Species reintroduction

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A Przewalski's horse being released into the wild in Mongolia, as part of the Return of the Wild Horses project.

Species reintroduction is the deliberate release of a species into the wild, from captivity or other areas where the organism is capable of survival.[1] The goal of species reintroduction is to establish a healthy, genetically diverse, self-sustaining population to an area where it has been extirpated, or to augment an existing population.[2] Species that may be eligible for reintroduction are typically threatened or endangered in the wild. However, reintroduction of a species can also be for pest control; for example, wolves being reintroduced to a wild area to curb an overpopulation of deer. Because reintroduction may involve returning native species to localities where they had been extirpated, some prefer the term "reestablishment".[1]

Humans have been reintroducing species for food and pest control for thousands of years. However, the practice of reintroducing for conservation is much younger, starting in the 20th century.[3]

Methods for sourcing individuals

There are a variety of approaches to species reintroduction. The optimal strategy will depend on the biology of the organism.[4] The first matter to address when beginning a species reintroduction is whether to source individuals in situ, from wild populations, or ex situ, from captivity in a zoo or botanic garden, for example.

In situ sourcing

In situ sourcing for restorations involves moving individuals from an existing wild population to a new site where the species was formerly extirpated. Ideally, populations should be sourced in situ when possible due to the numerous risks associated with reintroducing organisms from captive populations to the wild.[5] To ensure that reintroduced populations have the best chance of surviving and reproducing, individuals should be sourced from populations that genetically and ecologically resemble the recipient population.[6] Generally, sourcing from populations with similar environmental conditions to the reintroduction site will maximize the chance that reintroduced individuals are well adapted to the habitat of the reintroduction site otherwise there are possibilities that they will not take to their environment. .[7][6]

One consideration for in situ sourcing is at which life stage the organisms should be collected, transported, and reintroduced. For instance, with plants, it is often ideal to transport them as seeds as they have the best chance of surviving translocation at this stage. However, some plants are difficult to establish as seed and may need to be translocated as juveniles or adults.[4]

Ex situ sourcing

In situations where in situ collection of individuals is not feasible, such as for rare and endangered species with too few individuals existing in the wild, ex situ collection is possible. Ex situ collection methods allow storage of individuals that have high potential for reintroduction. Storage examples include germplasm stored in seed banks, sperm and egg banks, cryopreservation, and tissue culture.[5] Methods that allow for storage of a high numbers of individuals also aim to maximize genetic diversity. Stored materials generally have long lifespans in storage, but some species do lose viability when stored as seed.[8] Tissue culture and cryopreservation techniques have only been perfected for a few species.[9]

Organisms may also be kept in living collections in captivity. Living collections are more costly than storing germplasm and hence can support only a fraction of the individuals that ex situ sourcing can.[5] Risk increases when sourcing individuals to add to living collections. Loss of genetic diversity is a concern because fewer individuals stored.[10] Individuals may also become genetically adapted to captivity, which often adversely affects the reproductive fitness of individuals. Adaptation to captivity may make individuals less suitable for reintroduction to the wild. Thus, efforts should be made to replicate wild conditions and minimize time spent in captivity whenever possible.[11]

Successes and failures

Arabian oryx were reintroduced to Oman and Israel in the 20th century.

Reintroduction biology is a relatively young discipline and continues to be a work in progress. No strict and accepted definition of reintroduction success exists, but it has been proposed that the criteria widely used to assess the conservation status of endangered taxa, such as the IUCN Red List criteria, should be used to assess reintroduction success.[12] Successful reintroduction programs should yield viable and self-sustainable populations in the long-term. The IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group & Environment Agency, in their 2011 Global Re-introduction Perspectives, compiled reintroduction case studies from around the world.[13] 184 case studies were reported on a range of species which included invertebrates, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, and plants. Assessments from all of the studies included goals, success indicators, project summary, major difficulties faced, major lessons learned, and success of project with reasons for success or failure. A similar assessment focused solely on plants found high rates of success for rare species reintroductions.[14] An analysis of data from the Center for Plant Conservation International Reintroduction Registry found that, for the 49 cases where data were available, 92% of the reintroduced plant populations survived two years. The Siberian tiger population has rebounded from 40 individuals in the 1940s to around 500 in 2007. The Siberian tiger population is now the largest un-fragmented tiger population in the world.[15] Yet, a high proportion of translocations and reintroductions have not been successful in establishing viable populations.[16] For instance, in China reintroduction of captive Giant Pandas have had mixed effects. The initial pandas released from captivity all died quickly after reintroduction.[17] Even now that they have improved their ability to reintroduce pandas, concern remains over how well the captive-bred pandas will fare with their wild relatives.[18]

