Seder Olam Rabbah
Rabbinic literature | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Talmudic literature | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Halakhic Midrash | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Aggadic Midrash | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Targum | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Seder Olam Rabbah (Hebrew: סדר עולם רבה, "The Great Order of the World") is a 2nd-century CE Hebrew language chronology detailing the dates of biblical events from creation to Alexander the Great's conquest of Persia. It adds no stories beyond what is in the biblical text, and addresses such questions as the age of Isaac at his binding and the number of years that Joshua led the Israelites. Tradition considers it to have been written about 160 CE by Jose ben Halafta,[1] but it was probably also supplemented and edited at a later period.[2]
Name
In the
Structure
In its present form, Seder Olam Rabbah consists of 30 chapters, each 10 chapters forming a section or "gate."
The work is a chronological record, extending from
Many passages quoted in the Talmud are missing in the edition of Seder Olam which has survived.
Methodology
The author probably designed the work for calendrical purposes, to determine the era of the
In many cases, however, he gave the dates according to tradition, and inserted, besides, the sayings and
- To assume that the intention of the biblical author was, wherever possible, to give exact dates
- To assign to each of a series of events the shortest possible duration of time, where necessary, in order to secure agreement with the biblical text
- To adopt the lesser of two possible numbers.
Chronology
The current
These years are based on the computations of dates and periods found in the
Despite the computations by Yose ben Halafta, confusion persisted for a long time as to how the calculations should be applied.
In Jewish thought the counting is usually considered to be from the creation of the world, as has been emphasized in many ancient texts dealing with creation chronology, viz. that the six days of creation till man are literal days—including the days before the creation of the sun and earth.[13][14] However, some understand these days metaphorically.[15]
Genesis to the period of the Judges
According to Genesis, the confusion of languages took place in the days of Peleg.[16] Seder Olam attempts to identify when exactly in Peleg's life this occurred. It concludes that the first year of Peleg's life cannot be meant (as at the time of the confusion Peleg had a younger brother, Joktan, who had several children); nor could it have occurred during the middle years of his life (for the designation "middle years" is not an exact one; had the Bible intended to indicate only a general period, it would have used the phrase "in the days of Peleg and Joktan"). The Bible must therefore mean that the confusion of languages took place in the last year of Peleg's life, which (based on the dates of the previous generations in Genesis) occurred 340 years after the Flood, or 1996 years after the creation of the world.[17]
After dealing in the first 10 chapters with the chronology of the period from the creation of the world to the death of
.Period of the monarchy
The chronology of the Kings was more difficult, as there were differences to reconcile between the
According to Seder Olam, the prophecy of Obadiah occurred in the time of Amaziah[27] and those of Joel, Nahum, and Habakkuk in the reign of Manasseh. After devoting the 21st chapter to the prophets that lived before the conquest of the land, to the seven prophetesses, and to the seven prophets of the Gentiles, Seder Olam resumes the chronology of the Kings. This continues until the end of chapter 27, where it is calculated that the destruction of the Temple occurred after it had existed 410 years, or 3,338 years after the creation of the world.
Several vital clues are provided by the 2nd-century authors of Seder Olam and the
Moreover, the interval between the First Temple's destruction in 422 BCE and the Second Temple's destruction in 68 CE is put at 490 years.[39][40]
In the Jewish custom of recollecting regnal years of kings, the 1st day of the lunar month Nisan marks a New Year for kings, meaning, from this date was calculated the years of the reign of Israelite kings; thus if a king was enthroned in the preceding month, Adar, he begins his second year of reign in the next lunar month, following the 1st of Nisan.[41] Based on this unique way of reckoning regnal years, if King X died in the lunar month Nisan in the year 2022, and King XX succeeded him on the throne in Nisan of 2022, both kings are reckoned as having reigned one year in 2022. All dates provided in the following table showing King David's line of succession are, therefore, made subject to this caveat.
