Shuanggudui

Shuanggudui
双古堆
	Location within China
Location	Anhui, China
Coordinates	32°54′N 115°48′E / 32.9°N 115.8°E
Type	tombs
History
Periods	Han dynasty
Events	Sealed 165 BCE

Shuanggudui (

Guodian, two other tombs from the area of the old state of Chu

, the Shuanggudui find has shed great light on the culture and practices of the early Han dynasty.

Excavation and identification

Shuanggudui (双古堆, literally "paired ancient tumuli") was excavated in July 1977 during the expansion of the Fuyang municipal airport in Anhui province, China.^[1] Located about two miles outside Fuyang at the time, the site was known to contain old tombs, yet it is unclear whether the excavation was pre-planned or rushed just as construction started.^[2] The digging was supervised by two archeologists from the Anhui Provincial Archaeological Relics Find Team, who discovered two tombs, one of which (Tomb 1, to the east) was found to contain texts and artifacts.^[1] A ramp 4.1 metres (13 ft) wide led to a coffin chamber measuring 9.2 metres (30 ft) north-south by 7.65 metres (25.1 ft) east-west, about half the area of the more famous Tomb 3 that had been discovered in Mawangdui in 1973.^[3]

Some of the bronze artifacts found in Tomb 1 were marked with the name of the tomb's occupant Ruyin Hou (女［汝］陰侯), which means "Lord of Ruyin".

Liu Bang (r. 202–195 BCE) to establish the Han dynasty. Archeologists have identified the tomb as belonging to Ying's son Xiahou Zao, the second Lord of Ruyin. Little is known about him, except that he died seven years after his father.^[4] The tomb is therefore thought to have been sealed in 165 BCE, the fifteenth year of Emperor Wen's reign.^[5]

Artifacts

Cosmic boards

The Shuanggudui tomb contained the earliest known diviner's boards (shi 式), or "cosmographs",

astral deity), whereas the rim of both the disk and the square base is inscribed with astro-calendrical signs that helped to perform divination.^[8] Donald Harper, who wrote about this artifact soon after its discovery, argued that it should be called "cosmic board" because it is "so obviously a mechanistic model of the cosmos itself".^[9]

The use of such boards is described or alluded to in many ancient Chinese texts like the

Han Feizi, Huainanzi, and some military texts.^[10] The diviner would rotate the disk until the Dipper pointed in a chosen direction, usually corresponding to the current date.^[11] He would then find an answer to his question by means of numerological calculations.^[12] Manipulation of this miniature model of the cosmos was supposed to bring power to its user.^[13]

Numeral juxtaposition on the inner, round part of the board correlates to the

Luoshu. "The inscriptions ... appear to belong to ... the 'Circulation of Taiyi among the Nine Palaces' (Taiyi xing jiugong 太一行九宮)."^[14]

Other objects

The most valuable goods that were buried with the tomb's occupant had long been robbed when archeologists excavated the tomb in 1977. In addition to the two cosmic boards, many lacquered vessels were nonetheless found, as well as

terra cotta musical instruments, metallic weapons (a few made of iron but most of bronze), and a number of bronze artifacts like a mirror, a lamp, and a cauldron.^[1]

Texts

Bamboo strips

Robbers who looted the tomb in the late second century CE took the bamboo strips out of the lacquered bamboo hamper in which they had been placed and left the strips on the ground of the coffin chamber.^[15] The chamber itself later collapsed, breaking the strips, and muddy water covered the strips, eventually turning them into "paper-thin sheets, fused together into clumps by ground pressure."^[15] The largest of the three clumps was about 25 centimetres (9.8 in) long by 10 centimetres (3.9 in) wide and 10 centimetres (3.9 in) high.^[5] To complicate matters, the 1977 excavation took place under a heavy rainstorm, and the pump that the excavators used to remove mud from the coffin chamber also pumped out other fragments of bamboo strips.^[5]

It took a team led by Han Ziqiang (韩自强) of the Fuyang Local Museum and Yu Haoliang (于豪亮; 1917–1982) of the

Edward Shaughnessy, who has worked on some of the Shuanggudui texts, finds it "miraculous" that they could be reconstructed from such damaged material.^[16]

After Yu Haoliang's death in 1982, Hu Pingsheng (胡平生) replaced him at the head of the team.[5] It is Hu and Han Ziqiang who edited the texts for publication.^[16]

Classic of Changes

The longest text found in Shuanggudui is an incomplete version of the

Yijing, or Classic of Changes, in 752 fragments containing 3,119 characters.^[17] The hexagram and line statements of the Shuanggudui text closely resemble the received version, yet it is too fragmentary to reconstruct the complete text of any single hexagram or even the sequence in which they were presented.^[18]

Nearly two thirds of this Shuanggudui Yijing consist in "formulaic divination statements" that are present neither in the received Yijing, nor in the version that was found in Mawangdui that was also sealed in the 160s BCE.^[19] Edward Shaughnessy has hypothesized that the line statements of the received Book of Changes may have originated in similar but older divination statements.^[20]

Classic of Poetry

More than 170 fragments of the Classic of Poetry or Book of Odes, for a total of 820 characters, have also been found in Shuanggudui.^[21] These fragments are longer and have been more extensively studied than other incomplete versions of the Shijing found in ancient tombs like those of Guodian (tomb sealed around 300 BCE) and Mawangdui (168 BCE).^[22]

