Talk:Tomás Frías/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
31,298 edits + |
31,298 edits close Tomás Frías good article nomination as unsuccessful (GANReviewTool ) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==GA Review== |
==GA Review== |
||
{{atopr |
|||
| status = |
|||
| result = Unsuccessful. [[User:AirshipJungleman29|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 06:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Good article tools}} |
{{Good article tools}} |
||
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Tomás Frías/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Tomás Frías/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Tomás Frías/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Tomás Frías/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
||
| Line 7: | Line 11: | ||
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
||
I am quickfailing this nomination per [[WP:QF]] criteria 1: it is a long way from the GA criteria. Much of the article is cited to sources which are a century old, sometimes much more, and which are not [[WP:RS]]. There is far too much excessive detail: why does the "Reformation of Bolivia's education system (1845–1846)" section contain 450 words detailing individual decrees which could simply be summarized? Why are individual events described in a action-novel tone? And finally, why are there so many lengthy quotes, going far over what [[WP:LIMITED]] requires? This bloated article urgently needs to be cut of probably half its content. [[User:AirshipJungleman29|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 06:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
I am quickfailing this nomination per [[WP:QF]] criteria 1: it is a long way from the GA criteria. Much of the article is cited to sources which are a century old, sometimes much more, and which are not [[WP:RS]]. There is far too much excessive detail: why does the "Reformation of Bolivia's education system (1845–1846)" section contain 450 words detailing individual decrees which could simply be summarized? Why are individual events described in a action-novel tone? And finally, why are there so many lengthy quotes, going far over what [[WP:LIMITED]] requires? This bloated article urgently needs to be cut of probably half its content. [[User:AirshipJungleman29|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 06:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
{{abot}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:50, 13 March 2024
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 06:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
I am quickfailing this nomination per
WP:LIMITED requires? This bloated article urgently needs to be cut of probably half its content. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 06:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.