Many factors can attribute to the success or failure of a reintroduction. Predators, food, pathogens, competitors, and weather can all affect a reintroduced population's ability to grow, survive, and reproduce. The number of animals reintroduced in an attempt should also vary with factors such as social behavior, expected rates of predation, and density in the wild.[19] Animals raised in captivity may experience stress during captivity or translocation, which can weaken their immune systems.[20] The IUCN reintroduction guidelines emphasize the need for an assessment of the availability of suitable habitat as a key component of reintroduction planning.[21] Poor assessment of the release site can increase the chances that the species will reject the site and perhaps move to a less suitable environment. This can decrease the species fitness and thus decrease chances for survival.[20] They state that restoration of the original habitat and amelioration of causes of extinction must be explored and considered as essential conditions for these projects. Unfortunately, the monitoring period that should follow reintroductions often remains neglected.[22]

Genetic considerations

When a species has been extirpated from a site where it previously existed, individuals that will comprise the reintroduced population must be sourced from wild or captive populations. When sourcing individuals for reintroduction, it is important to consider local adaptation, adaptation to captivity (for ex situ conservation), the possibility of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression, and taxonomy, ecology, and genetic diversity of the source population.[2] Reintroduced populations experience increased vulnerability to influences of drift, selection, and gene flow evolutionary processes due to their small sizes, climatic and ecological differences between source and native habitats, and presence of other mating-compatible populations.[11][23][24][25]

If the species slated for reintroduction is rare in the wild, it is likely to have unusually low population numbers, and care should be taken to avoid inbreeding and inbreeding depression.[2] Inbreeding can change the frequency of allele distribution in a population, and potentially result in a change to crucial genetic diversity.[2] Additionally, outbreeding depression can occur if a reintroduced population can hybridize with existing populations in the wild, which can result in offspring with reduced fitness, and less adaptation to local conditions. To minimize both, practitioners should source for individuals in a way that captures as much genetic diversity as possible, and attempt to match source site conditions to local site conditions as much as possible.[2]

Capturing as much

heterozygosity, is suggested in species reintroductions.[2] Some protocols suggest sourcing approximately 30 individuals from a population will capture 95% of the genetic diversity.[2]
Maintaining genetic diversity in the recipient population is crucial to avoiding the loss of essential local adaptations, minimizing inbreeding depression, and maximizing fitness of the reintroduced population.

Ecological similarity

Plants or animals that undergo reintroduction may exhibit reduced fitness if they are not sufficiently adapted to local environmental conditions. Therefore, researchers should consider ecological and environmental similarity of source and recipient sites when selecting populations for reintroduction. Environmental factors to consider include climate and soil traits (pH, percent clay, silt and sand, percent combustion carbon, percent combustion nitrogen, concentration of Ca, Na, Mg, P, K).

common garden experiment to be an insufficient predictor of fitness.[6] Additionally, projected climatic shifts induced by climate change have led to the development of new seed sourcing protocols that aim to source seeds that are best adapted to project climate conditions.[27] Conservation agencies have developed seed transfer zones that serve as guidelines for how far plant material can be transported before it will perform poorly.[28] Seed transfer zones take into account proximity, ecological conditions, and climatic conditions in order to predict how plant performance will vary from one zone to the next. A study of the reintroduction of Castilleja levisecta found that the source populations most physically near the reintroduction site performed the poorest in a field experiment, while those from the source population whose ecological conditions most closely matched the reintroduction site performed best, demonstrating the importance of matching the evolved adaptations of a population to the conditions at the reintroduction site.[29]