The Shuanggudui version contains portions of 65 songs from the "Airs of States" (Guofeng 國風) section and 4 from the "Xiaoya" 小雅 section.^[23] Although the song titles are the same as those of the received version, the text varies substantially from that of the other early Han versions.^[23] Since each strip contained one stanza (zhang 章), characters were written smaller when a long stanza had to fit on a single strip.^[24]

Cangjiepian

Named after the

Chinese writing, the Cangjiepian or Cang Jie Wordbook was one of the earliest primers of Chinese characters.^[25] It was first compiled by Li Si (ca. 280–208 BCE) – an important statesman of the Qin dynasty who wanted to use it to support his policies of language unification – and later augmented with two other works.^[26] The Shuanggudui version counts 541 characters, a little less than 20 percent of the complete work.^[27] It is longer and more legible than the fragments of the same work that were found in Juyan 居延 (at the confines of Inner Mongolia and Gansu), and among the Dunhuang manuscripts.^[28] Its presence in several early Han tombs shows that the Cang Jie Pian "was, if not a common manual for elementary instruction, at least not a rare work."^[29]

Eight bamboo strips bearing 56 characters from the "Miscellaneous Chapters" (Zapian 雜篇) of the Zhuangzi.^[40]
A handbook for government officials that the modern editors have named Zuowu Yuancheng 作務員程, or Per Capita Rate for Work Duties.^[1] This manual gives the "standard rates of work for different tasks to be carried out by farmers and artisans".^[41]
Yinqueshan.^[42]

Ninety-six strips bearing a text resembling the Chunqiu Shiyu 春秋事語 (Stories and Sayings of the Spring and Autumn) excavated in Mawangdui.^[1]
Three "wooden boards" (du 牘) each bearing the table of contents of one book. One is the Chunqiu Shiyu (see previous entry), and the most complete one is called Rujiazhe Yan 儒家者言 (Sayings of the Ru School), close in content to the Kongzi Jiayu 孔子家語 (School Sayings of Confucius), which has been transmitted to the present.^[1]

Notes

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Shaughnessy 2014, p. 190.
^ ^a ^b Shaughnessy 2014, pp. 190–91.
^ Shaughnessy 2014, pp. 189–90.
^ Greatrex 1994, p. 98; Shaughnessy 2014, p. 191.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Shaughnessy 2014, p. 191.
^ Lewis 2006, p. 275 (earliest); Dorofeeva-Lichtmann 2007, p. 294 ("cosmograph"); Tseng 2011, p. 47 (widely used); Shaughnessy 2014, pp. 190–91 ("two well-preserved diviner's boards"). A drawing of one of these boards first published in the Chinese journal Kaogu ("Archeology") in 1978, is reproduced in Harper 1999, p. 840; Dorofeeva-Lichtmann 2007, p. 294; and Tseng 2011, p. 49.
^ Harper 1999, p. 839 ("astrological instrument" and description); Tseng 2011, pp. 47 (lacquered) and 49 (measurements).
^ Harper 1999, pp. 839 (on help for divination) and 841 (on Northern Dipper as deity); Tseng 2011, p. 47 (description of artifact).
^ Harper 1978–1979, p. 1.
^ Harper 1999, pp. 841–43.
^ Harper 1999, p. 839; Tseng 2011, pp. 47–49.
^ Harper 1999, p. 839.
^ Lewis 2006, p. 278.
^ Kalinowski 2013, pp. 340–341.
^ ^a ^b Shaughnessy 2001, p. 8.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Shaughnessy 2014, p. 192.
^ Shaughnessy 2001, pp. 9 ("largest single text among the Fuyang strips", 752 fragments) and 10 (3, 119 characters).
^ Shaughnessy 2001, pp. 10 (too fragmentary, no info on sequence) and 12 (close to received text).
^ Shaughnessy 2001, pp. 9 ("formulaic divination statements", comparison with Mawangdui Yijing) and 10 (2, 009 out of 3, 119 characters are divination statements).
^ Shaughnessy 2001, p. 18 and note.
^ Kern 2005, pp. 152 (number of fragments) and 156 (number of characters).
^ Kern 2005, p. 150.
^ ^a ^b Kern 2005, p. 152.
^ Kern 2005, p. 153.
^ Wilkinson 2000, p. 794; Hayhoe 1992, p. 28.
^ Hayhoe 1992, p. 28 (Li Si, language policies); Greatrex 1994, p. 101 (Cang Jie Pian composed of three works, including Li Si's shorter Cang Jie).
^ Sabban 2000, p. 807 (number of characters); Greatrex 1994, p. 104 ("nearly twenty percent of the original book").
^ Wilkinson 2000, p. 49, note 38 (location of the other finds); Greatrex 1994, p. 104 ("this is the largest and most legible discovery").
^ Greatrex 1994, p. 104.
^ Harper 1998, p. 34; Unschuld & Zheng 2005, p. 21.
^ Hsu 2010, p. 24.
^ ^a ^b Sterckx 2002, p. 27.
^ Harper 1998, p. 33.
^ ^a ^b Harper 1998, p. 34.
^ Hu 1989, pp. 1–6; Vankeerberghen 2007, p. 297. An illustration of the 32 fragments can be found in Hu 1989, pp. 24–25, and in Dorofeeva-Lichtmann 2004, p. 16.
^ Vankeerberghen 2007, p. 298.
^ Vankeerberghen 2007, p. 299.
^ ^a ^b Graziani 2009, p. 465.
^ Shaughnessy 2001, p. 27.
^ Shaughnessy 2014, p. 311, note 6.
^ Greatrex 1994, p. 100.
^ Shaughnessy 2014, p. 189.