User talk:LearnIndology: Difference between revisions

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Which version of lede did you restored?

I need to talk to you. There's these 2 editors who keep vandalising articles. I know vandalising is a strong word, but they keep removing any viewpoint which doesn't agree with them, even if it is by a noted historian, and keep pushing their own agenda, often based on pseudo theories and own personal bias. So if a statement or finding doesn't fit with what they want to show, he keeps removing it. On the other hand he keeps adding stuff, statements made by people who aren't experts in this particular field, and keep exclusively pushing that. They exclusively only allow view points by "scholars" like Audrey, but noted and Celebrated historians like Abraham Eraly, and social workers like Jogan Shankar are only "pop-historians", who can't be trusted. They're even removing statements made by Britsish judges, or moving them into reference sections in the name of "reformatting". I don't know if I am the one who is biased, but I've tried to look at everybody's view points. And I did add statements and theories from both sides. If it's from the side they are against, it's removed, if it's from the side they want to show ,they edit into something even more extreme and show that exclusively. Say there is professor Yang, who postulated several theories, they exclusively allow only one side of the possible theories to be presented. I think you've come across them before as well.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Somethingsomeoneqwerty (talk • contribs)

What are you talking about? The intro is too long, and I made it more concise. What is wrong with my edits. Metta79 (talk)

The dutch guys comment is being discussed on the talk page. Please join the thread. There is no consensus to add it, yet you have restored this content into the article. Venkat TL (talk) 09:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#LearnIndology - Thanks, TrangaBellam (talk) 09:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

White-spacing comments are not allowed. It's either in the MoS or in the help pages. Please correct your mistake. --91.5.101.3 (talk) 03:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both actually. --91.5.101.3 (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has reverted you this time.[1] You should really try talk page. LearnIndology (talk) 10:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's are to find a case that's clearer described in one of Wikipedia's rules, and I make my case very clear. Maybe you could use the talk page to explain why you want to ignore the rules. --91.5.101.3 (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following

topic ban

now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions concerning India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed. Please read

WP:TBAN

to see what "topic banned" means.

You have been sanctioned for the long-term problems explained at this arbitration enforcement request.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an

WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked

for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read

the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Johnuniq (talk) 11:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]