Adaptation to captivity

Some reintroduction programs use plants or animals from captive populations to form a reintroduced population.[2] When reintroducing individuals from a captive population to the wild, there is a risk that they have adapted to captivity due to differential selection of genotypes in captivity versus the wild. The genetic basis of this adaptation is selection of rare, recessive alleles that are deleterious in the wild but preferred in captivity.[11] Consequently, animals adapted to captivity show reduced stress tolerance, increased tameness, and loss of local adaptations.[30] Plants also can show adaptations to captivity through changes in drought tolerance, nutrient requirements, and seed dormancy requirements.[31] Extent of adaptation is directly related to intensity of selection, genetic diversity, effective population size and number of generations in captivity. Characteristics selected for in captivity are overwhelmingly disadvantageous in the wild, so such adaptations can lead to reduced fitness following reintroduction. Reintroduction projects that introduce wild animals generally experience higher success rates than those that use captive-bred animals.[11] Genetic adaptation to captivity can be minimized through management methods: by maximizing generation length and number of new individuals added to the captive population; minimizing effective population size, number of generations spent in captivity, and selection pressure; and reducing genetic diversity by fragmenting the population.[2][11] For plants, minimizing adaptation to captivity is usually achieved by sourcing plant material from a seed bank, where individuals are preserved as wild-collected seeds, and have not had the chance to adapt to conditions in captivity. However, this method is only plausible for plants with seed dormancy.[11]

Genetic trade-offs

In reintroductions from captivity, translocation of animals from captivity to the wild has implications for both captive and wild populations. Reintroduction of genetically valuable animals from captivity improves genetic diversity of reintroduced populations while depleting captive populations; conversely, genetically valuable captive-bred animals may be closely related to individuals in the wild and thus increase risk of inbreeding depression if reintroduced. Increasing genetic diversity is favored with removal of genetically overrepresented individuals from captive populations and addition of animals with low genetic relatedness to the wild.[32][33] However, in practice, initial reintroduction of individuals with low genetic value to the captive population is recommended to allow for genetic assessment before translocation of valuable individuals.[33]

Improving research techniques

A cooperative approach to reintroduction by ecologists and biologists could improve research techniques. For both preparation and monitoring of reintroductions, increasing contacts between academic population biologists and wildlife managers is encouraged within the Survival Species Commission and the IUCN. The IUCN states that a re-introduction requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a team of persons drawn from a variety of backgrounds.[21] A survey by Wolf et al. in 1998 indicated that 64% of reintroduction projects have used subjective opinion to assess habitat quality.[20] This means that most reintroduction evaluation has been based on human anecdotal evidence and not enough has been based on statistical findings. Seddon et al. (2007) suggest that researchers contemplating future reintroductions should specify goals, overall ecological purpose, and inherent technical and biological limitations of a given reintroduction, and planning and evaluation processes should incorporate both experimental and modeling approaches.[3]

Monitoring the health of individuals, as well as the survival, is important; both before and after the reintroduction. Intervention may be necessary if the situation proves unfavorable.[21] Population dynamics models that integrate demographic parameters and behavioral data recorded in the field can lead to simulations and tests of a priori hypotheses. Using previous results to design further decisions and experiments is a central concept of adaptive management. In other words, learning by doing can help in future projects. Population ecologists should therefore collaborate with biologists, ecologists, and wildlife management to improve reintroduction programs.[34]

Genetic monitoring

For reintroduced populations to successfully establish and maximize reproductive fitness, practitioners should perform genetic tests to select which individuals will be the founders of reintroduced populations and to continue monitoring populations post-reintroduction.

population structure, and can also be used to identify instances of inbreeding within reintroduced populations or hybridization
with existing populations that are genetically compatible. Long-term genetic monitoring is recommended post-reintroduction to track changes in genetic diversity of the reintroduced population and determine success of a reintroduction program. Adverse genetic changes such as loss of
heterozygosity may indicate management intervention, such as population supplementation, is necessary for survival of the reintroduced population.[36][37][38]

Re-introduction Specialist Group (RSG)

The RSG is a network of specialists whose aim is to combat the ongoing and massive loss of biodiversity by using re-introductions as a responsible tool for the management and restoration of biodiversity. It does this by actively developing and promoting sound inter-disciplinary scientific information, policy, and practice to establish viable wild populations in their natural habitats. The role of the RSG is to promote the re-establishment of viable populations in the wild of animals and plants. The need for this role was felt due to the increased demand from re-introduction practitioners, the global conservation community and increase in re-introduction projects worldwide.

Increasing numbers of animal and plant species are becoming rare, or even extinct in the wild. In an attempt to re-establish populations, species can – in some instances – be re-introduced into an area, either through translocation from existing wild populations, or by re-introducing captive-bred animals or artificially propagated plants.

Reintroduction programs

Africa

Asia

Middle East

Europe

Black-bellied hamster (Cricetus cricetus), also known as European hamster, common hamster

North America

Oceans and Oceania

South America

A Chaco tortoise being released into the wild in Santiago del Estero, Argentina.

