User talk:Sandstein: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Sandstein/Archives/2022/April) (bot |
→Neutralhomer close: Reply |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Hi Sandstein. Can you tell me why Neutralhomer isn't sitebanned according to the [[WP:CBAN|policy]]: {{tqq|Editors who are indefinitely blocked by community consensus, '''or remain indefinitely blocked after due consideration by the community''', are considered "banned by the Wikipedia community"}} (emphasis added). I've always thought it a bit of a booby trap for people but as policy have felt a need to respect it myself. Thanks, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 00:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Sandstein. Can you tell me why Neutralhomer isn't sitebanned according to the [[WP:CBAN|policy]]: {{tqq|Editors who are indefinitely blocked by community consensus, '''or remain indefinitely blocked after due consideration by the community''', are considered "banned by the Wikipedia community"}} (emphasis added). I've always thought it a bit of a booby trap for people but as policy have felt a need to respect it myself. Thanks, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 00:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
:You're right, I didn't consider this aspect of banning policy. I didn't mean (and have no authority to) to preclude the outcome of the discussion from being considered a ban under this policy. What I meant that if somebody wants the community to make an ''explicit'' decision to ban, this should be proposed separately, since the question posed in the AN thread (whether to unblock or not) had been clearly answered. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 05:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:46, 4 May 2022
Welcome to my talk page!
Please place new messages at the bottom of this page, or click here to start a new discussion, which will automatically be at the bottom. I will respond to comments here, unless you request otherwise. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our
talk page guidelines
before posting:
- Please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. This will create an identifying signature and timestamp.
- Do you have a question about arbitration enforcement? Please read my FAQ at User:Sandstein/AE.
- If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on administrative duty, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: [[example article]].
- If you are looking for my talk page's previous contents, they are in the archives.
No consensus close
Hi…I wanted to reopen one afd that was closed as no consensus. This one [1]. Do I nominate it again or you can just reopen it? Laptopinmyhands (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- You can start a new AfD for this article, but not reopen an existing one. Sandstein 18:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Sandstein, can you delete Flags of counties of the United States?
Sandstein, can you delete this page? It was being nominated. 116.206.28.43 (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, please wait for the AfD discussion to conclude and then an administrator will determine whether there is consensus to delete the article. Sandstein 08:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Deletion review for David Firth
An editor has asked for a deletion review of David Firth. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. RexSueciae (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Deletion review for David Rohl
An editor has asked for
David Rohl. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. TuckerResearch (talk) 16:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
]
Neutralhomer close
Hi Sandstein. Can you tell me why Neutralhomer isn't sitebanned according to the
policy:
]
Editors who are indefinitely blocked by community consensus, or remain indefinitely blocked after due consideration by the community, are considered "banned by the Wikipedia community"(emphasis added). I've always thought it a bit of a booby trap for people but as policy have felt a need to respect it myself. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- You're right, I didn't consider this aspect of banning policy. I didn't mean (and have no authority to) to preclude the outcome of the discussion from being considered a ban under this policy. What I meant that if somebody wants the community to make an explicit decision to ban, this should be proposed separately, since the question posed in the AN thread (whether to unblock or not) had been clearly answered. Sandstein 05:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)