Template talk:Edit COI: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Line 60: Line 60:


Why does this template have the generic name "request edit", when its wording actually amounts to "request edit but the requester has a conflict of interest"? That makes no sense. The "how to use" instructions here don't even mention or deal with the COI assertion which is part of the template. IMO this generic name should apply to a generic request - basically usable as a synonym for <nowiki>{{Edit semi-protected}}</nowiki> or equivalent. There was recently a user who included this template, <nowiki>{{Request edit}}</nowiki>, as part of their own talk page edit request, causing considerable puzzlement as to just who had accused the person of COI. We replaced it with the "Edit semi-protected" template which was clearly what the user intended. I doubt if this is the first time that someone has been confused by this title. Can we create a separate template for "requested edit by a COI user," if one is needed, and let this template's wording simply say the equivalent of "this is a requested edit"? -- [[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 18:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Why does this template have the generic name "request edit", when its wording actually amounts to "request edit but the requester has a conflict of interest"? That makes no sense. The "how to use" instructions here don't even mention or deal with the COI assertion which is part of the template. IMO this generic name should apply to a generic request - basically usable as a synonym for <nowiki>{{Edit semi-protected}}</nowiki> or equivalent. There was recently a user who included this template, <nowiki>{{Request edit}}</nowiki>, as part of their own talk page edit request, causing considerable puzzlement as to just who had accused the person of COI. We replaced it with the "Edit semi-protected" template which was clearly what the user intended. I doubt if this is the first time that someone has been confused by this title. Can we create a separate template for "requested edit by a COI user," if one is needed, and let this template's wording simply say the equivalent of "this is a requested edit"? -- [[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 18:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2021 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Template:Request edit/doc|answered=no}}
Unsure if my requests previously went through... I think my time had expired before I could hit publish. Thus, please see the below requests for Judo Bank Wikipedia Page if you have not yet received them. Thank you.

{{request edit}}
*Information to be added or removed: In February 2020, Judo Bank was announced the winner of the Mozo Experts choice awards 2020 Term Deposits. “Mozo Experts Choice Awards showcase providers who outperformed their competitors in delivering a great product to customers,” said Mozo’s Kirsty Lamont, “Judo scooped one of the top awards after being compared with 68 term deposit accounts, offering some of the best interest rates across short, medium and long term investments, which is no small feat.”
*Explanation of issue: In Feb 2020 Judo won the Mozo Term Deposit award, I would like to add this to the Judo Bank Wikipedia page, as this has not yet been added
*References supporting change: https://mozo.com.au/term-deposits/articles/judo-bank-term-deposit-wins-big-in-this-years-mozo-experts-choice-awards

{{request edit}}
*Information to be added or removed: In May 2020, Judo Bank has raised $230 million in fresh equity at a post-money valuation north of $1 billion, from existing investors, lifting it into an exclusive club of local unicorns and showing the support of existing investors despite the risks COVID-19 presents to business banking. "The support we’ve received for our third round, at an increased valuation to our second round capital raise last year, underscores the confidence and commitment our existing investors have in Judo, particularly at a time of extreme volatility in global markets, that has impacted all bank valuations," Mr Hornery said in a statement
*Explanation of issue: Judo Bank announced a unicorn after equity raise, a major achievement for Judo Bank, thus, I would like to get this added into the Judo Wikipedia page, as it previously had not been updated, please see several references below to confirm the statement
*References supporting change: https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/judo-bank-is-a-now-a-unicorn-20200506-p54qa0, https://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/judo-bank-revels-in-unicorn-status-as-investors-tip-in-another-230m-20200506-p54qcx.html, https://www.smartcompany.com.au/coronavirus/judo-bank-230-million-unicorn/, https://www.startupdaily.net/2020/05/sme-lender-judo-bank-just-became-a-unicorn-with-another-massive-230-million-raise/, https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/35797/judo-bank-achieves-unicorn-status-on-230-million-fund-raise

{{request edit}}
*Information to be added or removed: Having joined the "Unicorn Club" in May 2020 with a valuation of $1.6 billion, Judo Bank is the first of the Aussie challenger bank to reach the coveted position.
*Explanation of issue: an addition to the previous edit, an important note supporting Judo Bank's unicorn status and status as a challenger bank in Australia
*References supporting change: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/business/companies/the-unicorn-club-three-aussie-startups-part-of-exclusive-group-as-private-billion-dollar-companies/news-story/f8e037451c17ac9a2b32fadd6c95ff2b?btr=995a7058a268ed6308fff12ad2b4ed8f