See also

References

  1. ^ .
  2. ^ .
  3. ^ .
  4. ^ a b c "IUCN Guidelines for Restorations and Other Conservation Translocations" (PDF). IUCN. Retrieved 15 May 2017.
  5. ^ .
  6. ^ .
  7. .
  8. .
  9. .
  10. .
  11. ^ .
  12. .
  13. ^ Soorae, P. S. (ed.) (2011). Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2011. More case studies from around the globe. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group and Abu Dhabi, UAE: Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi. xiv + 250 pp.SBN: 978-2-8317-1432-5 https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2011-073.pdf
  14. .
  15. ^ Rietbergen, Jennifer Building a Sustainable Future WWF International 2008
  16. JSTOR 1311025
    .
  17. ^ "Reintroduction Program – 2006". Pandas International. Retrieved 2017-06-03.
  18. ^ "New Video Shows Returning Pandas to the Wild Actually Works". 19 April 2017. Archived from the original on April 22, 2017. Retrieved 2017-06-03.
  19. S2CID 85997109
    .
  20. ^ .
  21. ^ a b c Prepared by the SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group (May 1995) IUCN/SSC Guidelines for Re-Introductions http://www.iucnsscrsg.org
  22. ^ Sarrazin, F. Barbault, R. (November 1996). Reintroduction: Challenges and Lessons for Basic Ecology Elsevier Science Volume 11 No. 11
  23. S2CID 19523834
    .
  24. .
  25. .
  26. .
  27. .
  28. ^ Rogers, D. L.; Montalvo, A. M. (2004). Genetically appropriate choices for plant materials to maintain biological diversity. University of California: Report to the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Lakewood, CO. pp. 103–129.
  29. S2CID 85653946
    .
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .
  33. ^ .
  34. ^ "In situ Conservation". Our Work. BGCI. Archived from the original on 2012-02-01. Retrieved April 30, 2012.
  35. S2CID 3744830
    .
  36. ^ .
  37. .
  38. ^ .
  39. . Retrieved 13 November 2021.
  40. ^ "Critically endangered addax antelope to be reintroduced in Chad". Africa Geographic. Retrieved 26 August 2020.
  41. ^ "Elephants return to Samara". Samara Private Game Reserve. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  42. ^ "Leopards reintroduced to Majete". African Parks. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
  43. ^ "Final Leopard Reintroduction to Majete Wildlife Reserve". African Parks. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
  44. ^ "Malawi: Final Leopard Reintroduction to Majete Wildlife Reserve". African Conservation Foundation. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
  45. ^ "46 tortoises reintroduced in Senegal thanks to a unique transfer with Air France KLM Martinair Cargo". EN-VOLS. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  46. ^ "First Ever African Wild Dog Introduction to Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique". Wildlife ACT. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  47. ^ "The African Wild Dogs are back". Gorongosa National Park. Archived from the original on 30 May 2019. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  48. ^ "New Residents Settle In at Lekedi Park". Eramet. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  49. ^ "African Wild Dogs return to Malawi". www.africanparks.org. Retrieved 2023-01-05.
  50. ^ "Botswana Rhino Reintroduction Project". Wildness Safaris. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  51. ^ "Rhino Conservation Botswana". Rhino Conservation Botswana. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  52. ^ "Black rhinos return to Rwanda 10 years after disappearance". The Guardian. 3 May 2017. Retrieved 2019-05-22.
  53. ^ "Black rhino to be reintroduced in Chad". The Guardian.
  54. ^ "Black Rhino Reintroduction". Gonarezhou National Park. Retrieved 12 September 2023.
  55. ^ "Gonarezhou Black Rhino Reintroduction". Rhino Recovery Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2023.
  56. ^ "Black rhinos return to Zinave National Park in Mozambique". Peace Parks Foundation. Retrieved 12 September 2023.
  57. ^ "Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of wild born orphan chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) within the pongo and okokong islands of the douala-edea wildlife reserve, Littoral Region Cameroon". Neliti. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  58. ^ "Reintroduction of Cuvier's Gazelle Jebel Serj NP Tunisia - Latest News". rgct.eeza.csic.es. Retrieved 2022-12-12.
  59. ^ "Zebras returned to the wild". The Aspinall Foundation. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
