Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sprayitchyo: Difference between revisions

Sprayitchyo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

26 July 2020

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Greumaich (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Relatively new user has been referencing Wikipolicies such as

1. Obsession with a single source/scholar (Faust 2015) paired sometimes with Redford or others: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], vs. [6], [7], [8], [9]
2. This includes an obsession with authority or respect of said source: [10] These quotes are from biased, minimalist perspectives who have nowhere near the authority of the likes of Dever, Finkelstein or Faust vs. [11] AND I have a highly respected source - Faust - [12] as if it somehow overrides highly respected scholars like Faust and Shaw.
3. Both Epf2018 and Greumaich have been involved in other articles regarding ancient and modern peoples/anthropology or genetics: [13] [14], [15], vs. [16] [17]. Sprayitchyo and their other socks were involved in similar areas, i.e. [18]
4. edits on medieval topics [19], vs. [20].
5. edits about Shetland and Orkney by Greumaich and other confirmed socks [21], [22], [23], [24]
6. It's also worth noting that both Epf2018 and Greumaich have edit warred.

@A. Parrot: who suggested the link initially.--Ermenrich (talk) 16:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC) Ermenrich (talk) 16:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments