Tabula rasa
Tabula rasa (
Etymology
Tabula rasa is a
Philosophy
Ancient Greek philosophy
In Western philosophy, the concept of tabula rasa can be traced back to the writings of Aristotle who writes in his treatise De Anima (Περί Ψυχῆς, 'On the Soul') of the "unscribed tablet." In one of the more well-known passages of this treatise, he writes that:[2]
Haven't we already disposed of the difficulty about interaction involving a common element, when we said that mind is in a sense potentially whatever is thinkable, though actually it is nothing until it has thought? What it thinks must be in it just as characters may be said to be on a writing tablet on which as yet nothing stands written: this is exactly what happens with mind.
This idea was further evolved in
Perception, again, is an impression produced on the mind, its name being appropriately borrowed from impressions on wax made by a seal; and perception they divide into, comprehensible and incomprehensible: Comprehensible, which they call the criterion of facts, and which is produced by a real object, and is, therefore, at the same time conformable to that object; Incomprehensible, which has no relation to any real object, or else, if it has any such relation, does not correspond to it, being but a vague and indistinct representation.
Ibn Sina (11th century)
In the 11th century, the theory of tabula rasa was developed more clearly by
Ibn Tufail (12th century)
In the 12th century, the
The
Aquinas (13th century)
In the 13th century,
Descartes (17th century)
Descartes, in his work The Search for Truth by Natural Light, summarizes an empiricist view in which he uses the words table rase,[9] in French; in the following English translation, this was rendered tabula rasa:
All that seems to me to explain itself very clearly if we compare the imagination of children to a tabula rasa on which our ideas, which resemble portraits of each object taken from nature, should depict themselves. The senses, the inclinations, our masters and our intelligence, are the various painters who have the power of executing this work; and amongst them, those who are least adapted to succeed in it, i.e. the imperfect senses, blind instinct, and foolish nurses, are the first to mingle themselves with it. There finally comes the best of all, intelligence, and yet it is still requisite for it to have an apprenticeship of several years, and to follow the example of its masters for long, before daring to rectify a single one of their errors. In my opinion this is one of the principal causes of the difficulty we experience in attaining to true knowledge. For our senses really perceive that alone which is most coarse and common; our natural instinct is entirely corrupted; and as to our masters, although there may no doubt be very perfect ones found amongst them, they yet cannot force our minds to accept their reasoning before our understanding has examined it, for the accomplishment of this end pertains to it alone. But it is like a clever painter who might have been called upon to put the last touches on a bad picture sketched out by prentice hands, and who would probably have to employ all the rules of his art in correcting little by little first a trait here, then a trait there, and finally be required to add to it from his own hand all that was lacking, and who yet could not prevent great faults from remaining in it, because from the beginning the picture would have been badly conceived, the figures badly placed, and the proportions badly observed.[10]
Locke (17th century)
The modern idea of the theory is attributed mostly to
As understood by Locke, tabula rasa meant that the mind of the individual was born blank, and it also emphasized the freedom of individuals to author their own
Freud (19th century)
Tabula rasa also features in Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis. Freud depicted personality traits as being formed by family dynamics (see Oedipus complex). Freud's theories imply that humans lack free will, but also that genetic influences on human personality are minimal. In Freudian psychoanalysis, one is largely determined by one's upbringing.[citation needed]
Science
Psychology and neurobiology
Psychologists and neurobiologists have shown evidence that initially, the entire cerebral cortex is programmed and organized to process sensory input, control motor actions, regulate emotion, and respond reflexively (under predetermined conditions).[11] These programmed mechanisms in the brain subsequently act to learn and refine the ability of the organism.[12][13] Psychological research has shown that — in contrast to written language — the brain is "hard-wired" at birth to acquire spoken language, something argued by both psychologist Steven Pinker[14] and by the universal grammar theory of Noam Chomsky.[15]
There have been claims by a minority in psychology and neurobiology, however, that the brain is tabula rasa only for certain behaviours. For instance, with respect to one's ability to acquire both general and special types of knowledge or skills,
Important evidence against the tabula rasa model of the mind comes from
Social pre-wiring hypothesis
Principal evidence for this theory is uncovered by examining twin pregnancies. The main argument is, if there are
The social pre-wiring hypothesis was proven correct:
Computer science
In artificial intelligence, tabula rasa refers to the development of autonomous agents with a mechanism to reason and plan toward their goal, but no "built-in" knowledge-base of their environment. Thus, they truly are a blank slate.
In reality, autonomous agents possess an initial data-set or knowledge-base, but this cannot be immutable or it would hamper autonomy and heuristic ability. Even if the data-set is empty, it usually may be argued that there is a built-in bias in the reasoning and planning mechanisms. Either intentionally or unintentionally placed there by the human designer, it thus negates the true spirit of tabula rasa.[19]
A synthetic (programming) language
See also
- Innatism
- Pu (Daoism)
- Veil of ignorance
References
- ^ Smith, Sir William (1898). Cornish, F. Warre (ed.). A Concise Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. London: Spottiswoode and Co. pp. 608–9.
- ^ Aristotle, De Anima, 429b29–430a1
- ^ Bardzell, Jeffrey (11 June 2014). Speculative Grammar and Stoic Language Theory in Medieval Allegorical Narrative: From Prudentius to Alan of Lille. Routledge. pp. 18–9.
- . p. 238.
- Diogenes Laërtius, vii. 43-46
- ^ Rizvi, Sajjad H. 2006. "Avicenna/Ibn Sina (CA. 980–1037)." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- ISBN 90-04-09459-8.
- ISBN 978-0-578-52217-3. pp. 201-7.
- ^ "Recherche de la vérité par les lumières naturelles - Wikisource". fr.m.wikisource.org (in French). Retrieved 11 May 2022.
- OCLC 37600400.
- PMID 3291116.
- PMID 15630093.
- PMID 16924105.
- ^ a b Pinker, Steven. The Blank Slate. New York: Penguin. 2002.
- ^ "Tool Module: Chomsky's Universal Grammar". thebrain.mcgill.ca. Retrieved 28 August 2017.
- J. W. Davidson and J. A. Sloboda. (1998). Innate talents: reality or myth? Behav. Brain. Sci., 21, 399–407; discussion 407–42.
- PMID 9080940.
- ^ PMID 20949058.
- Hacker koan: Uncarved block
- arXiv:1712.01815 cs.AI.
Primary sources
- Aquinas, Thomas. [1485] 1952. Summa Theologica, translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province, edited by D. J. Sullivan, (Great Books of the Western World 19–20). Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
- William Heinemann.
- Avicenna. [1027] 1954. The Book of Healing [Kitāb al-Shifāʾ], translated by F. Rahman. London.
- Locke, John. [1689] 1996. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding II.i, edited by K. P. Winkler. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. pp. 33–36, lines 1–9. (See also editor's introduction, p. xix.)
- Tufail, Ibn. [11th century] 1708. The Improvement of Human Reason: Exhibited in the Life of Hai Ebn Yokdhan, translated by S. Ockley. London: Powell. pp. 1–195, Edm.
Secondary sources
- Baird, Forrest E., and ISBN 978-0-13-158591-1.
External links
- The dictionary definition of tabula rasa at Wiktionary
- Works related to Book II, Chapter I of Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding at Wikisource