Roger E. Olson

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The Reverend
Roger E. Olson
Born
Roger Eugene Olson

(1952-02-02) February 2, 1952 (age 72)
Des Moines, Iowa, US
Spouse
Becky Sandahl
​
(m. 1973)​
Ecclesiastical career
Religion
Baptist
)
Ordained1975
Academic background
North American Baptist Seminary
  • Rice University
    • ThesisTrinity and Eschatology (1984)
    Doctoral advisorNiels Nielsen[1]
    Influences
    Academic work
    DisciplineTheology
    Sub-disciplineChristian ethics
    School or tradition
    Institutions
    Websitepatheos.com/blogs/rogereolson

    Roger Eugene Olson (born 1952) is an American

    theologian and Professor of Christian Theology of Ethics at the Baylor University
    .

    Biography

    Personal life

    Olson was born on February 2, 1952, in Des Moines, Iowa. He is married and he and his wife have two daughters and one granddaughter. He is member of Calvary Baptist Church in Waco.[8]

    Education

    Olson studied at Open Bible College in Des Moines,

    North American Baptist Seminary, and Rice University, where he obtained his Ph.D. in Religious Studies in 1984, under the supervision of Nields Nielsen.[1] He is also an ordained Baptist minister.[9]

    He was influenced by: Donald G. Bloesch,[2][3] Robert Jenson,[4] Jürgen Moltmann,[5] Bernard Ramm,[6] and Jack Rogers.[7]

    Career

    Since 1999, Olson has been Holder of the Foy Valentine Professor of Christian Theology of Ethics at George W. Truett Theological Seminary of Baylor University, Waco, Texas.[9]

    Theological contribution

    Advocacy of Arminianism

    Olson identifies himself as a classical

    election.[13][14]

    According to him, adherence to classical Arminianism is defined by being classically

    Protestant, affirming total depravity, conditional election, unlimited atonement, prevenient grace, and that God is in no way, and by no means the author of sin and evil but that these are only permitted by him.[15][16] Olson's definition, without taking a position on the conditional preservation, is close to the view of the Remonstrants prior to 1618.[17]

    For Olson, "classical Arminianism" as defined is centered on God's Grace

    evangelical" to distinguish it from Catholic or Eastern Orthodox synergism.[15][26]

    Olson says that the first principle of Arminianism is "

    libertarian free will to avoid making God the author of sin and evil, and because it is an experienced reality necessary for responsibility.[12][30]

    Theology history and analysis

    Olson wrote a popular and widely acclaimed survey of Christian theology titled The Story of Christian Theology (1999).[31]

    He is noted for a broad view of what constitutes Protestant "orthodoxy." For example, on annihilationism he commented that some evangelical theologians have "resurrected the old polemical labels of heresy and aberrational teaching" in order to marginalize other evangelicals holding the view The mosaic of Christian belief, (2002).[32]

    Olson is one of the writers who sees two "loose coalitions" developing in evangelical theology.[33]

    Olson coined the label "Pannenberg's Principle" for Wolfhart Pannenberg's argument (1969) that God's deity is his rule - "The divinity of God and the reign of God in the world are inseparable."[34]

    He was the editor and author of the Handbook of Denominations in the United States, 14th edition (2018).[35]

