Though it may bee conceived a very ineffectual way for the securinge of persons to send warrants to a constable, yet if souldiers bringe the warrant to him, your ends may seeme accomplishable. You see the letter speakes of leadinge men. Therefore you did ill in releasinge Waringe, and you needed not have apprehended his ranting demand of a
However, Newport then drew Ottley's attention to an enclosed complaint from Captain Turner, who had been detained while visiting his wife and children at Shrewsbury, though he had a valid pass to do so from the authorities at Hull to do so:[48] Newport urged Ottley allow him to leave the town. With neither Newport nor the Council quite able to define their desired balance of clemency and repression, Ottley seems to have erred on the side of rigour. By 4 March the Council was troubled that the Shropshire authorities might be overstepping the mark. They wrote to tell Newport that the king was troubled by large numbers of petitions from those arrested on mere suspicion and that they were to be released forthwith. Many of those arrested were Quakers, who had suffered persecution even before the Restoration. Henceforth, decreed the Council, only the "Ringleaders of Faction" were to be detained.[49]
Nevertheless, Newport had already recommended Ottley and
Cavalier Parliament
Ottley was elected to the Parliament of 1661–79, the longest-lasting English parliament, and did not survive to the end of it, dying in 1670. The parliament was known as the Cavalier Parliament because it was largely royalist in sympathy, although important divisions appeared long before it ended. Ottley's election was almost certainly the result of Newport's influence.[50] Newport, later first Earl of Bradford, was to dominate elections until his death in 1708, gradually evolving into a Whig and suffering for it when he opposed the succession of James II.
After being a very active lieutenant of Newport in the county, Ottley became a very active member of Parliament, which probably accounts for his decreasing participation in local and regional affairs. He was a member of no less than 230 committees.
Ottley's own compensation took the form of commissions to collect taxes in Shropshire, which he undertook with his close friend and business partner, Richard Scriven, later MP for Bishop's Castle[63] First they were made receivers of the county's hearth tax, the key tax on property.[3] In 1663 they made a successful bid of £2,800 for the farm of the county's excise. However, the hearth tax concession was revoked in 1667 and Ottley and Scriven were ordered to pay arrears of £700. They sought to collect the amounts owing but this led to public disorder, with distrained goods and papers being stolen. To help his efforts at repayment, he was given any prize-money concealed during the Commonwealth that he could discover. He and Scriven were also granted all treasure trove found since the Restoration, as well as part of a Cheshire outlaw's estate. However, they were still unsuccessful. Ottley's arrears were remitted shortly before he died in 1670, although Scriven did not settle his debt until 1682.[63]
Marriage and family
Richard Ottley was married to Lady Lettice Ridgeway, daughter of Robert Ridgeway, 2nd Earl of Londonderry. The Ridgeway family fortune was based on the first earl's exploitation of land assigned to him as an "undertaker," or government contactor, during the Plantation of Ulster.[64] Richard and Lady Lettice Ottley had six sons and one daughter, five of whose baptisms are recorded in the Pitchford parish register.[65]
- Francis, born 11 October 1649. Died May 1652.[20]
- Thomas (baptised 18 February 1651), Sir Richard's heir, married one Elizabeth and died in 1695.[66]
- Richard (baptised 6 July 1652), died in infancy and was buried 30 March 1654.
- Bishop of St David's1713–23, died in 1723.
- Robert (baptised 26 July 1655)
- Lucy (baptised 28 February 1657) died in 1687[67]
- Francis (baptised 2 June 1660)
Dame Lettice Ottley was buried at Pitchford on 8 March 1669.[68] Sir Richard Ottley died aged 44 on 10 August 1670 and was buried at Pitchford.[3]
Family tree
Family tree: the Ottleys of Pitchford | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following family tree is based on information extracted from the heraldic visitations of Shropshire,[69] Lord Hawkesbury's pedigree[70] and the Pitchford parish register.[71]
|
Footnotes
- ^ Pollard, Albert Frederick (1901). Lee, Sidney (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography (1st supplement). Vol. 3. London: Smith, Elder & Co. . In
- ^ Grazebrook and Rylands, p.380-381
- ^ a b c d e f g h B.D. Henning (editor): History of Parliament Online: Members 1660–1690 – OTTLEY, Sir Richard (1626–70), of Pitchford Hall, Salop. – Author: Eveline Cruickshanks. Accessed 1 November 2013
- ^ Leighton, Stanley (1901): Shropshire houses past & present, no.3
- ^ Andrew Thrush and John P. Ferris (editors): History of Parliament Online: Constituencies 1604–1629 – Shrewsbury – Author: Simon Healy, accessed 30 October 2013.
- ^ Horton, p.13
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.234.
- ^ Coulton, p. 91
- ^ doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/20940. (Subscription or UK public library membershiprequired.)Subscription required: free to most UK public library members.
- ^ Phillips (ed), 1896, Ottley Papers, p.303.
