Supershear earthquake

Part of a series on
Earthquakes
Types Mainshock Foreshock Aftershock Blind thrust Doublet Interplate Intraplate Megathrust Remotely triggered Slow Submarine Supershear Tsunami Earthquake swarm
Causes Fault movement Volcanism Induced seismicity
Characteristics Epicenter Epicentral distance Hypocenter Shadow zone Seismic waves P wave S wave
Measurement Seismometer Seismic magnitude scales Seismic intensity scales
Prediction Coordinating Committee for Earthquake Prediction Forecasting
Other topics Shear wave splitting Adams–Williamson equation Flinn–Engdahl regions Earthquake engineering Seismite Seismology
Earth Sciences Portal Category Related topics
v t e

In

Evidence of rupture propagation at velocities greater than S-wave velocities expected for the surrounding crust have been observed for several large earthquakes associated with strike-slip faults. During strike-slip, the main component of rupture propagation will be horizontal, in the direction of displacement, as a Mode II (in-plane) shear crack. This contrasts with a dip-slip rupture where the main direction of rupture propagation will be perpendicular to the displacement, like a Mode III (anti-plane) shear crack. Theoretical studies have shown that Mode III cracks are limited to the shear wave velocity but that Mode II cracks can propagate between the S and P-wave velocities^[9] and this may explain why supershear earthquakes have not been observed on dip-slip faults.

Initiation of supershear rupture

The rupture velocity range between those of Rayleigh waves and shear waves remains forbidden for a Mode II crack (a good approximation to a strike-slip rupture). This means that a rupture cannot accelerate from Rayleigh speed to shear wave speed. In the "Burridge–Andrews" mechanism, supershear rupture is initiated on a 'daughter' rupture in the zone of high shear stress developed at the propagating tip of the initial rupture. Because of this high stress zone, this daughter rupture is able start propagating at supershear speed before combining with the existing rupture.^[10] Experimental shear crack rupture, using plates of a photoelastic material, has produced a transition from sub-Rayleigh to supershear rupture by a mechanism that "qualitatively conforms to the well-known Burridge-Andrews mechanism".^[11]

Geological effects

The high rates of strain expected near faults that are affected by supershear propagation are thought to generate what is described as pulverized rocks. The pulverization involves the development of many small microcracks at a scale smaller than the grain size of the rock, while preserving the earlier

• North Anatolian Fault Zone^[13]
• 1999 Düzce earthquake, magnitude M_w 7.2 associated with strike-slip movement on the North Anatolian Fault Zone^[13]
• Kunlun fault^[14][15]
• 2002 Denali earthquake, magnitude M_w 7.9 associated with strike-slip movement on the Denali Fault^[15][16]
• 2008 Sichuan earthquake, magnitude M_w 7.9 associated with strike-slip movement on the Longmenshan Fault^[17]
• 2010 Yushu earthquake, magnitude M_w 6.9 associated with strike-slip movement on the Yushu Fault^[18]
• 2012 Indian Ocean earthquakes, magnitude M_w 8.6 associated with strike-slip on several fault segments - the first supershear event recognised in oceanic lithosphere.^[19]
• 2013 Craig, Alaska earthquake, magnitude M_w 7.6 associated with strike-slip on the Queen Charlotte Fault - the first supershear event recognised on an oceanic plate boundary.^[20]
• 2013 Balochistan earthquake M_w 7.7 associated with strike-slip movement on a curved fault with supershear rupture speed.^[21]
• 2014 Aegean Sea earthquake, magnitude M_w 6.9, supershear was recognised during the second sub-event.^[22]
• 2015 Tajikistan earthquake, magnitude M_w 7.2, supershear slip on two segments, with normal slip at the restraining bend linking them.^[23]
• 2016 Romanche fracture zone earthquake, magnitude 7.1, westwards-directed supershear rupture following an initial easterly-travelling phase on the Romanche ocean transform fault in the equatorial Atlantic^[24]
• 2017 Komandorsky Islands earthquake, magnitude M_w 7.7, supershear transition followed a rupture jump across a fault stepover.^[25]
• 2018 Swan Islands earthquake, M_w  7.5 earthquake consisted of three sub-events with a compact rupture area and large cosesimic slip.^[26]
• 2018 Sulawesi earthquake, magnitude M_w 7.5, associated with strike-slip movement on the Palu-Koro Fault^[27]
• 2020 Caribbean Sea earthquake, magnitude M_w 7.7, unilateral rupture propagation westward from the epicenter along a 300 km section of the Oriente transform fault with two episodes of supershear rupture^[28]
• 2021 Maduo earthquake, M_w  7.4 earthquake in the Tibetan Plateau. This earthquake ruptured bilaterally for a length of 170 km within the Bayan Har block.^[29]
• 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquakes, M_w  7.8 and 7.6 earthquakes in Turkey. Supershear rupture initiated along both mainshocks,^[30] with the latter attaining a maximum velocity of 4.8 km (3.0 mi) per second.^[31]

• 1906 San Francisco earthquake, magnitude M_w  7.8 associated with strike-slip movement on the San Andreas Fault^[32]
• Imperial Fault^[4]
• 1990 Sakhalin earthquake, M_w  7.2 earthquake at over 600 km depth inferred to have ruptured at supershear speeds.^[33][34]
• 2013 Okhotsk Sea earthquake magnitude M_w  6.7 aftershock was an extremely deep (640 kilometers (400 miles)) supershear as well as unusually fast at "eight kilometers per second (five miles per second), nearly 50 percent faster than the shear wave velocity at that depth."^[35]

See also

• Slow earthquake

References