Seder Olam's delineation of David's dynasty (click to open) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The seventy years of exile
According to Seder Olam, the 70-year period spoken of by Jeremiah 25:11, Jeremiah 29:10 and Daniel 9:2 began in the first year of Nebuchadnezzar's reign, in 441 BCE,[93] and ended in the year 370 BCE, with the beginning of the return of the exiles under Cyrus.[94]
Aside from the disparity between the traditional Jewish method of dating Nebuchadnezzar's year of ascension (put at 441 BCE) and the conventional method of dating for Nebuchadnezzar's first-year of reign (put at 605 BCE) – a disparity of 164 years, there are also historic discrepancies in the chronological list of successive Babylonian kings mentioned by Seder Olam. Seder Olam's assignment of regnal years for the Babylonian kings in that period differs from those assigned by
The Babylonian kings' list in Seder Olam is explained by medieval biblical exegete
Saadia explains, moreover, how Seder Olam derived 23 years, instead of Berossus' 2 years, for Evil-merodach's reign, saying that since the third-year of Belshazzar's reign is referenced in the Scripture[104] and he is thought by the author of Seder Olam to have died in the third-year of his reign,[105] although the Book of Daniel does not say explicitly that Belshazzar died in the third-year of his reign,[106] it stands to reason that the years in between Nebuchadnezzar's 45-year reign and Belshazzar's 3-year reign, at the least, is collected as 23 years, during which time Evil-merodach reigned.[107] The Talmud refers to this as "deductive reasoning" (Hebrew: גמרא).[108] Belshazzar was thought by the author of Seder Olam to be the mere grandson of Nebuchadnezzar, based on the Scripture: "All the nations shall serve him (i.e. Nebuchadnezzar) and his son (i.e. Evil-merodach) and his grandson, etc." (Jeremiah 27:7).[95] Chroniclers have largely rejected Seder Olam's method of assigning regnal years for the Babylonian kings and have relied, instead, on Berossus and on other archaeological records.[109] Still, the 164–165-year disparity between events described in rabbinic tradition and the same events using conventional dating methods has been the subject of intense debate, with Jewish scholars occasionally taking sides.
The Persian period
According to one Jewish tradition, the seventy-year period of exile commences with the beginning of Nebuchadnezzar's reign, and concludes with the rise of
Alternatively, what seems to be a historical inaccuracy in Seder Olam has been explained in a different way. According to
As with the Seder Olam's record of the Babylonian kings, so is there difficulty reconciling the accounts in Seder Olam with historical records that mention successive Persian kings, such as that which was documented by
Successive Chaldean rulers | Conventional chronology[132] | Seder Olam's chronology[133] |
---|---|---|
Nebuchadnezzar |
43 years[134][135] | 45 years[133][136][a] |
Amel-Marduk | 2 years[137] | 23 years[133][138] |
It is to be noted here that where conventional chronology goes on to cite another 3 successive Chaldean kings (spanning a period of nearly 22 years), Talmudic chronology cites only one Chaldean king that reigned after Amel-Marduk, namely, Baltasar (co-regent with Nabonidus), and who is said by the Talmudic record to have reigned a mere 3 years. | ||
Neriglissar | 4 years[139] | --- |
Labosordacus | 9 months[140] | --- |
Nabonidus (Baltasar)[141] (Note: Others see Baltasar as Nabonidus' son and co-regent) | [Nabonidus] 17 years[142][143][b] |
[Baltasar] 3 years[133][144][c] |
Total number of years: | 67 years | 71 years |
Successive Persian rulers | Conventional chronology[132] | Seder Olam's chronology[145] |
---|---|---|
Herodotus notes in his Histories that Cyrus the Great reigned 29 years.[146] However, from Cyrus' taking of Babylon in the 17th year of the reign of Nabonidus, only 9 years remained of Cyrus' 29-year reign.[132] This view is corroborated by Ptolemy's Canon. The nine years of Cyrus' reign as mentioned by him only reflect the number of regnal years remaining after Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon in 539 BCE. Cyrus is thought to have died in 530 BCE.[147] | ||
Cyrus the Great | 29 years[148][d] | 3 years[149][e] |
Cambyses (Note: In the Talmud (Megillah 11b), Cambyses is not mentioned, but is replaced by Ahasuerus who is thought to have succeeded Cyrus the Great) | [Cambyses] 7 years and 5 months[150][f] |
[Ahasuerus] 14 years[151][g] |
The Magi | 7 months[152] | --- |
Darius, the son of Hystaspes | 36 years[153][127] | 2 years[h] [36 years][154][i] |
Xerxes (Artaxerxes), the Great, b. Darius[j] | 21 years[127] | --- |
Artabanus | 7 months[127] | --- |
Artaxerxes (Cyrus) b. Xerxes the Great (Ahasuerus)[k] |
41 years[127] | --- |
Xerxes | 2 months[127][157] | --- |
Sogdianus | 7 months[127] | --- |
Darius, the son of Xerxes | 19 years[127][158] | --- |
Artaxerxes II Mnemon[l] | 46 years[160] | --- |
Artaxerxes III Ochus | 21 years[161] | --- |
Artaxerxes IV Arses |
2 years[162] | --- |
Darius III Codomannus | 4 years[163][164] | --- |
Total number of years: | 228 years + 4 mo.[m] | 53 years |
Second Temple and post-destruction period
The narration continues after the 70 years of the
From the destruction of the Second Temple, which (according to Seder Olam, ch. 30) occurred at the departure of the Sabbatical year (meaning, the beginning of the 1st-year in a seven-year cycle), to the suppression of the
Authorship
Rabbinical eras |
---|
Assuming that this Seder Olam is the same as the Seder Olam mentioned in the
However, Ratner
Other scholars say that in Seder Olam Jose preserved the generally accepted opinions, even when they were contrary to his own, as indicated in
Usage in later rabbinic texts
Besides directly quoting Seder Olam, the Talmud often alludes to it. A passage in Seder Olam (chapter 30) describing the 420 years of four hegemonic powers (Persian, Grecian, Hasmonean and Herodian) appears almost verbatim in the Babylonian Talmud.[172] Often, the phrases "tanya" (= "we learned"), "tana" (= "he learned"), "tanu rabbanan" (= "our teachers learned"), and "amar mar" (= "the teacher said") introduce sentences also found in Seder Olam. In addition, many of its passages have been taken into the Mishnah without any allusion to their source. Seder Olam is not mentioned in the Jerusalem Talmud, although several passages in the latter are based on it. Finally, many of the sayings of Seder Olam have been taken into the Mekhilta, the Sifra, and the Sifre.[5]
Acceptance of Seder Olam Rabbah's chronology was not universal. Among the premodern sources whose chronologies contradict Seder Olam Rabbah are
Editions
- Seder Olam Rabbah (in print) first appeared at Abraham ibn David's Sefer ha-Ḳabbalah. It has been reedited several times since then.