  60. ^ "'It's a success': Pangolins return to a region where they were once extinct". MONGABAY. 23 June 2020. Retrieved 2020-12-17.
  61. ^ "andBeyond Donated Five Lionesses from Phinda to Rwanda". www.andbeyond.com. Archived from the original on 2018-06-12. Retrieved 2017-05-22.
  62. ^ "Lions to bring 'East Africa experience' to Rwanda". The East African. Retrieved 2017-05-22.
  63. ^ "Lions Reintroduced to Liwonde National Park in Malawi". African Parks. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  64. ^ "Reintroducing lions into Malawi". Lion Recovery Fund. Retrieved 26 August 2020.
  65. .
  66. .
  67. ^ "Absent for decades, zebras reintroduced to park in southern Tanzania". Mongabay. Retrieved 24 November 2022.
  68. ^ "The reintroduction of zebra to one of Zambia's parks". Conservation Solutions. Retrieved 24 November 2022.
  69. ^ "Scimitar-horned Oryx Reintroduction Programme". Sahara Conservation Fund. Archived from the original on 30 May 2019. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  70. ^ "Reintroducing scimitar-horned oryx to Chad". The Zoological Society of London. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  71. ^ "25 Scimitar-Horned Oryx to be Reintroduced to the Wild in Chad". Smithsonian Insider. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  72. ^ "White rhinos reintroduced to DR Congo national park". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 2023-06-20.
  73. ^ "White Rhinos to Rwanda". www.africanparks.org. Retrieved 2023-01-05.
  74. ^ Shreya Dasgupta (29 May 2017). "Cheetahs return to Malawi after decades". Mongabay. Retrieved 3 June 2017.
  75. ^ "Mozambique – hyenas reintroduced to Zinave". Africa Sustainable Conservation News. 4 August 2020. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  76. ^ "Go wild in these countries: five exciting rewilding projects to visit". the Guardian. 2022-06-26. Retrieved 2022-10-20.
  77. ^ "Reintroduction of the West African Giraffe". Save Giraffes Now. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  78. ^ "West African giraffe return to Gadabedji after 50 years of absence". Africa Geographic. 5 December 2018. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  79. ^ "Plan for Amur leopard reintroduction approved". ZSL. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  80. ^ "Amur Leopard Reintroduction". conservewildcats. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  81. ^ "The Amur Leopard Reintroduction Program launched in Primorye". WWF. Archived from the original on 30 May 2019. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  82. ^ "Elephants Return to the Forest". AMNH. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  83. ^ "First Ever Reintroduction of the Asian Giant Tortoise in Bangladesh: a Model for Future Rewilding Efforts". future for nature. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  84. ^ "Rewilding The Asian Giant Tortoise In Bangladesh". Nature in Focus. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  85. ^ "Tigers successfully reintroduced in Indian park". Mongabay. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  86. ^ "Sariska Tiger Reserve - Reintroduction of Tigers". Government of Rajasthan Forest Department. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  87. ^ Aleem, Abdul (May 1978). "Re-introduction of blackbuck in Pakistan". Pakistan Journal of Forestry. 28 (2): 111–115.
  88. ^ See Borneo Orangutan Survival
  89. ^ "Bukhara deer reintroduced in Kazakhstan". WWF. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  90. ^ "Bukhara deer to be reintroduced in Central Asia". Eco News. 28 November 2011. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  91. ^ "Star Tortoise Reintroduction Progressing Well in Myanmar". turtle survival alliance. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  92. ^ "India Gets Cheetahs Again After 70 Years: 10 Points". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2022-09-17.
  93. ^ "Feasibility study: reintroducing Chinese alligator to Yancheng". Conservation Leadership Program. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  94. ^ "Endangered bird returns to South Korea 40 years after extinction". Independent. 22 May 2019. Archived from the original on 2022-05-24. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
  95. ^ "Bringing back the crested ibis". The Japan Times. 14 June 2016. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  96. ^ "Reintroducing the Japanese Crested Ibis in Sado, Japan (PDF)" (PDF). Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  97. ^ "Reintroduction of Gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus) in Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve (PDF)" (PDF). The Wildlife Institute of India. Retrieved 26 October 2021.
