Roger Norreis
Roger Norreis | |
---|---|
Abbot of Evesham | |
Church | Evesham Abbey |
Appointed | 1190 |
Term ended | 1213 |
Predecessor | Adam de Senlis |
Successor | Randulf |
Orders | |
Consecration | 1190 |
Personal details | |
Died | between 1223 and 1225 |
Buried | Penwortham Priory |
Roger Norreis[a] (died between 1223 and 1225) was Abbot of Evesham in England. He was a controversial figure, installed in several offices against opposition. In his appointment to Evesham, he was accused of immoral behaviour and failing to follow monastic rules. In 1202, Norreis became embroiled in a dispute with his monks and his episcopal superior the Bishop of Worcester; litigation and argumentation lasted until his deposition in 1213. He was then appointed prior of a subsidiary monastic house of Evesham, but was deposed within months, then re-appointed to the office five years later.
Norreis has been described by modern historians as being unsuited for the religious positions to which he was appointed and by one of being completely unsuitable to hold any kind of spiritual role. Nevertheless, even his most severe contemporary critic,
Roger Norreis died between 1223 and 1225.
Background and early career
Norreis was a native of northern England and his family was probably of Norse origin.
Once Norreis reached the king he was converted to Baldwin's side, perhaps because of the latter's appointment of Norreis as the
Prior and abbot
King Henry died on 6 July 1189 and his son
Norreis was appointed to the abbacy of
Early in his tenure Norreis appears to have been somewhat circumspect and did not greatly annoy his monks. The change appears to have happened around 1195, when the monks are first recorded as appealing to higher authority. Because Evesham had traditionally claimed to be exempt from episcopal oversight by the see of Worcester, in which it was located, the monks could only appeal to the
Dispute with Mauger and his monks
In 1202, the new Bishop of Worcester
In 1203, Norreis, secure in his alliance with his own monks, once again began to exploit the monastery for his own profit and that of his family and friends. His monks became upset at this renewal of their exploitation and sent Thomas, along with other monks, to appropriate the harvest from some lands that had been given by Norreis to a non-member of the community. Norreis protested to King
Norreis went to Rome in the company of Thomas of Marlborough shortly before 1205 to lay the abbey's case before the papacy. Thomas remained in Italy, but Norreis returned to England in the middle of 1205.
With the question of the episcopal exemption decided in Evesham's favour, the alliance between Norreis and his monks dissolved. The monks again complained of their abbot's behaviour to the new papal legate, John of Sancta Maria.[15] The legate ordered an investigation, the result being a written agreement between the two parties.[20] Norreis gave gifts to the legate's nephew,[15] refused to sign the agreement,[20] and took revenge on his opponents by expelling Thomas of Marlborough and his allies from the monastery.[15] Thirty monks followed Thomas into exile, and Norreis pursued them with soldiers who were defeated by the monks.[20] A compromise was eventually reached, Norreis agreeing that the revenues of the abbey would be split with the monks, that officials of the abbey would be appointed by the abbot but with the advice and consent of the monks, and that the abbot would not admit or expel monks without taking the counsel of his monks nor dispose of the monastic property without the consent of his subordinates.[20][f] Although the issue of the monks' support was temporarily solved, the issue of the disputed properties between Mauger and the monastery continued. Norreis appears to have been willing to compromise with the bishop, but the monks refused.[15][g]
The dispute between Norreis and his monks dragged on for years. The
Later life and death
On 27 November 1213, Norreis was appointed the prior of
