Soviet Armed Forces
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Armed Forces of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics | |
---|---|
Вооружённые Силы Союза Советских Социалистических Республик Vooruzhonnyye Sily Soyuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik | |
US$200-300 billion (CIA, Pentagon estimate, 1988)[4] | |
Percent of GDP | 4.9% (official, 1988) 7.7–11.5% (CIA, Pentagon estimate, 1988) |
Related articles | |
History | Military history of the Soviet Union |
Ranks | Military ranks of the Soviet Union |
The Soviet Armed Forces,[a] also known as the Armed Forces of the Soviet Union,[b] the Red Army (1918–1946) and the Soviet Army (1946–1991), were the armed forces of the Russian SFSR (1917–1922) and the Soviet Union (1922–1991) from their beginnings in the Russian Civil War of 1917–1923 to the collapse of the USSR in 1991. In May 1992, Russian President Boris Yeltsin issued decrees forming the Russian Armed Forces, which subsumed much of the Soviet Armed Forces. Multiple sections of the former Soviet Armed Forces in the other, smaller Soviet republics gradually came under those republics' control.
According to the all-union military service law of September 1925, the Soviet Armed Forces consisted of the
In the USSR, general conscription applied, which meant that all able-bodied males aged eighteen and older were drafted into the armed forces.[6] International observers regarded the armed organizations as collectively one of the strongest such forces in world history.[7] The relative advancement and development of the government's militaries was a key part of the history of the USSR.
In the context of the Cold War, an academic study by the rival U.S. Department of Defense in 1984 found that the Soviets maintained a notable reach across the world and particularly inside Europe. The analysis explicitly concluded that "Soviet armies have always been massive" while "they are also highly modernized, well-equipped, and have great firepower... [as well as] mobility", which meant that "manpower and materiel combined make the present Soviet ground forces a very formidable land army." Although Soviet military strategy in general merited comment, "the ground forces constituted the largest of the five Soviet military services" as of the date the research ended.[7]
Names
Soviet Armed Forces |
---|
Components |
|
Ranks of the Soviet Military |
History of the Soviet Military |
Politics of the Soviet Union |
---|
Soviet Union portal |
- Russian: Вооружённые Силы Союза Советских Социалистических Республик, Vooruzhonnyye Sily Soyuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik
- Ukrainian: Збройні Сили Союзу Радянських Соціалістичних Республік, Zbroyni Syly Soyuzu Radyansʹkykh Sotsialistychnykh Respublik
- Belarusian: Узброеныя Сілы Саюза Савецкіх Сацыялістычных Рэспублік, Uzbrojenyja Sily Sajuza Savieckich Sacyjalistyčnych Respublik
- Uzbek: Совет Социалистик Республикалари Иттифоқининг қуролли кучлари, Sovet Sotsialistik Respublikalari Ittifoqining qurolli kuchlari
- Kazakh: Кеңестік Социалистік Республикалар Одағы Қарулы Күштері, Keńestik Socıalistik Respýblıkalar Odaǵy Qarýly Kúshteri
- Georgian: საბჭოთა სოციალისტური რესპუბლიკების კავშირის შეიარაღებული ძალები, Sabch’ota Sotsialist’uri Resp’ublik’ebis K’avshiris Sheiaraghebuli Dzalebi
- Azerbaijani: Совет Сосиалист Республикалары Иттифагынын Силаһлы Гүввәләри, Sovet Sosialist Respublikaları İttifaqının Silahlı Qüvvələri
- Lithuanian: Tarybų Socialistinių Respublikų Sąjungos Ginkluotosios Pajėgos
- Romanian (called "Moldavian" in the USSR; also known as Moldovan language): Форцеле армате але Униуна Републичилори Сочиалисть Советичь, Forțele armate ale Uniuna Republicilori Socialisti Sovietici
- Latvian: Padomju Sociālistisko Republiku Savienības Bruņotie Spēki
- Kyrgyz: Советтик Социалисттик Республикалар Союзу Куралдуу Күчтөрү, Sovettik Sotsialisttik Respublikalar Soyuzu Kuralduu Küçtörü
- Tajik: Қувваҳои Мусаллаҳи Иттиҳоди Ҷумҳуриҳои Шӯравии Сосиалистӣ, Quvvahoji Musallahi Ittihodi Çumhurihoji Şūraviji Sosialistī
- Armenian: Սովետական սոցիալիստական հանրապետությունների միության զինված ուժեր, Sovetakan sots’ialistakan hanrapetut’yunneri miut’yan zinvats uzher
