Summum bonum
Summum bonum is a Latin expression meaning the highest or ultimate good, which was introduced by the
The term was used in
Plato and Aristotle
Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics accepted that the target of human activity, "Must be the 'Good', that is, the supreme good.", but challenged Plato's Idea of the Good with the pragmatic question: "Will one who has had a vision of the Idea itself become thereby a better doctor or general?".[7] However, arguably at least, Aristotle's concept of the unmoved mover owed much to Plato's Idea of the Good.[8]
Hellenic syncretism
Philo of Alexandria conflated the Old Testament God with the unmoved mover and the Idea of the Good.[9] Plotinus, the neoplatonic philosopher, built on Plato's Good for his concept of the supreme One, while Plutarch drew on Zoroastrianism to develop his eternal principle of good.[10]
Augustine of Hippo in his early writings offered the summum bonum as the highest human goal, but was later to identify it as a feature of the Christian God[11] in De natura boni (On the Nature of Good, c. 399). Augustine denies the positive existence of absolute evil, describing a world with God as the supreme good at the center, and defining different grades of evil as different stages of remoteness from that center.[citation needed]
Later developments
The summum bonum has continued to be a focus of attention in Western philosophy, secular and religious.
G. E. Moore placed the highest good in personal relations and the contemplation of beauty – even if not all his followers in the Bloomsbury Group may have appreciated what Clive Bell called his "all-important distinction between 'Good on the whole' and 'Good as a whole'".[13]
The doctrine of the highest good maintained by Immanuel Kant can be seen as the fulfillment of all rational will. [14] It is the supreme end of the will, meaning that beyond the attainment of a good will, which is moral excellence signified by abiding by the categorical imperative and pure practical reason, this is not reducible to hypothetical imperatives such as happiness.[3] Furthermore, in virtue of the doctrine of the highest good, Kant postulates the existence of God and the eternal existence of rational agents, in order to reconcile three premises: (i) that agents are morally obligated to fully attain the highest good; (ii) that the object of an agent's obligation must be possible; (iii) that an agent's full realization of the highest good is not possible.[15]
Judgments
Judgments on the highest good have generally fallen into four categories:[2]
- Utilitarianism, when the highest good is identified with the maximum possible psychological happiness for the maximum number of people;
- flourishing;
- Rational deontologism, when the highest good is identified with virtueor duty;
- Rational eudaemonism, or tempered deontologism, when both virtue and happiness are combined in the highest good.
See also
Notes
- ^ De finibus, Book II, 37ff
- ^ a b c Dinneen 1909.
- ^ ISBN 978-3-11-036900-7.
- ^ B. Jowett trans, The Essential Plato (1999) p. 269
- ^ 517b–c (Stephanus)
- ^ Alexandre Kojève, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel (1980), p. 108
- ^ H, Tredennick revd, The Ethics of Aristotle (1976) p. 63 and p. 72
- ^ Tredennick, p. 352
- ^ J. Boardman ed., The Oxford History of the Classical World (1991) p. 703
- ^ Boardman, p. 705-7
- ^ J. McWilliam, Augustine (1992) p. 152-4
- ^ Kojève, p. 181-4
- ^ Quoted in H. Lee, Virginia Woolf (1996) p. 253
- ISBN 978-3-11-036900-7.
- JSTOR 2182492.
- Attribution
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Dinneen, M.F. (1909). "The Highest Good". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 6. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
External links
- Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 26 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 81.