- In 1577 Seder Olam Rabbah and Seder Olam Zuṭa were published in Latin languagetranslation, notes, and introduction, by John Meyer (Amsterdam, 1699).
- Commentaries on the work were written by
- The three latest editions prior to 1906 are those of Ratner,[177] A. Marx (who published the first ten chapters, basing the text upon different manuscripts and supplying it with a German language translation and an introduction; Berlin, 1903), and Jeroham Meïr Leiner (containing the commentaries of Jacob Emden and Elijah Wilna, and the editor's annotations under the title Me'r 'Ayin, Warsaw, 1904).
- OCLC 233091049.
- Heinrich W. Guggenheimer (2005), Seder Olam: The Rabbinic View of Biblical Chronology, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield (ISBN 978-0-7657-6021-0)
- Chaim Milikowsky (2013), Seder Olam: Critical Edition, Commentary, and Introduction (2 vols.), Yad Ben-Zvi: Jerusalem (ISBN 9789652173591)
See also
Notes
- ^ According to one Jewish tradition, the seventy-year period of exile commences with the beginning of Nebuchadnezzar's reign, and concludes with the rise of Cyrus the Great who ordered the rebuilding of Jerusalem.
- ^ The scholars who deciphered The Babylonian Chronicles (inscribed on tablets) and who analyzed the delineation of years inscribed therein have put the fall of Babylon, in the 17th-year of Nabonidus, in 539 BCE.
- BT Megillah 11b, the seventy-year period spoken of by Jeremiah (25:11–12; 29:10) and by Daniel (9:1–2) refers to the period of time from the destruction of Jerusalem in the days of Nebuchadnezzar to the 2nd-year of the reign of Darius the Great, the same year being the 3rd and final year of Baltasar's reign.
- ^ In Parker's and Dubberstein's Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C.–A.D. 75, p. 14, Cyrus' reign takes up where Nabonidus' reign ends. The nine years given for Cyrus only reflect the number of regnal years remaining after Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon in 539 BCE, bringing an end to Nabonidus' seventeen-year reign. Cyrus is thought to have died in 530 BCE.
- ^ The only reference in the Hebrew Bible mentioning the regnal years of Cyrus the Great is found in Daniel 10:1, viz., "In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia, etc." There is no indication as to how long he reigned.
- ^ It is to be noted that historians differ as to the number of his regnal years. Manetho puts down for this king that he reigned 5 years over his own kingdom in Persia, but 6 years over Egypt. Ptolemy's Canon writes that he reigned 8 years.
- ^ The regnal years for this king (14 years according to the Talmud), are not stated explicitly in the Hebrew Bible, and are thought to have only been inferred by the occurrence of four explicit timeframes mentioned in the Scroll of Esther and one that is inexplicit: the first being that Ahasuerus threw a large banqueting feast for his grandees and governors that lasted 180 days during the 3rd year of his reign [Esther 1:3]; the second being that he chose Esther (Hadassah) for his consort during the 7th year of his reign [Esther 2:16]; and the third being that during the 12th year of his reign [Esther 3:7], Haman desired to exterminate the entire Jewish nation and had contrived to commence the killing on a given day of a given month in the following year. On the following year [Esther 9:1], being now the 13th year of Ahasuerus, these orders were rescinded by the king's directives and the Jews found respite. Mordechai is said to have prospered from that time forward, while he and Esther sent out instructions on how the people of Israel were to observe the Purim festival: an allusion to the 14th year.