- Turkmen: Совет Сосиалистик Республикалары Союзы Яраглы Гүйчлери, Sowet Sosialistik Respublikalary Soýuzy Ýaragly Güýçleri
- Estonian: Nõukogude Sotsialistlike Vabariikide Liidu Relvajõud
History
Origins
The
At the beginning of its existence, the Red Army functioned as a voluntary formation, without ranks or insignia. Democratic elections selected the officers. However, a decree of May 29, 1918, imposed obligatory military service for men of ages 18 to 40. To service the massive draft, the Bolsheviks formed regional Military commissariats (voenkomats), which still carry out this function in Russia. They should not be confused with military political commissars. Democratic election of officers was also abolished by decree, while separate quarters for officers, special forms of address, saluting, and higher pay were all reinstated.
After General
The Bolshevik authorities assigned to every unit of the Red Army a political commissar, or politruk, who had the authority to override unit commanders' decisions if they ran counter to the principles of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Although this sometimes resulted in inefficient command, the Party leadership considered political control over the military necessary, as the Army relied more and more on experienced officers from the pre-revolutionary Tsarist period.
Civil War
Polish–Soviet War
The Polish–Soviet War represented the first foreign campaign of the Red Army. The Soviet counter-offensive following the 1920 Polish invasion of Ukraine at first met with success, but Polish forces halted it at the disastrous (for the Soviets) Battle of Warsaw (1920).
Far East
This article appears to contradict the article Battle of Khalkhin Gol. and do not remove this message until the contradictions are resolved. (August 2009) |
In 1934, Mongolia and the USSR, recognising the threat from the mounting Japanese military presence in Manchuria and Inner Mongolia, agreed to co-operate in the field of defence. On March 12, 1936, the co-operation increased with the ten-year Mongolian-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, which included a mutual defence protocol.
In May 1939, a Mongolian
On August 20
Shortly after the cease-fire, the Japanese negotiated access to the battlefields to collect their dead. Finding thousands upon thousands of dead bodies came as a further shock to the already shaken morale of the Japanese soldiers. The scale of the defeat probably became a major factor in discouraging a Japanese attack on the USSR during World War II, which allowed the Red Army to switch a large number of its
Second World War
The Polish Campaign
On September 17, 1939, the Red Army marched its troops into the eastern territories of
The
According to post-1991 Russian sources, the Red Army force in Poland numbered 466,516.
The Finnish campaigns
The Winter War began when the Soviet Union attacked Finland on 30 November 1939, two months after the invasion of Poland by Germany that started World War II. Because the attack was judged as illegal, the Soviet Union was expelled from the League of Nations on 14 December.[15] The war ended on 13 March 1940.
The
In
Barbarossa, 1941–1945 (Great Patriotic War)
By the autumn of 1940,
For
At the time of the Nazi assault on the Soviet Union in June 1941, the Red Army had 303 divisions and 22 brigades (4.8 million troops), including 166 divisions and 9 brigades (2.9 million troops) stationed in the western military districts. Their Axis opponents deployed on the
Soviet forces suffered heavy damage in the field as a result of poor levels of preparedness, which was primarily caused by a reluctant, half-hearted and ultimately belated decision by the Soviet Government and High Command to mobilize the army. Equally important was a general tactical superiority of the German army, which was conducting the kind of warfare that it had been combat-testing and fine-tuning for two years. The hasty pre-war growth and over-promotion of the Red Army cadres as well as the removal of experienced officers caused by the Purges offset the balance even more favourably for the Germans. Finally, the sheer numeric superiority of the Axis cannot be underestimated.