  98. ^ "Gharials get back into the Ganges". WWF. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  99. ^ "GHARIALS ON THE GANGA (PDF)" (PDF). Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  100. ^ "Male rhino dies at Laal Suhanra National Park".
  101. .
  102. ^ "Reintroduction of Greater Indian Rhinoceros into Dudhwa National Park (PDF)" (PDF). Retrieved 16 December 2020.
  103. ^ "One-horned rhino to be reintroduced in Corbett". The Times of India. 27 November 2019. Retrieved 16 December 2020.
  104. ^ "Foxes released into wild on Sobaeksan". The korean Herald. November 2012. Retrieved 26 April 2017.
  105. S2CID 4001038
    .
  106. ^ Maschinski, Joyce; Haskins, Kristin (2012). Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Island Press.
  107. . Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  108. ^ "Reintroduction of Pileated Gibbons at the Angkor World Heritage Site". Foundation Segre. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  109. ^ "The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Retrieved 2018-10-27.
  110. ^ "Przewalski's horse". Smithsonian's National Zoo. 2016-04-25. Retrieved 2023-03-13.
  111. ^ "Successful reintroduction of world's smallest hog". Mongabay. 13 May 2009. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  112. ^ ACAP Breeding Site No. 65. Torishima, where Short-tailed Albatrosses have survived both feather collectors and an active volcano
  113. ^ "Siamese crocodile". Fauna & Flora International. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  114. ^ "Siamese crocodiles re-introduced in Cat Tien National Park". WWF. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  115. ^ "Big Cat Swap Raises Questions". Institute for War and Peace Reporting. 19 May 2010. Archived from the original on 20 September 2018. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
  116. ^ "Reintroduction". Sumatran Orangutan Conservation Programme. Retrieved 19 December 2022.
  117. ^ "Reintroduction of the Asiatic Black Bear to Jirisan National Park (JNP) South Korea". RLR Reintroduction Management. Archived from the original on 26 April 2017. Retrieved 26 April 2017.
  118. ^ "The efforts to re-establish the Chinese water deer population in Shanghai, China". Retrieved 19 September 2019.
  119. S2CID 216528987
    .
  120. ^ "Wild buffalo to be reintroduced in Kanha Natl Park". Retrieved 26 October 2021.
  121. ^ a b c Farag, Mona (2023-01-18). "Saudi Arabia to release more than 1,500 endangered animals at AlUla". The National. Retrieved 2024-04-24.
  122. ISSN 0006-3207
    .
  123. .
  124. ^ IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group. 2017. Oryx leucoryx. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T15569A50191626. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-2.RLTS.T15569A50191626.en.
  125. .
  126. .
  127. ^ "Second batch of rare houbara bird to be reintroduced in Jordan in February". Jordan Times. 2018-01-15. Retrieved 2024-04-24.
  128. ^ Sharifi M.. Vaissi S.. 2014. Captive breeding and trial reintroduction of the Endangered yellow-spotted mountain newt Neurergus microspilotus in western Iran (pdf). Endanger Species Res 23. Vol. 23: pp.159–166. doi: 10.3354/esr00552. Retrieved on March 31, 2017
  129. ^ Hatzofe, O. (2001). Reintroduction of raptors to Ramat HaNadiv. Wings over Africa. The International Center for the Study of Bird Migration, Latrun, Israel, 190-202.
  130. ^ "The Bitter Fate of Ostriches in the Wild". Haaretz. Retrieved 2024-01-17.
  131. ISSN 0939-7140
    .
  132. .
  133. ^ "Nubian Ibex Conservation Case Study | The Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund". www.speciesconservation.org. Retrieved 2023-03-12.
  134. S2CID 245816312
    .
  135. .
  136. ^ Constantinoiu, Marina (2020-10-15). "The astonishing revival of Israel's Persian fallow deer". ISRAEL21c. Retrieved 2023-03-12.
  137. ISSN 0006-3207
    .
  138. ^ Lutz, Diana (2013-03-27). "The secret lives of the wild asses of the Negev - The Source - Washington University in St. Louis". The Source. Retrieved 2023-03-12.
  139. ISSN 0006-3207
    .
  140. ^ "Hai-Bar Carmel Nature Reserve". Israel Nature and Parks Authority. Retrieved 2023-03-12.
  141. S2CID 215510846.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2024 (link
    )
  142. ^ Goren, M. 2014. Acanthobrama telavivensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T61249A19009597. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014-1.RLTS.T61249A19009597.en.