- ^ These two years are only mentioned by the Talmud (Megillah 11b) so as to mark the conclusion of the 70-year period of Jerusalem's destruction, when Darius, during his 2nd-year of reign, laid the foundation for the Second Temple's rebuilding. It does not imply the complete regnal years of Darius' reign.
- ^ According to the Talmud (Megillah 11b), this Darius is thought to have been the son of Ahasuerus, based on a verse in Daniel 9:1. Seder Olam erroneously places this Darius as a contemporary with Alexander the Great, and the last of the Persian kings. In conventional chronology, Darius the Great was not the son of Ahasuerus, but rather the son of Hystaspes, and is said to have reigned 36 years, and was succeeded by his son Xerxes. However, in Seder Olam's chronology, Darius is mentioned only with respect to his 2nd-year of reign when he laid the foundation of the Second Temple (356 BCE), a crucial point of reference considering that it is thought to have marked the end of the seventy-year period of Jerusalem's destruction. According to Ezra 6:15, Darius went on to fully complete the Temple in the 6th-year of his reign (352 BCE), but since the entire period of Persian hegemony over Israel during the time of the Second Temple was thought by Seder Olam to have been a mere 34 years (from 352 BCE to 318 BCE),[155] this would imply that Grecian (Macedonian) hegemony over Israel began in 318 BCE, at the conclusion of Darius the Great's reign, or else at the beginning of Xerxes' reign, when the Persian army was defeated by Alexander the Great. Modern scholarship has obviated the clear discrepancy in Seder Olam's chronology by saying that Tannaic scholars confounded Darius the Great with Darius III, and which caused the rabbis to omit ten other successive kings after Darius the Great.
- ^ According to Josephus (Antiquities 11.5.1-5), Ezra ascends to the Land of Israel, in 7th year of his reign.
- ^ By some accounts, he is said to have also borne the name Ahasuerus, a contemporary of Esther and Mordecai.[156]
- ^ According to Isaac Abarbanel, this ruler is the same as Ahasuerus (אחשורוש), who reigned in the days of Esther and Mordecai. According to Abarbanel, some say that he reigned 14 years, while others say that he reigned 40 years.[159]
- ^ Years may vary depending on source used. Most authorities hold that the Persian period in the Land of Israel commenced in the year 539 BCE, and ended in 332 BCE, with Alexander the Great's victory over the Persians.[165] Mitchell First, who puts the Persian period at 207 years, reckons these years from when Cyrus first took Babylon in 539 BCE, rather than from Cyrus' first year of reign.
References
- ^ Yeb. 82b; Niddah46b
- ^ a b (Strack 1991)
- Ab. Zarah 8b; Niddah46b
- ^ Ha-Manhig, p. 2a, Berlin, 1855
- ^ a b c d e f Jewish Encyclopedia, Seder Olam Rabbah
- Shemitayear."
- ^ p.107, Kantor. Note that the book Seder Olam Rabbah has been continuously edited throughout the ages, and probably reached its current version around 806 CE according to the historian Leopold Zunz.
- ^ Genesis 2:7
- ^ Leopold Zunz On Time and Literature Zur Geschichte und Literatur opening chapter.
- ^ See The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries.
- OCLC 854906532., a year corresponding with 423/422 BCE.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link), who wrote there, in the section entitled "The Traditional Chronology based on Seder Olam", that the First Temple was destroyed in 3338 anno mundi - OCLC 854906532., a year corresponding with 67/68 CE.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link), who wrote there, in the section entitled "The Traditional Chronology based on Seder Olam", that the Second Temple was destroyed in 3828 anno mundi - ^ e.g.Maimonides Guide to the Perplexed (chapt 25): For two reasons, however, we have not done so, and have not accepted the Eternity of the Universe.... [A] mere argument in favour of a certain theory is not sufficient reason for rejecting the literal meaning of a biblical text, and explaining it figuratively, when the opposite theory [of literalism] can be supported by an equally good argument. SacredTexts.com
- Rambanon Genesis 1:3, And there was light: ...You should know that the "days" mentioned in the account of Creation, concerning the creating of heaven and earth, were real days, made up of hours and minutes, and there were six of them, like the [regular] six days of the work[week], in accordance with the simple understanding of the verse. (Translator's footnote:) Although there was no sun or moon for the first three days, so "day" cycles as we know them today did not exist then, nevertheless the six days of creation were six periods of twenty-four hours each. The Torah: with Ramban's commentary translated, annotated, and elucidated. Translated by Rabbi Yaakov Binder in collaboration with Rabbi Yoseph Kamenetsky. Artscroll Mesorah Publications, Ltd.
