States Reorganisation Commission
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (September 2019) |
The States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) constituted by the Central Government of
Background
After India became independent from the British Empire in 1947, the constituent units of India were classified under the following distinct categories:[3][4]
Category | Description | Administrator | States |
---|---|---|---|
Part A states | Former British provinces | An elected governor and state legislature | 9 states: Assam, Bihar, Bombay, East Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, Odisha, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal |
Part B states | Former princely states or groups of Covenanting states | Rajpramukh (former princes) | 9 states: Travancore-Cochin, and Vindhya Pradesh
|
Part C | Former princely states and provinces | Chief commissioner | 10 states: |
Part D | Union Territory | Governor appointed by the Indian president | Andaman and Nicobar Islands |
The borders of these states, inherited from
One of the proposals was to reorganise the state on the basis of languages of India. This would make administration easier, and would help replace the caste and religion-based identities with less controversial linguistic identities. Earlier in 1920, the members of the Indian National Congress had agreed on the linguistic reorganisation of the Indian states as one of the party's political goals.[5] The Provincial Committees of the party were set on this basis since 1920. In 1927, the Congress declared that it was committed to "the redistribution of provinces on a linguistic basis", and reaffirmed its stance several times, including in the election manifesto of 1945-46.[6]
But, soon after independence, the Congress-led Government became concerned that the states formed solely on a linguistic basis might be unsuitable, and might even pose a risk to the national unity.
By the 1952, the demand for creation of a Telugu-majority state in the parts of the
SRC report
The Commission submitted its report on 30 September 1955, with the following recommendations:[4]
- The three-tier (Part-A/B/C) state system should be abolished...
- The institution of Rajapramukh and special agreement with former princely states should be abolished
- The general control vested in Government of India by Article 371 should be abolished
- Only the following 3 states should be the Union Territories: Andaman & Nicobar, Delhi and Manipur. The other Part-C/D territories should be merged with the adjoining states
The report was tabled in the Lok Sabha on 14 December 1955.
In Part II of Report of the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) 1955, titled "Factors Bearing on Reorganisation", the Commission clearly said that "it is neither possible nor desirable to reorganise States on the basis of the single test of either language or culture, but that a balanced approach to the whole problem is necessary in the interest of our national unity."[10]
Implementation
The
Controversies
The recommendations of the commission were not accepted universally.
Vidarbha
The SRC recommended formation of separate
Kerala-Madras
The
Even though the SRC recommended for the merger of the entire Shenkottai taluk, the subsequently formed Joint Committee recommended the eastern portion of Shenkottai alone to be merged with Madras State. This decision was finally published authoritatively on 16 January 1956. In the July 1956 Lok Sabha meeting, Nesamony argued for the full merger of Shencottai as recommended by SRC. The House refused to reconsider the decision of the joint Committee by over-ruling the recommendation of the SRC.[12]
On the basis of the percentage of the people speaking Tamil, the S.R.Commission recommended for the transfer of four taluks namely, Agasteeswaram, Thovalai, Kalkulam and Vilavancode to Tamil Nadu from the State of Travancore-Cochin. The same yard stick was used for the transfer of Shenkotta Taluk to Tamil Nadu. Even though Shenkotta was fully transferred by the commission, the Joint Committee appointed to fix the exact boundaries of the states, divided Shenkotta Taluk and allowed Travancore–Cochin State to retain a major portion.
Andhra-Telangana
The Commission's report judged the arguments for and against the merger of the Telugu-majority Telangana region (of Hyderabad State) and the Andhra State (created in 1953). Para 369 to 389 of SRC deals with the merger of Telangana and Andhra to establish the Andhra Pradesh state (complete text of the recommendations is available on Wikisource). Para 386 of SRC says, "After taking all these factors into consideration we have come to the conclusions that it will be in the interests of Andhra as well as Telangana, if for the present, the Telangana area is to constitute into a separate State, which may be known as the Hyderabad State with provision for its unification with Andhra after the general elections likely to be held in or about 1961 if by a two thirds majority the legislature of the residency Hyderabad State expresses itself in favor of such unification".
