Stereopsis
Stereopsis is the component of depth perception retrieved by means of binocular disparity through binocular vision.[1] It is not the only contributor to depth perception, but it is a major one. Binocular vision occurs because each eye (left and right) receives a different image due to their slightly different positions in one's head. These positional differences are referred to as "horizontal disparities" or, more generally, "binocular disparities". Disparities are processed in the visual cortex of the brain to yield depth perception. While binocular disparities are naturally present when viewing a real three-dimensional scene with two eyes, they can also be simulated by artificially presenting two different images separately to each eye using a method called stereoscopy. The perception of depth in such cases is also referred to as "stereoscopic depth".[1]
The perception of depth and three-dimensional structure is, however, possible with information visible from one eye alone, such as differences in object size and
It has been suggested that the impression of "real" separation in depth is linked to the precision with which depth is derived, and that a conscious awareness of this precision – perceived as an impression of interactability and realness – may help guide the planning of motor action.[4]
Etymology
The term "stereopsis" comes from
(ópsis) 'appearance, sight'.Distinctions
Coarse and fine stereopsis
There are two distinct aspects to stereopsis: coarse stereopsis and fine stereopsis, and provide depth information of different degree of spatial and temporal precision.
- Coarse stereopsis (also called gross stereopsis) appears to be used to judge stereoscopic motion in the periphery. It provides the sense of being immersed in one's surroundings and is therefore sometimes also referred to as qualitative stereopsis.[5] Coarse stereopsis is important for orientation in space while moving, for example when descending a flight of stairs.
- Fine stereopsis is mainly based on static differences. It allows the individual to determine the depth of objects in the central visual area ( which is based on interaction effects from adjacent visual contours. Fine stereopsis is important for fine-motor tasks such as threading a needle.
The stereopsis which an individual can achieve is limited by the level of visual acuity of the poorer eye. In particular, patients who have comparatively lower visual acuity tend to need relatively larger spatial frequencies to be present in the input images, else they cannot achieve stereopsis.
Static and dynamic stimuli
It has also been suggested to distinguish between two different types of stereoscopic depth perception: static depth perception (or static stereo perception) and motion-in-depth perception (or stereo motion perception). Some individuals who have strabismus and show no depth perception using static stereotests (in particular, using Titmus tests, see this article's section on contour stereotests) do perceive motion in depth when tested using dynamic random dot stereograms.[10][11][12] One study found the combination of motion stereopsis and no static stereopsis to be present only in exotropes, not in esotropes.[13]
Research on perception mechanisms
There are strong indications that the stereoscopic mechanism consists of at least two perceptual mechanisms,[14] possibly three.[15] Coarse and fine stereopsis are processed by two different physiological subsystems, with a coarse stereopsis being derived from diplopic stimuli (that is, stimuli with disparities well beyond the range of binocular fusion) and yielding only a vague impression of depth magnitude.[14] Coarse stereopsis appears to be associated with the magno pathway which processes low spatial frequency disparities and motion, and fine stereopsis with the parvo pathway which processes high spatial frequency disparities.[16] The coarse stereoscopic system seems to be able to provide residual binocular depth information in some individuals who lack fine stereopsis.[17] Individuals have been found to integrate the various stimuli, for example stereoscopic cues and motion occlusion, in different ways.[18]
How the brain combines the different cues – including stereo, motion,
Prevalence and impact of stereopsis in humans
Not everyone has the same ability to see using stereopsis. One study shows that 97.3% are able to distinguish depth at horizontal disparities of 2.3
Stereopsis has a positive impact on exercising practical tasks such as needle-threading, ball-catching (especially in fast ball games
Binocular vision has further advantages aside from stereopsis, in particular the enhancement of vision quality through binocular summation; persons with strabismus (even those who have no double vision) have lower scores of binocular summation, and this appears to incite persons with strabismus to close one eye in visually demanding situations.[29][30]
It has long been recognized that full binocular vision, including stereopsis, is an important factor in the stabilization of post-surgical outcome of strabismus corrections. Many persons lacking stereopsis have (or have had) visible strabismus, which is known to have a potential socioeconomic impact on children and adults. In particular, both large-angle and small-angle strabismus can negatively affect self-esteem, as it interferes with normal eye contact, often causing embarrassment, anger, and feelings of awkwardness.[31] For further details on this, see psychosocial effects of strabismus.
It has been noted that with the growing introduction of 3D display technology in entertainment and in medical and scientific imaging, high quality binocular vision including stereopsis may become a key capability for success in modern society.[32]
Nonetheless, there are indications that the lack of stereo vision may lead persons to compensate by other means: in particular, stereo blindness may give people an advantage when depicting a scene using monocular depth cues of all kinds, and among artists there appear to be a disproportionately high number of persons lacking stereopsis.[33] In particular, a case has been made that Rembrandt may have been stereoblind.