  143. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde. 57 (4): 211–215. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2010-10-01. Retrieved 2010-11-13.
  144. ^ "VIDEO: Butterfly extinct for 42 years reintroduced to England". 18 May 2018.
  145. ^ Groff C., Bragalanti N., Rizzoli R., Zanghellini P. (editors), "2012 Bear Report, Forestry and Wildlife Department of the Autonomous Province of Trento", 2013.
  146. ISSN 0261-3077
    . Retrieved 2016-04-17.
  147. . Retrieved 2023-03-12.
  148. .
  149. ^ "Gazelle Reintroduction Programmme". WWf-Caucasus. Retrieved 12 September 2023.
  150. ^ "Ladybird Spider- Eresus cinnaberinus". 2011-08-11.
  151. S2CID 218626986
    .
  152. .
  153. ^ "Waldrappteam".
  154. ^ "Proyecto Eremita".
  155. ^ WWF (2009). "Flying Turkmen leopards to bring species back to Caucasus". WWF.
  156. ^ "TWO LEOPARDS FROM SWEDEN ARRIVED TO RUSSIA". WWF Russia. Archived from the original on 2022-10-03. Retrieved 2021-04-09.
  157. ^ "'First' Welsh born and bred pine marten". BBC News. 2017-06-09.
  158. ^ Tsoukanova, Ania. "Wild horses flourish in Chernobyl 35 years after explosion". phys.org. Retrieved 2023-03-13.
  159. ^ "Red Kite Reintroduction Project in Wicklow". Environment, Heritage and Local Government. 2007-05-21. Archived from the original on 2008-11-21.
  160. ISSN 0261-3077
    . Retrieved 2023-03-14.
  161. ^ Red squirrel conservation, squirrel ecology and grey squirrel management
  162. ^ "White Storks".
  163. ^ Barkham, Patrick (17 January 2020). "Young sea eagle takes up residence among Oxfordshire's red kites". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 January 2020.
  164. ^ "Reintroduction of American Bison". cemexnature. Archived from the original on 3 February 2020. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  165. ^ Rurik List; Jesus Pacheco; Eduardo Ponce; Rodrigo Sierra-Corona; Gerardo Ceballos (August 2010). "The Janos Biosphere Reserve, Northern Mexico". The Journal of International Wilderness. 16 (2). Retrieved July 28, 2019.
  166. ^ "Banff National Park Bison Reintroduction Project". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  167. ^ "History of Bison Management in Yellowstone (U.S. National Park Service)". www.nps.gov. Retrieved 2024-01-17.
  168. ^ "Interior Department Announces Significant Action to Restore Bison Populations as Part of New Restoration and Resilience Framework | U.S. Department of the Interior". www.doi.gov. 2023-03-03. Retrieved 2024-01-17.
  169. ^ "British Virgin Islands: Flamingo Reintroduction to Anegada - The Conservation Agency". The Conservation Agency. Retrieved 2016-04-12.
  170. ^ "How the Puffin Returned to Eastern Egg Rock". Smithsonian Ocean. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  171. ^ "Bringing Puffins Back to Maine - With Stephen Kress". BirdNote. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  172. ^ a b c d e f g h i "9 Wildlife Success Stories". NPCA. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  173. ^ "Black-Footed Ferret Reintroduction". Archived from the original on 2022-10-03.
  174. ^ "Blanding's Turtle Headstart Reintroduction". Urban Turtle Initiative. Toronto Zoo. Archived from the original on 2018-05-25.
  175. ^ Plair, B.L., Lal, M., Ramadhar, A., and Ramsubage, S. 2013. Status of Blue-and-yellow Macaws (Ara ararauna) Reintroduced to the Nariva Swamp, Trinidad and Tobago. Living World, Journal of The Trinidad and Tobago Field Naturalists' Club, 2013, 19-28.
  176. ^ "California Condor Recovery Program | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service". FWS.gov. Retrieved 2023-03-14.
  177. ^ Vashon, J. 2016. Lynx canadensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T12518A101138963. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T12518A101138963.en. Accessed on 20 August 2023.
  178. ^ "Canada Lynx - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation". www.dec.ny.gov. Retrieved 2021-07-03.
  179. S2CID 86211874
    .
  180. .
  181. .
  182. ^ "Black-tailed Prairie Dog Reintroduction". Wildlife. Arizona Game and Fish Department. Archived from the original on 2022-03-07. Retrieved 2022-03-25.
  183. ^ Roberts, Brandon. "Elk could be saving grace in coal country". Spectrumnews1.com. Retrieved 29 June 2022.
  184. ^ "Reintroducing Elk to the Great Smoky Mountains". American Forests. Archived from the original on September 29, 2013. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  185. ^ "Elk". Pennsylvania Game Commission. Retrieved 2023-03-13.