{{request edit}}
*Information to be added or removed: July 2020, Judo Bank has won the Bank of the Year – Term Deposits Award. Canstar Research noted Judo Bank was the market leader among banks when it came to interest rates, and beat the market average on features, with a market-leading performance on options offered at term deposit maturity.
*Explanation of issue: I would like to add this sentence to the Judo Bank Wikipedia page, as it was currently not mentioned that Judo Bank had won the Bank of the year Award 2020 according to Canstar's research, see reference below
*References supporting change: https://www.canstar.com.au/term-deposits/term-deposit-awards-2020/

{{request edit}}
*Information to be added or removed: September 2020, Judo Bank was crowned the winner of the Finder Awards Term Deposit for our 12 month term deposit
*Explanation of issue: I would like to add this sentence to the Judo Bank Wikipedia page, as it was currently not mentioned that Judo Bank had won the Finder Term Deposit award for the 12month term deposit, see reference below
*References supporting change: https://www.finder.com.au/finder-awards-2020-best-term-deposit-12-month

{{request edit}}
*Information to be added or removed: In September 2020, KPMG’s Pulse of Fintech report shows that venture capital investment in Australia's fintech sector has charged ahead, up 153% year on year, and that one of the two largest fintech transactions regarded Judo Bank with $203.4m.
*Explanation of issue: KPMG reported that Judo was one of the two companies that contributed to the venture capital investment in the fintech sector in Australia to be 153%higher than the year before, an important statement previously not mentioned in the Judo Bank Wikipedia page
*References supporting change:https://www.brokernews.com.au/news/breaking-news/australia-recognised-as-strong-fintech-hub-globally-273242.aspx

{{request edit}}
*Information to be added or removed: September 2020, According to LinkedIn’s 3rd Annual Top Startups, Judo Bank is named as best and most resilient Aussie Startup to work for
*Explanation of issue: Judo Bank was announced Linkedin's Top Startup to work for 2x in a row, once in 2019 and once in 2020, the latest in 2020 had not been recorded in the Judo Wikipedia page, thus I am wishing to update the wikipedia page by adding the above statement, please see reference below for confirmation of the award Judo received
*References supporting change: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/linkedin-top-startups-2020-10-australian-companies-rise-macdonald/?trackingId=xAN6siq9SVCTlhVp29WP1g%3D%3D

{{request edit}}
*Information to be added or removed: In December 2020, Judo Bank was ranked among the top 10 independent neo-banks across the globe by WhiteSight's Top 20 neo-banks of 2020 research, which based the ranking of the neo-banks on valuation. Judo Bank was the only Australian bank to rank among the top 10 neo-banks
*Explanation of issue: I would like to add that Judo Bank was ranked among the top 10 independent neo-banks across the globe, according to WhiteSight's research, as this was previously not in the Judo Bank Wikipedia page, however a recent highlight that supports Judo's quick growth and success as a challenger bank
*References supporting change: https://www.whitesight.net/post/top-20-neo-banks-of-2020

{{request edit}}
*Information to be added or removed: December 2020, Judo Bank has announced that it raised more than $280 million in equity in its recent Round 4 (R4) capital raise and will utilise the funds to "continue to expand the bank's operations nationally". The post-money valuation of Judo now exceeds $1.6 billion, up 60 per cent from its position in May. Judo's co-founder and co-CEO, David Hornery commented: "This year alone, we have raised over half a billion dollars in funding across two rounds in the most challenging market conditions in living memory, with funding coming from some of the best-known and most widely respected private and institutional investors in the world.”
*Explanation of issue: Judo Bank announced its 4th equity raise in Dec 2020, and managed to raise over half a billion dollars in 2020 with the 3rd and 4th equity raise alone, this has previously not been updated in the Wikipedia Judo Bank page, thus I would like to add it and to keep consistent with the previously mentioned equity raises of Judo Bank in the years before. The Age, Startup Daily and Mortgage business have all reported, see references below
*References supporting change: https://www.mortgagebusiness.com.au/breaking-news/15270-judo-bank-completes-280m-capital-raise, https://www.startupdaily.net/2020/12/neobank-judos-value-rises-60-following-280-million-series-d/, https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?offerset=ta_4for4_premium&sourceCode=TAWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fbusiness%2Fjudo-bank-closes-280m-capital-raising-to-value-neobank-at-more-than-16bn%2Fnews-story%2Fad60635c7112cfd969e56268b50aed7b&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&adobe_mc_sdid=SDID%3D373CA50C45C8759A-59CD1137933980DB%7CMCORGID%3D5FE61C8B533204850A490D4D%40AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1612416016&adobe_mc_ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F [[User:AnnikaBlattmann|AnnikaBlattmann]] ([[User talk:AnnikaBlattmann|talk]]) 05:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:42, 4 February 2021

Template-protected edit request on 30 June 2020

Please add the following after the pblock line for when a non-blocked user adds the {{Edit partially-blocked}} for the requester.

