Limor Shifman: Difference between revisions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
AFCH 0.9.1)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Israeli communications professor}}
{{Short description|Israeli communications professor}}
{{Draft topics|women|literature|media|stem}}
{{AfC topic|blp}}
{{AfC submission|||ts=20230111235743|u=Jelly0wen|ns=118}}
{{AfC submission|t||ts=20230111234907|u=Jelly0wen|ns=118|demo=}}<!-- Important, do not remove this line before article has been created. -->


'''Limor Shifman''' is a professor of [[communication]] at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and is the Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Limor Shifman |url=https://limorshifman.huji.ac.il/home |access-date=2023-01-11 |website=limorshifman.huji.ac.il |language=en}}</ref> Her work has been in researching and developing an area of study surrounding [[Internet meme|Internet memes]], a subarea of digital culture and digital media research. Since the late 2000s<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Shifman |first=Limor |last2=Thelwall |first2=Mike |date=December 2009 |title=Assessing global diffusion with Web memetics: The spread and evolution of a popular joke |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21185 |journal=Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology |language=en |volume=60 |issue=12 |pages=2567–2576 |doi=10.1002/asi.21185}}</ref> she has been an active contributor to the research area of [[memetics]], a more broad area of research interested in cultural evolution of ideas.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |url= |title=The selfish gene |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1976 |isbn= |edition=1st |chapter=Memes: The New Replicators |oclc=}}</ref>
'''Limor Shifman''' is a professor of [[communication]] at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and is the Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Limor Shifman |url=https://limorshifman.huji.ac.il/home |access-date=2023-01-11 |website=limorshifman.huji.ac.il |language=en}}</ref> Her work has been in researching and developing an area of study surrounding [[Internet meme|Internet memes]], a subarea of digital culture and digital media research. Since the late 2000s<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Shifman |first=Limor |last2=Thelwall |first2=Mike |date=December 2009 |title=Assessing global diffusion with Web memetics: The spread and evolution of a popular joke |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21185 |journal=Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology |language=en |volume=60 |issue=12 |pages=2567–2576 |doi=10.1002/asi.21185}}</ref> she has been an active contributor to the research area of [[memetics]], a more broad area of research interested in cultural evolution of ideas.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |url= |title=The selfish gene |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1976 |isbn= |edition=1st |chapter=Memes: The New Replicators |oclc=}}</ref>
Line 13: Line 9:
After the decline in interest of memetics in [[anthropology]], Shifman provided a text for why memetics should be redeveloped within a media and communication-oriented framework.<ref>{{Citation |last=Shifman |first=Limor |title=Memes in digital culture |date=2014 |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/929971523 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-1-4690-6325-6 |oclc=929971523 |access-date=2023-01-11}}</ref> In this text she defines ''internet memes'' to be the following:<blockquote>
After the decline in interest of memetics in [[anthropology]], Shifman provided a text for why memetics should be redeveloped within a media and communication-oriented framework.<ref>{{Citation |last=Shifman |first=Limor |title=Memes in digital culture |date=2014 |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/929971523 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-1-4690-6325-6 |oclc=929971523 |access-date=2023-01-11}}</ref> In this text she defines ''internet memes'' to be the following:<blockquote>
(a) a group of digital items sharing common characteristics of content, form, and/or stance, which (b) were created with awareness of each other, and (c) were circulated, imitated, and/or transformed via the Internet by many users.</blockquote>
(a) a group of digital items sharing common characteristics of content, form, and/or stance, which (b) were created with awareness of each other, and (c) were circulated, imitated, and/or transformed via the Internet by many users.</blockquote>
Further, she outlines ''content'' as "both ideas and ideologies", ''form'' as "the physical incarnation of the message", and ''stance'' as "the information memes convey about their own communication''."'' Stance is about how actors (e.g. people) position themselves in relation to content and form of the media as well as those who might be addressed by the message. Prior to Shifman, few researchers defined memes with communication-oriented development''.''<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lankshear |first=Colin |url= |title=New literacies : changing knowledge and classroom learning |last2=Michele |first2=Knobel |date= |publisher=Open University Press |others= |year=2006 |isbn=033522010X |edition=2nd |location=Buckingham [England] |oclc=}}</ref>
Further, she outlines ''content'' as "both ideas and ideologies", ''form'' as "the physical incarnation of the message", and ''stance'' as "the information memes convey about their own communication''."'' Stance is about how actors (e.g. people) position themselves in relation to content and form of the media as well as those who might be addressed by the message. Prior to Shifman, few researchers defined memes with communication-oriented development''.''<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lankshear |first=Colin |url= |title=New literacies : changing knowledge and classroom learning |last2=Michele |first2=Knobel |date= |publisher=Open University Press |others= |year=2006 |isbn=033522010X |edition=2nd |location=Buckingham [England] |oclc=}}</ref>


