EN
EN
RU
×
EN
EN
RU
×
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
Contribute
Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
Languages
Search
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Viewing filter 98: Creating very short new article
Help
Home
Recent filter changes
Examine past edits
Edit filter log
English
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
General
Upload file
Special pages
Printable version
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Editing filter 98 (see also a
graph
of recent actions)
Filter parameters
Filter ID:
98
Description:
(publicly viewable)
Filter hits:
357,491 hits
Statistics:
Of the last 71,802 actions, this filter has matched 4 (0.01%). On average, its run time is 0.04 ms, and it consumes 0.8 conditions of the condition limit.
Conditions:
(
documentation
)
page_id == 0 & new_size < 150 & page_namespace == 0 & !"extendedconfirmed" in user_rights & !added_lines irlike "{{(?:surname|given name|delrev|softredirect)}}|#redirect" & !'disambig' in lcase(new_html)
page_id == 0 & new_size < 150 & page_namespace == 0 & !"extendedconfirmed" in user_rights & !added_lines irlike "{{(?:surname|given name|delrev|softredirect)}}|#redirect" & !'disambig' in lcase(new_html)
Notes:
Users creating very short articles A size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior. Apparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters... Added {{softredirect}}. - Ruslik Added {{db-unpatrolled}}, see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle Stubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning ("make your article longer") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego Disabled for sysops. - KoH I limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik add tag "very short new article" - Cen I rearranged conditions. - Ruslik As did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold Nope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold Try this instead... - Hersfold There is nothing wrong with a short article, lets not patronize. People can work in steps. Disable - P Agree - remove warning bur re-enable because tagging them is useful - Cen Optimizing. -TS Optimized -- Shirik 21 Feb 2010 optimised 2015 --zzuuzz User user_rights instead of user_groups to turn off for sysops after recent ACPERM-inspired bump-up to extendedconfirmed from confirmed (see [[Special:Permalink/822578953#Filter 98 and ACTRIAL]]) -- Amory Updated deprecated parameters -Galo 20190115 Remove `db-unpatrolled` per [[Special:Permalink/1097882800#Regarding Filter 98]] --TNT 20220713 Format --Galobtter 21:33 7 May 2023
Flags:
Hide details of this filter from public view
Enable this filter
Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:
21:34, 7 May 2023
by
Galobtter
(
talk
|
contribs
)
History:
View this filter's history
Tools:
Export this filter to another wiki
{"data":{"rules":"page_id == 0 \u0026 \r\nnew_size \u003C 150 \u0026\r\npage_namespace == 0 \u0026\r\n!\"extendedconfirmed\" in user_rights \u0026\r\n!added_lines irlike \"{{(?:surname|given name|delrev|softredirect)}}|#redirect\" \u0026\r\n!'disambig' in lcase(new_html)","name":"Creating very short new article","comments":"Users creating very short articles\r\n\r\nA size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior.\r\n\r\nApparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters...\r\nAdded {{softredirect}}. - Ruslik\r\n\r\nAdded {{db-unpatrolled}}, see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle\r\n\r\nStubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning (\"make your article longer\") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego\r\n\r\nDisabled for sysops. - KoH\r\n\r\nI limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik\r\n\r\nadd tag \"very short new article\" - Cen\r\n\r\nI rearranged conditions. - Ruslik\r\nAs did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold\r\nNope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold\r\nTry this instead... - Hersfold\r\n\r\nThere is nothing wrong with a short article, lets not patronize. People can work in steps. Disable - P\r\n\r\nAgree - remove warning bur re-enable because tagging them is useful - Cen\r\n\r\nOptimizing. -TS\r\nOptimized -- Shirik 21 Feb 2010\r\n\r\noptimised 2015 --zzuuzz\r\n\r\nUser user_rights instead of user_groups to turn off for sysops after recent ACPERM-inspired bump-up to extendedconfirmed from confirmed (see [[Special:Permalink/822578953#Filter 98 and ACTRIAL]]) -- Amory\r\n\r\nUpdated deprecated parameters -Galo 20190115\r\n\r\nRemove `db-unpatrolled` per [[Special:Permalink/1097882800#Regarding Filter 98]] --TNT 20220713\r\n\r\nFormat --Galobtter 21:33 7 May 2023","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["very short new article"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"hidden":false,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["very short new article"]}}
Actions to take when matched
Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit
Number of actions to allow:
Period of time (in seconds):
Group throttle by:
user
See
the documentation on mediawiki.org
.
Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning
System message to use for warning:
abusefilter-warning
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Prevent the user from performing the action in question
System message to use for disallowing:
abusefilter-disallowed
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status
Tag the edit in contributions lists and page histories
Tags to apply:
(see
Wikipedia:Tags
for use and formatting)
(please don't rename a tag here, see link above)
(one per line, no commas, publicly visible)
very short new article
Toggle limited content width