Shadow biosphere

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A shadow biosphere is a hypothetical

microbial biosphere of Earth that would use radically different biochemical and molecular
processes from that of currently known life. Although life on Earth is relatively well studied, if a shadow biosphere exists, it may still remain unnoticed because the exploration of the microbial world targets primarily the biochemistry of the macro-organisms.

The hypothesis

It has been proposed that the early Earth hosted multiple origins of life, some of which produced chemical variations on life as we know it.

lateral gene transfer.[1]
Others, however, argue that this other form of life might still exist to this day.

Steven A. Benner, Alonso Ricardo, and Matthew A. Carrigan, biochemists at the

organisms based on RNA once existed, they might still be alive today, unnoticed because they do not contain ribosomes, which are usually used to detect living microorganisms. They suggest searching for them in environments that are low in sulfur, environments that are spatially constrained (for example, minerals with pores smaller than one micrometre), or environments that cycle between extreme hot and cold.[3]

Other proposed candidates for a shadow biosphere include organisms using different suites of amino acids in their proteins or different molecular units (e.g., bases or sugars) in their nucleic acids,

RNA) chains or biopolymers.[6] Carol Cleland, a philosopher of science at the University of Colorado (Boulder), argues that desert varnish, whose status as biological or nonbiological has been debated since the time of Darwin, should be investigated as a potential candidate for a shadow biosphere.[1][2][improper synthesis?
]

Existence of a shadow biosphere could mean that

evolutionary connection with any other known form of life.[6][7][8] It is suggested that if an alternate form of microbial life on Earth is discovered, the odds are good that life is also common elsewhere in the universe.[6][7]

Criticism

Methods used by proponents and conclusions drawn from experiments that purport to show evidence of shadow biospheres have been criticized. For example, evidence that once seemed to support arsenic as a substitute for phosphorus in DNA could have resulted from lab or field contamination, and DNA that includes arsenic is chemically unstable.[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Cleland, C.E. (2007) Epistemological issues in the study of microbial life: alternative biospheres. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38:847–861.
  2. ^ a b "Life on Earth… but not as we know it", Robin McKie, 14 April 2013, The Guardian
  3. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.10.003
    .
  4. ^ Cleland, C. E. and Copley, S. D. (2005) The possibility of alternative microbial life on Earth. International Journal of Astrobiology 4(4), 165-173.
  5. doi:10.1089/ast.2008.0251
    .
  6. ^ a b c Callaway, Ewen (2009-02-15). "Short Sharp Science: How to hunt for shadow life". NewScientist. Archived from the original on 20 November 2011. Retrieved 2010-05-15.
  7. ^ a b Morgan, James (2009-02-16). "Alien life 'may exist among us'". BBC News. Retrieved 2015-09-08.
  8. ^ "Cosmologist Explores Notion Of 'Alien' Life On Earth". Sciencedaily.com. 2009-02-26. Retrieved 2010-05-15.
  9. ^ Vastag, Brian (27 May 2011). "Debate over arsenic-based life enters a new chapter". Washington Post.

Further reading

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shadow_biosphere&oldid=1183787144"