South Slavs
This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2022) |
Roman Catholicism: (Croats, Slovenes and Bunjevci)[citation needed] Sunni Islam: (Bosniaks, Pomaks, Gorani, Torbeši and Ethnic Muslims)[citation needed] | |
Related ethnic groups | |
---|---|
Other Slavs |
South Slavs are Slavic people who speak South Slavic languages and inhabit a contiguous region of Southeast Europe comprising the eastern Alps and the Balkan Peninsula. Geographically separated from the West Slavs and East Slavs by Austria, Hungary, Romania, and the Black Sea, the South Slavs today include Bosniaks, Bulgarians, Croats, Macedonians, Montenegrins, Serbs and Slovenes.
In the 20th century, the country of
The term "Yugoslavs" was and sometimes is still used as a synonym for "South Slavs", but it never includes Bulgarians, and sometimes only refers to the citizens or inhabitants of former Yugoslavia, or only to those who officially registered themselves as ethnic Yugoslavs.
Terminology
The South Slavs are known in Serbian, Macedonian, and Montenegrin as Južni Sloveni (
Another name popular in the early modern period was Illyrians, using the name of a pre-Slavic Balkan people, a name first adopted by Dalmatian intellectuals in the late 15th century to refer to South Slavic lands and population.[3] It was then used by the Habsburg monarchy and France, and notably adopted by the 19th-century Croatian Illyrian movement.[4] Eventually, the idea of Yugoslavism appeared, aimed at uniting all South Slav-populated territories into a common state. From this idea emerged Yugoslavia—which, however, did not include Bulgaria.[citation needed]
History
Early South Slavs
The Proto-Slavic
While archaeological evidence for a large-scale migration is lacking, most present-day historians claim that Slavs invaded and settled the Balkans in the 6th and 7th centuries.
Subsequent information about Slavs' interaction with the Greeks and early Slavic states comes from the 10th-century text
Middle Ages
By 700 AD, Slavs had settled in most of Central and Southeast Europe, from Austria even down to the Peloponnese of Greece, and from the Adriatic to the Black Sea, with the exception of the coastal areas and certain mountainous regions of the Greek peninsula.
Inhabiting the territory between the Franks in the north and Byzantium in the south, the Slavs were exposed to competing influences.
Ibn al-Faqih described two kinds of South Slavic people, the first of swarthy complexion and dark hair, living near the Adriatic coast, and the other as light, living in the hinterland.[citation needed]
Early modern period
Through Islamization, communities of Slavic Muslims emerged, which survive until today in Bosnia, south Serbia, North Macedonia, and Bulgaria.[citation needed]
While Pan-Slavism has its origins in the 17th-century Slavic Catholic clergymen in the Republic of Venice and Republic of Ragusa, it crystallized only in the mid-19th century amidst rise of nationalism in the Ottoman and Habsburg empires.[citation needed]
Population
Languages
This section needs additional citations for verification. (June 2022) |
The South Slavic languages, one of three branches of the Slavic languages family (the other being West Slavic and East Slavic), form a dialect continuum. It comprises, from west to east, the official languages of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, North Macedonia, and Bulgaria. The South Slavic languages are geographically divided from the rest of the Slavic languages by areas where Germanic (Austria), Hungarian and Romanian languages prevail.
South Slavic standard languages are:
West: pluricentric )(Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, Montenegrin) Slovene |
East: |
|
The Serbo-Croatian varieties have strong structural unity and are regarded by most linguists as constituting one language.