    Bibliography

    Books

    Articles

    Notes and references

    Citations

    1. ^ a b Olson 2011b.
    2. ^ a b McWilliams 2018, p. 138.
    3. ^ a b Olson 2019a.
    4. ^ a b Olson 2017b.
    5. ^ a b Olson 2014b.
    6. ^ a b Olson 2014c.
    7. ^ a b Olson 2019b.
    8. ^ Olson 2018a, p. 2.
    9. ^ a b Olson 2018a, p. 1.
    10. ^ Olson 2010b. "I [...] have always identified myself as a classical Arminian."
    11. ^ Stanglin & McCall 2021, p. 243.
    12. ^ a b Kirkpatrick 2018, p. 12.
    13. ^ Kirkpatrick 2018, pp. 54, 65.
    14. ^ Olson 2018c. "What is Arminianism? A) Belief that God limits himself to give human beings free will to go against his perfect will so that God did not design or ordain sin and evil (or their consequences such as innocent suffering); B) Belief that, although sinners cannot achieve salvation on their own, without “prevenient grace” (enabling grace), God makes salvation possible for all through Jesus Christ and offers free salvation to all through the gospel. “A” is called “limited providence,” “B” is called “predestination by foreknowledge.”"
    15. ^ a b Thorsen 2009.
    16. ^ Olson 2014a, p. 21. "[...] in my mind, any person is an Arminian who: 1) is classically Protestant, 2) affirms total depravity (in the sense of helplessness to save himself or contribute meritoriously to his salvation such that a sinner is totally dependent on prevenient grace for even the first movement of the will toward God), 3) affirms conditional election and predestination based on foreknowledge, 4) affirms universal atonement, 5) affirms that grace is always resistible, and 6) affirms that God is in no way and by no means the author of sin and evil but affirms that these are only permitted by God’s consequent will."
    17. ^ De Jong 1968, pp. 220-, art. 5, points 3-4. "True believers can fall from true faith and can fall into such sins as cannot be consistent with true and justifying faith; not only is it possible for this to happen, but it even happens frequently. True believers are able to fall through their own fault into shameful and atrocious deeds, to persevere and to die in them; and therefore finally to fall and to perish."
    18. ^ Kirkpatrick 2018, p. 67.
    19. ^ Olson 2017a. "“Arminianism,” [...] is simply a term we use in theology for the view, held by some people before Arminius and many after him, that sinners who hear the gospel have the free will to accept or reject God’s offer of saving grace and that nobody is excluded by God from the possibility of salvation except those who freely exclude themselves. But true, historical, classical Arminianism includes the belief that this free will is itself a gift of God through prevenient grace; it is not a natural ability every person has of himself or herself. All people have free will to do many things, but free will to repent and believe unto salvation is always a gift of God’s grace."
    20. ^ Kirkpatrick 2018, p. 74.
    21. ^ Olson 2010e.
    22. ^ Olson 2010d.
    23. ^ Olson 2006, p. 18.
    24. ^ Kirkpatrick 2018, pp. 75, 142.
    25. ^ Olson 2014a, p. 1.
    26. ^ Olson 2010c.
    27. ^ Olson 2014a, p. 11.
    28. ^ Kirkpatrick 2018, p. 262.
    29. ^ Olson 2013a. "Basic to Arminianism is God’s love. The fundamental conflict between Calvinism and Arminianism is not sovereignty but God’s character. If Calvinism is true, God is the author of sin, evil, innocent suffering and hell. [...] Let me repeat. The most basic issue is not providence or predestination or the sovereignty of God. The most basic issue is God’s character."
    30. ^ Olson 2010a. "Classical Arminianism does NOT say God never interferes with free will. It says God NEVER foreordains or renders certain evil. [...] An Arminian COULD believe in divine dictation of Scripture and not do violence to his or her Arminian beliefs. [...] Arminianism is not in love with libertarian free will –as if that were central in and of itself. Classical Arminians have gone out of our way (beginning with Arminius himself) to make clear that our sole reasons for believe in free will AS ARMINIANS [...] are 1) to avoid making God the author of sin and evil, and 2) to make clear human responsibility for sin and evil."
    31. ^ Olson 2018a, p. 22. Award for best book in theology/ethics for 1999, Christianity Today, April, 2000. “Gold Medallion Award”, Evangelical Christian Publishers Association, June, 2000. Award for “Best Book in Theology/Doctrine” for 2001, Christian Publishers Association of Brazil, April, 2002
    32. ^ Knight 2003, p. 473. "In a similar vein, Roger E. Olson has pointed out that "many conservative evangelical theologians have resurrected the old polemical labels of heresy and aberrational teaching to marginalize those evangelicals who would dare to embrace a belief that was once relegated to the sectarian margins of Protestantism. This hardly seems like a valuable expenditure of time and energy. Annihilationism does not strike at the heart of the gospel or even deny any major Christian belief; it is simply a reinterpretation of hell."
    33. ^ Toulouse 2006, p. 241. "Roger E. Olson has developed the discussion of these two "loose coalitions" in "The Future of Evangelical Theology," Christianity Today (hereafter CT) (February 9, 1998): 40-48. He offers Edward Veith's Postmodern Times: A Christian Guide."
    34. ^ Grenz 2001, p. 49. "[...] to cite his own poignant statement, which Roger E. Olson has labeled "Pannenberg's Principle""
    35. ^ Olson & Mead 2018b.

    Sources

    External links

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roger_E._Olson&oldid=1204901555"