Russian battleship Peresvet

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Peresvet at anchor, 1901
History
Russian Empire
NamePeresvet
NamesakeAlexander Peresvet
BuilderBaltic Yard, Saint Petersburg
Cost10,540,000
rubles
Laid down21 November 1895[Note 1]
Launched19 May 1898 (1898-05-19)
In serviceAugust 1901
CapturedJanuary 1905 by the Japanese after the siege of Port Arthur
Fate
Scuttled
, 7 December 1904
Japan
NameSagami
NamesakeSagami Province
AcquiredRefloated, 29 June 1905
In service20 July 1908
ReclassifiedAs 1st-class
coast defense ship
FateSold to Russia, March 1916
Russian Empire
AcquiredBought, March 1916
RenamedPeresvet
ReclassifiedAs armored cruiser, 5 April 1916
FateSunk by mine off Port Said, Egypt, 4 January 1917
General characteristics
Class and typePeresvet-class pre-dreadnought battleship
Displacement13,810 long tons (14,032 t)
Length434 ft 5 in (132.4 m)
Beam71 ft 6 in (21.8 m)
Draft26 ft 3 in (8.0 m)
Installed power
  • 30
    Belleville boilers
  • 14,500 
    kW
    )
Propulsion3 shafts, 3 triple-expansion steam engines
Speed18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph)
Range6,200 nmi (11,500 km; 7,100 mi) at 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph)
Complement27 officers, 744 men
ArmamentAs built:
2 × twin
10 in (254 mm)
guns
11 × single 6 in (152 mm) guns
20 × single
75 mm (3 in)
guns
20 × single 47 mm (1.9 in) guns
8 × single 37 mm (1.5 in) guns
5 × 15 in (381 mm) torpedo tubes
45 × mines

As Sagami:

2 × twin 10 in (254 mm) guns
10 × single
6 in (152 mm)
guns
16 × single
12-pdr (3 in (76 mm))
guns
2 ×
18 in (450 mm)
torpedo tubes
Armor

Peresvet (Russian: Пересвет) was the

scuttled before the Russians surrendered, then salvaged
by the Japanese and placed into service with the name Sagami (相模).

Partially rearmed, Sagami was reclassified by the

coastal defense ship in 1912. In 1916, the Japanese sold her to the Russians, their allies since the beginning of World War I. En route to the White Sea in early 1917, she sank off Port Said, Egypt, after striking mines laid by a German submarine
.

Design and description

The design of the Peresvet class was inspired by the British second-class battleships of the Centurion class. The British ships were intended to defeat commerce-raiding armored cruisers like the Russian ships Rossia and Rurik, and the Peresvet class was designed to support their armored cruisers. This role placed a premium on high speed and long range at the expense of heavy armament and armor.[1]

Peresvet was 434 feet 5 inches (132.4 m)

kW) and designed to reach a top speed of 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph). Peresvet, however, reached a top speed of 18.44 knots (34.15 km/h; 21.22 mph) from 14,532 indicated horsepower (10,837 kW) during her sea trials in November 1899. She carried a maximum of 2,060 long tons (2,090 t) of coal, which allowed her to steam for 6,200 nautical miles (11,500 km; 7,100 mi) at a speed of 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph).[2]

The ship's

Krupp cemented armor of her gun turrets had a maximum thickness of nine inches and her deck ranged from 2 to 3 inches (51 to 76 mm) in thickness.[3]

Construction and career

Peresvet was named after

Battle of Port Arthur

After the Japanese victory in the First Sino-Japanese War of 1894–95, tensions had arisen between Russia and Japan over their ambitions to control both Manchuria and Korea. A further issue was the Russian failure to withdraw its troops from Manchuria in October 1903 as promised. Japan had begun negotiations to ease the situation in 1901, but the Russian government was slow and uncertain in its replies because it had not yet decided exactly how to resolve the problems. Japan interpreted these as deliberate prevarications designed to buy time to complete the Russian armament programs. The final straws were news of Russian timber concessions in northern Korea and the Russian refusal to acknowledge Japanese interests in Manchuria while continuing to place conditions on Japanese activities in Korea. These led the Japanese government to decide in December 1903 that war was now inevitable. The Pacific Squadron began mooring in the outer harbor at night as tensions with Japan increased, in order to react more quickly to any Japanese attempt to land troops in Korea.[9]

On the night of 8/9 February 1904, the IJN launched a

Vice Admiral Tōgō Heihachirō, attacked. Tōgō had expected the surprise night attack by his ships to be much more successful than it was, anticipating that the Russians would be badly disorganized and weakened, but they had recovered from their surprise and were ready for his assault. The Japanese vessels had been spotted by the protected cruiser Boyarin, which was patrolling offshore, and alerted the Russian defenses. Tōgō chose to attack the Russian coastal defenses with his main armament and engage the ships with his secondary guns. Splitting his fire proved to be a poor decision as the Japanese eight-inch (203 mm) and six-inch guns inflicted inconsequential damage on the Russian ships, which concentrated all their fire on their opponents with some effect.[10] Peresvet was hit three times with little effect during the battle.[7]