Thomas of Marlborough, who knew Norreis, wrote that he was "everywhere condemned as the manifest enemy of God".[5] More modern writers echo the sentiment. John Moorman described Norreis as a man "totally unsuited to the delicate and responsible task of ruling over a company of men and directing the affairs of a wealthy corporation".[23] David Knowles, a historian of English monasticism, wrote that Norreis was "utterly unworthy to hold spiritual office of any kind", and that Baldwin's appointment of him as prior at Christ Church "must always remain a dark stain on the archbishop's reputation".[4] Knowles also noted that he was "a man of great practical ability".[27] Even Thomas of Marlborough noted that Norreis was energetic, entertaining, and full of enterprise.[10]
Notes
- ^ Sometimes known as Roger Norreys[1] or Roger Norris.[2]
- ^ He was occasionally referred to as "from the North".[2]
- ^ The monks also punned on his escape, stating that "Roger Norreis, who, since he was not necessary to us, exited, filthy, by the sewer",[5] playing on the Latin word for sewer, necessaria.[2]
- ^ They were abbots of Malmesbury Abbey, Abingdon Abbey, and Eynsham Abbey.[15]
- livres of silver went to the pope and a further 100 livres to the cardinals.[18]
- ^ This compromise was eventually confirmed by Pope Innocent III in 1216.[20]
- ^ The case of the properties went into abeyance for several years and was not finally decided until 1248.[15]
- ^ The monks chose to deprive themselves of food so that their servants might be fed,[21] stating in the Chronicon that "without them [the servants] we cannot live".[22]
Citations
- ^ a b c d e Knowles Monastic Order pp. 319–322
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Sayers "Norreis, Roger" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
- ^ a b Knowles, et al. Heads of Religious Houses p. 48
- ^ a b c d Knowles Monastic Order p. 332
- ^ a b Quoted in Sayers "Norreis, Roger" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
- ^ Knowles, et al. Heads of Religious Houses p. 88
- ^ Fryde, et al. Handbook of British Chronology p. 36
- ^ Gillingham Richard I pp. 110–111
- ^ Turner and Heiser Reign of Richard Lionheart p. 94
- ^ a b c d Knowles Monastic Order pp. 333–334
- ^ a b Boureau "How Law Came to the Monks" Past & Present p. 43
- ^ Boureau "How Law Came to the Monks" Past & Present p. 29
- ^ a b c d Boureau "How Law Came to the Monks" Past & Present pp. 34–35
- ^ Cox "Evesham Abbey" Journal of the British Archaeological Association p. 24
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Knowles Monastic Order pp. 335–342
- ^ Boureau "How Law Came to the Monks" Past & Present pp. 45–46
- ^ Boureau "How Law Came to the Monks" Past & Present pp. 53–54
- ^ a b Boureau "How Law Came to the Monks" Past & Present p. 52
- ^ Gransden "Separation of Portions" English Historical Review p. 389
- ^ a b c d e Gransden "Democratic Movement" Journal of Ecclesiastical History pp. 27–28
- ^ Moorman Church Life in England p. 266
- ^ Quoted in Moorman Church Life in England p. 266
- ^ a b c d Moorman Church Life in England pp. 251–252
- ^ Moorman Church Life in England p. 305 footnote 3
- ^ a b c Knowles, et al. Heads of Religious Houses p. 94
- ^ a b c Knowles, et al. Heads of Religious Houses p. 261
- ^ Knowles Monastic Order p. 333
References
- Boureau, Alain (May 2000). "How Law Came to the Monks: The Use of Law in English Society at the Beginning of the Thirteenth Century". JSTOR 651253.
- Cox, David (2012). "Evesham Abbey: The Romanesque Church". Journal of the British Archaeological Association. 163: 24–71. S2CID 192100979.
- Fryde, E. B.; Greenway, D. E.; Porter, S.; Roy, I. (1996). Handbook of British Chronology (Third revised ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-56350-X.
- ISBN 0-300-07912-5.
- S2CID 163660827.
- JSTOR 3490234.
- ISBN 0-521-05479-6.
- ISBN 0-521-80452-3.
- OCLC 213820968.
- Sayers, Jane E. (2004). "Norreis, Roger (d. 1223)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press. required)
- Turner, Ralph V.; Heiser, Richard R. (2000). The Reign of Richard Lionheart: Ruler of the Angevin Empire 1189–1199. The Medieval World. Harlow, UK: Longman. ISBN 0-582-25660-7.