History of investigations into stereopsis
Leonardo da Vinci had realized that objects at different distances from the eyes project images in the two eyes that differ in their horizontal positions, but had concluded only that this made it impossible for a painter to portray a realistic depiction of the depth in a scene from a single canvas.[34] Leonardo chose for his near object a column with a circular cross section and for his far object a flat wall. Had he chosen any other near object, he might have discovered horizontal disparity of its features.[35] His column was one of the few objects that projects identical images of itself in the two eyes.
Stereopsis was first explained by Charles Wheatstone in 1838: "… the mind perceives an object of three dimensions by means of the two dissimilar pictures projected by it on the two retinæ …".[36] He recognized that because each eye views the visual world from slightly different horizontal positions, each eye's image differs from the other. Objects at different distances from the eyes project images in the two eyes that differ in their horizontal positions, giving the depth cue of horizontal disparity, also known as retinal disparity or binocular disparity. Wheatstone showed that this was an effective depth cue by creating the illusion of depth from flat pictures that differed only in horizontal disparity. To display his pictures separately to the two eyes, Wheatstone invented the stereoscope.
Stereoscopy became popular during
Until about the 1960s, research into stereopsis was dedicated to exploring its limits and its relationship to singleness of vision. Researchers included Peter Ludvig Panum, Ewald Hering, Adelbert Ames Jr., and Kenneth N. Ogle.
In the 1960s,
Also in the 1960s,
In the 1970s, Christopher Tyler invented autostereograms, random-dot stereograms that can be viewed without a stereoscope.[41] This led to the popular Magic Eye pictures.
In 1989 Antonio Medina Puerta demonstrated with photographs that retinal images with no parallax disparity but with different shadows are fused stereoscopically, imparting depth perception to the imaged scene. He named the phenomenon "shadow stereopsis". Shadows are therefore an important, stereoscopic cue for depth perception. He showed how effective the phenomenon is by taking two photographs of the Moon at different times, and therefore with different shadows, making the Moon to appear in 3D stereoscopically, despite the absence of any other stereoscopic cue.[42]
Human stereopsis in popular culture
A
Geometrical basis
Stereopsis appears to be processed in the visual cortex of mammals in binocular cells having receptive fields in different horizontal positions in the two eyes. Such a cell is active only when its preferred stimulus is in the correct position in the left eye and in the correct position in the right eye, making it a disparity detector.
When a person stares at an object, the two eyes converge so that the object appears at the center of the retina in both eyes. Other objects around the main object appear shifted in relation to the main object. In the following example, whereas the main object (dolphin) remains in the center of the two images in the two eyes, the cube is shifted to the right in the left eye's image and is shifted to the left when in the right eye's image.
Because each eye is in a different horizontal position, each has a slightly different perspective on a scene yielding different retinal images. Normally two images are not observed, but rather a single view of the scene, a phenomenon known as singleness of vision. Nevertheless, stereopsis is possible with double vision. This form of stereopsis was called qualitative stereopsis by Kenneth Ogle.[43]
If the images are very different (such as by going cross-eyed, or by presenting different images in a stereoscope) then one image at a time may be seen, a phenomenon known as binocular rivalry.
There is a
Interaction of stereopsis with other depth cues
Under normal circumstances, the depth specified by stereopsis agrees with other depth cues, such as motion parallax (when an observer moves while looking at one point in a scene, the fixation point, points nearer and farther than the fixation point appear to move against or with the movement, respectively, at velocities proportional to the distance from the fixation point), and pictorial cues such as superimposition (nearer objects cover up farther objects) and familiar size (nearer objects appear bigger than farther objects). However, by using a stereoscope, researchers have been able to oppose various depth cues including stereopsis. The most drastic version of this is pseudoscopy, in which the half-images of stereograms are swapped between the eyes, reversing the binocular disparity. Wheatstone (1838) found that observers could still appreciate the overall depth of a scene, consistent with the pictorial cues. The stereoscopic information went along with the overall depth.[36]
Computer stereo vision
Computer stereo vision is a part of the field of computer vision. It is sometimes used in mobile robotics to detect obstacles. Example applications include the ExoMars Rover and surgical robotics.[48]
Two cameras take pictures of the same scene, but they are separated by a distance – exactly like our eyes. A computer compares the images while shifting the two images together over top of each other to find the parts that match. The shifted amount is called the disparity. The disparity at which objects in the image best match is used by the computer to calculate their distance.
