User talk:CLCStudent: Difference between revisions

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240 241, 242, 243

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 13:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you think I'm making a mistake, just tell me. Just don't accuse me of being a vandal. Thanks. Nashhinton (talk) 22:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I've blocked this IP for personal attacks, but can you explain to me why you repeatedly restored the content they blanked from their page?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They were being uncivil. I was issuing warnings, not so much restoring content. CLCStudent (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Other than shared user templates and declined appeals on current blocks, it is completely ok for them to blank their talk page (see

WP:3RR block when you repeatedly restore content that an editor has removed from their talk page. You can issue new warnings, but you shouldn't be restoring all of the content each time. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

I blocked someone a couple of days ago for doing the same stuff; I think it was a known vandal, at least known among some editors. Do you know? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe it was this range that I remember--maybe not, maybe there's more. Drmies (talk) 17:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know, but the range block will most likely prevent her from editing through any other IP addresses in her organization. CLCStudent (talk) 17:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I see that you removed my earlier message about this subject, without comment. I realize I should have been more direct. Hualfe's edit's were not vandalism. So could you kindly remove or strike your {{uw-attempt1}} from their talk page? It's the first thing there, and may lead other users to judge this user as a vandal. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 03:19, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've lost count of the number of times you've beaten me to reverting vandalism tonight - good job! Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 21:43, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you reverted there and want to ask why you reverted, because it doesn't seems like Vandalism. (I'm not 100% certain on whether defeated countries should be added there, but if not a Vandalism revert looks a bit

]

A barnstar for you!

		CVU Anti-Vandalism Award
		This is for your excellent performance in saving Wikipedia from the harmful threats of vandalism. I appreciate your efforts and hardwork. You are a bold defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 15:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Thanks for fighting vandals!!

Viewratio (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had a message from an IP editor who wanted to contact you to ask about your edits but who wasn't able to because your user talk page is semi-protected. Can you please create some other page for unregistered editors to contact you and link to it from your talk page while it is protected, as recommended by the protection policy. Thanks. Hut 8.5 22:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CLCStudent: - Yesterday, I was trying to figure out how to respond to messages on my own talk page, when I noticed that you, undid the edits that I made, and then proceeded to template message me about it.

I then asked you for an explanation for your actions, yet received no response on two occasions. I then noticed that your user talk page was semi-protected, and combined with the fact that you ignored both of my messages, there was no way to contact you. I messaged an administrator who then left a message on your talk page, which you also appear to have ignored.

I am asking you for an explanation as to why you undid the edits that I made to my own talk page. If you continue to ignore me, I will have no choice but to escalate the issue to