- ^ Rabbi A. Kook (Orot Hakodesh Book 2 Chapt 537): If these six days were simply six days, why then would they be called "The secrets of creation" and why would it be forbidden to learn them until correctly prepared... The theory of evolution is increasingly conquering the world at this time, and, more so than all other philosophical theories, conforms to the kabbalistic secrets of the world. Evolution, which proceeds on a path of ascendancy, provides an optimistic foundation for the world. How is it possible to despair at a time when we see that everything evolves and ascends? ... My Jewish Learning Archived 2008-10-11 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Genesis 10:25
- ^ According to Genesis, in this year Abraham was 48 years old. When Abraham went into Egypt (Genesis 12:10) he was probably between 80 and 90 years old. Thus, Seder Olam implies that in less than 40 years Egypt was formed with Pharaohs and officials.
- ^ Judges 11:26
- ^ Judges 27:1
- ^ Judges 19–21
- ^ 1 Kings 6:1
- ^ Judges 13:1
- I Samuel4:18
- ^ I Samuel 13:2
- I Kings2:11
- I Samuel2:27
- ^ Compare, however, Yalkut Shimoni, Obadiah
- ^ Tosefta (Zevahim 13:6)
- OCLC 233090728.
- OCLC 233090728.
In the Jewish Diaspora they would write in their contracts, 'According to the counting of the Grecians, being a thousand [years since the exodus from Egypt']." This arcane statement is explained by Eliyahu of Vilna, in his commentary on Seder Olam as follows: "Being a thousand. Meaning, from the exodus of Egypt is reckoned a thousand years. That is to say, 480 [years passed] till the building of the [first] temple, and 410 [years being] the time of its duration, and 52 [years passed] till the kingdom of Persia [usurped authority over the Babylonian kingdom], and 52 [years being the duration] of the Persian kingdom [until their hegemony over Israel was taken by Macedonia], and 6 [years] of the kingdom of Greece (i.e. 312 BCE, thought to have been the 6th year of Alexander's reign)– all total, one-thousand years. It was during that time that they began to reckon the date in contracts, 'According to the kingdom of Grecia'.
- ^ Sar-Shalom, Rahamim (1984), p. 161. Sar-Shalom wrote there, in the section entitled "The Traditional Chronology based on Seder Olam", that the First Temple was destroyed in 3338 anno mundi, a year corresponding with 422 BCE.
- OCLC 233091049, who wrote that Nebuchadnezzar exiled the people of Judah from their land, in the 11th-year of Zedekiah's reign, which year fell out in 3338 anno mundi(= 422 BCE).
- Babylonian Talmud (Taanit 29a, Arakhin 11b); Jerusalem Talmud (Taanit 24a); Midrash Tehillim 94 (end); Seder Olam, ch. 30 (p. 100).
- OCLC 711874263.
When the Temple was destroyed the first time, it was the day after the Sabbath and the year after the Sabbatical year
- OCLC 233090728.
- OCLC 233090728.
- OCLC 233090728.
- Babylonian Talmud(Arakhin 12b)
- OCLC 233090728.
Rabbi Yose says: 'Seventy weeks' [spoken of by Daniel] is from the time of the destruction of the First Temple until the destruction of the last [Temple], [which time includes] the seventy [years] of its destruction, and four-hundred and ten (sic) [twenty] years of its building
- OCLC 122866057.
Commentary: In the lunar month Av of 5566 anno mundi (corresponding to 1806 CE), the Second Temple's destruction occurred 1738 years ago (i.e. in 68 CE), and the First Temple's destruction occurred 2228 years ago (i.e. in 422 BCE).
- ISBN 0-19-815402-X, s.v. Rosh Hashannah 1:1
- ^ 1 Kings 2:11; 2 Samuel 2:1–4
- ^ Seder Olam, ch. 15
- ^ 2 Samuel 5:1–5
- ^ 1 Kings 2:11–12; 1 Chronicles 29:27–28
- ^ Seder Olam, ch. 16 (p. 51); 1 Kings 11:42
- ^ 1 Kings 6:1; 1 Kings 6:37.
- ^ Seder Olam, ch. 15 (p. 51)
- OCLC 233091049, who wrote that the First Temple was built in 2909 anno mundi, a year corresponding with 852/851 BCE
- ^ 1 Kings 14:21; Seder Olam, ch. 16 (p. 51), based on the Vilna Gaon's correction of copyist error.
