Rosen Method Bodywork: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

20 April 2024

19 April 2024

18 February 2023

27 January 2023

13 November 2022

26 September 2022

  • link syntax and minor changes undo

23 July 2022

  • Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox | #UCB_webform_linked 386/481 undo

2 July 2022

9 March 2022

22 October 2021

  • Undo
  • curprev 18:3618:36, 22 October 202169.36.204.101 talk 2,027 bytes −648 As the success of "The body keeps the score" shows us, we're long past denying the relation between the body and its responses to the traumas it endures. As you can see by the references in the article in this link: https://rosenmethod.com/portfolio/rosen-method-bodywork-practice-and-science/ there is nothing quack about this practise. undo Tag: Reverted

25 March 2020

  • Undo
  • curprev 04:4204:42, 25 March 20202002:68dc:2518:0:78ee:af96:8be2:fb85 talk 3,331 bytes +640 Eliminated the word 'alleged' from the phrase 'alleged' protection in first paragraph because the first sentence already alludes to 'claims' of the validity of rosen method. Objectivity is important when creating a wikipedia entry, so is healthy skepticism, but the tone of the writing suggests a pronounced anti somatic bias as if touch therapy has no legitimate place in the therapeutic world. As it reads right now, the entry does not offer a balanced perspective. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 03:5603:56, 25 March 2020104.220.37.24 talk 2,691 bytes +16 Moved second paragraph reference to Quackwatch to last paragraph since it is a critique rather than an explanation of Rosen Method. I added the heading, 'Critics' because it is most likely a person who objects to the Rosen Method who added this paragraph in the first place to discredit its inclusion in wikipedia. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

16 February 2020

3 May 2018

  • link syntax and minor changes undo

9 April 2018

13 October 2016

16 August 2016

20 July 2016

16 April 2016

21 February 2016

28 September 2014

10 July 2014

9 July 2014

7 July 2014

3 July 2014

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)