Criminal Law in India: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
← Previous edit |
|||
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[Indian Penal Code]] |
|||
{{Multiple issues| |
|||
{{Cleanup|date=March 2023|reason=This article has frequent grammatical, tone, and punctuation errors; too few citations throughout most of the sections; and multiple statements that imply bias or opinions without having a citation explaining where the bias comes from.}} |
|||
{{Rcat shell| |
|||
{{Update|part=Divisions, Issues with IPC|reason=IPC, CRPC, IEA replaced with BNSS, BSA, and BNS|date=December 2023}} |
|||
{{R to related topic}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Use Indian English|date=February 2015}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2015}} |
|||
'''Indian criminal law''' is the law relating to criminal conduct in [[India]]. |
|||
==Divisions== |
|||
Indian criminal laws are divided into three major acts i.e. [[Indian Penal Code]], 1860,<ref>{{citation|url=https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2263|title=Indian Penal Code, 1860}}</ref> [[Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (India)|Code of Criminal Procedure]], 1973,<ref>{{citation|url=https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/16225/|title=Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973}}</ref> and [[Indian Evidence Act]], 1872.<ref>{{citation|url=http://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2188|title=Indian Evidence Act, 1872}}</ref> Indian Penal Code is a Substantive Law<ref>{{Cite web|title=Substantive Law|url=https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=Procedural%20and%20substantive%20laws%20|website=Indian Kanoon}}</ref> that defines rights and duties etc. Code of Criminal Procedure defines the rules with which substantive laws can be enforced. Besides these major acts, special Criminal Laws are also passed by the Indian Parliament, i.e., [[Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985|NDPS]], [[Prevention of Corruption Act]], [[Food Adulteration Act]], [[Dowry Prohibition Act]], [[The Defence of India Act]], etc. thousands of minor laws are made in India. |
|||
==History== |
|||
The [[Indian Penal Code]], formulated by the British during the [[British Raj]] in 1860, forms the backbone of [[criminal law]] in India. [[Jury trial]]s were abolished by the [[Government of India|government]] in 1960 on the grounds they would be susceptible to [[Mass media|media]] and public influence. This decision was based on an 8-1 acquittal of Kawas Nanavati in ''[[K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra]]'', which was overturned by higher courts.{{Citation needed|date=March 2023}} |
|||
The Indian Penal Code was drafted the first law commission under the chairmanship of [[Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay|Lord Macaulay]] in 1837. Jurists, judges, and professors made revisions in 1850, presented in legislative council in 1856, passed in 1860, and was enforced in 1862.<ref name=":0">{{Citation|title=Perspective : 160 years of Indian Penal Code {{!}} 01 January, 2022|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UG6hU18noVM|language=en|access-date=2022-01-02}}</ref> Lord Macaulay issued clarification for the people of India for implementation of this code, because people were of the view that rule of Capital Punishment will be misused against them.{{Citation needed|date=March 2023}} Furthermore, citizens were against foreign rule over Indian people. Indian Penal Code has been praised to be far-sighted, masterpiece of a law, with almost all kinds of crimes that can be committed by a human, being included in it in one go. It has been thoroughly embedded in the Indian conscience<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
== Issues with IPC<ref name=":0" /> == |
|||
{{More citations needed|section|date=March 2023}} |
|||
* Colonial ideas prevail in the code. |
|||
* Some laws don't reflect the aspirations of India's liberal Constitution. |
|||
* It does not recognize individual agency of citizens of free India |
|||
* Too many laws promote patriarchal attitudes, biased against women |
|||
* Sedition laws are misused by the state. |
|||
* Tech crimes, cyber crimes, sexual offences need to be defined. |
|||
* Risk of excessive policing, which leads to harassment of people. |
|||
* Need to harmonise statute books with court rulings, which have often expanded the rights of people. |
|||
* Accused people are burdened with institutional delay. |
|||
* According to Malimath Committee report, it weighed in favour of the accused and did not adequately focus on justice to the victims of crime. |
|||
* Some provisions are disadvantageous for the underprivileged who are trapped in jail for long, but favour the powerful, who get bail very easily. |
|||
* In some cases, such as lynching, the maximum sentence or fine is not mentioned, and there is judges' discretion, etc, so the punishment may vary according to a different circumstances. |
|||
* Adhering CrPC may be too complex and slow, which needs to be amended before amending the IPC. |
|||
* The influence of media trials on the judiciary while using the IPC. |
|||
== Recent Progress == |
|||
Malimath Committee<!-- No explanation of what the Malimath Committee is. --> had faced criticism for its drawbacks, notably that the standard of evidence be reduced from “beyond reasonable doubt” to “clear and convincing”.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Deepalakshmi|first=K.|date=2018-01-17|title=The Malimath Committee's recommendations on reforms in the criminal justice system in 20 points|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-malimath-committees-recommendations-on-reforms-in-the-criminal-justice-system-in-20-points/article22457589.ece|access-date=2022-01-02|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2020-07-11|title=Reform with caution: On criminal laws reform|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/reform-with-caution-the-hindu-editorial-on-criminal-laws-reform/article32046103.ece|access-date=2022-01-02|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> In the winter session<!-- What year? --> of parliament, Minister of State for Home Affairs [[Ajay Mishra Teni|Ajay Kumar Mishra]] said the committee had been, "constituted under the chairpersonship of the Vice Chancellor, National Law University, Delhi to suggest reforms in the criminal laws".{{Citation needed|date=March 2023}} He further said that the suggestions that will be received and the report of the committee will be examined by the Ministry of Home Affairs in consultation with all stakeholders.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Centre Has Set Up Panel To Reform Criminal Laws: Junior Home Minister|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/centre-has-set-up-panel-to-reform-criminal-laws-junior-home-minister-ajay-kumar-mishra-2652863|access-date=2022-01-02|website=NDTV.com}}</ref> |
|||
== References == |
|||
<references/> |
|||
* {{cite book|title=R.V. Kelkar's Criminal Procedure|first=R.V.|last=Kelkars|year= 2014 |edition= 6th |publisher=Eastern Book Company|place=Lucknow|isbn= 978-93-5145-228-7}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Indian Criminal Law}} |
|||
[[Category:Indian criminal law| ]] |
Latest revision as of 23:26, 9 January 2024
Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized. |