- ^ Phillips (ed), 1896, Ottley Papers, p.306.
- ^ Phillips (ed), 1896, Ottley Papers, p.307.
- ^ Phillips (ed), 1896, Ottley Papers, p.308-9.
- ^ Phillips (ed), 1896, Ottley Papers, p.310.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.234-5.
- ^ Foster, Folio 1020, p.243
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.236-7.
- ^ Foster, Folio 1027, p.245
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.242-5.
- ^ a b c Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.260.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.257-8.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.253-4.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.242.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.261-2.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.265.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.265.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.267.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.270-1.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.271.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.272-3.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.275-6.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.277.
- ^ Lloyd Kenyon, p.71
- ^ Lloyd Kenyon, p.79
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.144-5
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.146
- ^ a b Owen and Blakeway, p.478
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.147-8
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.149-52
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.153-4
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.155
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.156-7
- ^ Coulton, p.137-8
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.157-8
- ^ Coulton, p.17-8
- ^ Owen and Blakeway, p.480
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.158-60
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.160
- ^ Phillips, 1904, Lord Lieutenants of Shropshire, p.161-2
- ^ a b B.D. Henning (editor): History of Parliament Online: Constituencies 1660–1690 – Shropshire – Author: Eveline Cruickshanks. Accessed 11 November 2013
- ^ B.D. Henning (editor): History of Parliament Online: Members 1660–1690 – JONES, Thomas I (1614–92), of Shrewsbury, Salop and Cerreghwfa, Mont. – Author: Eveline Cruickshanks. Accessed 11 November 2013
- ^ Coulton, p.139
- ^ Coulton, p.139-40
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.310.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.295.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.296-300.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.303.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.304-5.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.305-6.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.315.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.311.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.301-3.
- ^ a b B.D. Henning (editor): History of Parliament Online: Members 1660–1690 – SCRIVEN, Richard (1625–83), of Frodesley, Salop. – Author: Eveline Cruickshanks. Accessed 11 November 2013
- ^ Dunlop, Robert Frederick (1896). Lee, Sidney (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 48. London: Smith, Elder & Co. . In
- ^ Horton, p.16
- ^ Horton, p.24
- ^ Horton, p.22
- ^ Horton, p.17
- ^ Tresswell, Robert; Vincent, Augustine (1889). Grazebrook, George; Rylands, John Paul (eds.). The visitation of Shropshire, taken in the year 1623. Vol. 2. London: Harleian Society. pp. 380–3. Retrieved 17 October 2013.
- ^ Foljambe, Lord Hawkesbury, Cecil (1895). "The Family of Ottley of Pitchford". Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society. 2. 7. Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society: 361–368. Retrieved 22 April 2015.
- ^ Horton, T. R., ed. (1900). The Registers of Pitchford Parish, Shropshire, 1558–1812. London: Shropshire Parish Register Society in conjunction with the Parish Register Society. Retrieved 4 November 2013.
- ^ Phillips (ed), 1895, Ottley Papers, p.290.
- ^ Phillips and Audley (ed), 1911, Ottley Papers, p.234
References
Coulton, Barbara (2010). Regime and Religion: Shrewsbury 1400–1700. Little Logaston: Logaston Press.
Foljambe, Lord Hawkesbury, Cecil (1895). "The Family of Ottley of Pitchford". Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society. 2. 7. Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society: 361–368. Retrieved 22 April 2015.
Foster, Joseph, ed. (1889). The Register of Admissions to Gray's Inn, 1521–1889. London: Hansard. Retrieved 4 November 2013.
Horton, T. R., ed. (1900). The Registers of Pitchford Parish, Shropshire, 1558–1812. London: Shropshire Parish Register Society in conjunction with the Parish Register Society. Retrieved 4 November 2013.
Lloyd Kenyon, R., ed. (1900). Abstract of the Orders made by the Court of Quarter Sessions for Shropshire, January, 1660–April, 1694. Shrewsbury: Shropshire County Records. Retrieved 11 November 2013.
Owen, Hugh; Blakeway, John Brickdale (1825). A History of Shrewsbury. London: Harding Leppard. Retrieved 1 November 2013.
Phillips, William, ed. (1896). "The Ottley Papers relating to the Civil War". Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society. 2. 8. Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society: 199–312. Retrieved 22 April 2015.
Phillips, William, ed. (1904). "The Lords-Lieutenant of Shropshire". Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society. 3. 4. Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society: 275–96. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
Phillips, William; Auden, J. E., eds. (1911). "Ottley Papers (2nd Series): Commonwealth and Restoration". Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society. 4. 1. Shropshire Archaeological and Natural History Society: 233–318. Retrieved 4 May 2015.
Tresswell, Robert; Vincent, Augustine (1889). Grazebrook, George; Rylands, John Paul (eds.). The visitation of Shropshire, taken in the year 1623. Vol. 1. London: Harleian Society. Retrieved 17 October 2013.