User talk:108.56.255.219: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
What is not more well sourced than providing sources which come directly from the horse's mouth, where the subject of the Wiki page mentions the name of her boyfriend, huh? You people are incorrigible. |
What is not more well sourced than providing sources which come directly from the horse's mouth, where the subject of the Wiki page mentions the name of her boyfriend, huh? You people are incorrigible. |
||
== December 2020 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">Anonymous users from this IP address have been '''[[WP:Partial blocks|blocked]]''' from editing<!-- |
|||
--> from certain pages ([[:Kristin Kreuk]]) for a period of '''1 year''' for [[WP:BLP]] violations in spite of several warnings and article protection. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 21:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-pblock --> |
Revision as of 21:47, 14 December 2020
August 2020
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
October 2020
New information, even if referenced, should be added only if noteworthy, relevant and documented in multiple reliable third-party sources. Wikipedia is
If challenged, the
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kristin Kreuk. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 16:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kristin Kreuk, you may be blocked from editing. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 04:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
November 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kristin Kreuk. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 00:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Recent edits
Hi, please don't add anything else to
]What is not more well sourced than providing sources which come directly from the horse's mouth, where the subject of the Wiki page mentions the name of her boyfriend, huh? You people are incorrigible.