Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.

Announcement archives:

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Arbitration motion regarding HazelBasil and SquareInARoundHole

For intractable differences of opinions and conduct both on- and off-wiki, the Committee resolves that

the standard exceptions. This also precludes SquareInARoundHole from editing the Ashley Gjøvik

article.

In addition, for comments and conduct made both on- and off-wiki, HazelBasil is indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia.

For the Arbitration Committee, Primefac (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 48 § Arbitration motion regarding HazelBasil and SquareInARoundHole

Arbitration motion regarding Timwi

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

The "Timwi" request for arbitration is resolved as follows:

The Committee recognizes Timwi's long service, and encourages his continued editing. However,

WP:ADMINACCT

, and remember that the toolset is not to be used to further content or policy disputes. The Committee will consider any further misuse of the toolset within a two-year period to be immediate cause for opening de-sysop proceedings.

For the Arbitration Committee, Amortias (T)(C) 22:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 48 § Arbitration motion regarding Timwi

Arbitration motion regarding Jonathunder

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

The "Jonathunder" request for arbitration is accepted. This case will be opened but suspended for a period of six months.^{[note 1]}

If Jonathunder (talk · contribs) should return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to arbcom-enwikimedia.org or at the clerks' noticeboard. Jonathunder is temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case.

If such a request is not made within six months of this motion or if Jonathunder resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Jonathunder shall be permanently desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Jonathunder may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful

request for adminship

.

^ The case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jonathunder.

For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 21:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 48 § Arbitration motion regarding Jonathunder

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing closed

An arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

Rp2006 (talk · contribs) is warned against a battleground mentality and further incivility.
Rp2006 is indefinitely
living people associated with or of interest to scientific skepticism
, broadly construed. This topic ban may be appealed after six months have elapsed and every six months thereafter.

talk · contribs
) is reminded to remain collegial in editing and interacting with others.

Roxy the dog (talk · contribs) is warned to remain collegial in editing and interacting with others.
Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia (GSoW) is advised that a presence on English Wikipedia, perhaps as its own WikiProject or as a task force of WikiProject Skepticism, will create more transparency and lessen some of the kinds of suspicion and conflict that preceded this case. It could also provide a place for the GSoW to get community feedback about its training which would increase its effectiveness.
Editors are reminded that
aware
of these discretionary sanctions under awareness criterion 1.

For the Arbitration Committee, –

☖ 05:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing closed

Arbitration motion regarding Geschichte

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

The "Geschichte" request for arbitration is accepted. This case will be opened but suspended for a period of three months.^{[note 1]}

If

clerks' noticeboard

. Geschichte is temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case.

If such a request is not made within three months of this motion or if Geschichte resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Geschichte shall be permanently desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Geschichte may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful

request for adminship

.

^ The case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Geschichte.

For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Geschichte

[1] The case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jonathunder.

[2] The case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Geschichte.

[note 1]

[note 1]