|user = {{{user|}}}

{{

reply to|Can I Log In}}'s talk page! 22:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

In addition please change the following
   |ADV = Some or all of the changes may be promotional in tone.
   |V = Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works.
   |O = The suggested edits are good, but the reviewer felt omissions in the content may create balance issues.
   |R = The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist. Consider re-writing, instead of deleting, bias content that needs to be written neutrally. 
   |D = The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first.
   |A = The reviewer requests that the COI editor implement the proposed edits directly.  
   |S = The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard|conflict of interest noticeboard]].
   |T = A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article. 
   |C = A consensus could not be reached.
   |#default = {{{2|}}}
Now replace with the follwing
   |ADV = Some or all of the changes may be promotional in tone.
   |V = Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works.
   |O = The suggested edits are good, but the reviewer felt omissions in the content may create balance issues.
   |R = The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist. Consider re-writing, instead of deleting, bias content that needs to be written [[WP:NPOV|neutrally]]. 
   |D = The reviewer would like to request the editor to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first.
   |A = {{#ifeq: {{{pblock}}} | yes | The requesting editor is no longer blocked and can edit the article directly|The reviewer requests that the COI editor implement the proposed edits directly.}}
   |S = The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the  {{#ifeq: {{{pblock}}} | yes |appropriate [[WP:Noticeboards|noticeboard]]|[[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard|conflict of interest noticeboard]]}}.
   |T = A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article. 
   |C = A consensus could not be reached.
   |#default = {{{2|}}}
{{
reply to|Can I Log In}}'s talk page! 22:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
 Partly done: I've implemented the second request, but not the first; please get a consensus that your proposed change is necessary. Primefac (talk) 23:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 4 August 2020

I am submitting the following changes to ensure the article is accurate. The information that I am submitting can be verified by any independent person. Here is how the article must appear to ensure its accuracy:

Manhattan Village Academy was founded in 1993 by Mary Butz, a 25-year veteran of the

New York City Board of Education. Butz was invited to establish this new small public high school by famed educator Deborah Meier, who worked closely with Ted Sizer and the Center for Collaborative Education. After selecting the site in a commercial loft building in the Chelsea district of Manhattan, Butz persuaded nationally known architect Beverly Willis to collaborate with her to design the space for the school. Butz recruited the students and faculty and shaped the culture of the school around the ideas of "reason, respect, and responsibility." The motto of the school from its inception was "a good school dedicated to the liberal arts." In the first graduating class, every student went on to attend college. The school was recognized by Chancellor Rudy Crew as one of the best high schools in the city and was regularly ranked among the city’s best public schools under Butz’s leadership. She maintained policies of open enrollment, project-based assessment, and close attention to punctuality and student deportment. When she left the school in 1999, she selected Hector Geager to succeed her. He introduced a series of innovative educational approaches; such as 7 Critical Thinking Authentic Performance Based Portfolios, 26 Critical Thinking Units--one per teacher twice a year, Success Units, Curriculum Mapping, High Performance Teams, School Uniform, an Internal Accountability System, a Critical Thinking Summer Academy, PM School and Saturday Academy and an open Advanced Placement Program with over 17 AP Courses, among other educational changes (See the School's Comprehensive Educational Plan--CEP--from 1999 to 2019). Mr. Geager continued the progressive work that Ms. Mary Butz began based on her philosophy of reason, respect and responsibility. Under his leadership, punctuality and attendance were expected, as part of the school philosophy. Admissions also became selective due to the thousands of parents and students that wanted to enroll in the school (See the high school student applications breakdown for the school and check with the Office of High School Admission). Since 2004, Manhattan Village Academy became one of the top schools in New York City, and every year was recognized by US News and World Report among the top schools in the city and the nation for minority students (See US News & World Report's School Ranking starting in 2004 and the State Department of Education school designation and recognition for closing the achievement gap). By 2018, it had reached a 100% graduation rate, a 98% college readiness index and a student attendance rate of 97%. From 2014 to the present, Manhattan Village Academy became the school with the highest impact and performance in New York City (See the DOE Dashboard). Mr. Geager retired in February 2020 due to a medical condition. In September of 2019, Christina White became interim principal of the school and was appointed principal of the school on March 11th, 2020. Hgeager (talk) 07:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

 Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template {{Request edit}}. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:46, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit wizard

I've noticed a lot of editors create malformed edit requests, either in wording, technical format, or both (see above). Because of that, I created an edit request wizard. Do other editors think it would be useful to link to it on the template documentation to encourage new editors to use it instead of directly using the template so there is less of a chance they mess up? Sam-2727 (talk) 00:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can't hurt, but you can't fix stupid. Primefac (talk) 01:00, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template name is inaccurate and confusing