- ^ 2 Chronicles 12:2–4
- ^ 1 Kings 15:1–2; Seder Olam, ch. 16 (p. 51)
- ^ 1 Kings 15:9–10; Seder Olam, ch. 16 (p. 52)
- ^ 1 Kings 22:42; 2 Chronicles 20:31; Seder Olam, ch. 17 (p. 56); Josephus, Antiquities 9.3.2. (Antiq. 37.44)
- ^ 2 Kings 8:17; Seder Olam, ch. 17 (pp. 56–57)
- ^ 2 Kings 8:26; Seder Olam, ch. 17 (p. 57)
- ^ 2 Kings 11:1–3
- ^ 2 Kings 12:2; Seder Olam, ch. 18 (p. 58)
- ^ Seder Olam, ch. 18 (p. 58)
- ^ 2 Kings 14:2; Seder Olam, ch. 19 (p. 59)
- ^ 2 Kings 15:2; Seder Olam, ch. 19 (p. 60)
- ^ 2 Kings 15:33; 2 Chronicles 27:1; Seder Olam, ch. 22 (p. 70)
- ^ 2 Kings 16:2; Seder Olam, ch. 22 (p. 70)
- ^ 2 Kings 18:2; 2 Chronicles 29:1
- OCLC 233091049
- ^ Seder Olam, ch. 22 (p. 73)
- ^ 2 Kings 18:9–11
- ^ Sar-Shalom, Rahamim (1984), p. 161, who wrote: "The destruction of Samaria and the second exile of the Ten Tribes [occurred in] 3205 anno mundi," a date corresponding with 556/555 BCE
- ^ 2 Kings 18:13; Isaiah 36:1
- ^ 2 Kings 21:1; Seder Olam, ch. 24 (p. 77)
- ^ 2 Kings 21:19; Seder Olam, ch. 24 (p. 77)
- ^ 2 Kings 22:1; Seder Olam, ch. 24 (p. 77)
- ^ a b Seder Olam, ch. 24 (p. 77)
- ^ 2 Kings 23:31; 2 Chronicles 36:1–4; Seder Olam, ch. 24 (p. 78)
- ^ 2 Kings 23:36
- ^ Seder Olam, ch. 24 (p. 78)
- ^ Seder Olam, ch. 25 (pp. 79–80)
- ^ Cf. Babylonian Talmud (Megillah 11b).
- ^ 2 Kings 24:8; Seder Olam, ch. 25 (p. 81)
- ^ 2 Kings 24:18; Seder Olam, ch. 25 (p. 82)
- ^ Seder Olam, ch. 25 (p. 81) states that Jehoiachin was exiled from the country during the half of the Jubilee, on the 4th year of the seven-year cycle. Indeed, on this very year, there were another 25 years until the next Jubilee in 408 BCE.
- Babylonian Talmud(Megillah 11b), where it states: "They were exiled in the seventh [year], [and] they were exiled in the eighth [year]. They were exiled in the eighteenth [year], [and] they were exiled in the nineteenth [year]. [Meaning], they were exiled in the seventh year after [Nebuchadnezzar's] conquest of Jehoiakim, being the [same year of] exile of Jehoiachin, which [year] is the eighth [year] of Nebuchadnezzar's reign." A reference to this exile is also mentioned in Jeremiah 52:28–29.
- ^ Jeremiah 52:4; Seder Olam, ch. 27 (p. 86; Josephus (Antiquities 10.7.3-4.)
- ^ 2 Kings 24:18
- ^ Josephus (Antiquities 10.7.3-4.)
- ^ 2 Kings 25:8–9; Jeremiah 52:12
- Babylonian Talmud (Megillah 11b), where it states: "They were exiled in the seventh [year] [and] they were exiled in the eighth [year]. They were exiled in the eighteenth [year] [and] they were exiled in the nineteenth [year]. [Meaning], they were exiled in the eighteenth year starting from [Nebuchadnezzar's] conquest of Jehoiakim [in 440 BCE to the present year, 422 BCE], being the [same year] of Zedekiah's exile, which [year] corresponds to the nineteenth [year] of Nebuchadnezzar's reign." A reference to this exile is also mentioned in Jeremiah 52:28–29.
- OCLC 233091049, who deviates from the accounts written in the Hebrew Scriptures and in the Babylonian Talmud, and writes, instead, that in the 23rd year of Nebuchadnezzar's reign, he (Nebuchadnezzar) exiled Zedekiah and destroyed the Temple.
- ^ Sar-Shalom, Rahamim (1984), p. 161. Sar-Shalom wrote there, in the section entitled "The Traditional Chronology based on Seder Olam", that the First Temple was destroyed in 3338 anno mundi, a year corresponding with 422 BCE.
- Babylonian Talmud(Arakhin 11b)
- ^ Jeremiah 52:30
- Babylonian Talmud(Arakhin 12b)
- OCLC 24066916. (reprinted in Jerusalem, 1962). It is to be noted that the commentator in Yemot Olam writes that Nebuchadnezzar began his reign in 3319 anno mundi, a year corresponding with 441 BCE)
- OCLC 233090728.
- ^ OCLC 214650444.
- ^ Saadia Gaon explains in his commentary on Daniel 9:2 that the year of each king's ascension is misleading, as it is a superfluous year, having been assigned for the departing king, as well as for the new king. Therefore, one year is to be deducted for every two kings.