For a human, the eyes change their angle according to the distance to the observed object. To a computer this represents significant extra complexity in the geometrical calculations (
Computer stereo vision with many cameras under fixed lighting is called
Computer stereo display
Many[
Discounting
Tests
In stereopsis tests (short: stereotests), slightly different images are shown to each eye, such that a 3D image is perceived in case stereovision is present. This can be achieved by means of
There are two types of common clinical tests for stereopsis and stereoacuity: random dot stereotests and contour stereotests. Random-dot stereopsis tests use pictures of stereo figures that are embedded in a background of random dots. Contour stereotests use pictures in which the targets presented to each eye are separated horizontally.[49]
Random dot stereotests
The ability of stereopsis can be tested by, for example, the Lang-Stereotest, which consists of a
Contour stereotests
Examples of contour stereotests are the Titmus stereotests, the most well-known example being the Titmus fly stereotest, where a picture of a fly is displayed with disparities on the edges. The patient uses a 3-D glasses to look at the picture and determine whether a 3-D figure can be seen. The amount of disparity in images vary, such as 400-100 sec of arc, and 800-40 sec arc.[51]
Deficiency and treatment
Deficiency in stereopsis can be complete (then called
In animals
There is good evidence for stereopsis throughout the animal kingdom. It occurs in many mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibia, fish, crustaceans, spiders, and insects.[1] Stomatopods even have stereopsis with just one eye.[55]
See also
References
- ^ a b c Howard IP, Rogers BJ (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
- ^ Howard IP, Rogers BJ (2012). Perceiving in Depth. Volume 3. New York: Oxford University Press."
- ISBN 978-0-7867-4474-9."
- PMID 24730596.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-107-02262-1.
- ^ Craven A, Tran T, Gustafson K, Wu T, So K, Levi D, Li R (2013). "Interocular acuity differences alter the spatial frequency tuning of stereopsis". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54 (15): 1518.
- doi:10.1167/12.9.219.
- PMID 23986537.
- .
- PMID 9587841.
- PMID 17596334.
- PMID 22560956.
- S2CID 23428336.
- ^ S2CID 11575053.
- S2CID 23713665.
- ISBN 978-1-4051-9250-7.
- ^ See the interpretation of statements by Bela Julesz provided in: Leonard J. Press: The Dual Nature of Stereopsis – Part 6 (downloaded 8 September 2014)
- PMID 21725706.
- PMID 16412492.
- PMID 19055888.
- PMID 22327475.
- S2CID 1397246.
- S2CID 32340895.
- S2CID 6615928.
- PMID 24359807.
- PMID 23764432.
- S2CID 6288004.
- PMID 17389475.
- PMID 24052160.
- ^ Damian McNamara (2013-09-23). "Strabismus study reveals visual function deficits". Medscape Medical News.
- ^ Strabismus, by All About Vision, Access Media Group LLC
- S2CID 29211166.
- ^ Sandra Blakeslee: A Defect That May Lead to a Masterpiece, New York Times, New York edition, page D6, 14 June 2011 (online June 13, 2001; downloaded 22 July 2013)
- ISBN 978-0-7148-2056-9.
- S2CID 24998020.
- ^ a b Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. – Part the First. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, Phenomena of Binocular Vision. By CHARLES WHEATSTONE, F.R.S., Professor of Experimental Philosophy in King's College, London.
- .
- PMID 6065881.
- S2CID 4265895.
- S2CID 43335583.
- S2CID 263894428.
- PMID 2926527.
- ^ Ogle KN (1950). Researchers in binocular vision. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.[page needed]
- S2CID 17092588.
- PMID 6038008.
- S2CID 7601967.
- PMID 6877990.
- S2CID 4695794.
- ^ Stereoacuity testing, ONE Network, American Academy of Phthalmology (downloaded 2 September 2014)
- ^ a b c d Lang stereotest in Farlex medical dictionary. In turn citing: Millodot: Dictionary of Optometry and Visual Science, 7th edition.
- PMID 21413376. Retrieved 9 April 2012.
- ^ "vision therapy". The Canadian Association of Optometrists. Archived from the original on 2013-04-10. Retrieved 2013-03-17.
- PMID 22581119.
- PMID 24508791.
- ^ Fox, Helen (2001). "The better to see you with..." University of California Museum of Paleontology. Retrieved 2 March 2021.
Bibliography
- Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Steinman, Scott B. & Steinman, Barbara A. & Garzia, Ralph Philip (2000). Foundations of Binocular Vision: A Clinical perspective. McGraw-Hill Medical. ISBN 0-8385-2670-5.
- ISBN 978-0-19-976415-0
- Cabani, I. (2007). Segmentation et mise en correspondance couleur – Application: étude et conception d'un système de stéréovision couleur pour l'aide à la conduite automobile. ISBN 978-613-1-52103-4