Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jettew10222: Difference between revisions

Jettew10222 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

24 May 2022

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Sdrqez (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Aside from being an

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Both already blocked,  Clerk endorsed for a sleeper check if it hasn't beend one already. Behaviour (impersonating admins to close AfDs) is highly reminiscent of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingshowman; if CU corroborates that, this should probably be merged there. --Blablubbs (talk) 08:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• No obvious sleepers, but they're running on a /28 and it's a bit too large to do a search. That being said, they're connecting on an open proxy, which was soft-glocked, so there's a reasonable chance that we won't get any new accounts out of it. Primefac (talk) 09:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

24 May 2022

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

• PhilKinght (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Same pattern as User:Sdrqez, this time impersonating User:PhilKnight. Obvious sock. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 08:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• See above. Primefac (talk) 09:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

24 May 2022

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Blablabbs (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Ditto as the previous two users. Reporting to track these impersonators at this point, user has just been blocked. Might be worth running another CU to see if they're using another open proxy. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 09:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. The creation of this page proves that too many people are worried about Sock puppetry than building the encyclopedia. What I’m doing — closing discussions pages — isn’t vandalism, You know. Jettew 13:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments