Tabor Light

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Russian Orthodox icon of the Transfiguration (Theophanes the Greek, ca. 1408).

In

Paul at his conversion
.

As a theological doctrine, the uncreated nature of the Light of Tabor was formulated in the 14th century by

Barlaam of Calabria. When considered as a theological doctrine, this view is known as Palamism after Palamas.[1][2]

The view was very controversial when it was first proposed, sparking the

Roman Catholic Church
. Roman Catholic theologians have rejected it in the past,[
year needed] but the Catholic view has tended to be more favourable since the later 20th century.[3] Several Western scholars have presented Palamism as compatible with Catholic doctrine.[4] In particular, Pope John Paul II in 1996 spoke favourably of hesychast spirituality,[5][6] and in 2002 he named the Transfiguration as the fourth Luminous Mystery of the Holy Rosary.[7]

In Eastern Orthodoxy

According to the Hesychast mystic tradition of Eastern Orthodox spirituality, a completely purified saint who has attained

the divine energies) and an invisible (the divine ousia
or essence). Seco and Maspero assert that the Palamite doctrine of the uncreated light is rooted in Palamas' reading of Gregory of Nyssa.[8]

Instances of the Uncreated Light are read into the Old Testament by Orthodox Christians, e.g. the

Burning Bush.[9]

Identification with the fires of hell

Many Orthodox theologians have identified the Tabor light with the fire of

Theophanes of Nicea believed that, for sinners, "the divine light will be perceived as the punishing fire of hell".[13]

According to Iōannēs Polemēs, Palamas himself did not identify hell-fire with the Tabor light: "Unlike Theophanes, Palamas did not believe that sinners could have an experience of the divine light [...] Nowhere in his works does Palamas seem to adopt Theophanes' view that the light of Tabor is identical with the fire of hell."[14]

Roman Catholicism

The upper part of The Transfiguration (1520) by Raphael, depicting Christ miraculously discoursing with Moses and Elijah.

Palamism, Gregory Palamas' theology of divine "operations", was never accepted by the Scholastic theologians of the Latin Catholic Church, who maintained a strong view of the simplicity of God, conceived as Actus purus. This doctrinal division reinforced the east–west split of the Great Schism throughout the 15th to 19th centuries, with only Pope John Paul II opening a possibility for reconciliation by expressing his personal respect for the doctrine.

Catholicism traditionally sees the glory manifested at Tabor as symbolic of the eschatological glory of heaven; in a 15th-century Latin hymn Coelestis formam gloriae:

O wondrous type, O vision fair
of glory that the Church shall share
Which Christ upon the mountain shows
where brighter than the sun He glows
With shining face and bright array
Christ deigns to manifest today
What glory shall be theirs above
who joy in God with perfect love.[15]

John of Ruysbroeck, a 14th-century Flemish mystic beatified by Pope Pius X in 1908, wrote of "the uncreated Light, which is not God, but is the intermediary between Him and the 'seeing thought'" as illuminating the contemplative not in the highest mode of contemplation, but in the second of the four ascending modes.[17]

John Paul II
from the 1980s sought for common ground in questions of doctrinal division between the Eastern and the Western Church. John Paul II repeatedly emphasized his respect for Eastern theology as an enrichment for the whole church, and spoke favourably of Hesychasm.
[5][6] In 2002, he also named the Transfiguration as the fourth Luminous Mystery of the Holy Rosary.[7] The Eastern doctrine of "uncreated light" has not been officially accepted in the Catholic Church, which likewise has not officially condemned it. Increasing parts of the Western Church consider Gregory Palamas a saint, even if uncanonized.[18] "Several Western scholars contend that the teaching of St. Gregory Palamas himself is compatible with Roman Catholic thought on the matter."[19] At the same time, anti-ecumenical currents within Eastern Orthodoxy presented the Tabor Light doctrine as a major dogmatic division between the Eastern and the Western Church, with the Hesychast movement even described as "a direct condemnation of Papism".[20]

In popular culture

"Tabor Light" was also used in the popular press of 1938 in reference to a mysterious light seen around a cemetery named "Tabor" near Esterhazy, Saskatchewan, Canada.[21]

See also

References

  1. ^ John Meyendorff, "Mount Athos in the Fourteenth Century: Spiritual and Intellectual Legacy" in Dumbarton Oaks Papers 1988
  2. ), p. x
  3. ), pp. 215-216.
  4. ), p. 243
  5. ^ a b "Pope John Paul II 11 August 1996 Angelus". www.ewtn.com. Retrieved 2018-01-09.
  6. ^ a b Original text (in Italian) Speaking of the hesychast controversy, Pope John Paul II said the term "hesychasm" refers to a practice of prayer marked by deep tranquillity of the spirit intent on contemplating God unceasingly by invoking the name of Jesus. While from a Catholic viewpoint there have been tensions concerning some developments of the practice, the Pope said, there is no denying the goodness of the intention that inspired its defence, which was to stress that man is offered the concrete possibility of uniting himself in his inner heart with God in that profound union of grace known as Theosis, divinization.
  7. ^ a b The "Luminous Mysteries", published in Rosarium Virginis Mariae, October 2002.
  8. .
  9. ^ "Jewish and Christian Orthodox Dialogue".
  10. ^ Chopelas, Peter (2016), "Uncreated Energies", Heaven and Hell in the Afterlife According to the Bible
  11. ^ Mmetallinos, George (March 2009). "Paradise and hell in the Orthodox tradition". Orthodox Heritage. 7 (3).
  12. ^ Vlachos, Hierotheos, Life after Death, pp. 254–261
  13. ^ Polemēs, Iōannēs (1996). Theophanes of Nicaea: His Life and Works. Vol. 20. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. p. 99.
  14. ^ Polemēs, Iōannēs (1996). Theophanes of Nicaea: His Life and Works. Vol. 20. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. p. 100.
  15. John M. Neale
    , 1851
  16. ^ Gregory the Great, Moralia, book 18, 89
  17. ^ van Ruysbroeck, Jan (1913). The Book of the Twelve Béguines. Translated by Francis, John. London: John M. Watkins. p. 40.
  18. .
  19. ), p. 243
  20. ^ "St. Gregory Palamas and the Pope of Rome", Orthodox Tradition Volume XIII, Number 2, Center for Traditionalist Orthodox Studies (1996). "Those who are enlightened by God know Him truly, as did some of the Orthodox Popes of Rome before that Church's fall, but this knowledge is solely the product of union with Christ, both in the case of the pauper and the Pope, as St. Gregory so eloquently argues in his essay Περὶ Θείας καὶ Θεοποιοῦ Μεθέξεως [On Divine and Deifying Participation] (Chrestou, op. cit., Vol. 3, pp. 212-261). The very structure of Palamite theology disallows any attribution of universal jurisdiction or authority, except in the traditional sense of 'honor' and 'eminence,' to anyone in the Church. St. Gregory resolutely and unequivocally identifies true teaching and all authority with spiritual enlightenment, which, in turn, is the product of a true and genuine encounter with God shared by all enlightened individuals in common and equally. Hesychasm is a direct condemnation of Papism." (pp. 26f., emphasis in original)
  21. .

Further reading

External links