Genetics
According to the 2013
According to a 2014 admixture analysis of Western Balkan, the South Slavs show a genetic uniformity. Bosnians and Croatians were closer to East European populations and largely overlapped with Hungarians from Central Europe.[53] In the 2015 analysis, Bosnians and Croatians formed a western South Slavic cluster together with Slovenians, in opposition to an eastern cluster formed by Macedonians and Bulgarians, with Serbians in between the two. The western cluster has an inclination toward Hungarians, Czechs, and Slovaks, while the eastern ones lean toward Romanians and, to some extent, to Greeks.[56] The modeled ancestral genetic component of Balto-Slavs among South Slavs was between 55 and 70%.[56] In the 2018 analysis of Slovenian population, the Slovenian population clustered with Croatians, Hungarians and was close to Czech.[57]
The 2006 Y-DNA study results "suggest that the Slavic expansion started from the territory of present-day Ukraine, thus supporting the hypothesis that places the earliest known homeland of Slavs in the basin of the middle Dnieper".[58] According to genetic studies until 2020, the distribution, variance and frequency of the Y-DNA haplogroups R1a and I2 and their subclades R-M558, R-M458 and I-CTS10228 among South Slavs are in correlation with the spreading of Slavic languages during the medieval Slavic expansion from Eastern Europe, most probably from the territory of present-day Ukraine and Southeastern Poland.[59][60][61][62][63][64][65]
See also
- Yugoslavs
- East Slavs
- West Slavs
- List of Slavic studies journals
- Outline of Slavic history and culture
Annotations
- ancient Greeks and ancient Romans. Roman influence, however, was initially limited to cities concentrated along the Dalmatian coast, later spreading to a few scattered cities inside the Balkan interior, particularly along the river Danube (Sirmium, Belgrade, Niš). Roman citizens from throughout the empire settled in these cities and in the adjacent countryside. Following the fall of Rome and numerous barbarian raids, the population in the Balkans dropped, as did commerce and general standards of living. Many people were killed or taken prisoner by invaders. This demographic decline was particularly attributed to a drop in the number of indigenous peasants living in rural areas. They were the most vulnerable to raids and were also hardest hit by the financial crises that plagued the falling empire. However, the Balkans were not desolate, and considerable numbers of indigenous people remained. Only certain areas tended to be affected by the raids (e.g. lands around major land routes, such as the Morava corridor).[66] In addition to the autochthons, there were remnants of previous invaders such as "Huns" and various Germanic peoples when the Slavs arrived. Sarmatian tribes such as the Iazyges were still recorded as living in the Banat region of the Danube.[67] The mixing of Slavs and other peoples is evident in genetic studies included in the article.
References
- ^ Kmietowicz 1976.
- ^ Kmietowicz 1976, Vlasto 1970
- ^ URI 2000, p. 104.
- ^ Hupchick 2004, p. 199.
- ^ Kobyliński 2005, pp. 525–526, Barford 2001, p. 37
- ^ Kobyliński 2005, p. 526, Barford 2001, p. 332
- ^ Fine 1991, p. 25.
- ^ Curta 2006, p. 56.
- ^ Curta 2001, pp. 71–73.
- ^ James 2014, p. 95, Kobyliński 1995, p. 524
- ^ Kobyliński 1995, pp. 524–525.
- ^ a b c Kobyliński 1995, p. 524.
- ^ Fine 1991, pp. 26–41.
- ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 29.
- ^ Fine 1991, p. 33.
- ^ a b Živković 2002, p. 187.
- ^ James 2014, p. 95, Curta 2001, p. 75
- ^ Curta 2001, p. 76.
- ^ Curta 2001, pp. 78–86.
- ^ James 2014, p. 97.
- ^ Byzantinoslavica. Vol. 61–62. Academia. 2003. pp. 78–79.
- ^ Kobyliński 1995, p. 536.
- ^ Kobyliński 1995, p. 537–539.
- ^ Curta 2001, pp. 47, 91.
- ^ Fine 1991, p. 31.
- ^ Curta 2001, p. 308.
- ^ Curta 2007, p. 61.
- ^ Hupchick 2004.
- ^ Fine 1991, p. 26.
- ^ Fine 1991, pp. 37.
- ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 35.
- ^ Fine 1991, pp. 38, 41.
- ^ Fine 1991, p. 36.
- ^ Fine 1991, pp. 29–43.
- ^ Fine 1991, p. 41.
- ^ Curta 2001, p. 66.
- ^ Portal 1969, p. 90.
- ^ Portal 1969, pp. 90–92.
- ^ a b c d Portal 1969, p. 92.
- ^ Dvornik, Francis (1956). The Slavs: Their Early History and Civilization. Boston: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. p. 179.
