Septic shock

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Septic shock
Infectious disease
Thrombocytopenia with purpura on right hand in patient with septic shock

Septic shock is a potentially fatal

vasopressor to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg or greater and having serum lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L (>18 mg/dL) in the absence of hypovolemia. This combination is associated with hospital mortality rates greater than 40%.[1]

The primary infection is most commonly caused by

abdominal organs.[2] It can cause multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (formerly known as multiple organ failure) and death.[3]

Frequently, people with septic shock are cared for in

intensive care units. It most commonly affects children, immunocompromised individuals, and the elderly, as their immune systems cannot deal with infection as effectively as those of healthy adults. The mortality rate from septic shock is approximately 25–50%.[3]

Causes

Septic shock is a result of a systemic response to infection or multiple infectious causes. The precipitating infections that may lead to septic shock if severe enough include but are not limited to

According to the earlier definitions of sepsis updated in 2001,[6] sepsis is a constellation of symptoms secondary to an infection that manifests as disruptions in heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and white blood cell count. If sepsis worsens to the point of end-organ dysfunction (kidney failure, liver dysfunction, altered mental status, or heart damage), then the condition is called severe sepsis. Once severe sepsis worsens to the point where blood pressure can no longer be maintained with intravenous fluids alone, then the criterion has been met for septic shock.[citation needed]

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of septic shock is not entirely understood, but it is known that a key role in the development of severe sepsis is played by an immune and coagulation response to an infection. Both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses play a role in septic shock.[7] Septic shock involves a widespread inflammatory response that produces a hypermetabolic effect. This is manifested by increased cellular respiration, protein catabolism, and metabolic acidosis with a compensatory respiratory alkalosis.[8]

Most cases of septic shock are caused by

endotoxins, which are bacterial membrane lipopolysaccharides
(LPS).

Gram-positive

In gram-positive bacteria, these are

anthrax lethal toxin. (note that Shigella and Vibrio cholerae are Gram negative organisms).[citation needed
]

Gram-negative

In gram-negative sepsis, free LPS attaches to a circulating

TNF-α. TLR-mediated activation helps to trigger the innate immune system to efficiently eradicate invading microbes, but the cytokines they produce also act on endothelial cells. There, they have a variety of effects, including reduced synthesis of anticoagulation factors such as tissue factor pathway inhibitor and thrombomodulin. The effects of the cytokines may be amplified by TLR-4 engagement on endothelial cells.[citation needed
]

In response to inflammation, a compensatory reaction of production of anti-inflammatory substances such as IL-4, IL-10 antagonists, IL-1 receptor, and cortisol occurs. This is called compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS).[10] Both the inflammatory and anti-inflammatory reactions are responsible for the course of sepsis and are described as MARS (Mixed Antagonist Response Syndrome). The aim of these processes is to keep inflammation at an appropriate level. CARS often leads to suppression of the immune system, which leaves patients vulnerable to secondary infection.[7] It was once thought that SIRS or CARS could predominate in a septic individual, and it was proposed that CARS follows SIRS in a two-wave process. It is now believed that the systemic inflammatory response and the compensatory anti-inflammatory response occur simultaneously.[10]

At high levels of LPS, the syndrome of septic shock supervenes; the same cytokine and secondary mediators, now at high levels, result in systemic vasodilation (hypotension), diminished myocardial contractility, widespread endothelial injury, activation causing systemic leukocyte adhesion and diffuse alveolar capillary damage in the lung, and activation of the coagulation system culminating in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

The hypoperfusion from the combined effects of widespread vasodilation, myocardial pump failure, and DIC causes multiorgan system failure that affects the liver, kidneys, and central nervous system, among other organ systems. Recently, severe damage to liver ultrastructure has been noticed from treatment with cell-free toxins of Salmonella.[11] Unless the underlying infection (and LPS overload) is rapidly brought under control, the patient usually dies.[citation needed]

The ability of

MD-2 system, dampening the host immune response and increasing the risk of bacterial dissemination. On the other hand, such LPS would not be able to induce septic shock in susceptible patients, rendering septic complications more manageable. Yet, defining and understanding how even the smallest structural differences between the very similar LPS species may affect the activation of the immune response may provide the mechanism for the fine tuning of the latter and new insights to immunomodulatory processes.[12]

Diagnosis

According to current guidelines, requirements for diagnosis with sepsis are "the presence (probable or documented) of infection together with systemic manifestations of infection".[8] These manifestations may include:

Documented evidence of infection may include positive blood culture, signs of pneumonia on chest x-ray, or other radiologic or laboratory evidence of infection. Signs of end-organ dysfunction are present in septic shock, including kidney failure, liver dysfunction, changes in mental status, or elevated serum lactate.

