User talk:Twitbookspacetube: Difference between revisions
GoldenRing (talk | contribs) →2017 Unite the Right rally: new section |
Extended confirmed users 1,224 edits |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Would you please consider self-reverting [[Special:Diff/795468959|this edit]] and give the TP discussion some time? [[User:GoldenRing|GoldenRing]] ([[User talk:GoldenRing|talk]]) 12:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC) |
Would you please consider self-reverting [[Special:Diff/795468959|this edit]] and give the TP discussion some time? [[User:GoldenRing|GoldenRing]] ([[User talk:GoldenRing|talk]]) 12:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
:No, because I am restoring sourced content in compliance with relevant policies. You are edit warring using deliberate misinterpretations of policy, and this request screams of [[WP:GAME]]ing the system. [[User:Twitbookspacetube|Twitbook]][[User talk:Twitbookspacetube|space]][[Special:Contributions/Twitbookspacetube|tube]] 12:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:54, 14 August 2017
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Dispute Resolution Noticeboard Volunteer Roll Call
This is a volunteer roll call sent to you on behalf of the current
Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC) This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this.
ANI
Hi TBST, thanks for your supportive notes at ANI. If you do consider bringing a full Arbcom case against Rubin's actions, feel free to ping me regarding the plethora of diffs I have which demonstrate the ongoing
- No Worries! You can find a draft of my statement at my sandbox - feel free to draft your statement there. Arthur, I know you're watching as well - feel free to do the same after you post that status update or those diffs (Not keeping your word will hurt your case). Twitbookspacetube 06:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a misunderstanding
Topic is your message on my talk page
What?! I NEVER edited the page A Family Man! 2600:387:B:7:0:0:0:BA (talk) 20:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hello? 2600:387:B:7:0:0:0:BA (talk) 23:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Maybe you didn't personally edit that page, but someone from your IPv6 address did. Sadly, we can't target warnings at specific individuals unless they have an account here. Twitbookspacetube 07:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I know. Somebody with the IP address 2600:387:B:7:0:0:0:BA did this before I got this user address. 2600:387:B:7:0:0:0:BA (talk) 16:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Re
That's enough of that. Please read WP:NPA
|
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Please stop fiddling around with that page about the Philadelphia police shooting. I have cited the reference; it is your responsibility then to disprove the citation, which you cannot. I do not understand your angle here, this is a simple and unobtrusive change which makes the sentence make some sense. It is illogical to say that such a man 'claimed to pledge', whether such a pledge reflects accurately on Islam or ISIS or not is irrelevant and is not the question, this is a simple statement of fact found in the police report. The man pledged his support, and his crime, to the Islamic State.
Ah, well, whereas I have made at least some of my views public, you hide yours behind filters and use the privileges granted you by this monstrosity of left-wing propaganda called 'wikipedia' to enforce them and conceal the truth. Tell me though, if you would: Who is "we"? And these sources, have you actually bothered to look at them? Come on, why don't you make an argument rather than hiding behind your privileges? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LikkerdySplit (talk • contribs) 15:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC) |
2017 Unite the Right rally
Would you please consider self-reverting this edit and give the TP discussion some time? GoldenRing (talk) 12:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- No, because I am restoring sourced content in compliance with relevant policies. You are edit warring using deliberate misinterpretations of policy, and this request screams of ]