A generation of brilliant Soviet commanders (most notably
The Soviet government adopted a number of measures to improve the state and morale of the retreating Red Army in 1941. Soviet propaganda turned away from political notions of
During the German–Soviet War, the Red Army drafted a staggering 29,574,900 in addition to the 4,826,907 in service at the beginning of the war. Of these it lost 6,329,600 KIA, 555,400 deaths by disease and 4,559,000 MIA (most captured). Of these 11,444,100, however, 939,700 re-joined the ranks in the subsequently re-took Soviet territory, and a further 1,836,000 returned from German captivity. Thus the grand total of losses amounted to 8,668,400. The majority of the losses were ethnic Russians (5,756,000), followed by ethnic Ukrainians (1,377,400).[17] The German losses on the Eastern Front consisted of an estimated 3,604,800 KIA/MIA (most killed) and 3,576,300 captured (total 7,181,100).
In the first part of the war, the Red Army fielded weaponry of mixed quality. It had excellent artillery, but it did not have enough trucks to manoeuvre and supply it; as a result the Wehrmacht (which rated it highly) captured much of it. Red Army
The Manchurian Campaign
After the end of the war in Europe, the Red Army attacked Japan and Manchukuo (Japan's puppet state in Manchuria) on 9 August 1945, and in combination with Mongolian and Chinese Communist forces rapidly overwhelmed the outnumbered Kwantung Army. Soviet forces also attacked in Sakhalin, in the Kuril Islands and in northern Korea. Japan surrendered unconditionally on 2 September 1945.
The Cold War
The Soviet Union only had Ground Forces, Air Forces, and the Navy in 1945.
Men within the Soviet Armed Forces dropped from around 11.3 million to approximately 2.8 million in 1948.
The trauma of the devastating
Confrontation with the US and NATO during the Cold War mainly took the form of threatened mutual deterrence with
Military doctrine
The Soviet meaning of military doctrine was much different from U.S. military usage of the term. Soviet Minister of Defence Marshal Andrei Grechko defined it in 1975 as 'a system of views on the nature of war and methods of waging it, and on the preparation of the country and army for war, officially adopted in a given state and its armed forces.' Soviet theorists emphasised both the political and 'military-technical' sides of military doctrine, while from the Soviet point of view, Westerners ignored the political side. According to Harriet F Scott and William Scott, the political parts of Soviet military doctrine best explained the international moves that the Soviet Union undertook during the Cold War.[24]
The limited contingent in Afghanistan
In 1979, however, the Soviet Army
The end of the Soviet Union
This section includes a improve this section by introducing more precise citations. (May 2012) ) |
From 1985 to 1991, the new leader of the Soviet Union
By mid-1991, the Soviet Union had reached a state of emergency. According to the official commission (the Soviet Academy of Sciences) appointed by the
Following the coup attempt of August 1991, the leadership of the Soviet Union retained practically no authority over the component republics. Nearly every Soviet Republic declared its intention to secede and began passing laws defying the Supreme Soviet. On December 8, 1991, the Presidents of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine declared the Soviet Union dissolved and signed the document setting up the
In mid-March 1992, Yeltsin appointed himself as the new Russian Minister of Defence, marking a crucial step in the creation of the new
The Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) became successful members of NATO since 2004. Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine maintain cooperation with NATO as well.
Structure and leadership
The Soviet Armed Forces were controlled by the
Beneath the Minister of Defence were two First Deputy Ministers of Defence; the
In 1989, the Soviet Armed Forces consisted of the
There were also a number of armed organisations beyond the Ministry of Defence; in 1989 these included
Personnel
Ranks and titles
The early Red Army never adopted the idea of a professional officer corps. It was seen as a "heritage of tsarism.". In particular, the Bolsheviks condemned the use of the word "officer" and used the word "commander" instead. The Red Army never adopted epaulettes and ranks, using purely functional titles such as "Division Commander", "Corps Commander", and similar titles. In 1924 it supplemented this system with "service categories", from K-1 (lowest) to K-14 (highest). The service categories essentially operated as ranks in disguise: they indicated the experience and qualifications of a commander. The insignia now denoted the category, not the position of a commander. However, one still had to use functional titles to address commanders, which could become as awkward as "comrade deputy head-of-staff of corps". If one did not know a commander's position, one used one of the possible positions—for example: "Regiment Commander" for K-9.