- Ptolemy of Alexandria in his Canon
- ^ Josephus in his Antiquities (10.11.2–4.) wrote that Belshazzar is simply another name for Nabonnedus
- Baba Bathra 131a; Sanhedrin 6b): "A judge has naught on which to base his judgment, except that which has been laid before his eyes" (Hebrew: אין לדיין אלא מה שעיניו רואות). Meaning, if a judge renders an improper verdict, it can only be attributed to faulty proceedings. If a man errs in his understanding of history, it is attributed to his lack of good sources.
- ^ OCLC 214650444., s.v. Daniel 9:2
- ^ A collection of these years amounts to 71, but Saadia Gaon explains in his commentary on Daniel 9:2 that the year of each king's ascension is misleading, as it is a superfluous year, having been assigned for the departing king, as well as for the new king. Therefore, one year is to be deducted for every two kings.
- OCLC 214650444.
- ^ In accordance with 2 Kings 24:12
- ^ Daniel 5:1-ff.
- ^ By a conflation of two verses: Daniel 8:1 and Daniel 5:30
- OCLC 24066916. (reprinted in Jerusalem, 1962)
- OCLC 214650444.
- Babylonian Talmud(Megillah 11b)
- OCLC 460027103., who write that Evil-merodach (also called Amel-Marduk) reigned merely 2 years, and that after Evil-merodach's reign, Neglissar (Neriglissoor) ascended the throne instead of Belshazzar.
- OCLC 233090728. (reprint of 1955 edition, Jerusalem)
- OCLC 1140887617.
- Babylonian Talmud(Megillah 11b)
- OCLC 233090728. (reprint of 1955 edition, Jerusalem)
- ISBN 0-434-99117-1 - British), it states that Cyrus reigned 29 years altogether, which might explain why Seder Olam called his 3 regnal years (beginning with Israel's return from the Babylonian captivity) "fragmented years".
- Scroll of Esther, since, there (Esther 3:7), it states: "...in the twelfth year of King Ahasuerus, they cast Pur, that is, they cast lots," and that in the following year the miracle of Israel's deliverance occurred, being the 13th year of his reign, and in the year after that (the 14th year of his reign) Mordecai and Esther enjoined the people of Israel to keep the holiday of Purim.
- Scroll of Esther), but was rather a different king. Conversely, Rashi in Megillah 11b, s.v. איהו כמה מלך ארביסר, holds that this Ahasuerus was the same Ahasuerus of the Scroll of Esther, since, there (Esther 3:7), it states: "...in the twelfth year of King Ahasuerus, they cast Pur, that is, they cast lots," whereas in the next year the miracle of Israel's deliverance occurred, being the 13th year of his reign, and in the following year (the 14th year of his reign) Mordecai and Esther enjoined the people of Israel to keep the holiday of Purim.
- OCLC 233090728.
- OCLC 233090728.
- Babylonian Talmud(Avodah Zarah 9a, s.v. מלכות פרס בפני הבית)
- Ptolemy in his Canon of Kings, viz. Darius I(36 years) → Xerxes (Artaxerxes), the Great, b. Darius (21 years) → Artabanus (7 months) → Artaxerxes (Cyrus) b. Xerxes the Great (41 years) → Xerxes (2 months) → Sogdianus (7 months) → Darius, the son of Xerxes (19 years) → Artaxerxes II Mnemon (46 years) → Artaxerxes III Ochus (21 years) → Artaxerxes IV Arses (2 years) → Darius III Codomannus (6 years, but who, at the end of his 4th year, Alexander the Great usurped authority over the Persian empire's hold of Syria).
- OCLC 460027103.. There, they conclude that this same period spanned from the first year of Darius I, in 522 BCE, to the 6th-year of Alexander the Great, in 331 BCE, a time-span of 191 years.
- Nathan ben Abraham, in his Introduction to his Mishnahcommentary.
- ^ According to Parker's and Dubberstein's Babylonian Chronology, p. 36, the 6th-year of Alexander the Great's reign over Macedonia, which fell-out in 331 BCE, was the 5th-year of Darius III. During the same year, the Macedonians put an end to Persian hegemony over Israel.
- OCLC 1000992106.. According to Parker's and Dubberstein's Babylonian Chronology 626 B.C.–A.D. 75, p. 30, who wrote the chronologies of the Babylonian and Persian kings based on ancient calendar tables, Cambyses' reign is put at 8 years. Herodotus, however, disputes these figures, putting Cambyses' reign at 7 years and 5 months. See Herodotus(1921). G.P. Goold (ed.). Herodotus: The Persian Wars. Vol. 2 (Books III–IV). Translated by A.D. Godley. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. p. 87 s. 65–68 (Book III).
- ^ Herodotus (1921). G.P. Goold (ed.). Herodotus: The Persian Wars. Vol. 2 (Books III–IV). Translated by A.D. Godley. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. p. 87 s. 65–68 (Book III).