  186. .
  187. ^ "Threatened and Endangered Species in Washington: 2012 Annual Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-03-29.
  188. ^ "Into the wild: reintroduction of spider monkeys in Guatemala". Lifetime Projects. 5 April 2020. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  189. ^ Yellowstone National Park, "Wolf Reintroduction Changes Ecosystem", 21 June 2011.
  190. ^ "Colorado Parks and Wildlife". Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Retrieved 2023-08-20.
  191. ^ Duncan, Travis (December 18, 2023). "Colorado Parks and Wildlife successfully releases gray wolves on Colorado's Western Slope". Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
  192. ^ "A reintroduction program for the conservation of the black howler monkey in Belize". Conservation Evidence. Retrieved 6 September 2023.
  193. ^ "Mexican Wolf Numbers Soar Past 200 | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service". FWS.gov. 2023-02-27. Retrieved 2023-03-12.
  194. .
  195. .
  196. ^ "Red Wolf Recovery Program | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service". FWS.gov. 4 April 2022. Retrieved 2023-03-13.
  197. . Retrieved 13 November 2021.
  198. .
  199. .
  200. ^ "Herman 'Duff' Holbrook: Benefactor of S.C. wildlife". The Post and Courier. 2015-07-23. Retrieved 2015-08-12.
  201. ^ McKean, Andrew (2015-07-27). "A Farewell to Herman "Duff" Holbrook, the Father of Wild Turkey Rocket-Netting". Outdoor Life. Retrieved 2015-08-12.
  202. ^ "First demonstration of reintroduction of West Indian Manatee in the Grand Cul-de-Sac Marin Bay, Guadeloupe". European Commission. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  203. ^ "Wood bison reintroduced in Southwest Alaska see another year of loss, but with a silver lining". Alaska Republic Media. 21 October 2020. Retrieved 2 December 2020.
  204. .
  205. ^ "Rewilding the eastern quoll | Rewilding Australia". rewildingaustralia.org.au. Archived from the original on 2020-03-10. Retrieved 2019-03-30.
  206. ^ "Eastern quoll reintroduced to mainland Australia". BBC News. 15 March 2018. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  207. .
  208. ^ "Kākāpō return to mainland in historic translocation". www.doc.govt.nz. Retrieved 2023-07-21.
  209. .
  210. ^ "Reintroduction of North Island robins Petroica austalis longipes to Tiritiri Matangi, Auckland, New Zealand". Conservation Evidence.
  211. ^ "Where to see Numbats?". numbat.org.au.
  212. ISSN 1442-9993
    .
  213. .
  214. ^ "After 3,000 years, Tasmanian devils are returning to Australian mainland". CNN. 5 October 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  215. ^ "Tasmanian devils return to mainland Australia for first time in 3,000 years". National Geographic. 5 October 2020. Archived from the original on October 6, 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  216. ^ "Tasmanian Devils Are Reintroduced to Australia's Mainland". EcoWatch. 9 October 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  217. ^ "Birth of Tassie devils could be first step to having them back on mainland after 3,000 years". www.abc.net.au. 2021-05-27. Retrieved 2021-06-28.
  218. S2CID 86398422
    .
  219. ^ "The reintroduction of the Andean condor". Conservation Evidence. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  220. ^ "Iberá Project-Collared Peccary". Proyecto Iberá. Retrieved 2023-09-06.
  221. ^ "Iberá Project-The Giant Anteater". Proyecto Iberá. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
  222. ^ "Iberá Project-Giant Otter". Proyecto Iberá. Retrieved 2020-12-17.
  223. ^ "Rewilding in Argentina: the giant river otter returns to Iberá park". UN environment program. 24 July 2019. Retrieved 2020-12-17.
  224. ^ "The giant river otter has returned to Argentina". Lonely Planet. Retrieved 2020-12-17.
  225. ^ "Reintroduction". Save The Golden Lion Tamarin. Retrieved 2023-06-20.
  226. ^ "The Golden Lion Tamarin Returns From Extinction". Saving Nature. Retrieved 2023-06-20.
  227. ^ "Jaguar Reintroduction Project in Argentina's Iberá Wetlands". &Beyond. Retrieved 2022-11-24.
  228. ^ "Reintroducing endangered South American deer to Patagonian wilds". MultiBrief. Retrieved 2020-12-17.
  229. ^ "Iberá Project-Green-Winged Macaw". Proyecto Iberá. Retrieved 2020-12-17.
  230. ^ "Lowland Tapir to be reintroduced into Atlantic Forest". Animalogic. 30 June 2016. Retrieved 2023-06-20.
  231. ^ "Reintroduction of tapirs in the Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro". Labvis. Retrieved 2023-06-20.

Further reading

External links