The Psalter and the Book of Prophets were adapted or "modernized" with special regard to their use in Bulgarian churches, and it was in this school that glagolitic writing was replaced by the so-called Cyrillic writing, which was more akin to the Greek uncial, simplified matters considerably and is still used by the Orthodox Slavs.
- ISBN 978-0521815390.
Cyrillic preslav.
- ISBN 978-0191614880. Archivedfrom the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 20 October 2020.
- ^ Portal 1969, p. 93.
- ^ Portal 1969, pp. 93–95.
- ^ a b c Portal 1969, p. 96.
- ^ Portal 1969, p. 96–97.
- ^ a b Portal 1969, p. 97.
- ^ Portal 1969, p. 97–98.
- ^ Portal 1969, p. 98.
- OCLC 49550401.
- ^ Trudgill P., 2000, "Greece and European Turkey: From Religious to Linguistic Identity". In: Stephen Barbour and Cathie Carmichael (eds.), Language and Nationalism in Europe, Oxford : Oxford University Press, p.259.
- ^ Boeschoten, Riki van (1993): Minority Languages in Northern Greece. Study Visit to Florina, Aridea, (Report to the European Commission, Brussels), p. 13 "The Western dialect is used in Florina and Kastoria and is closest to the language used north of the border, the Eastern dialect is used in the areas of Serres and Drama and is closest to Bulgarian, the Central dialect is used in the area between Edessa and Salonica and forms an intermediate dialect"
- ^ PMID 25148043.
- ^ "Companion website for "A genetic atlas of human admixture history", Hellenthal et al, Science (2014)". A genetic atlas of human admixture history. Archived from the original on 2 September 2019. Retrieved 10 December 2020.
Hellenthal, Garrett; Busby, George B.J.; Band, Gavin; Wilson, James F.; Capelli, Cristian; Falush, Daniel; Myers, Simon (14 February 2014). "A Genetic Atlas of Human Admixture History".PMID 24531965.S7.6 "East Europe": The difference between the 'East Europe I' and 'East Europe II' analyses is that the latter analysis included the Polish as a potential donor population. The Polish were included in this analysis to reflect a Slavic language speaking source group." "We speculate that the second event seen in our six Eastern Europe populations between northern European and southern European ancestral sources may correspond to the expansion of Slavic language speaking groups (commonly referred to as the Slavic expansion) across this region at a similar time, perhaps related to displacement caused by the Eurasian steppe invaders (38; 58). Under this scenario, the northerly source in the second event might represent DNA from Slavic-speaking migrants (sampled Slavic-speaking groups are excluded from being donors in the EastEurope I analysis). To test consistency with this, we repainted these populations adding the Polish as a single Slavic-speaking donor group ("East Europe II" analysis; see Note S7.6) and, in doing so, they largely replaced the original North European component (Figure S21), although we note that two nearby populations, Belarus and Lithuania, are equally often inferred as sources in our original analysis (Table S12). Outside these six populations, an admixture event at the same time (910CE, 95% CI:720-1140CE) is seen in the southerly neighboring Greeks, between sources represented by multiple neighboring Mediterranean peoples (63%) and the Polish (37%), suggesting a strong and early impact of the Slavic expansions in Greece, a subject of recent debate (37). These shared signals we find across East European groups could explain a recent observation of an excess of IBD sharing among similar groups, including Greece, that was dated to a wide range between 1,000 and 2,000 years ago (37)
- ^ PMID 23667324.
- ^ PMID 26332464.
- PMID 30510563.
- PMID 17364156.
- S2CID 34621779.
However, a study by Battaglia et al. (2009) showed a variance peak for I2a1 in the Ukraine and, based on the observed pattern of variation, it could be suggested that at least part of the I2a1 haplogroup could have arrived in the Balkans and Slovenia with the Slavic migrations from a homeland in present-day Ukraine... The calculated age of this specific haplogroup together with the variation peak detected in the suggested Slavic homeland could represent a signal of Slavic migration arising from medieval Slavic expansions. However, the strong genetic barrier around the area of Bosnia and Herzegovina, associated with the high frequency of the I2a1b-M423 haplogroup, could also be a consequence of a Paleolithic genetic signal of a Balkan refuge area, followed by mixing with a medieval Slavic signal from modern-day Ukraine.