- ISBN 0-434-99119-8- British)
- ^ OCLC 1000992106. (Manetho's list of eight successive Persian kings)
- ^ Manetho. Alluded to also by Herodotus, Histories, being the king that was slain before Ahasuerus ascended the throne.
- ^ In the Septuagint, the Book of Esther refers to the king as 'Artaxerxes,' (Ancient Greek: Ἀρταξέρξης); Josephus, Antiquities 11.6.1–13.
- OCLC 845250409.
- ISBN 1-56821-970-9.
- ^ OCLC 460027103.
- ^ OCLC 233090728. (reprint of 1955 edition, Jerusalem)
- OCLC 460027103.
- ^ Josephus, Against Apion 1:19–20 (1.146), citing Berossus.
- Babylonian Talmud(Megillah 11b)
- OCLC 460027103., who put down only two regnal years for this king; Josephus, Against Apion 1:19–20, citing Berossus. (It is to be noted that Josephus, elsewhere, contradicts himself, saying that Amel-Marduk reigned 18 years.)
- Babylonian Talmud(Megillah 11b)
- . (It is to be noted that Josephus, elsewhere, contradicts himself, saying that Neriglissar reigned 40 years).
- ^ Josephus, Against Apion 1.148
- ^ Josephus in his Antiquities (10.11.2–4.) wrote that Baltasar (Belshazzar) is simply another name for Nabonidus
- OCLC 460027103.
- ^ Josephus, Against Apion 1.150–151
- Babylonian Talmud(Megillah 11b).
- OCLC 233090728. (reprint of 1955 edition, Jerusalem)
- ISBN 0-434-99117-1- British)
- JSTOR 3209218)
- ISBN 0-434-99117-1- British)
- Babylonian Talmud(Megillah 11b)
- ISBN 0 434 99118 X- British).
- ^ These years, according to the Talmud (Megillah 11b), are attributed unto Ahasuerus, who is thought to have reigned after Cyrus the Great.
- ISBN 0 434 99118 X- British)
- ISBN 0-434-99119-8- British)
- ^ Rashi (Babylonian Talmud, Megillah 11b, s.v. באדין), following an opinion brought down elsewhere in the Babylonian Talmud (Rosh Hashana 3b), which, in turn, follows Seder Olam (chapter 30), says that Darius, Cyrus and Artaxerxes were all one and the same person.
- OCLC 233090728. (reprint of 1955 edition, Jerusalem)
- ^ In the Septuagint, the Book of Esther refers to the king as 'Artaxerxes,' (Ancient Greek: Ἀρταξέρξης); Josephus, Antiquities 11.6.1–13.
- ^ Ptolemy's Canon
- ^ Ptolemy's Canon
- OCLC 50864691. (Amsterdam 1647)
- ^ Ptolemy's Canon
- ^ Ptolemy's Canon
- ^ Ptolemy's Canon
- ^ Ptolemy's Canon
- ^ According to Parker's and Dubberstein's Babylonian Chronology, p. 36, the 6th-year of Alexander the Great's reign over Macedonia, which fell-out in 331 BCE, was the 5th-year of Darius III. During the same year, the Macedonians put an end to Persian hegemony over Israel.
- OCLC 845250409.
- ^ Compare Salzer in Berliner's Magazin, 4:141 et seq.
- ^ Mabo leha-Seder Olam Rabbah, Vilna, 1894
- Sanh.86a
- ^ l.c.
- ^ Sha'are Ẓiyyon, p. 25
- Abot, p. 14
- Avodah Zarah8b–9a
- ISBN 9781461629122.
- ^ With the text, Hamburg, 1757
- ^ With the text, Shklov, 1801
- ^ A double commentary, Etz Yosef and Anaf Yosef, Vilna, 1845
- ^ With critical and explanatory notes, Vilna, 1897
Bibliography
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Singer, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). "Seder 'Olam Rabbah". The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
- The Jewish Encyclopaedia cites the following works:
- Fürst, in Orient, Lit. vii. 547 et seq.;
- idem, Bibl. Jud. ii. 107–108;
- Grätz, Gesch.3d ed., iv. 184, and note 14;
- A. Marx, introduction to his edition of the Seder Olam;
- B. Ratner, Mabo leha-Seder Olam Rabbah;
- Steinschneider, Cat. Bodl. cols. 1433–1434;
- Weiss, Dor, ii. 257 et seq.;
- Winter and Wünsche, Die Jüdische Litteratur, iii. 299 et seq.;
- Zunz, G. V. p. 85.
- ISBN 978-1451409147(Note: page 326 in this edition was p. 354 in 1991).
External links
- English translation of the Seder Olam (INCOMPLETE)
- Seder Olam Rabbah - Gilbert Génébrard's Latin translation (Paris 1578)
- Jewish Encyclopedia article for Seder Olam Rabbah