Septic shock is diagnosed if there is low blood pressure (BP) that does not respond to treatment. This means that intravenous fluid administration alone is not enough to maintain a patient's BP. Diagnosis of septic shock is made when

systolic blood pressure is less than 90 mm Hg, a mean arterial pressure (MAP) is less than 70 mm Hg, or a systolic BP decrease of 40 mm Hg or more without other causes for low BP.[8]

Definition

Septic shock is a subclass of

smallest blood vessels results in inadequate blood supply to the body tissues, resulting in ischemia and organ dysfunction. Septic shock refers specifically to distributive shock due to sepsis as a result of infection.[citation needed
]

Septic shock may be defined as sepsis-induced

systemic vascular resistance, and low blood pressure. Finally, in an attempt to offset decreased blood pressure, ventricular dilatation and myocardial dysfunction occur.[citation needed
]

Septic shock may be regarded as a stage of SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome), in which sepsis, severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) represent different stages of a pathophysiological process. If an organism cannot cope with an infection, it may lead to a systemic response - sepsis, which may further progress to severe sepsis, septic shock, organ failure, and eventually, result in death.[citation needed]

Treatment

Treatment primarily consists of the following:

  1. Giving
    intravenous fluids[13]
  2. Early antibiotic administration [13]
  3. Early goal directed therapy[13]
  4. Rapid source identification and control
  5. Support of major organ dysfunction

Fluids

Because lowered blood pressure in septic shock contributes to poor perfusion,

lactated Ringer's solution are recommended as the initial fluid of choice, while the use of colloid solutions such as hydroxyethyl starch have not shown any advantage or decrease in mortality. When large quantities of fluids are given, administering albumin has shown some benefit.[9] However, too high of a rate of fluid infusion can be more risky; the particular type of fluid's flow rate must be closely monitored, along with the patient's condition and vital signs.[14]

Antibiotics

Treatment guidelines call for the administration of

antimicrobial therapy is important, as risk of dying increases by approximately 10% for every hour of delay in receiving antibiotics.[9] Time constraints do not allow the culture, identification, and testing for antibiotic sensitivity of the specific microorganism responsible for the infection. Therefore, combination antimicrobial therapy, which covers a wide range of potential causative organisms, is tied to better outcomes.[9] Antibiotics should be continued for 7–10 days in most patients, though treatment duration may be shorter or longer depending on clinical response.[10]

Vasopressors

Among the choices for

angiotensin II injection for intravenous infusion to increase blood pressure in adults with septic or other distributive shock.[16]

Methylene blue

Methylene blue has been found to be useful for this condition.[17][18][19][20] Although use of methylene blue has mostly been in adults it has also been shown to work in children.[21][22] Its mechanism of action is thought to be via the inhibition of the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway.[23] This pathway is excessively activated in septic shock. Methylene blue has been found to work in cases resistant to the usual agents.[24] This effect was first reported in the early 1990s.[25][26]

Other

While there is tentative evidence for β-Blocker therapy to help control heart rate, evidence is not significant enough for its routine use.[27][28] There is tentative evidence that steroids may be useful in improving outcomes.[29]

Tentative evidence exists that

Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column hemoperfusion may be beneficial in treatment of septic shock.[30] Trials are ongoing and it is currently being used in Japan and Western Europe.[31]

Cochrane review was found not to decrease mortality and to increase bleeding, and thus, was not recommended for use.[32]
Drotrecogin alfa (Xigris), was withdrawn from the market in October 2011.