Why does this template have the generic name "request edit", when its wording actually amounts to "request edit but the requester has a conflict of interest"? That makes no sense. The "how to use" instructions here don't even mention or deal with the COI assertion which is part of the template. IMO this generic name should apply to a generic request - basically usable as a synonym for {{Edit semi-protected}} or equivalent. There was recently a user who included this template, {{Request edit}}, as part of their own talk page edit request, causing considerable puzzlement as to just who had accused the person of COI. We replaced it with the "Edit semi-protected" template which was clearly what the user intended. I doubt if this is the first time that someone has been confused by this title. Can we create a separate template for "requested edit by a COI user," if one is needed, and let this template's wording simply say the equivalent of "this is a requested edit"? -- MelanieN (talk) 18:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2021

Unsure if my requests previously went through... I think my time had expired before I could hit publish. Thus, please see the below requests for Judo Bank Wikipedia Page if you have not yet received them. Thank you.

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.

  • Information to be added or removed: In February 2020, Judo Bank was announced the winner of the Mozo Experts choice awards 2020 Term Deposits. “Mozo Experts Choice Awards showcase providers who outperformed their competitors in delivering a great product to customers,” said Mozo’s Kirsty Lamont, “Judo scooped one of the top awards after being compared with 68 term deposit accounts, offering some of the best interest rates across short, medium and long term investments, which is no small feat.”
  • Explanation of issue: In Feb 2020 Judo won the Mozo Term Deposit award, I would like to add this to the Judo Bank Wikipedia page, as this has not yet been added
  • References supporting change: https://mozo.com.au/term-deposits/articles/judo-bank-term-deposit-wins-big-in-this-years-mozo-experts-choice-awards

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.

  • Information to be added or removed: July 2020, Judo Bank has won the Bank of the Year – Term Deposits Award. Canstar Research noted Judo Bank was the market leader among banks when it came to interest rates, and beat the market average on features, with a market-leading performance on options offered at term deposit maturity.
  • Explanation of issue: I would like to add this sentence to the Judo Bank Wikipedia page, as it was currently not mentioned that Judo Bank had won the Bank of the year Award 2020 according to Canstar's research, see reference below
  • References supporting change: https://www.canstar.com.au/term-deposits/term-deposit-awards-2020/

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.

  • Information to be added or removed: September 2020, Judo Bank was crowned the winner of the Finder Awards Term Deposit for our 12 month term deposit
  • Explanation of issue: I would like to add this sentence to the Judo Bank Wikipedia page, as it was currently not mentioned that Judo Bank had won the Finder Term Deposit award for the 12month term deposit, see reference below
  • References supporting change: https://www.finder.com.au/finder-awards-2020-best-term-deposit-12-month

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.

  • Information to be added or removed: In September 2020, KPMG’s Pulse of Fintech report shows that venture capital investment in Australia's fintech sector has charged ahead, up 153% year on year, and that one of the two largest fintech transactions regarded Judo Bank with $203.4m.
  • Explanation of issue: KPMG reported that Judo was one of the two companies that contributed to the venture capital investment in the fintech sector in Australia to be 153%higher than the year before, an important statement previously not mentioned in the Judo Bank Wikipedia page
  • References supporting change:https://www.brokernews.com.au/news/breaking-news/australia-recognised-as-strong-fintech-hub-globally-273242.aspx

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.

  • Information to be added or removed: September 2020, According to LinkedIn’s 3rd Annual Top Startups, Judo Bank is named as best and most resilient Aussie Startup to work for
  • Explanation of issue: Judo Bank was announced Linkedin's Top Startup to work for 2x in a row, once in 2019 and once in 2020, the latest in 2020 had not been recorded in the Judo Wikipedia page, thus I am wishing to update the wikipedia page by adding the above statement, please see reference below for confirmation of the award Judo received
  • References supporting change: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/linkedin-top-startups-2020-10-australian-companies-rise-macdonald/?trackingId=xAN6siq9SVCTlhVp29WP1g%3D%3D

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.

  • Information to be added or removed: In December 2020, Judo Bank was ranked among the top 10 independent neo-banks across the globe by WhiteSight's Top 20 neo-banks of 2020 research, which based the ranking of the neo-banks on valuation. Judo Bank was the only Australian bank to rank among the top 10 neo-banks
  • Explanation of issue: I would like to add that Judo Bank was ranked among the top 10 independent neo-banks across the globe, according to WhiteSight's research, as this was previously not in the Judo Bank Wikipedia page, however a recent highlight that supports Judo's quick growth and success as a challenger bank
  • References supporting change: https://www.whitesight.net/post/top-20-neo-banks-of-2020

{{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:

If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.