Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
 | If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=reason for move}} - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests
Uncontroversial technical requests
- WP:THE. Labattblueboy (talk) 02:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)]
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
Contested technical requests
- WP:THE this needs to happen. LightProof1995 (talk) 05:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC) (talk) 02:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Given there has been discussion at WP:RM. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Given there has been discussion at
- Africa U-23 Cup of Nations (currently a redirect to U-23 Africa Cup of Nations) → U-23 Africa Cup of Nations (move · discuss) – Faycal.09 moved it to the current title on the basis of the source provided on the page, but its branding and referrals in editions cited in sources point to the original title which is currently a redirect to Faycal.09's title. Intrisit (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Given the switcharoo of titles in 2015/16 between the two titles here, This might be potentially contested, please open a discussion on this. WP:PCM – robertsky (talk) 05:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Given the switcharoo of titles in 2015/16 between the two titles here, This might be potentially contested, please open a discussion on this.
- Meir Shiff (currently a redirect to Meir Schiff) → Meir Schiff (move · discuss) – Misspelled. The new name is the way his name is spelled throughout the article. TGRFAN (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Noting some previous discussion on Talk:Meir Shiff. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)]
- @WP:RM discussion by clicking the discuss link in your request. Once that has begun, please then remove this request. Thanks! - UtherSRG (talk) 10:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Noting some previous discussion on
- WP:COMMONNAME. Hyphens aren't used in nouns like this, only in adjectives. LightProof1995 (talk) 05:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)]
Administrator needed
- MOS:DEADNAME would apply to the article title. I'd move it myself, but the article is administrator move protected. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Judging by the talkpage this would not be an uncontroversial move and a full RM may be required. I'm not objecting just commenting. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is clearly WP:RM is required. I'm not objecting either though. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)]
- This is clearly
- Judging by the talkpage this would not be an uncontroversial move and a full RM may be required. I'm not objecting just commenting. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)