Epidemiology

Sepsis has a worldwide incidence of more than 20 million cases a year, with mortality due to septic shock reaching up to 50 percent even in industrialized countries.[33]

According to the U.S.

Centers for Disease Control, septic shock is the thirteenth leading cause of death in the United States and the most frequent cause of death in intensive care units. There has been an increase in the rate of septic shock deaths in recent decades, which is attributed to an increase in invasive medical devices and procedures, increases in immunocompromised patients, and an overall increase in elderly patients.[citation needed
]

Tertiary care centers (such as

]

The process of infection by bacteria or fungi may result in systemic signs and symptoms that are variously described. Approximately 70% of septic shock cases were once traceable to

MRSA and the increased use of arterial and venous catheters, gram-positive bacteria are implicated approximately as commonly as bacilli. In rough order of increasing severity these are, bacteremia or fungemia; sepsis, severe sepsis or sepsis syndrome; septic shock, refractory septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and death.[citation needed
]

35% of septic shock cases derive from

]

The mortality rate from sepsis, especially if it is not treated rapidly with the needed medications in a hospital, is approximately 40% in adults and 25% in children. It is significantly greater when sepsis is left untreated for more than seven days.[34]

References

  1. PMID 26903338
    .
  2. McGraw-Hill
    . pp. 1003–14. Retrieved December 11, 2012 – via AccessMedicine.
  3. ^ .
  4. .
  5. ^ .
  6. .
  7. ^ .
  8. ^ .
  9. ^ .
  10. ^ .
  11. ^ YashRoy R (June 1994). "Liver damage by intra-ileal treatment with Salmonella 3,10:r:- extract as studied by light and electron microscopy". Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 64 (6): 597–99 – via ResearchGate.(animal study).
  12. PMID 26635809
    .
  13. ^ .
  14. .
  15. .
  16. ^ Commissioner Oo. "Press Announcements - FDA approves drug to treat dangerously low blood pressure". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 2017-12-22.
  17. ^ Jang DH, Nelson LS, Hoffman RS (2013) Methylene blue for distributive shock: a potential new use of an old antidote. J Med Toxicol 9(3):242-249
  18. ^ Baldo CF, Silva LM, Arcencio L, Albuquerque AAS, Celotto AC, Basile-Filho A, Evora PRB (2018) Why Methylene Blue have to be always present in the tocking of emergency antidotes. Curr Drug Targets 19(13):1550-1559
  19. ^ McCartney SL, Duce L, Ghadimi K (2018) Intraoperative vasoplegia: methylene blue to the rescue! Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 31(1):43-49
  20. ^ Booth AT, Melmer PD, Tribble B, Mehaffey JH, Tribble C (2017) Methylene blue for vasoplegic syndrome. Heart Surg Forum 20(5):E234-E238
  21. ^ Rutledge C, Brown B, Benner K, Prabhakaran P, Hayes L (2015) A novel use of methylene blue in the pediatric ICU. Pediatrics 136(4):e1030-4
  22. ^ Volpon LC, Evora PRB, Teixeira GD, Godinho M, Scarpelini S, Carmona F, Carlotti APCP (2018) Methylene blue for refractory shock in polytraumatized patient: A case report. J Emerg Med 55(4):553-558
  23. ^ Da Silva PS, Furtado P (2018) Methylene blue to treat refractory latex-induced anaphylactic shock: a case report. A A Pract 10(3):57-60
  24. ^ Lo JC, Darracq MA, Clark RF (2014) A review of methylene blue treatment for cardiovascular collapse. J Emerg Med 46(5):670-679
  25. ^ Schneider F, Lutun P, Hasselmann M, Stoclet JC, Tempé JD (1992) Methylene blue increases systemic vascular resistance in human septic shock. Preliminary observations. Intensive Care Med 18(5):309-11
  26. ^ Preiser JC, Lejeune P, Roman A, Carlier E, De Backer D, Leeman M, Kahn RJ, Vincent JL (1995) Methylene blue administration in septic shock: a clinical trial. Crit Care Med 23(2):259-264
  27. PMID 26702201
    .
  28. .
  29. .
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .
  33. ^ "Researchers make blood poisoning breakthrough". Phys.org. June 4, 2010.
  34. ]

External links