On 22 March, Peresvet joined several other battleships firing indirectly at Japanese ships bombarding Port Arthur's harbor. While training outside Port Arthur on 26 March, she accidentally collided with the battleship Sevastopol and sustained minor damage. Peresvet participated in the action of 13 April, when Tōgō successfully lured out a portion of the Pacific Squadron, including Vice Admiral Stepan Makarov's flagship, the battleship Petropavlovsk. When Makarov spotted the five Japanese battleships, he turned back for Port Arthur and Petropavlovsk struck a minefield laid by the Japanese the previous night. The ship sank in less than two minutes following the explosion of one of her magazines, and Makarov was one of the 677 killed. Emboldened by his success, Tōgō resumed long-range bombardment missions.[11] Two days later, Peresvet hit the armored cruiser Nisshin once as the latter ship was bombarding Port Arthur.[7]

Peresvet sailed with the rest of the Pacific Squadron on 23 June in an abortive attempt to reach Vladivostok. The new squadron commander, Rear Admiral Wilgelm Vitgeft, ordered the squadron to return to Port Arthur when it encountered the Japanese fleet shortly before sunset, as he did not wish to engage his numerically superior opponents in a night battle.[12] Peresvet bombarded Japanese positions besieging Port Arthur on 28 July.[13] Some of the ship's guns were removed during the summer to reinforce the defenses of the port. Peresvet lost a total of three 6-inch, two 75-millimeter, two 47-millimeter and four 37-millimeter guns.[14] She was hit on 9 August by two 4.7-inch (120 mm) shells fired by a battery with a narrow view of the harbor, but they caused only slight damage.[15]

Battle of the Yellow Sea

Peresvet after having been scuttled

The Japanese bombardment, coupled with a direct order from

battleline started to execute the same turn, causing all of the ships directly behind Tsesarevich, including Peresvet, to maneuver wildly to avoid hitting the stationary flagship.[17]

As the Japanese ships continued to pound the Tsesarevich, the battleship Retvizan, followed shortly afterward by Peresvet, boldly charged Tōgō's battleline in an attempt to divert the Japanese shellfire. The Japanese battleline immediately shifted fire to the oncoming ships, badly damaging both and forcing them to turn away.[17] Ukhtomsky signaled the other Russian ships to follow him back to Port Arthur, but the signal was hard to discern because the flags had to be hung from the bridge railings without the topmasts and were only gradually recognized.[15] Peresvet received a total of 39 hits of all sizes[17] that killed 13 men and wounded 69. Her forward 10-inch turret was knocked out and several hits near the waterline caused flooding; compartments of the double bottom had to be counterflooded to restore some of her stability. Repairs were not completed until late September.[15]

Siege of Port Arthur

Returning to Port Arthur on 11 August, the Russian squadron found the city still under siege by the

siege guns to fire directly at the Russian ships and they hit Peresvet many times. The Russians scuttled her in shallow water on 7 December 1904 without, however, seriously damaging her, possibly in the hope of fooling the Japanese into switching targets.[15]

Japanese career

Sagami (center, rear) at anchor in Yokohama harbor during the Great White Fleet's visit, September 1908

Peresvet was refloated by Japanese engineers on 29 June 1905 and steamed under her own power to Sasebo Naval Arsenal, where she arrived on 25 August. She was renamed Sagami,[18] after the eponymous ancient province.[19] She was classified as a first-class battleship on 25 August and arrived at Yokosuka Naval Arsenal on 16 September. Her repairs began on 30 September and continued until 20 July 1908, although she participated in the review of captured ships on 23 October 1905.[18]

To improve her stability, Sagami's forward

18-inch torpedo tubes replaced her original torpedo armament and her crew now numbered 791 officers and enlisted men. She was one of the reception ships when the American Great White Fleet visited Japan in late 1908 and was often used as an "enemy" ship during the annual fleet maneuvers. Sagami was reclassified as a first-class coastal defense ship on 28 August 1912.[20]

Return to Russia

In 1916 the Russian government decided to reinforce its naval strength outside the

White Sea Fleet and paused en route in Port Said for machinery repairs at the beginning of 1917. On 4 January 1917, about 10 nautical miles (19 km; 12 mi) north of the harbor, the ship struck two mines that had been laid by the German submarine SM U-73. Holed forward and abreast one of her boiler rooms, Peresvet sank after catching fire. Losses were reported as either 167[22] or 116 men.[8]

Notes

  1. ^ All dates used in this article are New Style.
  2. ^ "Cwt" is the abbreviation for hundredweight, 12 cwt referring to the weight of the gun.

Footnotes

  1. ^ McLaughlin 2003, p. 108
  2. ^ McLaughlin 2003, pp. 107–108, 114
  3. ^ McLaughlin 2003, pp. 107–108, 112–114
  4. ^ McLaughlin 2003, pp. 107, 115
  5. ^ Campbell, p. 182
  6. ^ McLaughlin 2003, p. 112
  7. ^ a b c d McLaughlin 2008, p. 45
  8. ^ a b c McLaughlin 2003, p. 115
  9. ^ Westwood, pp. 15–21
  10. ^ Forczyk, pp. 41–43
  11. ^ Forczyk, pp. 45–46
  12. ^ Warner & Warner, pp. 305–306
  13. ^ McLaughlin 2008, pp. 45–46
  14. ^ McLaughlin 2003, pp. 115, 163
  15. ^ a b c d McLaughlin 2008, p. 46
  16. ^ Forczyk, p. 48
  17. ^ a b c McLaughlin 2003, p. 163
  18. ^ a b c Lengerer, p. 44
  19. ^ Silverstone, p. 336
  20. ^ Lengerer, pp. 43–44
  21. ^ McLaughlin 2008, pp. 47, 55
  22. ^ Preston, p. 207

References

Further reading