Hyderabad Chief minister in his letter to Congress President said Communist parties supported the merger for their political calculations. Hyderabad PCC chief said overwhelming majority from Congress opposed the merger and Communists were elected in special circumstances in 1951 and Visalandhra was not a political issue in 1951 and Assembly does not reflect people's view on this issue. He also said 80% of Congress delegates who were elected in 1955 opposed the merger.[13]
In Hyderabad assembly out of 174 MLAs, 147 MLAs expressed their view. 103 MLAs (including Marathi and Kannada MLAs) supported the merger and opposed the Fazal Ali Commission's recommendation to keep Telangana as a separate state for 5 years; and 29 opposed such merger. Among Telangana MLAs, 59 Telangana MLAs agreed with the merger, 25 Telangana MLAs opposed the merger. Out of 94 Telangana MLAs in the assembly, 36 were Communists(PDF), 40 were Congress, 11 were Socialist party(SP), 9 were independents. Voting did not take place on the resolution because Telangana proponents asked to include the phrase "As per the wishes of people" in the resolution.[14][15]
An agreement was reached between Telangana leaders and Andhra leaders on 20 February 1956 to merge Telangana and Andhra with promises to safeguard Telangana's interests.[16][17] Popular newspaper in Telangana, Golconda Patrika, in its editorial on 8 March 1956, immediately after Nehru public declaration about the merger, expressing doubts about the Gentleman's agreement said "Andhra older brother might say any number of sweet things now, but they have to be committed to their promises and they should not exploit Telangana younger brother in future."[18]
Following the
There have been several movements to invalidate the merger of Telangana and Andhra, major ones occurring in 1969, 1972 and 2000s onwards. The Telangana movement gained momentum over decades becoming a widespread political demand of creating a new state from the Telangana region of Andhra Pradesh.[19] In early 2014, the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 was approved by the Indian parliament, and Telangana became India's 29th state on 2 June 2014.
Punjabi Suba
The
The States Reorganisation Commission rejected the demand for a Punjabi-majority state saying that it lacked a majority support and that Punjabi was not grammatically very distinct from Hindi. The
states.Belagavi
After India became independent in 1947, the Belagavi district (
External links
Lok Sabha Discussion on States Reorganisation Commission
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/55931/1/lsd_01_11_09-12-1955.pdf Page 36
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/55796/1/lsd_01_11_14-12-1955.pdf page 38
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/55799/1/lsd_01_11_15-12-1955.pdf page 43
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/56096/1/lsd_01_11_16-12-1955.pdf page 50
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/55783/1/lsd_01_11_17-12-1955.pdf page 16
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/55801/1/lsd_01_11_19-12-1955.pdf page 42
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/55810/1/lsd_01_11_20-12-1955.pdf page 50
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/55811/1/lsd_01_11_21-12-1955.pdf page 74
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/55812/1/lsd_01_11_22-12-1955.pdf page 49
- https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/56101/1/lsd_01_11_23-12-1955.pdf page 247
See also
- States Reorganisation Act
References
- ^ ISBN 978-81-7930-721-2.
- ISBN 978-0-14-310409-4.
- ^ "The Constitution of India (1949)" (PDF). Lok Sabha Secretariat. pp. 1141–1143. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 30 November 2013.
- ^ ISBN 978-81-317-2133-9.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-56324-334-9.
- ^ a b c AG Noorani (10–23 April 2010). "Linguism trap". Frontline. 27 (8). The Hindu. Retrieved 3 January 2012.
- ISBN 978-81-7022-196-8.
- ^ Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar (1948). Maharashtra as a linguistic province: statement submitted to the Linguistic Provinces Commission. Thacker.
- ^ https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/760316/1/lsd_01_10_01-10-1955.pdf page 5
- ISBN 9027220824. Retrieved 5 June 2013.
- ^ "The Approach and Arrangements, States Reorganisation committee report, October 1955" (PDF). Retrieved 10 November 2013.
- ^ a b c d D. Peter; Ivy Peter. Liberation of the Oppressed: A Continuous Struggle. p. 127.
- ^ "No belief in Safeguards: Hyderabad PCC chief. - Page 4 of Nov 21, 1955 Indian Express". 21 November 1955. Retrieved 9 October 2011.
- ^ "Page 1 of the edition December 5, 1955" (PDF). Andhra Prabha. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 October 2013. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
- ^ "STATISTICAL REPORT ON GENERAL ELECTION, 1951 TO THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF HYDERABAD" (PDF). Election Commission. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
- ^ "SRC sub committee said no decision on Visalandhra taken". Indian Express. 1 February 1956. p. 1.
- ^ "New Telugu state to be called Hyderabad. Regional council for Telangana". Indian Express. 21 February 1956. p. 1.
- ^ "Parreksha Samayam(Testing time)" (PDF). Golconda Patrika - 8 March 1956 - Page 2. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- ^ "How Telangana movement has sparked political turf war in Andhra". Rediff.com. 5 October 2011. Retrieved 19 February 2012.
- ISBN 978-0-595-34394-2.