On September 22, 1935, the Red Army abandoned service categories and introduced personal ranks. These ranks, however, used a unique mix of functional titles and traditional ranks. For example, the ranks included "Lieutenant" and "Komdiv" (Комдив, Division Commander). Further complications ensued from the functional and categorical ranks for political officers (e.g., "Brigade Commissar", "Army Commissar 2nd Rank"), for technical corps (e.g., "Engineer 3rd Rank", "Division Engineer"), for administrative, medical and other non-combatant branches. The year before (1934), the revival of personal ranks began with the Marshal of the Soviet Union rank bestowed upon 5 Army Commanders.
There were further modifications to the system. 1937 saw the Junior Lieutenant and Junior Military Technician ranks being added. On May 7, 1940, the ranks of "
In early 1942 all the functional ranks in technical and administrative corps became regularised ranks (e.g., "Engineer Major", "Engineer Colonel", "Captain of the Intendant Service", etc.). On October 9, 1942, the authorities abolished the system of military commissars, together with the commissar ranks. The functional ranks remained only in medical, veterinary and legislative corps. By then the Naval rank of Midshipman was revived in the Soviet Navy as an NCO rank, a role lasting until the 1970s.
In early 1943 a unification of the system saw the abolition of all the remaining functional ranks. The word "officer" became officially endorsed, together with the epaulettes that superseded the previous rank insignia. The ranks and insignia of 1943 did not change much until the last days of the USSR; the contemporary Russian Army uses largely the same system. The old functional ranks of Kombat (Battalion or Battery Commander), Kombrig (Brigade Commander) and Komdiv (Division Commander) continue in informal use.
By the end of the Second World War, the
By 1972, the final transformation of military ranks began as the rank of Praporshchik (Warrant officer) ranks being added in the Army and Air Force for contract NCOs since the rank of Starshina (Sergeant Major) was from now on for conscripts. But in the Soviet Navy, it meant that the Naval rank of Midshipman became a rank for Naval warrant officers since the Navy created the new rank of Ship Chief Sergeant Major for its NCOs in naval service. The year of 1974 saw the rank insignia changed for Army Generals and Navy Fleet Admirals in their parade dress and working and combat dress uniforms.
General Staff
On September 22, 1935, the authorities renamed the RKKA Staff as the General Staff, which essentially reincarnated the General Staff of the Russian Empire. Many of the former RKKA Staff officers had served as General Staff officers in the Russian Empire and became General Staff officers in the USSR. General Staff officers typically had extensive combat experience and solid academic training.
Military education
During the
Red Army (and later
Manpower and enlisted men
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008) |
The Soviet Armed Forces were manned through conscription, which had been reduced in 1967 from three to two years (with remaining three years service in naval forces). This system was administered through the thousands of
Ethnic Composition and Tension
For years, Soviet leadership argued that Soviet military played a role in decreasing ethnic tensions and nationalist loyalties. According to professor Deborah Yarsike Ball, Soviet historians, such as B. F. Klochkov, argued that, "the Red Army strengthened friendship between soldiers of various nationalities." The official view of the military was that it was a "school of internationalism," where all the various people of the Soviet Union could develop unity and respect for each other.[30] During the Russian Civil War, the Bolshevik government employed non-Slavic ethnic groups, who were known as national military units.