- PMID 24667786,
R1a-M458 exceeds 20% in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, and Western Belarus. The lineage averages 11–15% across Russia and Ukraine and occurs at 7% or less elsewhere (Figure 2d). Unlike hg R1a-M458, the R1a-M558 clade is also common in the Volga-Uralic populations. R1a-M558 occurs at 10–33% in parts of Russia, exceeds 26% in Poland and Western Belarus, and varies between 10 and 23% in the Ukraine, whereas it drops 10-fold lower in Western Europe. In general, both R1a-M458 and R1a-M558 occur at low but informative frequencies in Balkan populations with known Slavonic heritage.
- ^ O.M. Utevska (2017). Генофонд українців за різними системами генетичних маркерів: походження і місце на європейському генетичному просторі [The gene pool of Ukrainians revealed by different systems of genetic markers: the origin and statement in Europe] (PhD) (in Ukrainian). National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. pp. 219–226, 302. Archived from the original on 17 July 2020. Retrieved 10 December 2020.
- PMID 31719606.
Hg I2a1a2b-L621 was present in 5 Conqueror samples, and a 6th sample form Magyarhomorog (MH/9) most likely also belongs here, as MH/9 is a likely kin of MH/16 (see below). This Hg of European origin is most prominent in the Balkans and Eastern Europe, especially among Slavic speaking groups.
- ISBN 978-963-263-855-3. Archivedfrom the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
Az I2-CTS10228 (köznevén „dinári-kárpáti") alcsoport legkorábbi közös őse 2200 évvel ezelőttre tehető, így esetében nem arról van szó, hogy a mezolit népesség Kelet-Európában ilyen mértékben fennmaradt volna, hanem arról, hogy egy, a mezolit csoportoktól származó szűk család az európai vaskorban sikeresen integrálódott egy olyan társadalomba, amely hamarosan erőteljes demográfiai expanzióba kezdett. Ez is mutatja, hogy nem feltétlenül népek, mintsem családok sikerével, nemzetségek elterjedésével is számolnunk kell, és ezt a jelenlegi etnikai identitással összefüggésbe hozni lehetetlen. A csoport elterjedése alapján valószínűsíthető, hogy a szláv népek migrációjában vett részt, így válva az R1a-t követően a második legdominánsabb csoporttá a mai Kelet-Európában. Nyugat-Európából viszont teljes mértékben hiányzik, kivéve a kora középkorban szláv nyelvet beszélő keletnémet területeket.
- ,
Based on SNP analysis, the CTS10228 group is 2200 ± 300 years old. The group's demographic expansion may have begun in Southeast Poland around that time, as carriers of the oldest subgroup are found there today. The group cannot solely be tied to the Slavs, because the proto-Slavic period was later, around 300–500 CE... The SNP-based age of the Eastern European CTS10228 branch is 2200 ± 300 years old. The carriers of the most ancient subgroup live in Southeast Poland, and it is likely that the rapid demographic expansion which brought the marker to other regions in Europe began there. The largest demographic explosion occurred in the Balkans, where the subgroup is dominant in 50.5% of Croatians, 30.1% of Serbs, 31.4% of Montenegrins, and in about 20% of Albanians and Greeks. As a result, this subgroup is often called Dinaric. It is interesting that while it is dominant among modern Balkan peoples, this subgroup has not been present yet during the Roman period, as it is almost absent in Italy as well (see Online Resource 5; ESM_5).
- , retrieved 10 December 2020,
The geographic distributions of the major eastern European NRY haplogroups (R1a-Z282, I2a-P37) overlap with the area occupied by the present-day Slavs to a great extent, and it might be tempting to consider both haplogroups as Slavic-specic patrilineal lineages
- ^ Fine 1991, pp. 9–12, 37.
- ^ Fine 1991, p. 57.
