Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Aidan9382-Bot: Difference between revisions
Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors 15,444 edits New BRFA - Citation misused |format= fix |
→Discussion: re |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
===Discussion=== |
===Discussion=== |
||
<!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion --> |
<!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion --> |
||
If there are only a "small amount" that are straight-forward as claimed, this might be better for a quick AWB run, no? [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:13, 27 March 2022
New to bots on Wikipedia? Read these primers!
- Approval process – How this discussion works
- Overview/Policy – What bots are/What they can (or can't) do
- Dictionary – Explains bot-related jargon
Operator: Aidan9382 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 08:09, Wednesday, March 23, 2022 (
Function overview: Replace clear-cut cases of improperly used "|format=" in citations
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Not for now
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): one time run
Estimated number of pages affected: A couple hundered, as there are about 1200 pages in the related catagory, but only a small amount are actually clear-cut
Namespace(s): Mainspace
Exclusion compliant No: Only edits mainspace
Function details: For now, it will simply replace clear-cut cases of misused format without url (Paperback, e-book, etc.) by swapping the field from format to type. It applies citation-error edits to only mainspace, so i dont imagine an exclusion compliance is going to be needed, but i may be mistaken.
Discussion
If there are only a "small amount" that are straight-forward as claimed, this might be better for a quick AWB run, no? Primefac (talk) 12:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)