Robert J. C. Young

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Robert J.C. Young
)

Robert J. C. Young
Born1950 (age 73–74)
race · ethnicity · Translation · Marxism
Notable ideas
"anti-colonialism", "colonial desire", "hybridity", "tricontinental"

Robert J. C. Young

postcolonial
theorist, cultural critic, and historian.

Life

Young was educated at

Wadham College. In 2005, he moved to New York University where he is Julius Silver Professor of English and Comparative Literature.[1]
From 2015 - 2018, he was Dean of Arts & Humanities at NYU Abu Dhabi.

As a graduate student at Oxford, he was one of the founding editors of the Oxford Literary Review, the first British journal devoted to literary and philosophical theory. Young is Editor of Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies which is published eight times a year.[2] His work has been translated into over twenty languages.[3] In 2013 he was elected a Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy,[4] in 2017 he was elected to an honorary life fellowship at Wadham College, Oxford.[5] Young is currently President of the AILC/ICLA Research Committee on Literary Theory.[6]

Works

Young's work has been described as being 'at least partially instrumental in the radicalisation of postcolonialism'.

Edward W. Said, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Homi K. Bhabha and the Subaltern Studies historians as its intellectual core.[citation needed
]

In Colonial Desire (1995)[8] Young examined the history of the concept of 'hybridity', showing its genealogy through nineteenth-century racial theory and twentieth-century linguistics, prior to its counter-appropriation and transformation into an innovative cultural-political concept by postcolonial theorists in the 1990s. Young demonstrates the extent to which racial theory was always developed in historical, scientific and cultural terms, and argues that this complex formation accounts for the ability of racialised thinking to survive into the modern era despite all the attempts made since 1945 to refute it. The most significant mistake that has been made, he suggests, involves the assumption that race was developed in the nineteenth-century purely as a 'science' which can be challenged on purely scientific grounds.

Having deconstructed 'white Marxism' through the lens of postcolonial theory in White Mythologies, in Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction (2001),[9] Young charted the genealogy of postcolonial theory in the very different trajectory of Marxism as the major ideological component of twentieth-century anti-colonial struggles. The book provides the first genealogy of the anticolonial thought and practice which form the roots of postcolonialism,[10] tracing the relation of the history of the national liberation movements to the development of postcolonial theory.[11] Stressing the significance of the work of the Third International, as well as Mao Zedong's reorientation of the landless peasant as the revolutionary subject, Young points to the importance of the Havana Tricontinental of 1966 as the first independent coming together of the three continents of the South—Africa, Asia and Latin America—in political solidarity, and argues that this was the moment in which what is now called 'postcolonial theory' was first formally constituted as a specific knowledge-base of non-Western political and cultural production.

In Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction (2003)[12] Young links this genealogy of postcolonialism to the contemporary activism of the New Social Movements in non-Western countries. Intended as an introduction to postcolonialism for the general reader, the book is written in a highly accessible style and unorthodox format, mixing history with fiction, cultural analysis with moments of poetic intensity that stage and evoke postcolonial experience rather than merely describe it. Instead of approaching postcolonialism through its often abstract and esoteric theories, the book works entirely out of particular examples. These examples emphasise issues of migration, gender, language, indigenous rights, 'development' and ecology as well as addressing the more usual postcolonial ideas of ambivalence, hybridity, orientalism and subalternity.

In The Idea of English Ethnicity (2008)[13] Young returned to the question of race to address an apparent contradiction—the idea of an English ethnicity. Why does ethnicity not seem to be a category applicable to English people? To answer this question, Young reconsiders the way that English identity was classified in historical and racial terms in the nineteenth century. He argues that what most affected this was the relation of England to Ireland after the Act of Union of 1800–1. Initial attempts at excluding the Irish were followed by a more inclusive idea of Englishness which removed the specificities of race and even place. Englishness, Young suggests, was never really about England at all,[14] but was developed as a broader identity, intended to include not only the Irish (and thus deter Irish nationalism) but also the English diaspora around the world—North Americans, South Africans, Australians and New Zealanders, and even, for some writers, Indians and those from the Caribbean. By the end of the nineteenth century, this had become appropriated as an ideology of empire. The delocalisation of the country England from ideas of Englishness (Kipling's "What do they know of England who only England know?") could account for why recent commentators have found Englishness so hard to define—while at the same time providing an explanation of why some of the most English of Englishmen have been Americans. On the other hand, Young argues, its broad principle of inclusiveness also helps to explain why Britain has been able to transform itself into one of the more integrated, or hybridized, of modern multiethnic nations.[15]

In 2015, together with Jean Khalfa, Young published a 680-page collection of writings by Frantz Fanon, the first new work by Fanon to be published in over 50 years, Écrits sur l’aliénation et la liberté[16] which includes two previously unpublished plays, together with psychiatric and political essays, letters, editorials from the weekly journals at the hospitals at Saint Alban (Trait d'union) and Blida (Notre Journal), as well as a complete list of Fanon's library and his annotations to his books.[17]

Selected publications

Other books

  • Empire, Colony, Postcolony. Oxford and Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell, 2015. Paperback:
    OCLC 885229460
    .
  • Torn Halves: Political Conflict in Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 1996. (Hardcover:
    OCLC 32822735. An online copy may be available from HathiTrust
    .

Editions

Edited works

Prefaces

Electronic publications

References

  1. ^ Debrett's People of Today, 2010.
  2. ^
    ProQuest 217337960
    .
  3. ^ "Entry trans". robertjcyoung.com. Archived from the original on 23 November 2007.
  4. ^ "British Academy Welcomes 59 New Fellows".
  5. ^ "Wadham's people".
  6. ^ "People". 6 July 2015.
  7. ISBN 978-0-415-05372-3
    .
  8. ISBN 978-0-415-05374-7
    .
  9. ISBN 978-0-631-20071-0
    .
  10. Project MUSE 38083
    .
  11. ^ "From redeeming Gandhi to creating Latin America". 18 April 2003.
  12. OCLC 51001171
    .
  13. ISBN 978-1-4051-0129-5
    .
  14. S2CID 140953965
    .
  15. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00442.x
    .
  16. OCLC 930770745
    .
  17. ^ "Écrits sur l'aliénation et la liberté".

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_J._C._Young&oldid=1200276246"