Sources
- Primary sources
- ISBN 9780884020219. Archivedfrom the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- Scholz, Bernhard Walter, ed. (1970). Carolingian Chronicles: Royal Frankish Annals and Nithard's Histories. University of Michigan Press. ISBN 0472061860. Archivedfrom the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- Books
- Barford, Paul M. (2001). The Early Slavs: Culture and Society in Early Medieval Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0801439779. Archivedfrom the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- Castellan, Georges (1992). History of the Balkans: From Mohammed the Conqueror to Stalin. East European Monographs. ISBN 978-0-88033-222-4. Archivedfrom the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
- ISBN 9781139428880. Archivedfrom the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
- ISBN 978-0-521-81539-0.
- ISBN 9780813507996.
- ISBN 0-472-08149-7.
- ISBN 0-472-08260-4.
- ISBN 0472025600. Archivedfrom the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- Hupchick, Dennis P. (2004) [2002]. The Balkans: From Constantinople to Communism. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-6417-5. Archivedfrom the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
- James, Edward (2014). Europe's Barbarians AD 200-600. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-86825-5. Archivedfrom the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
- Janković, Đorđe (2004). "The Slavs in the 6th Century North Illyricum". Гласник Српског археолошког друштва. 20: 39–61. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
- ISBN 9780521274586. Archivedfrom the original on 23 January 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
- ISBN 9780521274593.
- Kaimakamova, Miliana; Salamon, Maciej (2007). Byzantium, new peoples, new powers: the Byzantino-Slav contact zone, from the ninth to the fifteenth century. Towarzystwo Wydawnicze "Historia Iagellonica". ISBN 978-83-88737-83-1. Archivedfrom the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
- Kmietowicz, Frank A. (1976). Ancient Slavs. Worzalla Publishing Company. Archived from the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
- Kobyliński, Zbigniew (1995). The Slavs. Cambridge University Press. p. 524. ISBN 978-0-521-36291-7. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2018.)
{{cite book}}
:|work=
ignored (help - Kobyliński, Zbigniew (2005). "The Slavs". In Fouracre, Paul (ed.). The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume 1: c.500–c.700. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-36291-7. Archivedfrom the original on 28 September 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
- ISBN 9780351176449. Archivedfrom the original on 21 September 2023. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- Ostrogorsky, George (1956). History of the Byzantine State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Archived from the original on 23 April 2023. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- Portal, Roger (1969) [1965]. The Slavs. Translated by Evans, Patrick (Translated from French ed.). Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 9780297763130. Archivedfrom the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
- ISBN 9780598749222. Archivedfrom the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 20 October 2020.
- ISBN 9788675830153.
- Singleton, Fred (1985). A Short History of the Yugoslav Peoples. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-27485-2.
- ISBN 978-1-85065-551-0.
- ISBN 9780521074599. Archivedfrom the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
- ISBN 9788677430276. Archivedfrom the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
- ISBN 9788675585732. Archivedfrom the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
- Journals
- Gitelman, Zvi; Hajda, Lubomyr A.; Himka, John-Paul; Solchanyk, Roman, eds. (2000). Cultures and Nations of Central and Eastern Europe: Essays in Honor of Roman Szporluk. Ukrainian Research Institute, Harvard University. ISBN 978-0-916458-93-5. Archivedfrom the original on 6 October 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
Further reading
Media related to South Slavs at Wikimedia Commons
- Jelavich, C., 1990. South Slav nationalisms—textbooks and Yugoslav Union before 1914. Ohio State Univ Pr.
- Petkov, K., 1997. Infidels, Turks, and women: the South Slavs in the German mind; ca. 1400–1600. Lang.
- Ferjančić, B., 2009. Vizantija i južni Sloveni. Ethos.
- Kovacevic, M.G.J., 1950. Pregled materijalne kulture Juznih Slovena.
- Filipovic, M.S., 1963. Forms and functions of ritual kinship among South Slavs. In V Congres international des sciences anthropologiques et ethnologiques (pp. 77–80).
- Šarić, L., 2004. Balkan identity: Changing self-images of the South Slavs. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural development, 25(5–6), pp. 389–407.
- Ostrogorsky, G., 1963. Byzantium and the South Slavs. The Slavonic and East European Review, 42(98), pp. 1–14.