Despite the official view, the history of inter-ethnic relations in the military was more complicated. As the Bolsheviks consolidated power in the late 1910s and early 1920s, the central leadership became suspicious of the size of the national units. Their sizes were restricted, they were put under close supervision, and eventually disbanded by 1938. The national units were briefly brought back during World War II before being disbanded again in the mid-1950s. In 1956, when soldier were ordered to respond to protesters in the Georgian capital of Tbilisi, the ethnic-Georgian unit refused to follow orders from their Russian higher-ranking officers.[31]
Soviet minorities were not treated equally and many carried anti-regime views. According to a 1983
Inter-ethnic relations in the military did not improve after World War II. In fact, although the
By 1990, Slavic troops still made a majority of Soviet soldiers. In total, 69.2% of all military members were ethnic Slavic (Russian, Ukrainian, Belorussian), 1.9% were Baltic people, 20.6% were Muslim-Turkic people and 8.3% were all other types of people.[31]
Purge
The late 1930s saw the "Purges of the Red Army cadres", occurring against the historical background of the Great Purge. The Purges had the objective of cleansing the Red Army of "politically unreliable elements", mainly among the higher-ranking officers. This inevitably provided a convenient pretext for settling personal vendettas and eventually resulted in a witch-hunt. In 1937, the Red Army numbered around 1.3 million, and it grew to almost three times that number by June 1941. This necessitated quick promotion of junior officers, often despite their lack of experience or training, with obvious grave implications for the effectiveness of the Army in the coming war against Germany.
In the highest echelons of the Red Army the Purges removed 3 of the 5 marshals, 13 of 15 generals of the army, 8 of 9 admirals, 50 of 57 army corps generals, 154 out of 186 division generals, 16 of 16 army commissars, and 25 of 28 army corps commissars.
Party control of the Armed Forces
The Communist Party had a number of mechanisms of control over the country's armed forces. First, starting from a certain rank, only a Party member could be a military commander, and was thus subject to Party discipline. Second, the top military leaders had been systematically integrated into the highest echelons of the party. Third, the party placed a network of political officers throughout the armed forces to influence the activities of the military.
A political commander (zampolit) served as a political commissar of the armed forces. A zampolit supervised party organizations and conducted party political work within a military unit. He lectured troops on Marxism–Leninism, the Soviet view of international affairs, and the party's tasks for the armed forces. During World War II the zampolit lost veto authority over the commander's decisions but retained the power to report to the next highest political officer or organization on the political attitudes and performance of the unit's commander.
In 1989 over 20% of all armed forces personnel were party members or Komsomol members. Over 90% of all officers in the armed forces were party or Komsomol members.
Weapons and equipment
The Soviet Union established an indigenous arms industry as part of
The Red Army suffered from a shortage of adequate
to use it today.See also
- List of Soviet Union military bases abroad
- Comparative military ranks of World War II
- List of military aircraft of the Soviet Union and the CIS
- Soviet war crimes
- Mikhail Tukhachevsky
Notes
- ^ Russian: Вооружённые Силы Союза Советских Социалистических Республик, romanized: Vooruzhonnyye Sily Soyuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik, lit. 'Armed Forces of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics'
- ^ Russian: Вооружённые Силы Советского Союза, romanized: Vooruzhyonnyye Sily Sovetskogo Soyuza
References
- ^ "Loading". Archived from the original on 2015-05-11. Retrieved 2017-03-03.
- ^ a b c Zickel & Keefe 1991, p. 697.
- ^ "Soviet Military Budget: $128 Billion Bombshell". The New York Times. 31 May 1989. Archived from the original on 2017-03-12. Retrieved 2017-02-12.
- ^ "Soviets to trim military production by 1990". Defense Daily. 24 July 1989. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 9 August 2015.; "Soviet military spending put at 20–25% of GNP". Defense Daily. 24 April 1990. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 9 August 2015.; "Soviets have not hardened position on SLCM – Akhromeyev". Defense Daily. 9 May 1990. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 9 August 2015.
- ^ Scott & Scott 1979, p. 13.
- ^ "Принят закон "О всеобщей воинской обязанности"". Translated by A law on the mandatory military draft. prlib.ru. 12 October 1967.
- ^ Department of the Army. Field Manual (No. 100-2-1). 16 July 1984. Washington, D.C.
- ^ Telegram from the German Ambassador in the Soviet Union, (Schulenburg) to the German Foreign Office Archived 2009-11-07 at the Wayback Machine, 10 September 1939, at Yale Law School's Avalon Project: Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939–1941.
- ^ Fischer 1999.
- ^ Krivosheev 1997.
- ISBN 0786403713.
- ^ Sanford pp. 20–24
- ^ Ibid.