In defining memes this way, she notes that the earlier memetics research struggled in distinguishing memes from meme-vehicles, and suggests that attempting to do so was a failed project. She cites [[Susan Blackmore]] as providing the metaphysical outline which inspired her memetic concept, arguing that much of memetics prior to her conception was either behaviorist- or mentalist-driven, taking sides in arguing that memes were respectively accounted for as material behavior or as a theory of cognition. She rejects these two sides and opts for what she calls an "inclusivist" approach, which denies that the memetic research can cleanly dissect memes into a cultural idea and its medium. She credits Blackmore as being the only other popular memetics researcher who does the same. By empirically connecting memes to digital media, Shifman provided theoretical developments in memetics which diverge from earlier interests. As such, Internet memetics often avoids strong associations with historical arguments from cultural anthropology, theory of mind, and philosophy of biology. Instead, they operate across several theoretical paradigms of sociology, communication, and media.{{Cn|date=January 2023}}
In defining memes this way, she notes that the earlier memetics research struggled in distinguishing memes from meme-vehicles, and suggests that attempting to do so was a failed project. She cites [[Susan Blackmore]] as providing the metaphysical outline which inspired her memetic concept, arguing that much of memetics prior to her conception was either behaviorist- or mentalist-driven, taking sides in arguing that memes were respectively accounted for as material behavior or as a theory of cognition. She rejects these two sides and opts for what she calls an "inclusivist" approach, which denies that the memetic research can cleanly dissect memes into a cultural idea and its medium. She credits Blackmore as being the only other popular memetics researcher who does the same. By empirically connecting memes to digital media, Shifman provided theoretical developments in memetics which diverge from earlier interests. As such, Internet memetics often avoids strong associations with historical arguments from cultural anthropology, theory of mind, and philosophy of biology. Instead, they operate across several theoretical paradigms of sociology, communication, and media.{{Cn|date=January 2023}}


== References ==
== References ==

<!-- Inline citations added to your article will automatically display here. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:REFB for instructions on how to add citations. -->
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Shifman, Limor}}
[[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)]]
[[Category:Living people]]

Revision as of 07:35, 12 January 2023

Limor Shifman is a professor of communication at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and is the Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences.[1] Her work has been in researching and developing an area of study surrounding Internet memes, a subarea of digital culture and digital media research. Since the late 2000s[2] she has been an active contributor to the research area of memetics, a more broad area of research interested in cultural evolution of ideas.[3]

Education and career

Limor Shifman initially worked in theater and media as a writer, producer and presenter. Her work researched the history of Israeli humor and popular culture for the Department of Children and Youth, Israel Public Television.[4] Shifman completed her doctoral work at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem's Department of Communication and Journalism[5] where she maintains a professorship. After completing her dissertation, in 2005 she became a research fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute.[5] Since the late 2000s, her work shifted from the history of Israeli humor and television research to what she eventually would call Internet memetics.

Contribution to Internet memetics

After the decline in interest of memetics in anthropology, Shifman provided a text for why memetics should be redeveloped within a media and communication-oriented framework.[6] In this text she defines internet memes to be the following:

(a) a group of digital items sharing common characteristics of content, form, and/or stance, which (b) were created with awareness of each other, and (c) were circulated, imitated, and/or transformed via the Internet by many users.

Further, she outlines content as "both ideas and ideologies", form as "the physical incarnation of the message", and stance as "the information memes convey about their own communication." Stance is about how actors (e.g. people) position themselves in relation to content and form of the media as well as those who might be addressed by the message. Prior to Shifman, few researchers defined memes with communication-oriented development.[7]

In defining memes this way, she notes that the earlier memetics research struggled in distinguishing memes from meme-vehicles, and suggests that attempting to do so was a failed project. She cites Susan Blackmore as providing the metaphysical outline which inspired her memetic concept, arguing that much of memetics prior to her conception was either behaviorist- or mentalist-driven, taking sides in arguing that memes were respectively accounted for as material behavior or as a theory of cognition. She rejects these two sides and opts for what she calls an "inclusivist" approach, which denies that the memetic research can cleanly dissect memes into a cultural idea and its medium. She credits Blackmore as being the only other popular memetics researcher who does the same. By empirically connecting memes to digital media, Shifman provided theoretical developments in memetics which diverge from earlier interests. As such, Internet memetics often avoids strong associations with historical arguments from cultural anthropology, theory of mind, and philosophy of biology. Instead, they operate across several theoretical paradigms of sociology, communication, and media.[citation needed]

References

  1. ^ "Limor Shifman". limorshifman.huji.ac.il. Retrieved 2023-01-11.
  2. .
  3. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1976). "Memes: The New Replicators". The selfish gene (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
  4. ^ "OII | Five Research Fellows Join the Oxford Internet Institute". www.oii.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 2023-01-11.
  5. ^
    ISSN 0003-1224
    .
  6. , retrieved 2023-01-11
  7. .