Talk:$1,000 genome

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the $1,000 genome article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Claim that Veritas Genomics has achieved $1,000 genome

This claim needs to be substantiated. I am happy with the statement that Veritas Genomics *claim* to have achieved the $1,000 genome, or announced this. However, many companies have claimed to have reached the $1,000 genome (Whole_genome_sequencing#Commercialization). To prove the claim, it needs to be clear what exact criteria constitute achieving the $1,000 genome (whether it be the cancelled X Prize's definition or otherwise), and then shown via objective independent verification that Veritas Genomics have met those criteria. Jmc200 (talk) 13:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Type of sequencing

Can someone clarify is this is full genome sequencing or exome sequencing? Natureium (talk) 17:58, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on $1,000 genome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]