- ISSN 1734-6584. (Official publication of the Polish Army). Last accessed on 28 November 2006.
- ^ "LEAGUE OF NATIONS' EXPULSION OF THE U.S.S.R., DECEMBER 14, 1939". www.ibiblio.org. Archived from the original on 2008-12-19. Retrieved 2009-03-12.
- ISBN 9780700612086.
- ^ Krivosheev 1993.
- ^ Scott & Scott 1979, p. 131.
- ^ Tsouras 1994, p. 37.
- ^ a b Scott & Scott 1979, p. 176.
- ^ Feskov et al 2004, p. 22.
- ^ Odom 1998, p. 29.
- JSTOR 25163360.
- ^ Scott & Scott 1979, pp. 37, 59.
- ^ Warner, Edward; Bonan, Packman (April 1984). Key Personnel and Organisations of the Soviet Military High Command (PDF). RAND Notes. RAND Corporation. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-05-31. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- ^ Schofield 1991, pp. 67–70.
- ^ Christopher Donnelly, "The Pattern of Military Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe," IISS conference paper, Moscow, March 2001.
- ^ Suvorov 1982 gives the figure of six months with a training division.
- ^ Odom 1998, p. 43.
- ^ S2CID 143940494. Retrieved 3 September 2023.
- ^ . Retrieved 3 September 2023.
- ^ Alexiev, Alexander; Wimbush, S. Enders (August 1983). "The Ethnic Factor in the Soviet Armed Forces" (PDF).
- ^ "The U.S.S.R.: Moscow's Military Machine". Time. 1980-06-23. Archived from the original on 2011-06-29.; Zickel, Country Study, p747
- ^ Alexiev, Alexander; Wimbush, S. Enders (August 1983). "The Ethnic Factor in the Soviet Armed Forces" (PDF).
- ^ Terence W. Lapin, The Mosin-Nagant Rifle (3rd Ed., North Cape 2003)
- Donnelly, Christopher, Red Banner: the Soviet military system in peace and war, Coulsdon, Surrey: Janes's Information Group; Alexandria, VA: 1988. [1]
- Fischer, Benjamin B. (1999). "The Katyn Controversy: Stalin's Killing Field". Studies in Intelligence. Archived from the original on 13 June 2007. Retrieved 16 July 2007.
- Krivosheev, G. F. (1997). Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century. Greenhill Books. ISBN 978-1-85367-280-4.
- Krivosheev, G. F. (1993). "Soviet Armed Forces Losses in Wars, Combat Operations and Military Conflicts: A Statistical Study" (PDF). Translated by U.S. government. Moscow: Military Publishing House. Retrieved 11 March 2018 – via The Black Vault.
- Odom, William E. (1998). The Collapse of the Soviet Military. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
- Schofield, Carey (1991). Inside the Soviet Army. London: Headline Book Publishing PLC. ISBN 0-7472-0418-7.
- Scott, Harriet Fast; Scott, William Fontaine (1979). The armed forces of the USSR. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. p. [2]. ISBN 978-0-89158-276-2.
- Suvorov, Viktor (1982). Inside the Soviet Army. MacMillan.
- Tsouras, Peter G. (1994). Changing Orders: The Evolution of the World's Armies, 1945 to the Present. New York: Facts on File.
- Zickel, Raymond E; Keefe, Eugene K (1991). Soviet Union: a country study. Washington, D.C.: Library Of Congress. Federal Research Division. For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
Further reading
- Lehrke, Jesse Paul. "The Transition to National Armies in the Former Soviet Republics, 1988–2005." Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge (2013). See especially Chapters 1–4 (see: The Transition to National Armies in the Former Soviet Republics, 1988–2005)
- Lester W. Grau and Ali Ajmad Jalali, "The Campaign for the Caves: The Battles for Ahawar in the Soviet-Afghan War" Foreign Military Studies Office, Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas, reprinted from Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol. 14, September 2001, Number 3.
- ISBN 978-0815755524
- Brenda J. Vallance, "Corruption and reform in the Soviet military," The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Volume 7, 1994 - Issue 4